I

 

absolutely despise

"The anthropic principle, 

also known as the 

"observation selection effect", 

is the hypothesis, 

(Strike one.

It is an unscientific hypothesis, 

as a scientific hypothesis

has to be testable, measurable etc

and this clearly is not.

See: Saturday, April 20, 2024

Well? One of them was right :-).

Smolin–Susskind debate

"Smolin's argument that the "anthropic principle" cannot yield any falsifiable predictions, and therefore cannot be a part of science." It began on July 26, 2004, with Smolin's publication of "Scientific alternatives to the anthropic principle." Smolin e-mailed Susskind asking for a comment. Having not had the chance to read the paper, Susskind requested a summarization of his arguments. Smolin obliged, and on July 28, 2004, Susskind responded, saying that the logic Smolin followed "can lead to ridiculous conclusions." 

The next day, Smolin responded, saying that 

"If a large body of our colleagues feels comfortable 

believing a theory that cannot be proved wrong, 

then the progress of science could get stuck, 

leading to a situation in which false, 

but unfalsifiable theories dominate 

the attention of our field." 

That was in 2004 

and it is exactly what has happened.

 

This is merely an idea

that originated 

in somebody's mind.

Keep that in mind.

Get it?

Keep that in mind lol.

Nevermind lol.

OMG I crack myself up lo.)

"first proposed in 1957 by Robert Dicke, that 

the range of possible observations 

that could be made about the universe 

is limited by the fact 

that observations could happen 

only in a universe 

capable of developing intelligent life. 

("We only see things

the way we do

because we are in it."

Well what other 

recommendations 

might you have

for us to observe there Mr. Brainiac?

We cant exactly 

observe the unobservable.

Gotta point out 

the effects of the unobservable

are observable:

Wind, Dark Matter, Dark Energy ect.)

What would be the point

in a universe

that wasnt observable?

The logic is 100% backwards.

The reason it is observable

is because it was designed

for us to be in it

and observe it.

Duh.

There is evidence to back that up.

Wait for it...lol

A philosopher might even ask:

"Does it even really exist?

If we cant observe it,

or observe it's effects?"

Hello people 

who buy into 

this line of reasoning:

There is no point

in a universe that isn't observable.

It is the reason it exist 

in the first place.

So that we can observe it.

again more on that in a bit.)

"Proponents of the anthropic principle argue that it explains why the universe has the age 

and the fundamental physical constants 

necessary to accommodate conscious life, 

since if either had been different, no one would have been around to make observations. Anthropic reasoning is often used to deal with the idea that the universe seems to be finely tuned for the existence of life."

(Trying to find a way 

to work around

what you don't like seeing

is not science.

It is promoting 

a faith-based ideology.

(Ref: Monday, May 22, 2023

Here is what

and

Fine-Tuning Parameters)

And if it wasnt for that?

The anthropic principal

 would have never been dreamed up

in the first place.

It is the entire reason

it was dreamed up 

 to try and explain away why:

"the universe seems to be finely tuned 

for the existence of life."

Which it so obviously was

or I wouldn't be here right now

 writing this.

Duh.

So Strike two:

Trying to explain away 

what you dont like seeing

namely:

Fine-Tuning Parameters

Strike three:

It has led to all kinds of

unscientific hypotheses,

being presented as scientific

that we see today.

This was the spearhead

from which all of those emanated.

Anybody comes at me with:

"We just seein that way 

because we are in it"

kinda nonsense

And I straight up

hit em up with:

1) Information in the DNA molecule.

Im not just seeing it that way

because I want to,

it is a 100% physical reality

that exist

and that trumps any

 filthy dreamers dream

about we are just seeing it that way

because we exist in it.

Physical reality

always trumps

mans imagined

mental constructs.

PERIOD.

2) The method by which

Information was imputed

into the DNA molecule.

Again, that is a physical reality.

It is not based on us seeing it 

the way we want to.

3) It does absolutely

nothing to explain:

The initial conditions

of both:

the universe

and the laws 

that govern 

its existence.

4) It does nothing to explain

why the DNA molecule 

is always right handed

and the proteins 

it works with 

to form life

are always left handed.

And if it wasnt that way?

They wouldn't work

and there wouldn't be any life.

"All of yall go over there

(DNA)

and all the rest of yall 

go over there

(proteins)"

Isnt, in fact can not be

a random event or chance or an accident,

it is clear evidence

of design

which requires a designer.

So once again

we have a physical reality

(not a mental construct)

that is not dependent

on us wanting to see it

in any particular manner.

Which is exactly 

what the anthropic principal 

was based on. 

The physical realities

described above

just "Are".

All of that mentioned

above, exist independent of 

any "built in observer bias".

Where did any of that get difficult?

So just go on 

keep on coming up more 

unscientific hypothesis, 

and see where that leads ya.

“The remarkable fact is that the values of these numbers [the constants of physics] seem to have been very finely adjusted to make possible the development of life.” 

(Stephen Hawking A Brief History of Time, p. 125) 

Thursday, January 23, 2025

I spent

 about three hours yesterday

expanding on 

what he talked about 

in a lil over Eight minutes.

Chuck Missler Genesis Commentary Session 6 

(Genesis 1:20-21) The fifth day.

"So if you wanna believe:

"left-handed electrons preferentially destroy

 left-handed precursors of biological molecules"

"This selective destruction 

could explain why life primarily utilizes 

right-handed structures..."

"cosmic radiation, which may have favored"

"nature favored one type of enantiomer"

"polarized cosmic radiation 

could have selectively destroyed"

"If our Universe hadn’t created..."

a matter-antimatter asymmetry early on..."

"If the inflation (Field) 

treated right-handed particles 

differently than the left-handed ones

then it could have 

preferentially created particles 

of one handedness over the other."

As opposed to:

"At some point in time 

one has to reach the logical conclusion 

 the entities themselves 

are not the ones 

making decisions/exercising preferences, 

("electrons preferentially destroy"

"selective destruction"

"cosmic radiation, which may have favored

"nature favored one type of enantiomer"

"polarized cosmic radiation 

could have selectively destroyed"

"If our Universe hadn’t created..."

a matter-antimatter asymmetry

"If the inflation (Field) 

treated right-handed particles 

differently

So Thats: 

Electrons, Cosmic Radiation,

Nature, The Universe

and 

"The inflation field"

(0 evidence of one BTW)

all conspiring together

to favor life 

but no creator?

"Occam's Razor (or Ockham's Razor) is a problem-solving principle stating that when presented with competing explanations, the simplest one—requiring the fewest assumptions—is usually the best.)

"...but that 

the entities (listed above)

CREATOR 

is exercising his preference 

for there to be life 

in the universe he created.

?????????????

THEN YOU JUST GO RIGHT AHEAD 

AND DO SO."

One more piece of evidence

pointing to 

the universe having been created 

for us to be in it 

and to observe it.

OBSERVATION CHANGES REALITY.

Wave-particle duality: Before observation, subatomic particles can exist in multiple states at once, behaving like waves spread out in space.

Collapse of the wave function: When a measurement is made, the particle is forced to "choose" a single, definite state and act like a particle.

(Witnessed it first hand,

ask me sometime I'll share it with you.

It wasnt an experiment

I'll just put it that way.)

The double-slit experiment: This is a classic example. When unobserved, particles create an interference pattern on a screen, showing their wave-like behavior. However, if scientists try to detect which slit the particle goes through, the interference pattern disappears, and the particles behave like discrete objects."

Think that was the result of an accident?

If we were not

 supposed to be in it?

Then why would it 

have been 

designed that away?

Infinite Wisdom

didn't design the Quantum Realm?

You people are insane!

Or put another way?

In summary then?

Fuck your anthropic principal.

It's nothing but a bunch of

"ascientific" nonsense

that led to a whole lot of

host of other problems

and explains away none

of the physical reality

listed above.

Things that try and explain away things

(Multiverse, Anthropic principal etc)

prove to you they are not 

a valid answer as they invariantly produce

more questions than they solve.

Not that there is anything inherently wrong with having more questions, that's not the problem as its part of the scientific method, 

it's the strawmanish:

"Well this explains all of that"

faulty way of thinking

that doesn't really solve anything

and causes more issues

is the problem.

1 Corinthians 3:19

For the wisdom of this world 

is foolishness with God. 

For it is written, 

He taketh the wise in their own craftiness.

Been saying for a long time now:

I want a shirt that says 

on the back of it 

in big black block letters:

"ELECTRONS

DONT MAKE DECISIONS

THEIR CREATOR DOES."

Just to see who would understand 

what was being said.

Come to your senses.

Time is getting late.

Speaking of which:

Leads me right into my next post.

:-).

Love ya babe.

Probably

 

the biggest thing 

I feel like

people are missing 

about my and honeys saga is this:

God alone justifies.

Romans 8:33-34

Who will bring any charge against those whom God has chosen? 

It is God who justifies. 

(wipes slates clean.)

34 Who then is the one who condemns? No one. Christ Jesus who died—more than that, who was raised to life—is at the right hand of God and is also interceding for us.

And he will do it

with whoever he sees fit,

your thoughts on the matter

do not concern him in the least.

You don't like who God choses?

Take it up with him yourself then

his response will probably 

be something along the lines of:

Job 38:2

“Who is this who darkens counsel

By words without knowledge?

Personally? 

I think God 

thought we all needed 

a lil reminder

that he is God

and he will use 

who he chooses.

And then there is this

and I love it:

Father Andrey Lemeshonok reflects 

on a challenging question: 

Where is the line for a priest’s sinfulness?

"A priest is a man chosen by the lord for divine service.

He does not belong to himself but to God.

He contends with the passions 

that consume each and every one of us.

This is the core of the struggle

to be a vessel 

through whom God acts

while being acutely aware

of your own

profound unworthiness.

Nobody knows any more 

than I/we how

"profoundly unworthy"

we are.

Who could be worthy enough

is my question?

And

"I think God 

thought we all needed 

a lil reminder

that he is God

and he will use 

who he chooses."

is how 

and where 

I find my peace with it.

If you are intent on making it about us?

Then you have already missed

a huge point.

Avi, Brother? (3I/ATLAS) (Or? PEOPLE ARE JUST NOT UNDERSTANDING WHAT IS GOING ON!)

 

"Whosoever diggith a pit

shall fall in it,

shall bury in it."

RNM

"The effort of 

gatekeepers 

to hide anomalies 

and maintain 

traditional thinking 

will ultimately fail."

~

Avi Loeb

First things first:

End of November Images of 3I/ATLAS

Avi Loeb Medium 12/06/25

"Processed displays (from Toni Scarmato, Italy) of the November 30, 2025 image of the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS, taken by the Hubble Space Telescope. The left panel shows the original 7x270 second exposure, the middle panel shows the Unsharp Mask filter applied to the original image to sharpen its features, and the right panel shows the Larson-Sekanina filter for detecting rotational gradients in an image. The right-hand panel shows evidence for two jets with a clear anti-tail which is not common in familiar comets. The sunward direction is pointing towards the upper left corner. The image has 0.04 arcsecond per pixel and was taken by the instruments WFC3, UVIS2–2K2C-SUB Filter F350 LP. (Image credit: NASA, ESA, STScI, D. Jewitt (UCLA), M.-T. Hui (Shanghai Astronomical Observatory). Image Processing: J. DePasquale (STScI))

(Thats a different image 

showing the same thing

in the middle 

with two green jets 

symmetrical to each other 

with one pointing to the sun.)

One more time:

"The right-hand panel (Above) shows evidence for two jets with a clear anti-tail which is not common in familiar comets. The sunward direction is pointing towards the upper left corner." 

"The rotational gradient map of the new Hubble image of the interstellar visitor 3I/ATLAS, taken on November 30 with a remarkable angular resolution of 0.04 arcseconds per pixel, shows evidence for two jets, with a clear anti-tail extending out to more than 60,000 kilometers 

(37,000 miles) 

(ten times the Earth’s radius) 

in the direction of the Sun."

"During perihelion, the anti-tail apparently reversed direction relative to the steady motion of 3I/ATLAS. It appears to always point toward the Sun, irrespective of the direction of motion. This phenomenon is not normal in familiar comets and needs to be explained. As I often say: the foundation of science is the humility to learn, not the arrogance of expertise."

(What needs to be learned is this:

There are things that exist

outside of the laws of nature

that science can not explain, ever.

The natural laws obey their creator.)

"Here on planet Earth, there is some good news. As of this morning, YouTube took down the fake AI videos on 3I/ATLAS. All it took was a brief addendum to my latest Medium.com post here. For details on the steps leading to the removal of this fake content, click here. Unfortunately, shortly after the previous channel had been removed, a new YouTube channel appeared here."

(You will not stop it.

If AI wants to do that continually?

Then it will do continue to do so

and you will end up spending

all of your time and energy

trying to get it to cease.

Machines don't sleep.)

Anyway, back to:)

"...the anti-tail apparently reversed direction relative to the steady motion of 3I/ATLAS. It appears to always point toward the Sun, irrespective of the direction of motion. This phenomenon is not normal in familiar comets and needs to be explained."

(Here is what Avi doesnt tell you.

I just went to the NOAA site and took a screen shot.

The current Solar Wind at that time 

was 366 KM/SEC 

which is a staggering

818,718 mph.

Here is a hurricane force wind

(70-200 mph)

for comparison:

So here is what Avi is 

INTENTIONALLY 

leaving out.

1) The speed of the solar winds.

Which just a few minutes ago were 

818,718 mph.

2) The fact that

NOTHING

(nothing mechanical, 

nothing technological

and nothing natural)

extends forward into

a 818,718 mph wind.

And particularly

just in case anybody 

had any doubts,

nothing extends forward

for 37,000 miles

into a 818,718 mph wind

as the "plume"

(their words not mine)

on the left does.

Physically impossible.

Defying the laws of nature

is 3I/ATLAS purpose

to prove conclusively

for once and for all

that things exist outside 

the laws of nature exist.

Thats not breaking the laws of "cometary physics"

as some like to say, that is defying our natural laws.

Clearly making 3I/ATLAS a supernatural object.

Avi? Ive read a lot of your post about 3I/ATLAS, 

never once have I seen 

the speed of the solar wind referenced, 

just that it should push things in the opposite direction away from it, not toward it.

Why are you not mentioning that?

And who is being the 

"gatekeeper"

in this instance?

Hum?

And thats not even the hole you are digging.

Is 3I/ATLAS a Friendly Gardener 

or a Serial Killer?

Avi Loeb Medium 12/07/25

Avi?

What intelligence agency had you

post such mindless drivel?

Im not even going to dignify it 

with to many references to it,

only what I need to make my point:

"Spectroscopic observations of the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS by the Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array (ALMA), were reported here to detect methanol (CH3OH) and hydrogen cyanide (HCN). These molecules are known to form on icy dust grains in the cold interstellar medium and act as key precursors for the complex organic chemistry relevant to the origins of life."

(All of that and  50 cents

might get you 

a pack of chewing gum, maybe

these days I aint so sure.

TRANSLATION?

None of that means squat.

It dont add up to nothing.

LIFE TAKES INFORMATION.

NO INFORMATION

=

NO LIFE.

See how hard that was?

But that's not what Avi is inferring

Avi is inferring

that it does add up to something.)

"Methanol is a building block for amino acids and sugars (like ribose, a component of RNA and DNA) which are fundamental to the organic chemistry of life-as-we-know-it."

(Avi knows

(or should know at least)

 there are no biological

chemical or physical

(geological) 

processes 

which produce enough new information

to produce new life including the original.

NONE.

NOT ONE.

Anywhere.

Ever.

Information always comes

from a source outside itself.

Always.

Universal law.

No exceptions, anywhere ever.)

"On a blind date with an interstellar visitor, it is prudent to observe the dating partner and decide whether it could have seeded life on Earth by carrying out interstellar panspermia (as discussed in a paper that I co-authored here) or whether it represents a serial killer spreading poison. The anomalously large ratio of methanol to hydrogen-cyanide production by 3I/ATLAS suggests a friendly nature for this interstellar visitor."

(Avi?

Where did the life that

"could have seeded life on Earth"

and the information it needed

come from?

All panspermia does

is move the problem of life's origins

(not a problem for this community BTW)

to somewhere else out in the cosmos.

The only reason Francis Crick came up with the idea to start with was he knew there was to much information packed to tightly into the double helix structure of DNA itself, such that it requires a non-human intelligence to have created it.

“An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to be almost a miracle, so many are the conditions which would have had to have been satisfied to get it going" 

(Well know kidding. 

Gee thx.)

Crick does goes on to say:

"But this should not be taken to imply 

that there are good reasons to believe 

that it could not have started on the earth 

by a perfectly reasonable sequence 

of fairly ordinary chemical reactions. 

Francis Crick, 

Life Itself: Its Origin and Nature.

Published in 1981, 44 years ago.

And we know now

(as does Avi or he should), that

"a perfectly reasonable sequence 

of fairly ordinary chemical reactions"

doesnt produce enough new information

to produce new (or original) lifeforms.

The biologist leave out 

the fact that 

INFORMATION ALONE

is foundational to life.

Without it?

Nothing else ever works.

Ever.

So Avi?

Brother?

You can have all of the chemical compounds you want, in copious amounts, on every single planet that has the right conditions for life to flourish (n ot just exist) and without information that always comes from an outside source?

All you got is a bunch of gunk.

More like a bunch of bunk really.

Life comes from life.

Brains come from brains,

every living cell that has ever existed

came from a previous one

and nobody 

has ever 

observed 

(what science is supposed to be based on)

any different, 

anywhere, ever.

Life comes from life.

Lets review:

1)

All Panspermia does is creates more problems than it was trying to solve in the first place solves, so you can throw it out the window and it doesn't tell you where that information came from.

2)

And all the earth's swirling around 

through the cosmos

(Milky Way)

and traveling through left over remnants

of super and hypernova explosions,

still doesn't equal

 the one ingredient

ESSENTIAL FOR LIFE,

information.

3)

And you can have an armada

of your friendly interstellar gardeners

trying to "seed life" everywhere, forever

and all of their chemical, organic, microbes 

molecules etc still can not equal

INFORMATION

as it always comes 

from an outside source.

Look, the biologist dont even wanna

talk about the information 

in the DNA molecule or how it got there,

(And with good reason,

as it's a problem they know they cant solve

and dont want you to know exist)

you really think 

the cosmologist/Astrophysicist types 

are gonna want to talk about 

the information in the DNA molecule 

or how it got there

????????????

You really think Avi doesn't know

Information is the most critical

component of life?

So who is really

playing the role of 

a "gatekeeper"

these days.

And Avi?

Defending Panspermia as you did here:

Is 3I/ATLAS a Friendly Gardener 

or a Serial Killer?

Avi Loeb Medium 12/07/25

Shows you feel your belief system 

is being chipped away at.

"A rich man 

doesn't have to prove it

to anybody." 

It's a waste of his time.

He already knows it.

“Only gradually did I realize that this lack of qualification could be an advantage. By the time most scientists have reached age thirty they are trapped by their own expertise. They have invested so much effort in one particular field that it is often extremely difficult, at that time in their careers, to make a radical change.

― Francis Crick, What Mad Pursuit

Avi?

You are going to end up like Fred Hoyle 

here in a minute if you aint carful.

And Stephen Hawking (Atheist) went to his grave thinking that something had to be missing, because nothing in his reductionist paradigm that he preached his whole life could explain why the universe was so perfectly created for life.

(More on this coming up 

in another post here in a bit.)

John 1:1

In the beginning was the Word, 

and the Word was with God, 

and the Word was God.

You see it takes an intelligence to put

the characters for

w-o-r-d 

together.

 

It could never happen all on its own

same goes for a three billion character code

that has existed in every cell

of everything

that has ever lived

the only place 

WE KNOW

life has ever existed.

It takes logic an preplanning and sequence,

and BTW?

since you like your math 

and your differential equations Avi?

Math is the language by which

by which everything that exist

was spoken into existence. 

2nd Peter 3:5

 by God’s word 

the heavens came into being 

and the earth was formed 

Everything that exist

has a mathematical component to it.

Did I mention:

"Whosoever diggith a pit

shall fall in it

shall bury in it."

You are using Gods tools

given us for your work

and yet denying their creator.

Avi?

You're gonna have to do 

way better than this:

Is 3I/ATLAS a Friendly Gardener 

or a Serial Killer?

Avi Loeb Medium 12/07/25

Cause this is still 

just way to easy.