Honey sent me some interesting
things on 3I/ATLAS last night
which I original shared here:
Wednesday, December 3, 2025
So if you missed them
here they are again:
Mars on the left
3I/ATLAS on the right,
whizzing right past one another.
Kinda hard for me to believe
they didn't make contact
not with all the other things
that we know
and have been documented
about that "pass-by"
Ref: Wednesday, November 26, 2025
Apparently, we've struck a nerve
"but near Mars
it was moving sideways."
Avi Loeb.
"If you have
an image that is degraded
plus all these fuzzy images
and the best you can say is
that there is some hydrogen around 3I/ATLAS,
you don’t hold a press conference for that."
"Lets consider some more issues:
Avi Loeb changed 3I/ATLAS from going to go past Mars at 2 AU, to going past it at .02 AU, with a chance of a slight course correction making that 0 AU, all without any explanation, none whatsoever."
"See why the focus is now on:
"accurate astrometric measurements
and
orbit predictions"
"challenges
to estimate comet trajectories"
"improve tracking methodologies"
and:
"scenarios that might carry
greater uncertainty."
"Apparently there is good enough reason
to want to improve all of that."
"See above about going
from 2 AU to .02 AU
without any explanation."
"Nobody, I mean nobody, not even Avi
is talking about it having been hit
by A Coronal Mass Ejection
a week prior to
its closest approach to Mars
??????????"
"Think that might have
altered the trajectory?
Bouncing the fuck off Mars?
These guys know physics right?"
"That CME blew it right into Mars.
Thats why its going sideways now.
HELLO?
DUH..."
"Avi Loeb switched from wanting images taken from the HiRISE instrument on the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiteer on Oct 3rd (when it was the closest to Mars) to wanting the ones taken on Oct 2nd
??????????"
"Again without any explanation being given
as to why that was so?"
"Avi switched from stating the images "were taken" by the HiRISE instrument on Oct 3rd, to saying they "could have been taken" the day of the NASA live event
??????????"
"And the damn thing is now flying sideways
??????????
And he is using pictures from amateurs
Not NASA?
Even though an entire armada of their spacecraft has been watching this object since it came into our solar system?"
"The day of the NASA event Avi calls 3I/ATLAS an "iceberg" for the first time, after saying it weights 33 Billion tons? Thats a shit ton of ice my brother, seems like it would have outgassed a lot more than it did to me but hey, i'm not the head of the Harvard Astronomy department."
"No pictures from NASA from the HiRISE instrument on Oct 3rd when it was the closest to Mars?"
"The image released at the NASA live event
were from Oct 2nd
and they were fuzzy
??????????"
"Avi says:
"Hopefully we wont get any surprises
from 3I/ATLAS during
the upcoming Holidays multiple times?"
"He told NASA they should be monitoring
around Mars for "satellites" from 3I/ATLAS."
"Well I wonder why?
This is the guy
that said it could be 0 AU
when it passed by the red planet,
and now its flying sideways?"
"And the nucleus still hasn't been resolved
??????????"
(Apparently now it doesn't even
look like it has one.)
"And There was a meteorite found on Mars
that shouldn't have been there"
???????????"
"An IAWN is conducting an
"exercise"?"
etc., etc., etc.,)
Thats not even what I am getting at
on this piece lol.
In the video below:
Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS Appears To Be Experiencing "Cryovolcanism",
And Is Eerily Similar To Objects In The Outer Solar System
IFL science 12/02/25
"It's just going to keep getting
weirder and weirder
as it gets closer to us."
Me and Honey in July.
How did we know that then hum?
But Avi and others
have a dilemma
and its one that
once again
me and Honey
spoke of very early on.
Transcript from the video
above:
1:24
And
what I'm seeing challenges
our conventional understanding.
The data shows frozen volatile materials
1:32
primarily carbon dioxide ice
vaporizing beneath the surface
and forcing through
1:38
the porous interior
in violent outbursts.
These jets are expelling
1:44
pristine material
that has been preserved
since the object's formation
billions of years ago.
(Why now?
Is one of the questions
one has to ask.)
The Spanish
1:50
astronomical institutions involved
in this research
report observations
that the surface temperature increase
1:56
triggered the activation
of dormant frozen gases
that had remained stable
during the comet's journey through
2:03
interstellar space.
(Simply put?
Aint no fuckin way Jack.)
Right now, my colleagues and I are analyzing
the composition and structure of these eruptions.
2:10
We're working to understand how
an object potentially 7 to 14
2:15
billion years old
maintains such volatile compounds
in its nucleus.
4:19
What makes this unprecedented
and what I find most remarkable
is the age of the material
being expelled.
(When they were talking about it getting closer to the sun
and that it would start sublimating
("volatiles" going from ice to vapor)
I asked honey:
"If it is as old as they are saying it is?
And if it is a comet
like they are now saying it is?
See:
that mysterious object shooting
Live Science 07/03/25
"On Wednesday (July 2), NASA released a statement confirming that A11pl3Z is indeed an interstellar object and will not remain in the solar system for long. The researchers also shared the object's new official name, 3I/ATLAS, and revealed that it is most likely a comet, upending previous assumptions that it was an asteroid."
Then what makes them think
it has any frozen gases/water left
to sublimate?")
4:55
Adding to this discovery,
spectroscopic observations I've examined taken between
5:01
November 20 and the 1st of December 2025
reveal that the ejected material
5:06
contains not just carbon dioxide and water ice,
but also organic compounds
5:12
along with traces of metallic elements,
including nickel and iron.
(Oh you mean like that meteorite they just found on Mars
six weeks after the 3I/ATLAs "pass by"
that wasnt supposed to be there?
Interesting.
NASA Discovered a Rock on Mars That Doesn't Belong There
Sciencealert.com 11/18/25
)
This chemical
5:18
fingerprint is distinctly different from solar system comets,
confirming the object's interstellar origin while
5:25
providing direct information about chemistry in distant star systems.
This data connects directly
to the central
5:32
question driving my research.
How has three Atlas
preserved these frozen compounds
5:37
for up to 14 billion years
of interstellar travel?
(When I say it is
8 billion years old
I am intentionally going
to the low side
of how old
they are saying it is.)
"During its journey
5:43
through the void between stars,
the comet would have been exposed to
cosmic radiation
and micrometeorite impacts.
5:51
These forces should have
eroded or altered surface volatiles
over such vast time scales.
Think about that.
Avi?
We already have
"thought about that"
A good while back
and all I can tell you is:
When something
shouldn't even exist
to begin with?
Anomalies of 3I/ATLAS, Organized by Likelihood
Avi Loeb Medium 11/23/25
3. P<0.001: The nucleus of 3I/ATLAS is roughly a million times more massive than 1I/`Oumuamua and a thousand times more massive than 2I/Borisov, while moving faster than both (see here and here).
There is not enough rocky material in interstellar space to deliver a rock of this mass once per decade to the inner solar system
(Mars on left, 3I/ATLAS on the right)
This suggests that 3I/ATLAS may have targeted the inner solar system rather than was drawn at random from the reservoir of interstellar rocks."
Then why in the world
are you surprised
at how it behaves
??????????
The dilemma in case you didn't catch it
was:
If it is a comet?
Then it should sublimate
as it got closer to the sun.
Cause thats what comets do.
But if it is as old as they say it is?
Then it shouldn't have anything left
to sublimate
after all the traveling
through the interstellar medium
for billions of years.
I'll make it more simple for you.
THE MASTER OF THE UNIVERSE
IS BOXING
THESE GUYS
IN A CORNER
FROM WHICH
THERE IS ONLY
ONE ESCAPE:
Draw your own conclusions.
No comments:
Post a Comment