This thing just never quits.
Let review the events of last week once again.
Monday
Timeline revised by the Clark County Sheriff's office.
Later Monday or Tuesday.
MGM disputes the revised timeline.
They do it through a public-relations firm, not their legal department.
Thursday
MGM puts forth it's own timeline of events.
Friday
Clark County Sheriff's office updates their timeline once again, this time matching up with MGM's version of events.
So?
Who paid who here?
I mean that all happened pretty fast right?
MGM timeline on Thursday,.
The Clark County Sheriff's office revised theirs to match MGM's and they give it out at a news conference
after the news cycle on Friday
the very next day?
It's almost like this kinda conversation took place:
"Hey, we were negligent about some things
and let some things go we never should have.
But we can't make this thing make sense,
and apparently you can't either,
so can we at least have some kinda a shield
against the negligence lawsuits that will come out of this?
Cool.
Thanks.
Appreciate it."
It's obvious they are matching things up to put forth a story that will match as close as possible to the evidence they have, not putting forth the truth from the evidence like they should be.
And?
They aren't even doing a good job of manufacturing a story.
If they were?
They wouldn't have to change it so much.
No comments:
Post a Comment