For The First Time, Scientists Say
They've Built a Synthetic Cell From Scratch
Sciencealert.com 07/22/26
You have to keep in mind this is the same
"community
that wanted you to believe
"The Multiverse"
and
"The Anthropic Principal"
were "scientific."
This is nothing but "click-bait" idiorcary.
And thats only id one goes so far to actualy click on the link.
Most people just see the haedline
and scroll right on past thinking:
"Well know kidding,
they did that years ago already."
NOTHING
could be any farther from the truth.
"The project is called SpudCell, and it has a genome of just 90 kilobase pairs (kbp). For comparison, the human genome is about 3 million kpb, and biologists previously assumed that a living cell would require at least 113 kpb of genetic data to function properly.
According to Adamala and her colleagues, SpudCell appears to stretch these limits, though their research is yet to be formally published and has not been peer-reviewed."
(But by God we got headlines out there!
Seein how this works yet?
And it been this way
as long as I have been following
the subject matter some 14 years or so.)
"According to Science magazine, SpudCell has met some hurdles in publication: apparently one reviewer at Cell, a prestigious science journal, said the project was not real biology."
("Who cares!
We got the headline we wanted!
Yea us!"
It's just flat out stupidity.
Anyone with a brain can see
what they are doing and why.)
"The 'cell' is also equipped with an in-built 'protein expression system', which translates the DNA's genetic instructions into action. That's what allows the 'cell' to turn the nutrients it absorbs from the surrounding liquid into useful materials, and enables cell division.'
(Instructions = Information.
Notice they didn't say
the instructions
came from an outside source.
So much for being
"A synthetic cell from scratch.")
"Currently, SpudCells don't last more than a few generations. They can't actually produce their own protein expression system, nor can they regulate their metabolism, so they rely entirely on substances and components in the liquid medium in which they float."
"The blobs also lack a cytoskeleton, the internal scaffolding that props up natural cells. This simplifies things, but it also means they can't shuttle materials around or clear waste."
"But this work does provide a proof of concept that other scientists can build on – and that we'll keep a close eye on in the coming years."
See?
"Scientist say they have built
a Proof of concept
for a synthetic cell from scratch"
just wouldn't quite have the
"click bait appeal now would it?"
In other words:
We Created Life! Er, Wait a Minute
scienceandculture.com 07/02/26
At the New York Times,
the science story of the day:
“This Cell Feeds,
Grows and Reproduces. And It’s Manmade.”
"A professor at a prominent university
writes in to us to taunt Dr. Tour about this:
(See: Friday, April 10, 2026
So?
(For more about Dr. Tour)
"So Fellow James Tour and you folk STILL claim the evil materialist scientists are “clueless” about the origin of life?"
(Easy fact check: James Tour isn’t a Fellow of the Center for Science and Culture.)
"What’s This All About?
It’s a silly comment
if the professor has actually listened to Dr. Tour.
Tour’s main point is that
to get origin-of-life scenarios to work
you would need active guidance and control
by the scientist… not an unguided process.
Absolutely positively no way to get around it.
And If life can just create itself from scratch?
THEN WHY DID IT JUST STOP?
"The idea is simple. From, “A Chemically Defined Synthetic Cell Capable of Growth and Replication,” at Biotic:
"Building ribosomes from genetic instructions. SpudCell currently uses ribosomes from E. coli bacteria. Without the capability to remake ribosomes, SpudCell runs for 5-10 generations before the machinery degrades. Building ribosomes from scratch means synthesising dozens of proteins and RNA molecules, then getting them to assemble in the right order.
"Um…so it’s borrowing ribosomes from real cells but can’t make new ones, so it dies. That doesn’t sound like it’s from scratch, doesn’t sound like a minimal cell, and doesn’t sound like a real cell."
SO IT'S CASE CLOSED.
TRY AGIAN.
OH IM SORRY
THAT WOULD MEAN ANOTHER
GUIDED ATTEMPT
TO PROVE AN "UNGUIDED PROCESS."
These people honey.
Just killin anybody and everybody
with any common sense.
MORE YET! (:-)
Science news this week:
Life on Mars, weird water
and a curious human cousin.
livescience.com 06/27/26
Again with the headline right?
It's a built in bias on purpose
to make people think along the lines of:
"Oh yeah, Martians,
we knew that along time ago."
But if you dig into the article you find:
"Now, scientists have confirmed the widespread presence of complex carbon-based molecules in this area of the crater, which they suggest indicate the presence of fossilized microbes."
Well whooptie shit.
Just stop the presses everybody:
"They suggest"
and
"the presence of
fossilized microbes"
Oh my goodness The Martians
are just gonna take over
the earth any time now!
"the presence of
fossilized microbes"
One more time for all the
knuckledraggers out there:
Life requires information.
Information requires a brain.
Somebody hollar at me
when you see him:
And also we have:
Astronomers Discover Another Galaxy With No Dark Matter
universetoday 07/01/26
"In the 1970s, astronomer Vera C. Rubin provided the first solid evidence for the existence of Dark Matter, a mysterious, unseen mass that appeared to be holding galaxies together. Since then, the indirect evidence for Dark Matter has grown considerably, with scientists observing "halos" and gravitational lenses that could not be caused by normal (or "visible") mass. Based on observational data, Dark Matter is estimated to account for 85% of the total mass of the Universe. However, astronomers have also observed a few galaxies that don't fit this pattern."
("indirect evidence"
And it's all based on,
or inferred by looking at:
LIGHT.)
"Using the W.M. Keck Observatory, a team of Yale-led astronomers has discovered the third known galaxy that appears to lack Dark Matter altogether. This faint dwarf galaxy, known as DF9, is part of a linear structure that may have formed from a violent collision between galaxies. This discovery strengthens the evidence for a rare and previously unknown process that could assist astronomers in future studies. The study detailing their findings was published on June 16th in The Astrophysical Journal."
(Yeah, they are looking for something
that just doesn't exist yo.
Hey? Don't get pissed at me
Stephen Hawking's last theory
said the Universe was a hologram.
Some prominent other concur:
(Bohm, Susskind etc)
"As Michael Keim, a PhD Candidate at Yale University and the lead author on the paper, said in a Yale press release:
"A line of galaxies lacking dark matter has never been seen before. The discovery provides some of the strongest evidence yet that these galaxies formed through an extreme and previously unseen process and offers a rare new window into the nature of dark matter itself."
(Oh you can count on the fact that it was an:
"extreme and previously unseen process"
alright.)
"He (Pieter van Dokkum, co-author of the paper.) further proposed that DF9 be analyzed by Keck's Cosmic Web Imager (CWI), which is specifically designed to study faint light sources in the Universe.'
(Thats all these people are looking at.
LIGHT.
Holograms move things from the spatial domain
to the frequency domain via the mathematical process of
Fourier transformation.
These people just have no idea what they are looking at.)
From a few years back:
New research suggests
that our universe has no dark matter
sciencedaily.com 03/16/24
"A University of Ottawa study published today challenges the current model of the universe by showing that, in fact, it has no room for dark matter.
"In cosmology, the term "dark matter" describes all that appears not to interact with light or the electromagnetic field, or that can only be explained through gravitational force. We can't see it, nor do we know what it's made of, but it helps us understand how galaxies, planets and stars behave.'
"Rajendra Gupta, a physics professor at the Faculty of Science, used a combination of the covarying coupling constants (CCC) and "tired light" (TL) theories (the CCC+TL model) to reach this conclusion. This model combines two ideas -- about how the forces of nature decrease over cosmic time and about light losing energy when it travels a long distance. It's been tested and has been shown to match up with several observations, such as about how galaxies are spread out and how light from the early universe has evolved."
(From the "tired light" link above:
Despite periodic re-examination of the concept, tired light has not been supported by observational tests and remains a fringe topic in astrophysics.)
"...explains Gupta. "In standard cosmology, the accelerated expansion of the universe is said to be caused by dark energy but is in fact due to the weakening forces of nature as it expands, not due to dark energy."
"Redshifts" refer to when light is shifted toward the red part of the spectrum. The researcher analyzed data from recent papers on the distribution of galaxies at low redshifts and the angular size of the sound horizon in the literature at high redshift."
"There are several papers that question the existence of dark matter, but mine is the first one, to my knowledge, that eliminates its cosmological existence while being consistent with key cosmological observations that we have had time to confirm," says Gupta."
"By challenging the need for dark matter in the universe and providing evidence for a new cosmological model, this study opens up new avenues for exploring the fundamental properties of the universe."
See also:
Wednesday, June 17, 2026
More things that a
"Holographic Universe "
would explain.
And always, always, always
remember:
"this is the same
"community
that wanted you to believe
"The Multiverse"
and
"The Anthropic Principal"
were
"Scientific."
Speaks for itself.
"Anything but God"
is their religion,
nothing quite like
ruling out
the obvious much.
.jpg)
