This is about

 

the stupidest garbage

I have read in a long time.

Romans 1:22

Professing themselves to be wise, 

they became fools,

@futuregenquantum(IG)

" A new study from 

UBC Okanagan has delivered a

major blow to the popular "simulation hypothesis." 

Using Gödel's incompleteness theorem, 

physicists now argue 

that the universe cannot be 

fully simulated - not even in principle.

Their conclusion:

Reality isn't algorithmic.

Who ever said it had to be

in the first place

???????????

And why do you think 

they are out to dispel it

"NOW"

??????????

Way to go team!

This community is making inroads

or we wouldn't be seeing 

this kinda push back.

"physicists now argue"

They are only doing so

"NOW" 

because certain 

"theologians" 

or what have you,

have "bought in" 

so to speak 

as it fits

biblically.

Hebrews 11:3

3 Through faith we understand 

that 

the worlds 

(Ant hills, 

deep under the sea,

The cell, 

Subatomic,

all of em...)

were framed 

by the word of God, 

(The language of God

is math BTW.)

so that 

things which are seen 

were not made 

of things 

which do appear.

"The universe contains 

truths and structures 

that no computational system 

can fully capture."

Gee thanks,

never knew...

Sarcasm BTW...

What if its a living

intelligence

they dont think exist?

So they just rule it out

at the onset?

And not:

"a computational system"

THEN WHAT?

Thats two presuppositions put forth

for this argument

without any evidence:

1) "Reality isn't algorithmic"

2) "that no computational system 

can fully capture"

Classic Straw Man much?

"You misrepresented someone's argument 

to make it easier to attack.

By exaggerating, misrepresenting, or just completely fabricating someone's argument, it's much easier to present your own position as being reasonable, but this kind of dishonesty serves to undermine honest rational debate."

They deliberately set up the argument

so they could make their own points 

breaking it down,

AND

besides that?

Isaiah 55:8-9

For my thoughts 

are not your thoughts, 

neither are your ways 

my ways, 

saith the Lord.

9 For as the heavens are higher 

than the earth, 

so are my ways 

higher than your ways, 

and my thoughts 

than your thoughts.

So who ever said

you have to have a 

"computational system"

for our reality to exist

to begin with

??????????

Was automatically limiting options

as to how that reality could exit

from the onset.

IT GOES 

TO SHOW INTENT.

"Gödel showed that 

any algorithmic system 

has limits - statements that are true 

but impossible for the system to prove."

(Who ever said it was an

"algorithmic system"

to start with?)

"statements that are true 

but impossible 

for the system to prove"

Thats kinda why 

it is called faith

you cant prove it

otherwise God is a dictator.

AND?

It also gives you free with

as to whether or not

you would wish to

BELIEVE:

"statements that are true 

but impossible 

for the system to prove"

HELLO?

ANYBODY HOME?)

"The researchers 

(It's a philosophical argument

you cant put it in a Petri dish.)

"applied this reasoning 

to physics 

and found that 

the laws of the universe 

rely on forms of 

"non-algorithmic 

understanding" 

that no simulator, 

no matter how advanced, 

could reproduce.

(Just because

 the laws of the universe 

rely on forms of 

"non-algorithmic understanding" 

DOES NOT MEAN

it can not be a simulation.

More coming up here in a second.

"In simple terms:

If the universe were a simulation, 

it would have to run on rules 

simpler than reality."

(Says who?

Infinite wisdom

just might have 

something different

 to say about that.

See Isaiah 55:8-9

above.

Presupposition #3 

by my count.)

"But reality itself 

contains phenomena 

that cannot be 

reduced to finite algorithms."

(Yeah?, no kiddin?

but we're still here right?

So maybe 

you just assumed wrong 

from the outset

??????????

Is that not an option or something?

If:

"reality contains phenomena 

that cannot be 

reduced to finite algorithms"

Then why

 are we assuming from the onset:

"Reality isn't algorithmic."

??????????

I or any number of people 

could have informed them of that.

"So according to this new mathematical proof:

The universe is not computable

No simulator could contain all of its truths

(Infinite wisdom can

and does however.)

Therefore, the universe cannot be a simulation."

(Only if you exclude

the option mentioned 

in my comment 

directly above.)

"A bold result - and a major challenge 

to one of the most popular philosophical ideas of our time."

Such a bunch of AI garbage.

But I had also read a couple other things about it

that weren't from a social media site.

Universe as a hologram

Goes like this okay?

It's not about any 

algorithmic systems.

If it were?

We would know the precise location

of electrons. 

We dont

and I or any number of other people 

could have informed them of such.)

Instead

what isn't being addressed here

and it is being done 

PURPOSLY MIND YOU

is this:

Everything you see

is made of atoms.

Even a lot of things you dont see

(Gases, etc...)

And 99.99999999999996% 

of what makes up atoms, 

are electrical and magnetic fields.

WHICH ARE NOT VISABLE.

(The colored space shown 

in-between the nucleolus and the electron.)

And?

if our realty were a

 "algorithmic system"

as is presupposed 

in this bunch of nonsense

then we would know

the precise location of an electron

which we can not compute.

SO IT SEEMS LIKE 

THEY WOULD HAVE KNOWN SO.

OH! THEY DID!

THEN WHY EVEN BOTHER

WITH THIS MINDLESS DRIVEL

IN THE FIRST PLACE?

So thanks for coming,

drive home safely

TRY AGAIN.

"Researchers" lol.

Wrote a philosophical position paper

that takes about 5 minutes 

for an 8th grader to destroy.

And these guys got PHD's and shit?

WTH?

So I go back 

to one of my original questions:

Why do you think

any of them

 felt the need

to do any of this

"NOW"

as in:

"physicists now argue"

Pretty obvious 

why "Now"

if you ask me,

or even if you don't.

AND

if it were true?

AND

if it were that simple?

Then somebody else 

would have came up with it

a long time before now.

So yeah

back to the drawing board yo.

It is just

 

plain and simple

and common sense

which is all sorely lacking

in our world right now.

"There is no known 

law of nature, 

no known process 

and 

no known 

sequence of events 

which can cause information 

to originate by itself 

in matter."

DR. WERNER GITT, 

INFORMATION SCIENTIST

Or anywhere else 

for that matter.

(Get it?

"for that matter"

That was a pun yo lol.)

Information always requires 

a source outside of itself,

and since it has to be:

organized, 

pre-planed and sequenced

in order to be considered

"information"

otherwise it's just 

unintelligible gibberish,

IT REQUIRES

an intellect behind it.

And all the bots 

on social media go:

"DNA isn't a code!"

Okay great, have it your way then

(Burger King is still open I hear.)

it's an instruction manual

on how to create proteins,

it's still information dip-shits.

This is why 

I just laugh

at:

Exoplanet discoveries.

"Building blocks of life"

discoveries on asteroids, 

finding water 

on other planets etc.

NO INFORMATION?

NO LIFE.

It is 

the single most important 

ingredient for life

and it requires an intellect.

And if ya go:

"Well life could have 

developed somewhere else 

differently than it did here?

I'll go all, 

Carl Sagan:

("agnostic or scientifically skeptical" BTW)

"Extraordinary claims 

require extraordinary evidence"

of which there is none

let alone 

"extraordinary"

and 

Christopher Hitchens

(Atheist.)

"What can be asserted without evidence 

can be dismissed without evidence," 

on your ass.

LOOK AT YOUR WORLD.

Ya might wanna reconsider some things.

Ya really might...

It aint

 

"On Iran" 

that he is 

"worried about."

Report: 

Netanyahu says he’s 

‘worried’ about Trump on Iran

The Times of Israel. 2/22/26

"After meeting US President Donald Trump in Washington earlier this month, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told a senior US official that he could not get a handle on what the president wanted to do vis-a-vis Iran, Channel 12 reports.

“Is he still with us?” 

Netanyahu reportedly 

asked the US official. 

“I’m worried.”

Lets just assume 

for a minute

the report is accurate 

and that it is 

"about Iran" 

that Netanyahu 

is worried about.

If Israel is really calling the shots here

as the narrative has been framed lately?

Then why would

Netanyahu 

be worried about it?

See:

Saturday, June 21, 2025

Now

the truth 

you didn't wanna 

hear about.

In addition to that?

Trumps mental state

is openly subject to question.

Dont think so?

See:

European leader spoke of shock 

at Trump’s state of mind 

after Mar-a-Lago meeting

Politico 1/28/26

"BRUSSELS ― Slovakia’s prime minister told EU leaders at a summit last week that a meeting with Donald Trump left him shocked by the U.S. president’s state of mind, five European diplomats briefed on the conversation said."

"Robert Fico, one of the few EU leaders to frequently support Trump’s stance on Europe’s weaknesses, was concerned about the U.S. president’s “psychological state,” two of the diplomats said. Fico used the word “dangerous” to describe how the U.S. president came across during their face-to-face meeting at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida on Jan. 17, according to two of the diplomats."

(This evil spirits job

(False prophet)

is to get this ball rolling

and we are seeing that

right now

with our stance toward Iran.)

"While none of the diplomats who spoke to POLITICO were present, individual leaders briefed them separately on the content of the conversation shortly after it."

(If it wasnt true?

Then why is Netanyahu 

saying he is

"worried"

??????????

"One is an accident.

Two is a trend."

(Not technically 

according to my statistician buddy

but you get the idea :-)

"Fico’s comments are especially pertinent because he’s among Europe’s most pro-Trump politicians, touting his access to the U.S. president in a Facebook video after the Mar-a-Lago meeting and voicing support for Washington’s approach to the Russia-Ukraine war."

(So your:

"Well he is just Anti-Trump"

position just doesn't any hold water.)

"Fico said that he “did not speak at the informal summit in Brussels” and added: “I agree with many strategies of the US president, but with some I don’t. I honestly expected that after my sharp statement on Venezuela, my visit to the US would be cancelled. This did not happen, which makes me appreciate the meeting with the U.S. president all the more.”

"Anna Kelly, a White House spokesperson, said: “This is absolutely total fake news from anonymous European diplomats who are trying to be relevant. The meeting at Mar-a-Lago was positive and productive.”

(Hey Anna Kelly?

Why would they be

"anonymous European diplomats"

if they were:

"trying to be relevant"

??????????

Seems to me like they wouldn't wanna be

"anonymous" if they wanted 

"to be relevant".

And again 

why is Netanyahu 

saying he is

"worried"

??????????

This is literally how stupid

people have become these days.

It is just mind-boggling.

"The simple minded

And the uninformed

Can be easily led astray

And those that cannot connect the dots

Hey, look the other way

People believe what they want to believe

When it makes no sense at all..."

).

"Fico seemed to be “traumatized” by his encounter with Trump, one of the European diplomats said. Fico characterized Trump as being “out of his mind,” a diplomat said, using the words briefed to them by their leader, who was directly involved in the conversation."

"Even without Fico’s remarks, Europe’s leaders and senior officials are increasingly concerned about the U.S. president’s “unpredictability,” according to a sixth EU diplomat, who was not briefed directly by a leader on last week’s conversation."

"Fears about the U.S. president’s health are “rapidly becoming a more conversed topic at all levels,” said an EU official who is involved in political discussions in Brussels and between capitals."

"Ever since Trump returned to office a year ago, European governments have been grappling with how to deal with his positions on issues such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, his administration’s apparent backing for far-right politicians, barriers to free trade, and the U.S. role in the continent’s defense."

If it was anybody else?

Except someone 

you had deluded yourself 

into thinking

was your 

and your countries savior

2 Thessalonians 2:10-13

10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; 

because they received not the love of the truth, 

that they might be saved.

11 And for this cause 

God shall send them strong delusion, 

that they should believe a lie:

12 That they all might be damned 

who believed not the truth, 

but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

(Read that again.)

13 But we are bound to give thanks 

always to God for you, 

brethren beloved of the Lord, 

because God hath 

from the beginning 

chosen you to salvation 

(So much for that

"There is no verse about

pre-destination"

in the bible nonsense.

How would an all-knowing God

not know who 

was going to choose him

ahead of time

??????????

Get back with me,

I'll be waiting,

you already know where.)

through sanctification of the Spirit 

and belief of the truth:

If you believe the truth?

You are not gonna fall

for Satans 

Satanic Delusions

in the end  times.

And if those verses

fit better some time in the past?

Come explain it to me.

I gotta know how that is so.

And if it is gonna fit better

some time in the future?

Come explain it to me.

I gotta know how that is so.

To conclude,

if it was anybody else

except your 

and your countries

self-appointed savior?

Then you would have 

already accepted:

"IN EVERY AGE of human history and in every phase of daily life demons have played a tremendous and very important role. In no realm is their activity more significant than in the sphere of human government. 

("All governments are illegal" RNM)

In this area possibly more than in any other field of their operation their activity has frequently not been clearly discerned or even partially understood. Their invisible nature, their close and inseparable identity with their visible human agents, and the supernatural character of their operations have combined to clothe them and their wicked machinations and evil enterprises in ominous mystery. Innumerable multitudes without the light of divine revelation, and other multitudes possessing the Bible, but uninitiated into the truths of the "mystery of lawlessness" (II Thess. 2:7), cannot get beyond "flesh and blood" (Eph.6:12). They can see only the human actors upon the stage of history. Wicked rulers, ruthless dictators, tyrants, oppressors, kings, governors, and presidents are, to them, the real and only characters in the great drama of life as it affects the political realm. They have no idea at all of the unseen realm of evil personalities, energizing and motivating their human agents. "The principalities ... the powers ... the world rulers of this present darkness," and "the spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places" (Eph. 6:12, R.S.V.) are, so far as they are concerned, mere theological nonentities with which they do not reckon. However, in the realm of human government the unseen personalities of the evil supernatural sphere are just as real and active as their visible human agents

Tuesday, December 3, 2024

BIBLICAL DEMONOLOGY 

AND WORLD GOVERNMENTS Part 1 of 4.

 CHAPTER XI

BIBLICAL DEMONOLOGY 

AND WORLD GOVERNMENTS.

As the truth 

it so obviously is.

2 Thessalonians 2:13

"and belief of the truth"

Interpreters Bible

Exegesis Conclusion

on Revelation 13

(1957)

"On the one side, the evil side, 

are Satan, 

the beasts representing 

the demonic 

Roman emperors 

(World Leaders)

and the Antichrist, 

the angels of Satan, 

the pagans who are generally grouped as enemies 

and persecutors of the Christians, 

as well as Jews 

and apostate 

Christians, 

(Rebellious, 

as in not trusting God's will

just like Korah and his band of rebels

in Numbers 16.)

who are also on Satan's side. 

1957.

My how quickly we forget

and have fallen.

Kinda like Korah

and his band of rebels did

in the desert,

yup.

"...and apostate 

Christians, 

who are also 

on Satan's side."

There are just 

way more of them

then you could ever

want to believe.

If that was anybody else?

Except your self-appointed savior?

You would freely admit

there is a problem there.

A big one.

Don't be delusional.

Know the truth.

"Random ramblings"

 

It says 

in the intro/description heading lol...

"Random ramblings from an amateur rock-n-roll historian and critic, self-professed bourbon aficionado, blackberry growin', jam makin', sometime tie-die shirt makin', ex hippie wannabe, turned punk rock lovein', blues festival going, middle aged pudgy bald white guy who loves to wear Hawaiian shirts in the summertime and happens to be more Stax than Motown, more Allman Brothers than Skynard, more Stones than Beatles, more NASCAR than Baseball, more freeware than license keys...

So here is one 

"Random rambling..."

for you

goes a lil like this:

If 

China, Russia and Iran

can change the security architecture

of the Persian Gulf

(and it is my contention that they only did so

AFTER

the 12 day war last year 

(assessing strengths and weaknesses

tactics and strategies,

THEN

they started pouring in equipment

hardware etc)

which they have,

then they can do so

for any other country(s)

that don't want to do business with the US

and play by our arbitrary 

"rules based order"

which we selectively enforce.

And if a country 

can no longer force other countries

to play by its rules any longer?

THEN HOW LONG

WILL THAT COUNTRYS

CURRENCY BE THE

RESERVE CURRENCY 

OF THE WORLD?

You already know the answer.

NOT VERY LONG.

All those dollars in all of those central banks

are going to come streaming back here

like you cant even imagine.

Who would want them

when they are worthless any more?

It wont be inflation, 

it will be hyper-inflation.

Side Note:

Venezuela was sending 

its oil to China,

(It aint anymore

"Not from this hemisphere you won't!"

seems to have been the message.)

that 

and Iran being an 

"energy hub" 

at the end of Chinas

"Belt and Road" initiative

have a lot more to do with things

that what you are being told.

All we can do 

is bomb the living shit out of them

and hope for the best

which is exactly 

what we are going to do

and they already know it

and they will survive it

and just absolutely 

demolish Israel

and a lot of our 

military bases

in the region

during and after.

If you

 

cant even say what you are trying to do?

Then you will never be able to achieve it.

With U.S. forces in position, 

Trump mulls his options for Iran

NPR 2/21/26

'The president has also been intentionally vague about his ultimate goal with Iran. Some days he sounds like he would be satisfied with a negotiated deal on the country's nuclear program. Other times, his emphasis seems to be on ousting Iran's theocratic leaders, who have ruled for nearly a half-century."

"Right now, no additional talks are planned."

"Trump has been far more willing to call on the military in his second term. He has bombed seven countries in the past year..."

(I thought it was 8 but okay, seven...)

"Most of these attacks have been brief one-and-done operations that the president can launch — and shut down very quickly."

(Not this time.)

"Trump has expressed support on several occasions for regime change in Iran. That option would almost certainly include a large-scale military operation, and there would be no guarantee of success."

"Iran has been ruled for the past 37 years by Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, who is now 86. While he makes major policy decisions, Iran has multiple power centers and a range of security forces that include the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, a force dedicated to preserving Islamic rule."

"As a result, ousting Khamenei or even several top leaders 

might not produce a major change in the way Iran is ruled."

"In addition, the U.S. force is built on fighter jets that would strike from the sky and Navy ships that would fire long distance from the seas. The U.S. does not have large numbers of ground troops anywhere near Iran."

(Thats a good thing 

cause it would just be an unmitigated disaster

if that was the route they ever decided to go.)

"With no prospect of a ground war, Iran's leaders seem to believe they could survive a U.S. bombing campaign, said Alex Vatanka, an Iran expert at the Middle East Institute in Washington."

(Man doesn't live in the air

or in the sea.

Sooner or later 

if you want people gone you 

HAVE TO

go after them on the ground.)

"The boots-on-the-ground option is not being taken very seriously in Tehran, which means the U.S. can hurt them badly, but it's not going to be sufficient and last long enough to end the regime's ability to stay in power," said Vatanka. "This means you get hit hard, you're bloodied, but you will rise again and you move on."

"Trump has not sought to make a case for war

(He doesn't think he needs to.)

"American presidents have traditionally made a full-court press when attempting to build support for a U.S. war."

(It's odd, kit really is.)

"However, Trump has so far not made a major speech to the American people about the prospect of a new Middle East war. He will have an opportunity to do so in his State of the Union address on Tuesday, but it's not clear that he will."

"The Trump administration has not sought formal support from Congress, though some Republicans are expressing support individually. The administration has also declined to make its case at the United Nations. And aside from Israel, the president hasn't sought to bring in allies of the U.S. or build an international military coalition."

So Thats:

American people

Congress

United Nations

Allies of the U.S

None of em being sold

on why we need to go to war with Iran.

What more do you really need to know?

Our military is not what it was in the 2003 gulf war.

That was almost a quarter century ago.

Then we could get six carriers 

at a time to the middle east if we had to.

Nowadays we are struggling to get two.

And our adversaries got weapons

and technologies

(Radar capable of detecting stealth aircraft

and submarines under sea etc.)

we don't got

and we don't have 

answers for either.