Thermal-Gradient Imaging Reveals
3I/ATLAS Firing Structured Jets
with Possible Intentional Control
USAherald
Samuel Lopez -November 30, 2025
How many timed do you have to say it?
Things that shouldn't exist
to begin with?
Don't have to behave like you say they do.
"Key Findings
The latest filtered capture
exposes jet vectors no natural model can comfortably explain.
The anti-tail is firing directly into the Sun as if pushed from within.
Every new image narrows the field of possibilities—and none of them are ordinary.
A filtered rotational-gradient view from Thailand exposes jet geometry that defies natural comet physics and forces a deeper question: what exactly is 3I/ATLAS doing?
("defies natural comet physics"
Those are determined
by the laws of nature.
To defy those?
You are defying the laws of nature.
Nobody seems to want to say it
for some reason.
Why?)
"The newest image of interstellar object 3I/ATLAS, captured on November 29, 2025 at 21:53 UTC
(Few days ago now)
"by observer Teerasak Thaluang in Rayong, Thailand, represents one of the most revealing rotational-gradient analyses of the object to date."
(Where's NASA?
"observer Teerasak Thaluang
in Rayong, Thailand"
makin yawl look bad yo.
And so is Ray's Astrophotography
and a whole host of others.)
"Using a Larson–Sekanina filter to strip away the coma and reveal underlying structural geometry, this frame isolates two crisp, collimated jets—each emerging in opposite directions—while also confirming a sunward-pointing anti-tail projected toward the lower left."
"In ordinary comet science, such features should be inconsistent, asymmetric, and dependent entirely on solar heating. But this image denies those expectations at every level."
"The first undeniable anomaly, and the one that repeats across nearly every international capture for the past thirty days, is directional discipline."
"These jets are not diffuse dust plumes. They are narrow, linear, and appear to hold a consistent vector orientation even after rotational gradients remove noise and coma distortion."
(Avi has talked about this as well
not very long ago.)
"From a legal-forensic perspective, this is the kind of pattern—stable, repeatable, and geometrically coherent—that would constitute evidence of controlled action if we were analyzing aircraft, missile plumes, or mechanical exhaust. You do not get this kind of stability from random sublimation occurring on a spinning icy nucleus. You get it from a source that fires in lines rather than clouds."
"The second anomaly arrives from the sunward anti-tail, which is illuminated here with unmistakable clarity. Under known physics, solar radiation pressure pushes dust away from the Sun, producing a tail that always flows anti-sunward. Yet 3I/ATLAS continues to project material toward the Sun, a behavior previously observed by astronomers in Hawaii, Utah, Italy, and Spain but rarely this cleanly."
(HELLO?
Anybody home?
Anybody seen NASA lately?)
"The Thailand gradient filter removes any chance of misinterpretation: the anti-tail is not an illusion of camera angle. It is a physical jet firing into the solar vector. No natural mechanism explains why dust particles would willingly move into a headwind of photons traveling at light speed. Something is pushing them.'
("No natural mechanism"
This Object is doing everything it can
to tell you
the laws of physics
do not apply to it.
How much more do you need?)
"Our previous investigative lineage for USA Herald has built a consistent case: 3I/ATLAS is displaying behaviors characteristic of non-gravitational acceleration, pulsed activity, and structured mass ejection. Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb’s most recent analysis noted that the object’s 16.16-hour pulsations cannot originate from rotation alone, because the nucleus is too small to produce brightness swings of tens of percent. That means the coma—not the nucleus—is brightening. And only one mechanism explains rhythmic brightening in the coma: pulsed jets."
(Avis "heartbeat")
"This image supports that view. The jets do not appear chaotic. They appear periodic. Their symmetry is unnatural. And their angles resist solar influence. If the jets were merely natural vents, they would wobble, flicker, and distort with nucleus rotation. Yet here, even after a full rotational-gradient pass designed to reveal structural deception, the jets present as disciplined beams. That places us squarely in the territory Avi Loeb warned would be the dividing line: if the jet pulse direction remains stable rather than driven by the Sun, the mechanism is technological (Supernatural)"
(Supernatural, not technological.
See Sunday, November 9, 2025
It's not a technological problem...(3I/ATLAS)
We know the Supernatural exist:
UAP, Genetic Code, the Mechanism by which
the genetic code got into living cells etc,
all of that exist
outside the known laws of physics.
We have never so much as seen a living cell
anywhere else besides this earth.
Let alone any "intelligent life" or any
"technology" they supposedly somehow created.
Therefore, 3I/ATLAS
Being of supernatural origin
outweighs it being
"technological"
by a 3:1 margin.
It's not even close!)
"Given this, the most logical hypothesis—based solely on forensic evidence, prior imaging, brightness variability, and this rotational-gradient result—is that 3I/ATLAS is not behaving like a natural comet at all."
(We said that on the porch in July.
So what are ya telling us exactly?)
"Its activity patterns resemble controlled thrust, and its anti-tail suggests counter-solar propulsion. If the object is exerting force against solar radiation pressure,
it may be adjusting trajectory,
stabilizing orientation, or maintaining a deliberate path through the inner solar system. That leaves humanity confronting a question no one in government has yet dared articulate publicly: if this object is displaying intentionality, what is its purpose?"
(Here is its purpose:
"Hello humanity
Yoo-hoo down there?
Hello?
God here.
Just thought I'd send
you a lil something
to remind you
the laws of nature
obey their creator.
Good day.
Oh and we will be
rearranging
the Solar System
while were at it,
carry on,
keep ignoring me like always.)
"The most reasonable interpretation, based on observable behavior, is that 3I/ATLAS is performing transit rather than targeting. Its path is hyperbolic, which implies passage rather than approach. Its jets appear to regulate stability more than accelerate toward any body.
"The absence of trajectory deviation toward Earth
reinforces that the object is not engaging
in directed movement toward our planet."
It's not going to have a choice.
There is major Solar Storm Activity happening right now
Strong Geomagnetic Storm Warning.
"The solar flare peaked
at 9:49 p.m. EST on Sunday, November 30,
(In all likelihood that was after this was published.
No time is given just 11/30 listed
as the published date.)
"said NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory, which constantly monitors the sun. The flare was classified as X1.9 flare, the space agency said. X-classes are the most intense kind of flare. The eruption came from a newly emerging sunspot region.
(400-600 KMS solar winds
is what I have seen listed here and there
the last few days and
I have no idea what is normal
but:
"400 kilometers per second
is approximately
894,774.35 mph
and 600 kilometers per second
is approximately
1,342,161.8 mph"
So that might just have something to do with
what lies ahead and whether 3I/ATLAS
starts heading towards earth or not.
The bumping into Mars wasnt to get the angel right
for 3I/ATLAS to come here and hit us,
that was done to place Mars
where God wanted it.
And a CME will do the same thing for 3I/ATLAS
as it did when it went by Mars,
it's gonna push it right to us.
God Speed man.
I don't know what to tell ya.
Think about that demon
in that Church shooting in Nashville
that broke the fifth seal
and his cryptic Facebook post
shortly beforehand:
Saturday, September 30, 2017
The shooting in Nashville last Sunday?
"Everything you've ever doubted
or made to be believe as false,
is real. & vice versa, B.” )
"Instead, the controlled jets suggest station-keeping or orientation management, the same way spacecraft adjust posture as they rotate to protect instruments, solar arrays, or onboard sensors."
"If the object is intelligent
—or operating through an intelligent system—
(Oh its operating through an intelligent system alright,
one that people refuse to acknowledge exist.
Thats the whole reason its on full display.)
"...the question then becomes whether Earth should attempt communication. History, physics, and legal precedent all push us toward caution. If the object is merely observing, communicating prematurely could impose risk or unnecessary provocation."
"However, if its jets correlate with periodic pulses of electromagnetic energy, such as the radio signals detected by MeerKAT earlier in October, then synchronization-based communication becomes the safest method.
In the absence of shared language,
mathematics is always the universal bridge.
The Fibonacci sequence,
(Already discussed both of those
in great detail)
"prime numbers, or timed radio pulses could offer a non-threatening, non-intrusive invitation for acknowledgment."
"But until we know more, the most responsible action is continued observation. No aircraft would be intercepted blindly. No spacecraft would be hailed without plan. And no interstellar object should be treated differently. The evidence suggests 3I/ATLAS is using jets to regulate movement rather than issue threat. It is behaving like a vessel in transit—not a weapon in approach."
(The evidence suggest
a Coronal Mass Ejection
pushed it right into Mars
and we got Solar Storms brewing?
And we got a
"newly emerging sunspot region"
And its gonna be facing right at earth?
just like there was one last time
One was pointed right at Mars.
Hello?
Anybody home?)
"The Thailand rotational-gradient capture now joins the growing constellation of images that undermine the “natural comet” narrative."
(We never once bought that nonsense here
no matter what anybody was ever saying.
We both said day one:
"This isnt a comet!"
And we have never backed off of that.)
"It is too structured. Too linear. Too intentional. The most reasonable conclusion, grounded in months of forensic examination, is that 3I/ATLAS is an engineered visitor
(100 % WRONG
The most reasonable conclusion
by a 3...excuse me
but it's actually it's by a 4:0 ratio.
Counting 3I/ATLAS as a
supernatural object gives us four examples
of things existing outside the known laws of nature
while those who would argue
its "technological"
cant find one living cell
outside of earth.
So by a 4:0 ratio
the most reasonable explanation is
3I/ATLAs is
SUPERNATURAL!)
YOU CAN NOT BUILD
TECHNOLOGY
THAT DEFYS
THE LAWS OF NATURE.
HOW FUCKING HARD IS THIS?
WE CANT DO IT.
ALIENS
(if they existed
and they dont)
COULDNT DO IT EITHER.
ITS THE SAME NATRAUL LAWS
FOR THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE.
Sunday, November 9, 2025
It's not a technological problem
...(3I/ATLAS)
It's a
laws of nature
problem.
This is satanic garbage
that has been force fed people
for generations now.
The only thing that can willingly
defy the laws of nature?
(Or allow others to)
Is their creator.
They obey him.
They do
what he says.
This is what man gets
for getting a big head
and thinking he was God.
Opps.)
"—or at minimum,
contains engineered components—"
(For God sake
Just find me
one living cell
somewhere else first.
Good luck.)
"that is
navigating our system with purpose."
(Oh you had better believe that.)
"And for the first time,
we may have a clear image of how it moves."
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
