Good Stuff

 

If you're interested in this kinda stuff.

The Universe is not symmetric

The laws of physics obey certain symmetries and defy others. It's theoretically tempting to add new ones, but reality doesn't agree.

"We must face reality: the Universe is not symmetric."

"The Universe could have been symmetric, but for some reason, it is not."

(Theism

/ˈTHēˌizəm/

noun

belief in the existence of a god or gods, 

especially belief in one god 

as creator 

of the universe, 

intervening in it 

and sustaining a personal relation to his creatures.)

(This is the one that gets em right here:

"The idea of unification holds that all three of the Standard Model forces, and perhaps even gravity at higher energies, are unified together in a single framework. This idea, although it remains popular and mathematically compelling, does not have any direct evidence in support of its relevance to reality. (Credit: ABCC Australia, 2015)"

(But where did those forces come from and how were they "unpackaged" right when they were needed?

Gravity needed to have been first 

pulling all the subatomic particle parts in thr primordia soup together.

Strong nuclear force would have needed to have been next to "glue" the particles together to for atomic nuclei for atoms etc.

Electromagnetism would need to be third to "glue the atoms" into molecules, 

and weak nuclear force would have been last as it deals with decay of the aforementioned particles.

So how did all of that get there?

It had to have been preplanned or programed whatever.

Indicates a programer or a designer and this is what certian scientist just dont wanna talk about.

To think that these four fundamental forces just generated themselves out of nothing right when they needed to exist?

Yeah...wats your logical rational brain God gave you think that likelihood is?

Hum? I reiterate:

Theism

/ˈTHēˌizəm/

noun

belief in the existence of a god or gods, 

especially belief in one god 

as creator 

of the universe, 

intervening in it 

and sustaining a personal relation to his creatures.)

"...there are significant problems with adding in additional symmetries that are often glossed-over. For one, each of the new symmetries discussed here leads to the predictions of both new particles and new phenomena, none of which are borne out or validated by experiments."

(You mean you could actually:

"experiment and observe"?

Interesting concept Multiverse fans.)

"It’s easy to argue that these 

“hints” of additional symmetries 

were put there 

by our own hopes, 

imaginations, and biases, 

not by a physical need for them."

(Hearing that multiverse fans?

Same thing.)

"And you must remember that, 

despite what Max Tegmark says, 

mathematics is not physics. 

Mathematics offers options 

to what physics 

could 

result in, 

but only by observing the Universe 

can you pick out 

which mathematical possibility 

has actual, physical relevance."

(One more time Multiverse fans.)

"The Universe is not symmetric, 

and 

the sooner we let 

our measured Universe, 

rather than our 

theoretical prejudices, 

be our guide,

 the better off we’ll all be."

(Agreed 100%

You should know by know 

what the audience is 

that statement 

is intended for :-).

And I love 

Ethan Siegel

I really do.

I know I have given him a hard time

but I really do like him.

Im sure we could have some interesting conversations,

laughs,

good times etc...