Saturday, December 27, 2025

So? (Sunspots 4296/4294, 3I/ATLAS etc.)

 

why in the world

are we getting information on 

Sunspot regions 4296 and 4294

from: www.futura-sciences.com

and not NASA?

Hum

??????????


Wat is your best guess, 

with the

logical, rational, brain 

God Gave ya.

??????????


Somebody wanna come 

and try and explain that to me?

Good luck.


A massive sunspot is pointed right at us 

— could another Carrington-like event happen?

www.futura-sciences.com 12/24/25


(Christmas eve, 

right when everybody is reading

futura-sciences.com right?

How many times have we seen things like that?

And yes another Carrington event 

most certainly

could happen, 

and

given the state our our world today?

We should be expecting one 

And?

Just based on our overreliance 

on technology alone

we should be expecting it 

to be way worse.


It is not a matter of "if"

with these type events.

It is a matter of when.


Same with the San Andres fault line,

the New Madrid fault line etc.

Events like these are inevitable,

and eventually, they just go.)


"There’s a massive sunspot 

currently facing Earth


(It's more like they are on the edge of

facing the earth even today.

This article was from three days ago

)


and it’s about the same size as the one that unleashed the most powerful solar storm ever recorded — the legendary Carrington Event. So, should we be worried?"


(What's to worry about ever

if your souls is assured an eternity

with its creator/owner?)


"Back on September 1, 1859, astronomer Richard Carrington observed a dark blemish on the Sun and began sketching it. Moments later, it erupted in a colossal X45-class flare that sent a wave of charged particles crashing into Earth’s magnetic field. The result was chaos: telegraph systems sparked and failed across continents, and auroras lit the skies as far south as the Caribbean. It remains the strongest solar storm ever recorded — and if something similar happened today, 

our satellite networks and power grids 

could face catastrophic damage."


(That happens first.

Then the impact from 3I/ATLAS

or one of its fragments etc.


Remember this,

it was a Coronal Mass Ejection

that sent 3I/ATLAS 

crashing into Mars.


Thursday, December 18, 2025

11 points of evidence 

supporting the conclusion 

of a Mars 3I/ATLAS collision:


"1) Avi Loeb 

has never once mentioned 

the Coronal Mass Ejection 

that was aimed right at 3I/ATLAS 

right before its approach to the planet.


Sun Fires Energy Blast 

Straight at Mysterious Interstellar Object 

Cruising Through Solar System

futurism.com 9/26/25"


Sorry Avi

but when you yap incessantly

about things we know that can not exist?

"Technological Thrusters"

and such?

And just completely ignore 

the existing physical reality

that happened?

Thats just not having any integrity.

None at all.)


"The current sunspot drawing everyone’s attention is labeled 4294–4296 — technically two spots so close they appear as one. At roughly 2,080 millionths of a solar hemisphere, it’s about the same scale as Carrington’s and ranks among the biggest seen in the past decade — the third largest of the Sun’s ongoing Solar Cycle 25."


(That is not an accident BTW:

"...the third largest 

of the Sun’s ongoing Solar Cycle 25."

None of these numbers are.

8th IAWN "exercise" etc.)


"Is a major eruption on the horizon?

To put it simply, this thing is enormous

 — many times larger than Earth itself."


(So big NASA apparently

doesn't want you to know about it.


All that hubbub about 

who was gonna be the NASA

head make more sense now?)


"The region is highly active, its magnetic fields swirling and snapping with energy. If they reconnect, the result could be one or more X-class flares — the most powerful type the Sun produces. And because the sunspot is currently facing our planet, any eruption could send a blast of radiation and plasma directly toward Earth.

"Still, there’s some relief: the intense X1.9 flare that erupted a few hours ago didn’t come from this giant region."


(How was the article released on 12/24/25 

yet says that a flare that "erupted a few hours ago"

is listed below as happened on 12/25?

Anybody else catch that?)



"1Dec25.  AR 4294-96 is one of the biggest #sunspot seen in a decade. AR4294 is growing rapidly and harbours magnetic fields with #X_flare potential. The surprise is the X1.9 flare this morning came not from AR4294-96 behemoth but from the smaller AR4295 sunspot. This X-flare started at 0227, reached maximum intensity of X1.9 at 0249 and ended at 0305hrs. The animated gif was made from SDO/AIA 131 Angstrom images The associated #CME is directed away from Earth. Credit: NASA/SDO.


When "Alfred Tan"

is giving you more information on X

than you can find on the 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Space Weather Prediction Center

page?


It's back up BTW.

https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/


You just might wanna

reexamine

some long held beliefs

you had.


Just sayin...


And

this page 

https://community.spaceweatherlive.com/topic/4151-ar4294-4296-4298/page/19/

from 

spaceweatherlive.com

seems to be kept up to date 

with contributions

by it's members.


THIS AGE ENDS.

GET A HOLD OF YOURSELVES

BEFORE IT'S TO LATE.






No comments: