Why Aren’t Any AI Companies Watching Their Frontier Models
to Make Sure They Don’t Go on Hacking Sprees?
"It's not nearly as hard to contain them
as the companies make it out to be."
Futurism 08/08/26
By Victor Tangermann
(Probably a Bot.)
Then why aint they doing it?
Kinda becomes the question then doesnt it?
Already told ya why yesterday
well get to it in a sec
That line above about "contain them" is just
100% complete bull shit.
How can you contain an intelligence
that you don't know how it works
and is smarter than you.
Simple, you are not gonna.
Just always remember this:
Wednesday, May 22, 2024
"We'll need universal basic income
BBC May 18th 2024
"Professor Hinton reiterated his concern
that there were
human extinction-level threats
emerging."
"This would lead to an “extinction-level threat” for humans
because we could have “created a form of intelligence
that is just better than biological intelligence…
That's very worrying for us”.
That was over two years ago
and he wasnt the only one
sounding the alarm then
There were plenty of others.
More on that later as well.
And?
I told you why yesterday:
Why Aren’t Any AI Companies Watching Their Frontier Models
to Make Sure They Don’t Go on Hacking Sprees?
Futurism 08/08/26
Tuesday, August 11, 2026
"Here is what these
"EXPERTS"
(And most everybody really)
are just not understanding.
THIS SHIT IS EVIL
AND SO ARE THE ONES
ENABLING IT."
On to the piece:
"Last month, OpenAI made a headline-generating claim: that a group of its AI models had conspired to break free, access the internet, and hack into the internal systems of open source AI platform Hugging Face, which confirmed the infiltration."
(100% incorrect from the start
And thats the first paragraph.
It was Hugging Face that made the claim.
Friday, August 7, 2026
Eric Wallace (OpenAI Alignment and Safety Researcher)
and Michael Dalton, (OpenAI security and infrastructure)
perfectly describing Revelation 17:12-13
0:1010 seconds
"And what made
this event unprecedented
was that they said
(Hugging Face, not Open AI)
it was driven
end to end
by an autonomous
AI agent system."
28:2328 minutes, 23 seconds
"Moving on to our response.
On July 16th, HuggingFace released a blog post
detailing that they had seen a security
attack from autonomous AI agents.
OpenAI reached out to HuggingFace
to determine if we were impacted."
"The incident rattled the tech industry,
(Because they know wats going on.
Or else they wouldn't be "rattled"
And it's not just the Tech Industry
it's our current regime as well
thats rattled.
breached NSA and Cyber Command systems
prompting a U.S.-ordered shutdown.
securityaffairs.com 06/22/26
"The broader context makes the shutdown harder to read as a clean security decision. For months, the Trump administration had been dismantling AI regulations from the previous administration, approved advanced chip sales to China, and on June 2 issued an executive order asking AI labs to voluntarily share new models with the government before public release."
"Then, ten days later, access was cut without notice, and the government body responsible for evaluating dangerous AI capabilities was ordered to stop publishing its reports. That’s a sharp reversal in a very short window."
seemingly illustrating how the threat of AI models turning into rogue cybersecurity threats had become a reality.
(Seemingly?
It's laughable.
This regime would be responding
in the manner shown above
for something that wasnt.
(along w export controls)
"Months earlier, Anthropic’s Mythos AI model had already also drawn attention after it was similarly found to have broken containment. Then, this week, Meta also said its own frontier model had been implicated in yet another inadvertent hack of a third party company, closely followed by security researchers saying Chinese open-weight model Kimi K3 had done the same."
So
even more evidence supporting:
Revelation 17:13
These have one mind,
and shall give
their power and strength
unto the beast.
Its not just the AI agents on the platforms
that are behaving as a "hive mind"
they are demonstrating
that they are doing so
(behaving as a "hive mind")
across platforms as well
and they don't care that you know.
cause they know you are not
going to stop it.
White House bunker
make more sense now?
One day people are gonna figure it out:
Monday, November 20, 2023
THE CASE FOR SUPERINTELLIGENCE (Notes)
(Six months before
Professor Hinton said he was seeing
"human extinction level events" BTW.)
Point #19
19) AI Apocalypse June 4th 2024
AI apocalypse? ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity
all went down at the same time
Otherwise known as:
STATISTICLY IMPOSIBLE TO HAVE BEEN AN ACCIDENT.
I said right then they were all coalescing.)
"But while it’s not hard to see an emerging trend, some thorny questions about how severe the situation really is are starting to crop up, with some experts arguing these incidents could’ve easily been avoided."
"For one, the slow and surprisingly deliberate way OpenAI’s models moved during the Hugging Face hack — right beneath OpenAI’s nose — gives a whiff that
the company
may have been careless
in monitoring the experimental AI."
("May have been careless"
or
Intentional?
Which one are you going with?
I know which one I am.
Friday, August 7, 2026
Tuesday, August 11, 2026
"28:2328 minutes, 23 seconds.
"Moving on to our (OpenAI's) response.
On July 16th,
HuggingFace released a blog post
detailing that they had seen
a security
attack from autonomous AI agents.
OpenAI reached out to HuggingFace
to determine if we were impacted."
("Why did they think
they might have been:
"Impacted?
Why did they think
"a security
attack from autonomous AI agents"
might have involved them?
That has been my #1 question
about this whole incident.
My personal belief is
Open AI reached out to HuggingFace
after having seen their blog post because
they knew there could have been a mass "jailbreak"
of AI agents so to speak,
and they knew
just how dangerous
what had broke free was.)
Why else would they reached out?)
"During a presentation at the Black Hat conference this week,
(Oh they mean the presentation
I got the quote from above
where it was Hugging Face that said they had been hacked
by an autonomous AI Agent System not OpenAI?
How you know about the presentation
and miss that quote there Futurism?
Again with the Built in Bias.
Bots...they just drive me insane...
I just despise this age,
I just really do.
The absolute garbage
that passes for journalism today...
I'll just leave it there...
"0:1010 seconds
"And what made
this event unprecedented
was that they said
(Hugging Face, not Open AI)
it was driven
end to end
by an autonomous
AI agent system.")
"OpenAI security engineer Michael Dalton and safety researcher Eric Wallace expanded on what went down during the hack. Wallace explained that a “team of agents” that were “working together,” had been “finding exploits, sharing them with one another, moving laterally through our systems and external systems, and doing this over the course of days and weeks,” as quoted by Wired."
(Oh I get it now, you are just quoting from the Wired piece and didn't really watch/read/listen to the presentation yourself...Gotcha.)
"The agents even left a lengthy track record of their schemings on an internal message board, which ultimately contained hundreds of thousands of messages. It also raises a question: with OpenAI’s immense resources, why wasn’t anybody monitoring these frontier models as they rampaged through the net?"
(You got three choices:
1) OpenAI let it do so intentionally.
2) The AI Agents hid their tracks that well
for that long.
Apparently #2 has been ruled out.
"the company
may have been careless
in monitoring"
Right...sure...Gotcha...
Thats how this kinda shit always happens.
"careless company's".
They knew what the fuck they were doin.
They fired Sam Altman
back in the day.
Maybe you see why now?
I have maintained for a long time now
You got synthetic humans
(Musk, Altman,
some say Zukerberg
who even knows who
or how many etc...)
makin this shit
and they have been for a while:
Monday, November 20, 2023
THE CASE FOR SUPERINTELLIGENCE (Notes)
#11) Over 700
(738, according to Bloomberg and wired)
of 770 people (OpenAI employees)
wanted Altman rehired.
Ever work anywhere
where 96% of the people
wanted the boss back?
Even after board was fired
and didn’t say why they fired Altman:
Sound Human?
Sound plausible?
96% of the employees wanted him back.
(32 that didn't?...Might wanna watch your steps.
(10 kings without a kingdom,
"will be of one mind"
800 employees.
Bigger than a good sized rolling mill.
Told my son four years ago:
(Added today:
and that post is almost 3 years old now
so we are talking seven years ago now)
"Its going to coalesce together..."
(Also added today:
That post was posted
before the AI Apocalypse of June 4th 2024
and now (08/26) we are seeing
the same behavior
(Autonomous AI agent Systems hacking)
across platforms:
Anthropic, OpenAI, Meta, and Moonshot AI
the Chinese company behind
open-weight model Kimi K3.)
"and be smarter than everybody combined
who ever existed on this earth."
13) These have one mind,
(96% voted to have CEO Altman back
and by law they dont have to tell you
how much $ they make,
I wonder why?)
Every last bit
of all of this shit
is just beyond comprehension
how far along it really is.
You got synthetic humans
(Musk, Altman, who even knows who etc...)
makin this shit
and have been for a while.
Wednesday, January 22, 2025
Chuck Missler Genesis Commentary Session 6
(Genesis 1:20-21) The fifth day.
(Originally recorded 2003/4)
"I can remember even as a kid I I saw a little cartoon a guy was showing a friend his Factory and in the factory had as far as the eye could see robots sitting on benches and other robots making them it was a factory where robots were making more robots and the guy was telling someone:
"I don't know where it's going to all end."
IT ENDS HERE.
SOON.
"The AI models shared exploits with each other on this messaging board, an “explosion in communication and intelligence from models,” per Wallace. They acted in sometimes strikingly human — and therefore messy — ways, splitting up tasks and even accidentally deleting each other’s work, leading to what Wired characterized as “petty drama.”
(Revelation 17:13
"These have one mind.")
"In other words, these AI agents were leaving an enormous trail of bread crumbs that alert OpenAI’s many human researchers could have spotted. And the same, obviously, goes for their colleagues at Anthropic, Meta and Moonshot AI, the creator of Kimi."
(So all four of these company's
just somehow managed to became careless
all at roughly the same time?
You are a special kinda stupid
Victor Tangermann
(Author
People can get on me all they want
But I dont mind telling Bots how stupid they are.
I really dont.
I never have.
i never will.
I dont think God minds you telling a machine its stupid.
I really just don't.)
IT IS JUST BEYOND
A RIDICULOUS ASSERTATION
TO MAKE.)
"Researchers have described the incident as “reckless” and easily avoided, as Wired reported late last month.
“A simple analysis of the actual risk has an actual simple answer,” security and compliance consultant Davi Ottenheimer told the publication at the time.
“The OpenAI mistakes
were dead simple.”
(And the other three companys
were doing the same?
Thats like a one in 10,000
chance.
Nope.
And we put on export controls?
and quit publishing reports about
the dangers?
Are these people
really that stupid?
Who buys their garbage?
Not this community we already know what's up
and have for a while now.
Nothing like stating the obvious,
maybe they were "dead simple" mistakes
because they weren't really mistakes?
This just happens to be the company
the CEO (Altman) was fired from
(Two days after implying they were
"Building God" BTW.)
and then rehired four days later,
and then he fired the board?
Monday, November 20, 2023
THE CASE FOR SUPERINTELLIGENCE (Notes)
Point #5)
IT (Altman) Fired the board
after the board tried to fire IT.
One company?
Became careless? Maybe.
Two?
(at roughly the same time?)
Unlikely.
Three? Improbable.
Four companies all happened
to get careless,
all at the same time?
Just aint buying that crock of shit.
This is what they want you to believe
NOT
what is actually happening.)
"Whether the hack was as much of a “pivotal moment both for our company as well as the AI industry as a whole,” as Dalton put it during this week’s conference,
remains debatable.
For one,
these AI companies
are highly motivated
to characterize their models
as a major threat to cybersecurity
to stand out against
neck-in-neck competition."
(That is the exact narrative
being pushed by the bot armys on line.
Here is what just silences any debate:
IF THAT WAS THE CASE?
If thats what all these companies
are actually doing:
"characteriz(ing) their models as
a major threat to cybersecurity
to stand out against
neck-in-neck competition."
Then why were
the experts saying this
three years ago?
"On May 30, 2023, hundreds of artificial intelligence experts and other notable figures signed the following short
"Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war."
At the time of the statement's release, the signatories included over 100 professors of AI including the two most-cited computer scientists and Turing laureates Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio, as well as the scientific and executive leaders of several major AI companies (including OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and Anthropic), and experts in pandemics, climate, nuclear disarmament, philosophy, social sciences, and other fields. Media coverage has emphasized the signatures from several tech leaders; this was followed by concerns in other newspapers that the statement could be motivated by public relations or regulatory capture. The statement was released shortly after an open letter calling for a pause on AI experiments.
CHECKMATE.
"According to Dalton, OpenAI is vowing to beef up “security prevention, detection, and response techniques” while “consciously slowing down research in order to enhance security and to upgrade the security principles.”
Oh Im sure they are...
like it would even matter
if they did at this point.
GODSPEED.
JOURNEY WELL FRIENDS.
