Monday, July 6, 2026

Funny to me

 


the people that

are so quick to quote this

and not put it 

in context 

like they will everything else:


1 Corinthians 14:34-35

Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience as also saith the law.

35 And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.

and never bring up 
Joel 2:28-29

And it shall come to pass afterward, 
that I will pour out my spirit upon all flesh; 
and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, 
your old men shall dream dreams, 
your young men shall see visions:

29 And also upon the servants 
and upon the handmaids in those days 
will I pour out my spirit.

and when that was supposed to happen

THEY JUST NEVER REALLY SEEM 
TO EVER HAVE THE SAME ZEAL
OR ENTHUISAM FOR:


Romans 12:1

I beseech you therefore, brethren, 
by the mercies of God, 
that ye present your bodies 
a living sacrifice, holy, 
acceptable unto God, 
which is your reasonable service.

As they do for
1 Corinthians 14:34-35.

I dont think its to hard to figure out
why that is, I just really dont.

Paul wrote em both,
so whats the problem with the one
but not the other?

Cause we've heard all about:
1 Corinthians 14:34-35
for eons now.

But we rarely if ever 
hear anything much about

"present your bodies 
a living sacrifice, holy, 
acceptable unto God, 
which is your reasonable service."

(We do during the communion
 liturgy at our church BTW)

If you aint willing to die
for God that gave you life
and died for you?

Then why are you even bothering?



People need

 

to hear this more:

(along with some other things)


We Are Not a Christian Nation - 

Pastor Loran Livingston tells us why 

we're not a Christian nation

Loran Livingston


0:00 

"We're not a Christian nation."


(I have always maintained that

See: Wednesday, August 9, 2017

Christian Nation )


"You see, 

a Christian nation would not have killed and displaced

20 million Native Americans who are still

marginalized and suffering greatly.


A Christian nation would never have thought that owning slaves

was somehow pleasing to God and okay to do or that it lined up with scripture.


Not only did we practice it, but it was so important to us

that we split a nation, had a civil war, 

fought against each other, and 500,000

Americans died 

because some people wanted 

to own as property other people.


More people, more Americans died in the Civil War 

than any other war we've ever fought in the history of this country, 

including World War II.'


(He goes on and obviously 

our positions on abortion differ.)


"No Christian nation would thoughtlessly murder 

80 million unborn babies, mostly minorities.

thoughtlessly throw them in a trash can and be done with it. 

Mostly minorities.

I'm pro-choice. People say, 

"Well, uh, you are for the most racist stance

in this country, knowing that abortion affects minorities 

more than anybody else." 

And you stand for that."


(No soul? 

No murder

and scripture is quite clear

nobody knows 

when the soul enters the body


Ecclesiastes 11:5


As thou knowest not 

what is the way of the spirit, 

(The breath of life)

nor how the bones do grow 

in the womb of her that is with child: 

even so thou knowest not 

the works of God who maketh all.


Not saying I like it, 

agree with it etc

just saying

NOBODY KNOWS

if it was murder or not.


When you can tell me why the wind blows 

in the manner it does?

Then you can tell me

when the soul enters the body.


Till then?

Im not listening much.


And if you go all:

Jeremiah 1:5

 “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you,

    before you were born I set you apart;

    I appointed you as a prophet to the nations


I'll say look at the context.


And if you go all:

"God even knows the hairs of your head"

on me:

Luke 12:7, Matthew 10:30.


I'll probably bring up 

something about predestination:

Revelation 13:8, Revelation 17:8 


When was Rahab saved?

Same as you and me.

When our names were written

in the Lambs book of life

BEFORE:

THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD


David and Moses were murders BTW.

Just sayin...sometimes we like to forget things.)


"Do you think a Christian nation would be gender confused?

A Christian nation would fund and finance the butchering of children's bodies to

change their sex because abusive adults

were so empty and lost that they would advise young children

who don't even understand biology much less the sexual process to have their bodies changed."


(We should have been on the look out for 

"hybrids" of all kinds years ago.)



"Do you think a Christian nation would praise and promote same sex union? No, sir.

A woman marrying a woman and a man marrying a man.

You notice I said union. I didn't say marriage. T

he only definition of marriage is one woman and one man.

or any other perverted union."



"Could could a could the conscience of a Christian nation

allow that nation to spend billions of dollars on sports stadiums

while the poor, the hungry, the jobless 

sit in the shadow of those arenas in rat infested low

income housing.

No Christian nation wouldn't stand for that.

No Christian nation's heart 

would allow sports and entertainment to

become more important 

than the Bible, God's word, godly instruction,

and basic skills in school like reading,

writing, adding, subtracting, counting back change.

Nope. A Christian nation wouldn't let only the prospective great athletes have

all the privileges and all the wealthy people have all of the blessings.



("NEWSFLASH:

NO CHRISTIAN NATION

WOULD WORSHIP 

ITS OWN MILITRAY EITHER!


Monday, February 9, 2026

Micah chapters 5 and 6...


NAB NOTES

 [9-13] 

Part of the messianic restoration will consist in

the removal of everything 

that has drawn 

Israel 

(Believers)

away from the Lord; 

this includes not only the objects 

of false worship, 

but also 

the armaments 

in which the idolaters 

had trusted.


9 On that day, 

says the LORD, 

I will destroy the horses 

from your midst and ruin your chariots;


(Your military is going away.)


"A Christian nation would weep and do something about 

our military veterans sleeping on the streets.

I mean, do something about it.


(Been going on since WW1 BTW.

Wednesday, September 27, 2017

Others


'A Christian nation would not allow sick, 

poor people to suffer without medicine.

Because big pharma companies charge too much money. 

A Christian nation would say, "No way.

Get medicine and get help to these people.


(So let em grow their own 

medicine for God sake!



Mercy ALWAYS trumps sacrifice
was the lesson of David and the show bread yo.)


"No Christian nation would ban the Bible or remove the Bible from anything.

So I just thought I would uh lay that before you 

and maybe see if we can't understand some things.

The church of Jesus Christ 

in this country is the only light there is.


I don't know if he mentions it or not

I dont have the full sermon,

But how can 

a "Christian Nation" justify a 

$1.5 trillion defense budget

and not care about your citizens:

Health

Education

or

Standard of living?


ITS EASY TO GO AFTER:


Abortion.

Sports and entertainment.

Trans. people.

Gay-marriage.

Lack of Veterans benefits

but don't you dare 

say anything against:


THE SATANIC 

US WAR MACHINE.



I was all glad to see him saying

what he did, 

but going after 

"Sports and entertainment"

and leaving out the wars since Vietnam

and the economic sanctions

which have 

killed an estimated 

38 million people

??????????

See:

Effects of international sanctions on age-specific mortality: a cross-national panel data analysis


Seems like a lil misplaced ire to me.


Glad to hear him say what he did.

But we need to go 

a lil further than that as well.


And it was a lil more than bizarre

yesterday, driving past the site 

of a future surveillance (data) center

and then going to worship and singing:


"My country tis of thee

sweet land of liberty..."


Monday, May 5, 2025

WTF?


"Interpreters bible exposition

Rev13:15. 

Living in an Unreal World. 

(Indeed we are)


The picture the man of Patmos paints is fairly fantastic in its evil confusion. The true God is ignored. The beast is worshiped. The lifeless image breathes and speaks words of wicked power. A phantasmagoria of evil has taken the place of the reign of good. The false vitality of wickedness masters the state. What seems real to men is actually unreal to them. What for the moment seems unreal to them is the eternal rule of GOD.






This is how badly

 


we have been

"propagandized" 

about this war.


Thursday, October 20, 2022

I thought they were out of missiles?


Russia’s airstrikes,

intended to show force, reveal another weakness

Washington Post Oct 14th 1 AM EDT


"...no matter how many times Russia fires at Ukraine, pro-war Russian nationalists want more, even though targeting civilian infrastructure is potentially a war crime."

"But the hawks, who are demanding publicly on TV broadcasts and on Telegram to know why Russia does not hit more high value targets, won’t like the answer: The Russian military appears to lack sufficient accurate missiles to sustain airstrikes at Monday’s tempo, according to Western military analysts.


(Baloney. your Western Military analysts are flat out wrong. The reason they aren't hitting more high value targets is to draw this conflict out as long as they can, and only a select few know it, that's why the Russian war hawks aren't being told and wont be told whats going on. Mob bosses dont go around telling every lieutenant exactly what they are up to. Too many cooks spoils the dinner etc...)


(Added today:

As stated all over this blog:

Drawing this conflict out

lessens NATO and US 

missile/drone/weapons stockpiles

it was kinda the point of it.) 


They are low on precision guided missiles,” said Konrad Muzyka, founder of Gdansk, Poland-based Rochan Consulting, offering his assessment of Russia’s sporadic air attacks. “That is essentially the only explanation that I have.”


(Sandbaging for the real conflict is not even a possibility there Mr. Muzyka? Really? Nobody else is even considering this?)


"if the Russians had access to a large stock of PGMS, they could probably inflict a similar damage to Ukrainian armed forces, but they haven’t."


(Maybe because they want this conflict drug out? 

Because it benefits them 

and hastens the fall of the US and the West?


Thats not even a remote possibility 

as to why they are engaging 

in this conflict in the manner they are?


No "expert" ever thought of that?

I have a hard time believing that, I really do.


Remember the Fiona Hill interview piece 

I did a few days ago? What did she say?


"Time is not on our side."


So if you could destroy a country pretty much at will, but dragging it out benefits your side long term and hurts more serious foes abroad than the foe you are engaged with? why wouldn't you conduct the conflict in such a manner as is being waged?")


And now today

Russia has supposedly hit:

Ukraine's Vizar plant which produces

maintains and repairs anti-aircraft missile systems

as well as the Vishnyovoye Fuel Depot

which supply's emergency fuel deliveries 

to the front lines.



Secondary detonations were confirmed at the Vizar plant.


Russia is getting ready to break through

Ukraine's last line of defense.


I told honey when Ukraine hit Russian

Oil infrastructure in St. Petersburg a few days ago:

Zelensky confirms Ukrainian strike 

on St. Petersburg oil infrastructure

07/04/26 Kiev Independent.


"They are getting desperate.

Last gasp for them.

They know whats coming.

Best for them to give it their best shot

while they still can."


She said:

"All hell is getting ready to break loose."


"Yup."


And who thinks Ukraine 

acting alone

is capable of these kinda attacks?


Ukraine Strikes Russia’s Largest Oil Refinery 

in Western Siberia

The Moscow Times 07/06/26


Might wanna buckle up

cause our world 

is in for a bumpy ride.


And I reiterate:


November 2, 2023

This


"They are gonna walk into Kiev"


(I told my son not that long ago.

And with the country largely intact.

Just like envisioned.

And control a huge portion 

of the worlds grain market

in the process.)


Kinda why we dont 

bother to listen

to all the "static"

out in Babylon.


I'd just as soon listen to Marley

ty very much.


"Science" so they say, tidbits...

 


For The First Time, Scientists Say 

They've Built a Synthetic Cell From Scratch

Sciencealert.com 07/22/26


You have to keep in mind this is the same

"community

that wanted you to believe 

"The Multiverse"

and

"The Anthropic Principal"

were "scientific."


This is nothing but "click-bait" idiorcary.

And thats only id one goes so far to actualy click on the link.

Most people just see the haedline

and scroll right on past thinking:


"Well know kidding, 

they did that years ago already."


NOTHING

could be any farther from the truth.


"The project is called SpudCell, and it has a genome of just 90 kilobase pairs (kbp). For comparison, the human genome is about 3 million kpb, and biologists previously assumed that a living cell would require at least 113 kpb of genetic data to function properly.

According to Adamala and her colleagues, SpudCell appears to stretch these limits, though their research is yet to be formally published and has not been peer-reviewed."


(But by God we got headlines out there!

Seein how this works yet?

And it been this way 

as long as I have been following

the subject matter some 14 years or so.)


"According to Science magazine, SpudCell has met some hurdles in publication: apparently one reviewer at Cell, a prestigious science journal, said the project was not real biology."


("Who cares!

 We got the headline we wanted!

Yea us!"

It's just flat out stupidity.

Anyone with a brain can see

what they are doing and why.)


"The 'cell' is also equipped with an in-built 'protein expression system', which translates the DNA's genetic instructions into action. That's what allows the 'cell' to turn the nutrients it absorbs from the surrounding liquid into useful materials, and enables cell division.'


(Instructions = Information.

Notice they didn't say 

the instructions 

came from an outside source.

So much for being

"A synthetic cell from scratch.")


"Currently, SpudCells don't last more than a few generations. They can't actually produce their own protein expression system, nor can they regulate their metabolism, so they rely entirely on substances and components in the liquid medium in which they float."

"The blobs also lack a cytoskeleton, the internal scaffolding that props up natural cells. This simplifies things, but it also means they can't shuttle materials around or clear waste."

"But this work does provide a proof of concept that other scientists can build on – and that we'll keep a close eye on in the coming years."


See?

"Scientist say they have built

a Proof of concept

for a synthetic cell from scratch"

just wouldn't quite have the

"click bait appeal now would it?"


In other words:

We Created Life! Er, Wait a Minute

scienceandculture.com 07/02/26


At the New York Times, 

the science story of the day:


“This Cell Feeds, 

Grows and Reproduces. And It’s Manmade.”


"A professor at a prominent university 

writes in to us to taunt Dr. Tour about this:


(See: Friday, April 10, 2026

So?

(For more about Dr. Tour)


"So Fellow James Tour and you folk STILL claim the evil materialist scientists are “clueless” about the origin of life?"

(Easy fact check: James Tour isn’t a Fellow of the Center for Science and Culture.)


"What’s This All About?

It’s a silly comment 

if the professor has actually listened to Dr. Tour. 

Tour’s main point is that 

to get origin-of-life scenarios to work 

you would need active guidance and control 

by the scientist… not an unguided process.


Absolutely positively no way to get around it.

And If life can just create itself from scratch?

THEN WHY DID IT JUST STOP?


"The idea is simple. From, “A Chemically Defined Synthetic Cell Capable of Growth and Replication,” at Biotic:


"Building ribosomes from genetic instructions. SpudCell currently uses ribosomes from E. coli bacteria. Without the capability to remake ribosomes, SpudCell runs for 5-10 generations before the machinery degrades. Building ribosomes from scratch means synthesising dozens of proteins and RNA molecules, then getting them to assemble in the right order.

"Um…so it’s borrowing ribosomes from real cells but can’t make new ones, so it dies. That doesn’t sound like it’s from scratch, doesn’t sound like a minimal cell, and doesn’t sound like a real cell."


SO IT'S CASE CLOSED. 

TRY AGIAN.

OH IM SORRY

THAT WOULD MEAN ANOTHER

GUIDED ATTEMPT

TO PROVE AN "UNGUIDED PROCESS."


These people honey.

Just killin anybody and everybody

with any common sense.


MORE YET! (:-)


Science news this week: 

Life on Mars, weird water 

and a curious human cousin.

livescience.com 06/27/26


Again with the headline right?

It's a built in bias on purpose

to make people think along the lines of:

"Oh yeah, Martians, 

we knew that along time ago."


But if you dig into the article you find:

"Now, scientists have confirmed the widespread presence of complex carbon-based molecules in this area of the crater, which they suggest indicate the presence of fossilized microbes."


Well whooptie shit.

Just stop the presses everybody:

"They suggest"

and

"the presence of 

fossilized microbes"


Oh my goodness The Martians 

are just gonna take over 

the earth any time now!


"the presence of 

fossilized microbes"



One more time for all the 

knuckledraggers out there:


Life requires information.

Information requires a brain.




Somebody hollar at me 
when you see him:




And also we have:



Astronomers Discover 

Another Galaxy With No Dark Matter

universetoday 07/01/26


"In the 1970s, astronomer Vera C. Rubin provided the first solid evidence for the existence of Dark Matter, a mysterious, unseen mass that appeared to be holding galaxies together. Since then, the indirect evidence for Dark Matter has grown considerably, with scientists observing "halos" and gravitational lenses that could not be caused by normal (or "visible") mass. Based on observational data, Dark Matter is estimated to account for 85% of the total mass of the Universe. However, astronomers have also observed a few galaxies that don't fit this pattern."


("indirect evidence"


And 
it's all based on,  

or inferred by looking at:

LIGHT.)


"Using the W.M. Keck Observatory, a team of Yale-led astronomers has discovered the third known galaxy that appears to lack Dark Matter altogether. This faint dwarf galaxy, known as DF9, is part of a linear structure that may have formed from a violent collision between galaxies. This discovery strengthens the evidence for a rare and previously unknown process that could assist astronomers in future studies. The study detailing their findings was published on June 16th in The Astrophysical Journal."


(Yeah, they are looking for something 

that just doesn't exist yo.

Hey? Don't get pissed at me

Stephen Hawking's last theory

said the Universe was a hologram.

Some prominent other concur:

(Bohm, Susskind etc) 


"As Michael Keim, a PhD Candidate at Yale University and the lead author on the paper, said in a Yale press release:


"A line of galaxies lacking dark matter has never been seen before. The discovery provides some of the strongest evidence yet that these galaxies formed through an extreme and previously unseen process and offers a rare new window into the nature of dark matter itself."


(Oh you can count on the fact that it was an:

"extreme and previously unseen process"

alright.)


"He (Pieter van Dokkum, co-author of the paper.) further proposed that DF9 be analyzed by Keck's Cosmic Web Imager (CWI), which is specifically designed to study faint light sources in the Universe.'


(Thats all these people are looking at.

LIGHT.

Holograms move things from the spatial domain

to the frequency domain via the mathematical process of

Fourier transformation.

These people just have no idea what they are looking at.)


From a few years back:

New research suggests 

that our universe has no dark matter

sciencedaily.com 03/16/24


"A University of Ottawa study published today challenges the current model of the universe by showing that, in fact, it has no room for dark matter.


"In cosmology, the term "dark matter" describes all that appears not to interact with light or the electromagnetic field, or that can only be explained through gravitational force. We can't see it, nor do we know what it's made of, but it helps us understand how galaxies, planets and stars behave.'


"Rajendra Gupta, a physics professor at the Faculty of Science, used a combination of the covarying coupling constants (CCC) and "tired light" (TL) theories (the CCC+TL model) to reach this conclusion. This model combines two ideas -- about how the forces of nature decrease over cosmic time and about light losing energy when it travels a long distance. It's been tested and has been shown to match up with several observations, such as about how galaxies are spread out and how light from the early universe has evolved."


(From the "tired light" link above:

 Despite periodic re-examination of the concept, tired light has not been supported by observational tests and remains a fringe topic in astrophysics.)


"...explains Gupta. "In standard cosmology, the accelerated expansion of the universe is said to be caused by dark energy but is in fact due to the weakening forces of nature as it expands, not due to dark energy."


"Redshifts" refer to when light is shifted toward the red part of the spectrum. The researcher analyzed data from recent papers on the distribution of galaxies at low redshifts and the angular size of the sound horizon in the literature at high redshift."


"There are several papers that question the existence of dark matter, but mine is the first one, to my knowledge, that eliminates its cosmological existence while being consistent with key cosmological observations that we have had time to confirm," says Gupta."


"By challenging the need for dark matter in the universe and providing evidence for a new cosmological model, this study opens up new avenues for exploring the fundamental properties of the universe."


See also:

Wednesday, June 17, 2026

More things that a 

"Holographic Universe " 

would explain.


And always, always, always 

remember:


"this is the same

"community

that wanted you to believe 

"The Multiverse"

and

"The Anthropic Principal"

were 

"Scientific."


Speaks for itself.

"Anything but God"

is their religion,

nothing quite like 

ruling out 

the obvious much.


It bears repeating...

 

Thursday,

November 2, 2023

This

is so not complicated.

It so simple.




He knew we were broke.

That he had more 

"conventional"

(non nuclear weapons)

than NATO did collectively

and that

he would see the day 

when our resolve would fold.

It's kinda what we do.


Ukraine’s backers in US Congress 

struggle to secure aid for war effort


"They are gonna walk into Kiev"


(I told my son not that long ago.

And with the country largely intact.

Just like envisioned.

And control a huge portion 

of the worlds grain market

in the process.)

Sunday, July 5, 2026

Consciousness, Luke 16, current science, etc...

 

Wednesday, June 3, 2026

Chuck Missler Angels pt.3 "The Dark Side".


0:3520 minutes, 35 seconds

"And uh the rich man and Lazarus 

in in uh 

Luke 16

 are a place 

where we learn 

most of these conceptions 

that the Lord Jesus taught us. 


20:4320 minutes, 43 seconds


And uh the rich man lifted up his eyes 

and could he sense he could see 


20:5020 minutes, 50 seconds


the bosom of Abraham a far off. 

So strangely he is in the dark place,

 the bad place, 

but he's aware. 


He has consciousness.


20:5620 minutes, 56 seconds


He's aware and 

he knows that 

the the u that 

Lazarus is in the good place. 

So he somehow

is conscious of all of that. 


The man in Hades, though, the


26:1626 minutes, 16 seconds


rich man who go dies 

and goes to Hades is fully conscious.


 We recognize that from the 

By the way, that's not a parable. 

That's an actual event. 


Chapter 10:

In The Rich Man and Lazarus Luke 16


26:2526 minutes, 25 seconds


In parable, 

people don't have names in here. 

We have a specific name in Lazarus. 

Jesus describing some specifics. 


And the man 

in Hades had a memory.


(Every thought

you have ever thought

gave off:

"Brain waves".

It's a form of guess what?

ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY.

Guess what?

It cant be destroyed.

This is what physics says.

It is residing somewhere

waiting on you.)


26:3326 minutes, 33 seconds


 He was able to speak. 

He was in deep pain 

and he had intense desires.


26:4026 minutes, 40 seconds


His eternal destiny was irrevocably fixed. 

He understood that. 

He never questioned it. 

He never felt it was unjust.

 Strangely enough. 


(Everybody gets exactly what they deserve.

Nobody gest ripped off.

Nobody.)


26:4926 minutes, 49 seconds


In fact, he knew 

just what he was experiencing 

was fair and just. 

And he alludes to that.


26:5526 minutes, 55 seconds


He also knew

what his brothers needed to do to do 

to a avoid his own fate to repent. 

He pleads for someone to get


27:0427 minutes, 4 seconds


that message to his brothers 

so they wouldn't uh inherit the the fate 

that he is suffering. 

And he was not yet in hell


27:1227 minutes, 12 seconds


by the way. 


(That was just the waiting room

so to speak.)


He was in Hades. 

Gehenna is yet future on his situation. 

In fact, that guy asking for


27:2127 minutes, 21 seconds


a touch of water 

is still waiting today for that."



Brain activity under anesthesia 

challenges what we know about consciousness

sciencedaily 06/28/26


"Summary:

The unconscious brain appears to be far more capable than scientists once believed. Researchers found that patients under general anesthesia could still process language at a sophisticated level, distinguishing nouns, verbs, and adjectives while listening to stories. Even more remarkably, neural activity showed signs of predicting upcoming words before they were heard. The results challenge traditional ideas about consciousness and hint at new possibilities for brain-computer interfaces."


"Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine have discovered that the human brain can continue performing surprisingly advanced language tasks even when a person is fully unconscious under general anesthesia. The findings, published in Nature, challenge long held assumptions about the relationship between consciousness and cognition. They also offer new insights that could shape future research on memory, language, and brain-computer interfaces."


"Our findings show that the brain is far more active and capable during unconsciousness than previously thought," said Dr. Sameer Sheth, professor and Cullen Foundation Endowed chair of neurosurgery and a McNair Scholar at Baylor. "Even when patients are fully anesthetized, their brains continue to analyze the world around them."


"The Brain Continued Processing Language

The first experiment exposed patients to a series of repeating tones with occasional unexpected sounds mixed in. The researchers found that neurons in the hippocampus consistently detected these unusual tones. Even more interesting, the brain became better at recognizing them over time, suggesting that learning or neural plasticity was still taking place during anesthesia."


"The researchers then increased the complexity of the experiment by playing short stories while continuing to record brain activity. The hippocampus showed clear evidence of processing language in real time. Patterns of neural activity revealed that the brain could distinguish different parts of speech, including nouns, verbs, and adjectives."


"The team also made another surprising discovery. Neural signals could be used to predict upcoming words before they were spoken."


"The brain appears to anticipate what comes next in a story, even without conscious awareness," said Sheth, who is also Director of The Gordon and Mary Cain Pediatric Neurology Research Foundation Laboratories within the Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children's Hospital."


"This kind of predictive coding is something we associate with being awake and attentive, yet it's happening here in an unconscious state," said Dr. Benjamin Hayden, professor of neurosurgery at Baylor."


"Rethinking Consciousness

The findings suggest that important cognitive abilities, including language comprehension and prediction, may not depend on conscious awareness. Instead, consciousness itself may arise from communication across multiple brain regions rather than from activity within a single area such as the hippocampus."


"The researchers caution that the findings should be interpreted carefully. The study examined only one type of general anesthesia, so the results may not apply to other unconscious states such as sleep or coma. In addition, the research focused on a single brain region, and it remains unclear how broadly these processes occur throughout the brain."


"This work pushes us to rethink what it means to be conscious," said Sheth. "The brain is doing much more behind the scenes than we fully understand."


Maybe its creator 

knew a thing or two about it huh?

Maybe?

Best guess.

Rational, logical brain

God gave ya.