Wednesday, October 18, 2017

Three Things



I liked about writing:

"Satan's Backstory"

1) The ending was the beginning. 

Why wouldn't it be?
"I am the Alpha and the Omega"

Revelation 1:8


says the Lord God,
“who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty.”
At first, when I started looking at things I was like, wow, where does this part of the story go?
The beginning or the end?
I guess its some big theological brouhaha judging by the number or web pages that the search returned, then it just hit me.
This is just like the creation vs evolution argument, 
everybody (most) see it as this or that, 
one or the other, 
when in fact, they are two parts of the same thing.
Any end is just a new beginning.


2) The woman giving birth.


Again, it applies to both Christ first and second coming.
(Not even gonna get into Moses being a precursor for Christ)
The first coming, Christ, forerunner to a new church, was taken away to Egypt to be saved from King Harrods slaughter of the innocents.

Matthew 2:13-23


The second time, the woman giving birth is also supernatural. 
This time, once again, it's the birth of Christ New Church.
As it was before? 
So shall it be again.
The male child, the new church in this second instance, 
which comes before Christ return?
It will also be protected supernaturally from Satan's grasp.

3) And he said to them,
“I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven"
"and I saw a star fallen from heaven to earth,
and he was given the key to the shaft of the bottomless pit."


This combines:

 Luke 10:18

with

Revelation 9:1.


Who was the one giving John his revelation again?

Exactly.
(It was Christ)

Here is why I don't worry about what I am doing.
When an answer to an age old theological question:
How was the devil present in the garden of Eden 
when he doesn't get thrown out of heaven till the last book of the bible in Revelation? 
gets answered for me in a matter of seconds?
I know it wasn't me imparting my will on things.
Not only that, if I have a question about something I'm not sure I should be writing?
I'll pause for a second and ask.
I was told:

"Write it, you're on track."

When I get that kind of answer before I have even finished asking the question?
I go with it.

Besides, The bible isn't all that chronological to begin with.
It's organized by books of history, poetry, prophecy, letters etc.
Within the types of books? 
It is pretty much chronological.

I do what I'm told.
Not really sure what else I'm supposed to be doing at this point.

Love you Lucy.

New Church.
New day.
New way of looking at things.
Kingdom perspective.
Not Church perspective.
Bound to ruffle some feathers.
Always has.





No comments: