These people lol...
I told honey on or around July 4th 2025:
"Wait till you see the crazy shit
they will start making up
when this thing doesn't outgas like it should."
Now?
Now they are already making up stuff
about other of its characteristics.
They are trying to fit a square peg into a round hole
and its just going to keep getting more and more obvious
as this thing just doesn't match up
with how the practitioners of the extremist cult
of scientism thinks it should.
Well tough.
The basic tenant of this cult:
"Anything but God."
is currently just being torn to shreds.
Look at your world and the shape its in
and you will know why it is so.
There is a God.
he is proving it to you.
First some background:
Avi Loeb on CNN This Morning
Thursday 08/07/25
per Raw Story
"The brightness of the object implies a diameter of 20 km, and there is not enough rocky material, and there is not enough rocky material in interstellar space to deliver such a giant object per decade," Loeb said.
(It should not exist)
"It takes 10,000 years
for that much mass
to arrive to the inner part of the solar system."
(To my friend who believes
in 10,000 year cycles?
Chill, the trajectory says
it aint ever comin back,
this aint a cycle.)
"Moreover, the trajectory of this object
is very fine tuned."
(INTERESTING CHOICE OF WORDS
See: Fine tuning of the universe)
"It lies in the plane of the orbits of the planets around the sun to within five degrees."
(See previous post about 5 degree tilt of polar axis:
Thursday, August 7, 2025
"The chance for that to happen is one in 500, and moreover, it passes very close to Jupiter, Mars and Venus with a chance of one per 20,000 if you just change the arrival time randomly, and it will arrive closest to the sun when the earth would be on the opposite side. We won't be able to observe it, but that's the perfect time for it to maneuver, and so we just need to watch it."
(Extrapolate all of that out together
and what you get is:
IT CAN NOT BE AN ACCIDENT
OR RANDOM CHANCE EVENT.
It had to have been designed.
And it was, by the designer of our universe
and the life in it.)
"Loeb has posited that the object is slightly more likely than not to have been engineered instead of being a naturally occurring object, but he stopped short of saying it was built by alien life forms.
"I'm not saying it's an alien technology," Loeb said. "I'm just saying it doesn't look like a very common thing, and actually,
the glow that is around this object,
usually for comets,
you see a trailing tail behind the object
and here the glow from the Hubble Space Telescope image
is actually in front of the object.
We've never seen such a thing.
A comet doesn't have glow in front of it."
And that was Avi loeb
the chair of Harvard university's
astronomy department.
Now compare:
A mysterious glow from interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS
Universe space tech 08/07/25
"The results of two new studies shed light on its remarkable properties, which challenge conventional wisdom about comet behavior."
(Cause its not one, duh.)
"The spectrum obtained by the 4.1-meter SOAR telescope on July 3, 2025, when the comet was far from the Sun, revealed a red tint in the reflected light. However, no signs of radiation from typical cometary gases (CN, C3, C2, CO+) or atomic oxygen were detected. This creates a paradox: the comet became active early, but without the usual sublimation of ice. Scientists suggest..."
(WHO? WHERE? WHEN?)
"that dust release may occur through a different, unusual mechanism characteristic of ancient interstellar “travelers.”"
(Well we have only had two others interstellar visitors so which ones are they basing that on and who are they that are doing so?
And with only three specimens in the sample pool how did they determine it was a "different, unusual mechanism characteristic of ancient interstellar “travelers.
??????????)
"A second study conducted by David Jewitt’s team based on images from the Hubble Space Telescope between July 4 and 5 made it possible to estimate the size of the comet’s nucleus. It turned out to be very compact – only 0.32 to 5.6 kilometers in diameter. This is consistent with preliminary predictions based on the limited availability of durable material in the interstellar medium.
(Then why was it so bright
when it was first observed if it was so small?
They got more problems
than you can shake a stick at with this thing.)
"However, this tiny nucleus is surrounded by an impressively large cloud of dust, which makes up the bulk of the visible object."
"The most unexpected discovery made by Hubble was the structure of the coma of 3I/ATLAS. Instead of the classic tail extending from the Sun, the telescope detected a diffuse glow ahead of the comet’s movement toward our star. This contradicts the usual picture for comets.'
(Again, because it simply isn't one. This is the trying to put a square peg in the round hole part and it just aint working, and will get progressively worse as (more like if) we get more data)
"An explanation for this phenomenon was proposed back in early August:"
(Its the seventh yo.
How far back you talkin exactly?)
"the comet’s nucleus rotates very slowly.
(Every 8 hours?)
"The sun heats only one side of it. The dust evaporation occurs precisely there. If the nucleus does not rotate fast enough, this hot daytime side does not have time to cool down significantly. Consequently, dust continues to be actively released from the “illuminated” part, creating a glowing effect in front. This hypothesis has been confirmed."
(Where, when, by whom and
where is the link to the scientific paper?)
"Remaining mystery
The latest ground-based observations complete the picture: the rotation period of 3I/ATLAS is 16.16 hours (±0.01 hours). This means that “night” and “day” on its surface last about 8 hours each. During these 8 hours, dust particles released from the day side are carried away from the nucleus to a distance of up to 10,000 km. In Hubble images, this corresponds to 0.35 arcseconds — the scale at which the elongated forward glow is observed."
"The key point is that the surface of the nucleus has to cool down quickly after it goes into shadow, meaning in less than 8 hours.
(Apparently this guy never worked around any kind of large object of heated up metal, to ASSUME this thing is gonna cool down within 8 hours?
Only to turn around again
and be reheated over and over?
For four billion years?
its just an absurd proposition
and sounds like an AI hallucination
than anything.)
"Otherwise, the release of dust would become more uniform and would not produce a clear frontal effect."
"The main mystery that remains is the combination of intense dust release, visible by its glow, with the complete absence of any traces of gases that usually “carry” this dust in comets."
(How many time ya gotta say it:
Cause its not one.)
"As it approaches the Sun, 3I/ATLAS will become brighter. The greatest hopes for unraveling its mystery are pinned on the James Webb Space Telescope. Its infrared vision will help analyze the comet’s thermal radiation and dust composition in greater detail, possibly finally answering questions about its true nature and the mechanism behind its unusual activity."
(What I have read from sources I trust much more than this is we only have till the end of August, to observe this thing with the JWST, so why are we not doing so right now?)
So?
Ivan Hrinko
(more like an AI Bot)
News editor
Universe space tech website
Brings 15 years of experience in science journalism. Holds a technical degree from the National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute” in “Automation and Control in Technical Systems.” His strong technical background and skill in simplifying complex material helped him work as an author and editor in the tech sections of major Ukrainian media outlets. At Universe Space Tech, Ivan covers astronomy, science, technology, and discoveries in space research. His materials serve as a bridge between complex science and readers seeking to understand the universe in simple terms. Fascinated by space since childhood — especially black holes, dark matter, and quasars — he sees space not only as science but as a source of inspiration, philosophy, and humanity’s quest to understand their place in the cosmos.
"The sun heats only one side of it. The dust evaporation occurs precisely there. If the nucleus does not rotate fast enough, this hot daytime side does not have time to cool down significantly. Consequently, dust continues to be actively released from the “illuminated” part, creating a glowing effect in front. This hypothesis has been confirmed."
(Without saying who, where, when or how
and without giving a link to
the scientific paper written about it.)
Or?
Avi Loeb
chair of Harvard university's
astronomy department.
"We've never seen such a thing.
A comet doesn't have
glow in front of it."
I know which one Im going with.
"They got more problems
than you can shake a stick at
with this thing."
And it will only get worse.
Funny thing about God.
To have created the laws of nature,
just like creating the universe,
he had to be
outside of them
to have done so.
Transcendent
is the word as in:
"existing apart from
and not subject to
the limitations of
the material universe".
God nots affected by natural laws,
he is their creator,
they do what he wants,
not the other way around.
It's how Christ calmed the storm.
They obey him.
Sucks to have
your delusions destroyed dont it?
Oh well,
better get over it
quick like in a hurry
and wise up.
Time is running out.
No comments:
Post a Comment