these
Knuckle dragging
bigoted
Neanderthal types
are gonna understand:
NO INFORMATION?
NO LIFE.
PRETTY SIMPLE.
AND?
INFORMATION
REQUIRES AN INTELLECT:
Pre-Planning, sequence, order, logic etc.
Behind it.
Not one example of it anywhere ever
where that wasnt ever the case.
Not one.
AND INFORMATION
always has to come
from outside of
where it is hosted.
(at least initially.)
Seen this a few times
here in last few days:
Peptides, the Building Blocks of Life,
Could Form on Interstellar Dust
Avi Loeb Medium 1/23/26
(Not even worthy of reading anymore.
as I've read to many articles like this
and they all say the same thing
and they are all just
WAY TO EASY
to demolish.
AND IT'S NEVER THE BIOLOGIST
THAT GET EXCITED
ABOUT THESE THINGS.
THAT SHOULD
TELL YOU SOMETHING!
Because they understand
way better than most
just how difficult
life is to come by.
It's always the cosmologist,
or the astro-physicist,
or the particle physicist,
or the astronomer
WHO ALL KNOW
just how well
the universe is fine-tuned
for life to be in it.
The code in the DNA molecule
just demolishes
The Anthropic principal argument
that we only see things
as we do
because we exist in the reality
that we do.
Plus?
There is the dilemma of:
The DNA molecule
is made of protein(s).
The DNA molecule
gives a copy
of the blueprint
(Instructions never create themselves)
of the
needed proteins
to the RNA molecule
(made of protein(s)
that goes and makes
the needed proteins.
SEE THE DELIMA?
SO WHICH CAME FIRST?
The proteins
or the DNA molecule?
"Well life
could have
developed differently
somewhere else."
(See logical fallacy's
Burden of proof etc.)
Is the argument that
most often gets offered in response,
to which I respond with
a quote from one of
cosmology's chosen
"golden boys"
"very popular
and successful or accomplished."
"Extraordinary claims
require
extraordinary evidence"
~
Carl Sagan
"Peptides, the Building Blocks of Life,
Could Form on Interstellar Dust"
"Monkeys are getting ready
to fly out of my ass"
100% SAME EXACT LOGIC.
AND THERE
is absolutely
no evidence
of life having
"formed differently"
anywhere else.
ZERO!
NONE.
NADA.
ZILCH.
ETC.
"...the Sagan standard,
dictates that
claims contradicting established,
well-supported knowledge
(Like the single most important
ingredient for life
is information)
require robust,
high-quality evidence
to be accepted.
(All life that has ever
processed oxygen to live
the only place
we know life exist
has had information in it
in the form
of the genetic code
in the DNA molecule.)
"Popularized by Carl Sagan, this principle roots in Bayesian probability—claims with low prior probability
(Like "life could have developed differently
somewhere else".)
"need strong evidence"
(There is not any.
Let alone:
"strong" evidence.)
to overcome that
initial improbability."
Someday these knuckledragging
bigots are gonna understand
one of their own had it right years ago.
I just hope its not to late for em.
Seems like all they want to do is
preach to the choir
of the cult of scientism.
And pieces like Avi wrote?
Just Are not even worth reading anymore.
There s a reason
nobody talks about
where did the information
in the DNA molecule come from,
oh yes there most assuredly is.
PROMISE.
People only believe this garbage
cause they want to.
Time to change the paradigm
don't ya think?
I sure do.
No comments:
Post a Comment