"Science" so they say, tidbits...

 

For The First Time, Scientists Say 

They've Built a Synthetic Cell From Scratch

Sciencealert.com 07/22/26

You have to keep in mind this is the same

"community

that wanted you to believe 

"The Multiverse"

and

"The Anthropic Principal"

were "scientific."

This is nothing but "click-bait" idiorcary.

And thats only id one goes so far to actualy click on the link.

Most people just see the haedline

and scroll right on past thinking:

"Well know kidding, 

they did that years ago already."

NOTHING

could be any farther from the truth.

"The project is called SpudCell, and it has a genome of just 90 kilobase pairs (kbp). For comparison, the human genome is about 3 million kpb, and biologists previously assumed that a living cell would require at least 113 kpb of genetic data to function properly.

According to Adamala and her colleagues, SpudCell appears to stretch these limits, though their research is yet to be formally published and has not been peer-reviewed."

(But by God we got headlines out there!

Seein how this works yet?

And it been this way 

as long as I have been following

the subject matter some 14 years or so.)

"According to Science magazine, SpudCell has met some hurdles in publication: apparently one reviewer at Cell, a prestigious science journal, said the project was not real biology."

("Who cares!

 We got the headline we wanted!

Yea us!"

It's just flat out stupidity.

Anyone with a brain can see

what they are doing and why.)

"The 'cell' is also equipped with an in-built 'protein expression system', which translates the DNA's genetic instructions into action. That's what allows the 'cell' to turn the nutrients it absorbs from the surrounding liquid into useful materials, and enables cell division.'

(Instructions = Information.

Notice they didn't say 

the instructions 

came from an outside source.

So much for being

"A synthetic cell from scratch.")

"Currently, SpudCells don't last more than a few generations. They can't actually produce their own protein expression system, nor can they regulate their metabolism, so they rely entirely on substances and components in the liquid medium in which they float."

"The blobs also lack a cytoskeleton, the internal scaffolding that props up natural cells. This simplifies things, but it also means they can't shuttle materials around or clear waste."

"But this work does provide a proof of concept that other scientists can build on – and that we'll keep a close eye on in the coming years."

See?

"Scientist say they have built

a Proof of concept

for a synthetic cell from scratch"

just wouldn't quite have the

"click bait appeal now would it?"

In other words:

We Created Life! Er, Wait a Minute

scienceandculture.com 07/02/26

At the New York Times, 

the science story of the day:

“This Cell Feeds, 

Grows and Reproduces. And It’s Manmade.”

"A professor at a prominent university 

writes in to us to taunt Dr. Tour about this:

(See: Friday, April 10, 2026

So?

(For more about Dr. Tour)

"So Fellow James Tour and you folk STILL claim the evil materialist scientists are “clueless” about the origin of life?"

(Easy fact check: James Tour isn’t a Fellow of the Center for Science and Culture.)

"What’s This All About?

It’s a silly comment 

if the professor has actually listened to Dr. Tour. 

Tour’s main point is that 

to get origin-of-life scenarios to work 

you would need active guidance and control 

by the scientist… not an unguided process.

Absolutely positively no way to get around it.

And If life can just create itself from scratch?

THEN WHY DID IT JUST STOP?

"The idea is simple. From, “A Chemically Defined Synthetic Cell Capable of Growth and Replication,” at Biotic:

"Building ribosomes from genetic instructions. SpudCell currently uses ribosomes from E. coli bacteria. Without the capability to remake ribosomes, SpudCell runs for 5-10 generations before the machinery degrades. Building ribosomes from scratch means synthesising dozens of proteins and RNA molecules, then getting them to assemble in the right order.

"Um…so it’s borrowing ribosomes from real cells but can’t make new ones, so it dies. That doesn’t sound like it’s from scratch, doesn’t sound like a minimal cell, and doesn’t sound like a real cell."

SO IT'S CASE CLOSED. 

TRY AGIAN.

OH IM SORRY

THAT WOULD MEAN ANOTHER

GUIDED ATTEMPT

TO PROVE AN "UNGUIDED PROCESS."

These people honey.

Just killin anybody and everybody

with any common sense.

MORE YET! (:-)

Science news this week: 

Life on Mars, weird water 

and a curious human cousin.

livescience.com 06/27/26

Again with the headline right?

It's a built in bias on purpose

to make people think along the lines of:

"Oh yeah, Martians, 

we knew that along time ago."

But if you dig into the article you find:

"Now, scientists have confirmed the widespread presence of complex carbon-based molecules in this area of the crater, which they suggest indicate the presence of fossilized microbes."

Well whooptie shit.

Just stop the presses everybody:

"They suggest"

and

"the presence of 

fossilized microbes"

Oh my goodness The Martians 

are just gonna take over 

the earth any time now!

"the presence of 

fossilized microbes"

One more time for all the 

knuckledraggers out there:

Life requires information.

Information requires a brain.

Somebody hollar at me 

when you see him:

Marvin the Martian

And also we have:

Astronomers Discover 

Another Galaxy With No Dark Matter

universetoday 07/01/26

"In the 1970s, astronomer Vera C. Rubin provided the first solid evidence for the existence of Dark Matter, a mysterious, unseen mass that appeared to be holding galaxies together. Since then, the indirect evidence for Dark Matter has grown considerably, with scientists observing "halos" and gravitational lenses that could not be caused by normal (or "visible") mass. Based on observational data, Dark Matter is estimated to account for 85% of the total mass of the Universe. However, astronomers have also observed a few galaxies that don't fit this pattern."

("indirect evidence"

And it's all based on,  

or inferred by looking at:

LIGHT.)

"Using the W.M. Keck Observatory, a team of Yale-led astronomers has discovered the third known galaxy that appears to lack Dark Matter altogether. This faint dwarf galaxy, known as DF9, is part of a linear structure that may have formed from a violent collision between galaxies. This discovery strengthens the evidence for a rare and previously unknown process that could assist astronomers in future studies. The study detailing their findings was published on June 16th in The Astrophysical Journal."

(Yeah, they are looking for something 

that just doesn't exist yo.

Hey? Don't get pissed at me

Stephen Hawking's last theory

said the Universe was a hologram.

Some prominent other concur:

(Bohm, Susskind etc) 

"As Michael Keim, a PhD Candidate at Yale University and the lead author on the paper, said in a Yale press release:

"A line of galaxies lacking dark matter has never been seen before. The discovery provides some of the strongest evidence yet that these galaxies formed through an extreme and previously unseen process and offers a rare new window into the nature of dark matter itself."

(Oh you can count on the fact that it was an:

"extreme and previously unseen process"

alright.)

"He (Pieter van Dokkum, co-author of the paper.) further proposed that DF9 be analyzed by Keck's Cosmic Web Imager (CWI), which is specifically designed to study faint light sources in the Universe.'

(Thats all these people are looking at.

LIGHT.

Holograms move things from the spatial domain

to the frequency domain via the mathematical process of

Fourier transformation.

These people just have no idea what they are looking at.)

From a few years back:

New research suggests 

that our universe has no dark matter

sciencedaily.com 03/16/24

"A University of Ottawa study published today challenges the current model of the universe by showing that, in fact, it has no room for dark matter.

"In cosmology, the term "dark matter" describes all that appears not to interact with light or the electromagnetic field, or that can only be explained through gravitational force. We can't see it, nor do we know what it's made of, but it helps us understand how galaxies, planets and stars behave.'

"Rajendra Gupta, a physics professor at the Faculty of Science, used a combination of the covarying coupling constants (CCC) and "tired light" (TL) theories (the CCC+TL model) to reach this conclusion. This model combines two ideas -- about how the forces of nature decrease over cosmic time and about light losing energy when it travels a long distance. It's been tested and has been shown to match up with several observations, such as about how galaxies are spread out and how light from the early universe has evolved."

(From the "tired light" link above:

 Despite periodic re-examination of the concept, tired light has not been supported by observational tests and remains a fringe topic in astrophysics.)

"...explains Gupta. "In standard cosmology, the accelerated expansion of the universe is said to be caused by dark energy but is in fact due to the weakening forces of nature as it expands, not due to dark energy."

"Redshifts" refer to when light is shifted toward the red part of the spectrum. The researcher analyzed data from recent papers on the distribution of galaxies at low redshifts and the angular size of the sound horizon in the literature at high redshift."

"There are several papers that question the existence of dark matter, but mine is the first one, to my knowledge, that eliminates its cosmological existence while being consistent with key cosmological observations that we have had time to confirm," says Gupta."

"By challenging the need for dark matter in the universe and providing evidence for a new cosmological model, this study opens up new avenues for exploring the fundamental properties of the universe."

See also:

Wednesday, June 17, 2026

More things that a 

"Holographic Universe " 

would explain.

And always, always, always 

remember:

"this is the same

"community

that wanted you to believe 

"The Multiverse"

and

"The Anthropic Principal"

were 

"Scientific."

Speaks for itself.

"Anything but God"

is their religion,

nothing quite like 

ruling out 

the obvious much.

It bears repeating...

 

Thursday,

November 2, 2023

This

is so not complicated.

It so simple.

He knew we were broke.

That he had more 

"conventional"

(non nuclear weapons)

than NATO did collectively

and that

he would see the day 

when our resolve would fold.

It's kinda what we do.

Ukraine’s backers in US Congress 

struggle to secure aid for war effort

"They are gonna walk into Kiev"

(I told my son not that long ago.

And with the country largely intact.

Just like envisioned.

And control a huge portion 

of the worlds grain market

in the process.)

Consciousness, Luke 16, current science, etc...

 

Wednesday, June 3, 2026

Chuck Missler Angels pt.3 "The Dark Side".

0:3520 minutes, 35 seconds

"And uh the rich man and Lazarus 

in in uh 

Luke 16

 are a place 

where we learn 

most of these conceptions 

that the Lord Jesus taught us. 

20:4320 minutes, 43 seconds

And uh the rich man lifted up his eyes 

and could he sense he could see 

20:5020 minutes, 50 seconds

the bosom of Abraham a far off. 

So strangely he is in the dark place,

 the bad place, 

but he's aware. 

He has consciousness.

20:5620 minutes, 56 seconds

He's aware and 

he knows that 

the the u that 

Lazarus is in the good place. 

So he somehow

is conscious of all of that. 

The man in Hades, though, the

26:1626 minutes, 16 seconds

rich man who go dies 

and goes to Hades is fully conscious.

 We recognize that from the 

By the way, that's not a parable. 

That's an actual event. 

Chapter 10:

In The Rich Man and Lazarus Luke 16

26:2526 minutes, 25 seconds

In parable, 

people don't have names in here. 

We have a specific name in Lazarus. 

Jesus describing some specifics. 

And the man 

in Hades had a memory.

(Every thought

you have ever thought

gave off:

"Brain waves".

It's a form of guess what?

ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY.

Guess what?

It cant be destroyed.

This is what physics says.

It is residing somewhere

waiting on you.)

26:3326 minutes, 33 seconds

 He was able to speak. 

He was in deep pain 

and he had intense desires.

26:4026 minutes, 40 seconds

His eternal destiny was irrevocably fixed. 

He understood that. 

He never questioned it. 

He never felt it was unjust.

 Strangely enough. 

(Everybody gets exactly what they deserve.

Nobody gest ripped off.

Nobody.)

26:4926 minutes, 49 seconds

In fact, he knew 

just what he was experiencing 

was fair and just. 

And he alludes to that.

26:5526 minutes, 55 seconds

He also knew

what his brothers needed to do to do 

to a avoid his own fate to repent. 

He pleads for someone to get

27:0427 minutes, 4 seconds

that message to his brothers 

so they wouldn't uh inherit the the fate 

that he is suffering. 

And he was not yet in hell

27:1227 minutes, 12 seconds

by the way. 

(That was just the waiting room

so to speak.)

He was in Hades. 

Gehenna is yet future on his situation. 

In fact, that guy asking for

27:2127 minutes, 21 seconds

a touch of water 

is still waiting today for that."

Brain activity under anesthesia 

challenges what we know about consciousness

sciencedaily 06/28/26

"Summary:

The unconscious brain appears to be far more capable than scientists once believed. Researchers found that patients under general anesthesia could still process language at a sophisticated level, distinguishing nouns, verbs, and adjectives while listening to stories. Even more remarkably, neural activity showed signs of predicting upcoming words before they were heard. The results challenge traditional ideas about consciousness and hint at new possibilities for brain-computer interfaces."

"Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine have discovered that the human brain can continue performing surprisingly advanced language tasks even when a person is fully unconscious under general anesthesia. The findings, published in Nature, challenge long held assumptions about the relationship between consciousness and cognition. They also offer new insights that could shape future research on memory, language, and brain-computer interfaces."

"Our findings show that the brain is far more active and capable during unconsciousness than previously thought," said Dr. Sameer Sheth, professor and Cullen Foundation Endowed chair of neurosurgery and a McNair Scholar at Baylor. "Even when patients are fully anesthetized, their brains continue to analyze the world around them."

"The Brain Continued Processing Language

The first experiment exposed patients to a series of repeating tones with occasional unexpected sounds mixed in. The researchers found that neurons in the hippocampus consistently detected these unusual tones. Even more interesting, the brain became better at recognizing them over time, suggesting that learning or neural plasticity was still taking place during anesthesia."

"The researchers then increased the complexity of the experiment by playing short stories while continuing to record brain activity. The hippocampus showed clear evidence of processing language in real time. Patterns of neural activity revealed that the brain could distinguish different parts of speech, including nouns, verbs, and adjectives."

"The team also made another surprising discovery. Neural signals could be used to predict upcoming words before they were spoken."

"The brain appears to anticipate what comes next in a story, even without conscious awareness," said Sheth, who is also Director of The Gordon and Mary Cain Pediatric Neurology Research Foundation Laboratories within the Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children's Hospital."

"This kind of predictive coding is something we associate with being awake and attentive, yet it's happening here in an unconscious state," said Dr. Benjamin Hayden, professor of neurosurgery at Baylor."

"Rethinking Consciousness

The findings suggest that important cognitive abilities, including language comprehension and prediction, may not depend on conscious awareness. Instead, consciousness itself may arise from communication across multiple brain regions rather than from activity within a single area such as the hippocampus."

"The researchers caution that the findings should be interpreted carefully. The study examined only one type of general anesthesia, so the results may not apply to other unconscious states such as sleep or coma. In addition, the research focused on a single brain region, and it remains unclear how broadly these processes occur throughout the brain."

"This work pushes us to rethink what it means to be conscious," said Sheth. "The brain is doing much more behind the scenes than we fully understand."

Maybe its creator 

knew a thing or two about it huh?

Maybe?

Best guess.

Rational, logical brain

God gave ya.

"More yet!" (Cant help it lol)...Regarding:

 

Saturday, July 4, 2026

You really only got three choices

First of all lets take a look at:

Position #3

"...if I believe that the world will see the progressive triumph of Christ people 

until the whole world is Christian 

and a glorious material and spiritual era unfolds."

And the teaser for:

God's Plan For Victory: 

The Meaning of Postmillennialism

by R. J. Rushdoony 

Goals determine our present-day action, and if the purpose of our action is God’s victory in history, then we are all the more motivated in our actions. Our goal is Christ’s Kingdom 

(Christ Kingdom was never in doubt.

So why is that "our goal"

What about God's goal?)

and His purpose for humanity and the world. Therefore, our eschatology is vital for how we should govern our lives today. The average Christian holds an eschatology of defeat with the only victory coming in heaven after we die or at Christ’s return. 

(This guy didn't know Christ already won?

Where is "the eschatology of defeat" exactly?)

As far as history is concerned, they are “pessimillennialists.” Not so for postmillennialism which invigorates the Christian life with a victorious view of God’s Kingdom in history so that each Christian finds the purpose needed to fuel their application of the faith in every area of life and thought.

God’s Plan for Victory: The Meaning of Postmillennialism is a concise statement of this victorious eschatology and why you should embrace it. This third edition is expanded to include six appendices featuring other writings by R. J. Rushdoony on postmillennialism.'

Lots of 

"ours" and "we's" and "you's"

don't you think?

Matthew 7:22

Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?

Anybody that makes it about

what you or I or anybody else does?

HAS OBVIOUSLY  MISSING THE BOAT

R. J. Rushdoony

 "He is credited as being 

the father of Christian Reconstructionism"

"Through Chalcedon and his collaborations with figures like Gary North, he promoted Christian Reconstructionism, emphasizing the application of biblical law to society and education while critiquing secularism and modern democratic principles."

"Christian reconstructionism is a fundamentalist Calvinist theonomic movement.[1] It developed primarily under the direction of R. J. Rushdoony, Greg Bahnsen and Gary North[2] and has had an important influence on the Christian right in the United States.[3][4] Its central theme is that society should be reconstructed under the lordship of Jesus in all aspects of life.[5] In keeping with the biblical cultural mandate, reconstructionists advocate for theonomy and the restoration of certain biblical laws said to have continued applicability.[6] These include the death penalty not only for murder, but also for idolatry,[7] homosexuality,[8] adultery, witchcraft and blasphemy.[9]

I guess he just throws:

Zechariah 4:6, 

"Not by might, nor by power, 

but by my Spirit, saith the LORD of hosts".

Right out the window along with

Matthew 7:22 from above?

And people bought in to this nonsense?

UNREAL.

All it did was what Satan wanted:

"Religious studies scholar Julie Ingersoll traces the movement's origins to Calvinism, "Southern Presbyterianism, and mid-20th century right wing conservatism of the John Birch Society" and argues that the movement has helped shape Christian nationalism in the United States.[13]

The book 

God's Plan For Victory: 

The Meaning of Postmillennialism

was from 1977.

"Christian Reconstructionism, emphasizing the application of biblical law to society and education

"Its central theme is that society should be reconstructed under the lordship of Jesus in all aspects of life."

That was close to fifty years ago,

so how did that work out?

Hum?

From todays sermon:

Acts 5:35-39

35 And said unto them, Ye men of Israel, take heed to yourselves what ye intend to do as touching these men.

36 For before these days rose up Theudas, boasting himself to be somebody; to whom a number of men, about four hundred, joined themselves: who was slain; and all, as many as obeyed him, were scattered, and brought to nought.

37 After this man rose up Judas of Galilee in the days of the taxing, and drew away much people after him: he also perished; and all, even as many as obeyed him, were dispersed.

38 And now I say unto you, Refrain from these men, and let them alone: for if this counsel or this work be of men, it will come to nought:

39 But if it be of God, ye cannot overthrow it; lest haply ye be found even to fight against God.

Also see vs 40-41

40 And to him they agreed: and when they had called the apostles, and beaten them, they commanded that they should not speak in the name of Jesus, and let them go.

41 And they departed from the presence of the council, rejoicing that they were counted worthy to suffer shame for his name.

Somebody has to explain 

this to people these days?

Hebrews 5:12-14

12 By now you should be teachers. Instead, you need someone to teach you again the first things you need to know from God’s Word. You still need milk instead of solid food. 13 Anyone who lives on milk cannot understand the teaching about being right with God. He is a baby. 14 Solid food is for full-grown men. They have learned to use their minds to tell the difference between good and bad.

And if:

"Christian Reconstructionism, 

emphasizing the application of biblical law 

to society and education."

"Its central theme is that 

society should be reconstructed 

under the lordship of Jesus 

in all aspects of life."

Never came to fruition?

After 50 years?

Then what's the chances of:

"postmillennial eschatology" 

thats associated with it

Position #3

"...if I believe that the world will see the progressive triumph of Christ people until the whole world is Christian and a glorious material and spiritual era unfolds."

Being correct?

If it's not even nowhere close 

to the horizon even some 50 years later?

I mean the position is already 0 for 2.

along with:

Matthew 7:22

"Lord, have we not..."

NEWSFLASH:

Making it about what you do

aint really what god wants.

and Zechariah 4:6 from above as well.

OH I AINT DONE LOL.

Go figure lol.

I got some more questions

for these types as well:

Position #1) 

"I believe that Christ will soon 

rapture me 

from the evil world"

Romans 12:1

I beseech you therefore, 

brethren, by the mercies of God, 

that ye 

present your bodies 

a living sacrifice, 

holy, acceptable unto God, 

which is your reasonable service.

So that was just for the first century Christians?

And the Nigerians, and the Ethiopians 

And the Sudanese and the Syrians of today?

Anybody and everybody else is fine

but just not certain groups of American Evangelicals?

YOU HAVE ABSOLUTELY

LOST YOUR MINDS.

I got all day:

Come reconcile a 

"Pretribulation Rapture"

with:

Romans 12:1

I beseech you therefore, 

brethren, by the mercies of God, 

that ye 

present your bodies a living sacrifice, 

holy, acceptable unto God, 

which is your reasonable service.

And when your done with that one?

Work on this one for a while:

Luke 21:36

Watch ye therefore, and pray always, 

that ye may be accounted worthy to escape 

all these things that shall come to pass, 

and to stand before the Son of man.

(Where did ya go if you are here we he comes back?

Not saying you are not Christian or that you are going to hell

Im just asking you:

How are you gonna be spiritually ready

for whats about to come on this earth

if you dont think 

you

have to go through it?

What a privileged

sense of entitlement.

If you lived in Uganda I bet 

you would think like that.

The only way you are going to escape 

what is coming is by your faith in God. 

And if it hasnt ever been tested?

Then how do you know how strong it really is?

And?

Job 2:10

10 But he said unto her, Thou speakest as one of the foolish women speaketh. What? shall we receive good at the hand of God, and shall we not receive evil? In all this did not Job sin with his lips.

So yeah, wrap your 

"pretrib rapture"

around all of that

and get back with me.

And one more thing from:

God's Plan For Victory: 

The Meaning of Postmillennialism

R. J. Rushdoony

"our view of the end, of eschatology, 

depends to a large measure 

on our view of the beginning"

There were "Hybrid" beings in Noahs day

(Genesis 6:1-5)

Pouring gasoline on the wickedness 

of the world as it were.

We got the same exact thing 

going on right now.

Trandsexual

Transhumanism

And Souless humaniod robots

giving "Abodes" to the evil spirits 

of the Nephilim and their offspring.

Same exact thing.

Same exact result.

CATACLYSMIC JUDGEMENT.

I wonder what the pre-tribulation raptureites

and the Postmillennialist's interpretations 

of Genesis 6 are?

Cause I bet it aint the Angel view...

Just sayin...

You really only got three choices

"Rousas John Rushdoony 

shared in his book, 

God's Plan for Victory

The Meaning of Postmillennialism

(Written in 1977 BTW, and: 

(Postmillennialism is a Christian end-times theology 

asserting that Christ’s second coming will occur 

after a prolonged golden age (the Millennium) 

of global peace and Christian prosperity. 

Adherents believe the church will 

successfully evangelize the world, 

gradually transforming society 

before Jesus returns.)

(Not my kinda positions or viewpoints BTW. 

Not at all, anyway in that book there is)

"a very sobering thought 

concerning differing doctrines 

of eschatology:

(Oh it's a "very sobering" alright.)

"Once you adopt a position it has certain logical consequences and also very practical implications for our lives. If I believe that Christ will soon rapture me from the evil world, this will have a practical effect on my life very different from a belief that I shall see the world get worse and worse and live through a terrible tribulation. Again if I believe that the world will see the progressive triumph of Christ people until the whole world is Christian and a glorious material and spiritual era unfolds. I shall be motivated very much differently. Thus one can not hold these different doctrines of eschatology (the study of last things) are a matter of indifference. They make a very great difference in how we view the world and our work and future in it...our view of the end, of eschatology, depends to a large measure on our view of the beginning, and of all history and our doctrine of God and salvation."

(And that was from the preface, p. xiii

of that book above

published in 1991.)

Lets take a look at our 

three choices today in 2026:

Position #1) 

"I believe that Christ will soon 

rapture me 

from the evil world"

That straight up contradicts 

Christ very words, so that one is out

 and it does it not just once but twice:

John 17:15

 I pray not that thou shouldest 

(Should not)

take them out of the world, 

but that thou shouldest 

keep them from the evil.

ESV: "I do not ask that you take them out of the world, 

but that you keep them from the evil one".

NIV: My prayer is not that you take them out of the world 

but that you protect them from the evil one.

Even Scofield in his Reference Bible 

didn't bother

to try and twist some comments around about 

that verse and make it mesh with

his "Pre-tribulation rapture" theology.

AS IT JUST SO PLAINLY 

SPEAKS FOR ITSELF.

And if you try and do the mental

gymnastics needed to say:

"Well that verse in Christ prayer

was just for the disciples"?

John 17:20

Neither pray I for these alone, 

but for them also 

which shall believe on me 

through their word;

And again a second time:

Matthew 24:29-30

Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:

30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.

So now you have just called God a liar twice.

"Well you shouldn't criticize the

Pretribulation Rapture

of the church."

Why not?

Its clearly not based on scripture,

and it came to the game late so to speak

(1800's)

when we know 

things just get more and more perverted 

and polluted and corrupted etc.

(Even the Egyptian religion 

of the Pharaohs wasnt as sublime

near the end as it was in the beginning.

IT'S HOW THINGS WORK.)

Position #2:

"a belief that I shall see 

the world get worse and worse 

and live through 

a terrible tribulation..."

Even the secular 

"20 somethings" these days 

KNOW

this world is not right

and is not headed in 

any kind of direction

to fix itself.

So where is your evidence

What is your belief based on?

That this:

"I shall see the world get worse and worse 

and live through a terrible tribulation."

Isnt 

100% exactly what we are seeing

 happening in our world

right now?

See; Thursday, March 12, 2026

Compare this:

So I'll be waiting.

I got all day.

Cause this I just gotta hear.

Have The Pope 

or Anybody else you want

come and explain it to me,

all ears, undivided attention,

I'll make us a nice meal etc.

Position #3

"...if I believe that the world will see the progressive triumph of Christ people until the whole world is Christian and a glorious material and spiritual era unfolds."

(That era being a "figurative" 

and not a literal millennial Kingdom.)

How can ANYBODY

look at our world

TODAY

and justify

MAINTAINING that position?

I understand we have always had Evil 

in our world 

but not like this 

where it doesn't even care 

if you know it's evil or not.

It doesn't even bother 

to hide itself anymore.

Now thrown in nukes and fake brains

to go along with it.

This view contradicts 

the teachings of scripture as well.

All through the Old Testament,

when people got out of line?

God smacked em around

so that they would come to their senses.

And that is exactly where we are right now

and your only escape is gonna be 

your faith and trust in God

and his plan.

NOT YOURS. HIS

To people who still maintain this view?

With all the evidence that says otherwise

so clearly being presented before us?

Two questions:

1) How exactly would:

"the progressive triumph of Christ people until the whole world is Christian and a glorious material and spiritual era unfolds"

take place,

after what was holding evil back

had been removed?

2 Thessalonians 2:7

For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: 

only he who now letteth will let, 

until he be taken out of the way.

Which has so obviously happened

and is the reason why evil these days:

"doesn't even care 

if you know it's evil or not."

(See Revelation 17:17 

for the explanation

as to why that is.)

And I got another question

FOR ANYBODY

that holds this view.

Explain this:

Mathew 24:21-22

For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.

(Newsflash:

They didnt have nukes 

and fake brains in 70 AD yo.

22 And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened.

So two of those three viewpoints

are clearly man-made fairytales

to try and circumvent God's will

for the eradication of evil from this world

a lot of which is done

by simply turning evil loose on it's self

which we are currently witnessing

(See 2 Thessalonians 2:7 above.)

So which of those three positions

matches up best with

what we see unfurling 

in our world right now?

THE CHOICE IS OBVIOUS.

"In other words, 

does the viewpoint...

demonstrate a proper method 

of interpreting Scripture?...

Does it fit the facts of history?"

~

Walvoord

I'll just leave it at that

as it speaks for itself,

it really does.