I guess the NYT
cant do some basic research?
Read a Wikipedia entry?
Double check a link on a footnote?
kinda give it away
they are selling you horseshit.
Goes right along with:
"Full Scale Invasion"
"12 day war."
etc.
People know
what is going on and why
and what all of this means,
they most certainly do,
they just dont want you to know.
Anyway,
honey mentioned she had
saw this
(Or saw a different article
but on the same topic)
yesterday:
Bipartisan US lawmakers propose
giving bunker-buster bombs to Israel
07/03/25
(Nice timing right?
Right before a holiday?
Think that is an accident?
And why does it always
have to come
from a foreign source?)
Anyway, she said she had seen a similar article yesterday, today I came in to take a break from outside and laid down to relax and read for a minute and I saw this and thought hey lets see what they are saying...unreal just how stupid and ignorant this country has become, it really is.
Follow along.
I'll point out the progression at the end.
"For third time, Democrat Josh Gottheimer and Republican Mike Lawler introduce measure to provide massive GBU-57 explosive
and aircraft to deliver them
should Iran resume nuke bid."
(Immediately I'm like:
"Wait a minute,
all we heard for weeks on end
was how only the B2
can deliver the GBU-57
We only have 19 B2's
at 2.5 Billion a pop
And we are gonna make
them available?
"introduce measure to provide
massive GBU-57 explosive
and aircraft to deliver them"
To Israel?
WTF?)
"US lawmakers introduced a bipartisan bill Wednesday aimed at giving Israel access to the massive bunker-busting bombs used in American strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities last month,
along with planes to drop them from."
"The bill, announced by New Jersey Democrat Josh Gottheimer and co-sponsored by New York Republican Mike Lawler, would give the US president the authority to transfer to Israel a supply of the 30,000-pound GBU-57 bunker-busting bombs
(Like what?
The six or seven we got left?)
"along with unspecified aircraft,
in the event that Iran continues working
on developing a nuclear weapon."
(Now I'm like,
Okay, If,
like we were told
the B2,
is the only plane?
That can launch
the 30,000-pound GBU-57
bunker-busting bombs?
Then how
"unspecified"
of an aircraft
can it be really?
Know where this is going yet?)
"Currently, the only aircraft configured to use the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs are US B-2 stealth bombers,
(One,
GBU-57
Massive Ordnance Penetrator
as shown below
not two each, loaded up in Missouri and flown half way around the world using our most advanced stealth aircraft when the Iranian advance warning radars and anti aircraft batteries had already been taken out, like we were sold. They didn't even need the stealth for goodness sakes! Why risk your fleet when there wasnt a need?
Anyway, back to the article)
"which have not been provided
to any other countries."
(Well fuck no they haven't been. The entire world watches what we do with our B2's, wants to know where they are 24/7, so that they can know if something is coming their way, makes sense right? Stealth capable lethal bomber that can stay airborne something like 44 hours with refeulers. if you were China or Russia, wouldn't you wanna know where they are at any given moment? Then I read the next sentence and just laughed and went and go t honey to tell her what I had just read.
"The veteran B-52 bomber
could also be used
to deliver the bomb,
among other possible aircraft."
(Like?
And did ya hear that NYT?
Every other major US news outlet?
Every Social Media Platform?
Podcast?
"The veteran B-52 bomber
could also be used
to deliver the bomb"
They had em parked in Qatar
up until the June19th.
"Currently, the only aircraft configured to use the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs are US B-2 stealth bombers, which have not been provided to any other countries. The veteran B-52 bomber could also be used to deliver the bomb, among other possible aircraft."
If:
"the only aircraft configured to use
the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs
are US B-2 stealth bombers"
Then how can:
"The veteran B-52 bomber
could also be used to deliver the bomb,
among other possible aircraft."
??????????
"In a joint statement, the lawmakers said the legislation was introduced to “Give the President the authority to transfer the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) bomb, or ‘bunker buster,’ and the aircraft necessary to carry it — if Iran is on the cusp of developing a weapon.”
"It will aim to
“preserve Israel’s qualitative military edge in the region while maintaining the capacity to deter Iran,”
said Gottheimer,
who is a member of the
House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence."
(If we "obliterated" their nuclear program and the "12 day war" is over? Then why does "a member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence." think we need to: "preserve Israel’s qualitative military edge in the region while maintaining the capacity to deter Iran" becomes my question.
??????????)
“Iran is the world’s leading state sponsor of terror and is responsible for the deaths of thousands of Americans,” Gottheimer wrote on X. “As Iran rebuilds its nuclear program, we must maintain maximum deterrence.”
(“As Iran rebuilds its nuclear program"
?????????)
"Israel launched an unprecedented air campaign targeting Iranian nuclear sites, scientists and top military brass on June 13
in a bid to end the country’s nuclear program
and to radically degrade
its ballistic missile capabilities"
(It didnt get close to either
The nuclear program has not ended
and Iran still has some 2500
ballistic missiles
(They fired about 500 of em)
some of which Israel has no defense for.)
"Iran, which openly seeks to destroy Israel,..."
(It is this governments entire purpose!
Quit thinking we are dealing with rational people!
Nothing is going to stop them at this point.
They took Israels and the US best shot.
No negotiation, no "bunker busters"
14 didnt do the trick so 6 more will?
No military action, nothing will change:
"Iran, which openly seeks to destroy Israel,")
"...claims its nuclear program is solely geared toward civilian use, but it has enriched uranium to 60 percent purity, above levels needed for civilian usage
and a short step from the level needed
for weapons production,
(That is another lie that's been propagated
See:
Iran can still build nuclear weapons
07/02/25 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist
(Not exactly Fox, CNN, etc...more coming on that soon.)
"obstructed international inspectors from checking its nuclear facilities, and expanded its ballistic missile capabilities."
"Israel says it holds intelligence information indicating that Tehran was taking active steps to build a bomb. It has also warned that it could take further military steps if it sees Iran attempting to rebuild its nuclear and missile programs."
"12 day war"
my ass.
Lets review the progression shown
throughout the article.
"and aircraft to deliver them"
"along with planes to drop them from."
"along with unspecified aircraft"
(They sure werent "unspecified"
in the lead up to the bombing:
"The veteran B-52 bomber
could also be used
to deliver the bomb,
among other possible aircraft."
"and the aircraft necessary to carry it"
Isaiah 54:17
No weapon formed against you shall prosper,
and you will refute every tongue that accuses you.
This is the heritage
of the servants of the LORD,
and
their vindication is from Me,”
declares the LORD.
People dont get vindicated.
Prophets dont get vindicated.
Vindication
is the providence
of the Lord God Almighty
alone.
Period.
If you cant even trust your government
about what planes can be used
to deliver ordinance?
Then how in the world
are you gonna believe
their damage assessment?
Luke 16:10
“Whoever can be trusted with very little can also be trusted with much, and whoever is dishonest with very little will also be dishonest with much.
Drew?
You are so crazy.
You keep saying Iran
already has a bomb(s).
So why didn't they use it then?
Huh?
Because they needed
a reason
to be able to do so
and we just gave it to them.
Senior Iranian politician Ali Shamkhani, as quoted by the Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA): "Even assuming that the facilities have been entirely destroyed, the game would not be over, because enriched material, homegrown knowhow, and political will remain.
Now, the political and operational initiative
— with the right to legitimate defense —
is held by the party that both knows
how to play it smart
and avoids indiscriminate fire."
Henry Stinson,
FDR Secretary of War in his diary:
"The question was,
we should maneuver them
(The Japanese)
into the position of firing the first shot,
without allowing
to much danger to ourselves."
They just did it to Israel
and to us.)
And just like in the above example?
Where b52's could have been
and were used to deliver
massive GBU-57's?
Which is obviously the case
as we are not sending
B2's to Israel,
I dont worry about being right.
(See Isaiah 54:17 again)
I worry whether or not
you are gonna believe it.
No comments:
Post a Comment