Review time first:
"Joel 2:30-32
And I will shew wonders
in the heavens
and in the earth,
blood, and fire,
and pillars of smoke.
31 The sun shall be turned into darkness,
and the moon into blood,
before the great and terrible
day of the Lord come.
32 And it shall come to pass,
that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord
shall be delivered:
for in mount Zion and in Jerusalem
shall be deliverance,
as the Lord hath said,
and in the remnant
whom the Lord shall call.
See
Wednesday, March 18, 2020
If you want some more background.
another puzzling interstellar object
Phys.org 07/06/25
Etc."
So here is another article:
NASA confirms that mysterious object
shooting through the solar system
Live Science 07/02/25
"NASA scientists have confirmed that a mysterious object shooting toward us through the solar system is an "interstellar object" — only the third of its kind ever seen."
"On Wednesday (July 2), NASA released a statement confirming that A11pl3Z is indeed an interstellar object and will not remain in the solar system for long. The researchers also shared the object's new official name, 3I/ATLAS, and revealed that it is most likely a comet, upending previous assumptions that it was an asteroid."
"Researchers initially suspected that 3I/ATLAS was an asteroid, like 'Oumuamua. However, the object has displayed "tentative signs of cometary activity" like 2I/Borisov — including being surrounded by a bright cloud of gas and ice, known as a coma, and having what looks like a tail — according to the IAU's Minor Planet Center. However, more observations are needed to confirm this."
"There has been no additional information about the potential comet's size or shape: The current best guess is that it could be up to 12 miles (20 kilometers) across."
"3I/ATLAS is currently around 4.5 times as far from the sun as Earth is. It will reach its closest point to the sun, or perihelion, on Oct. 30, coming within 1.4 Earth-sun distances, or astronomical units (AU), of our home star. Shortly before this happens, the comet will also make its closest approach to Mars, coming within 0.4 AU of the Red Planet."
(Not quite what the article was saying yesterday
Astronomers spot an interstellar object
zipping through our solar system
CNN 07/03/25
"The comet will also whip by Mars on
October 2 at 18 million miles
(30 million kilometers)
from the red planet.
This is a relatively close pass,
astronomically speaking.")
"Earth will be on the opposite side of the sun to 3I/ATLAS during its solar flyby. The comet will likely make its closest approach to Earth in December, on its journey back out of the solar system. As a result, "the comet poses no threat to Earth and will remain at a [minimum] distance of at least 1.6 astronomical units," NASA officials wrote in the statement."
(Okay,
but what about
any possible effects
on Mars orbit itself?
Or Mars gravitational pull
affecting the comet somehow?
Ect?
Do you remember:
Tuesday, November 19, 2024
The Book of Genesis - Session 5 of 24 -
Because as soon
as I saw these images:
and how close it was to go by Mars?
"This is a relatively close pass,
astronomically speaking."
What Missler was saying
in that presentation
was the first thing I remembered.
It made me about sick to my stomach:
Revelation 10:9
And I went to the angel and said,
“Give me the small scroll.”
“Take it and eat it,” he said.
“ It will make your stomach bitter,
but in your mouth it will be as sweet as honey.”
I couldn't think let alone
get anything else done
around here
the rest of the day.
REVIEW TIME PT2
Chuck Missler The Book of Genesis - Session 5 of 24 -
So here is what he said:
"34:36
...there's a theory
there's a hypothesis about
a near pass by of Mars
(And if you got no problem accepting the nebular hypothesis,
The grand tack theory, the multiverse etc?
All of that garbage?
But then you have a problem with this?
Well?
I got a problem with that)
"as we have learned about 34:43 orbital resonance all of you that have some musical background understand what resonance is or if you're electrical engineer what resonances orbits also 34:49 resonate
things that are in orbit
and near each other
pass energy
and Earth and Mars the conjecture is 34:57 were originally on resonant orbits the earth on a 360 day orbit and Mars on a 35:03 720-day orbit and uh in resonance however every 108 years
they would have 35:12
a near pass by
because of the geometry
the pass by would always occur October 25th
(From the article above about our interstellar comet.
"It will reach its closest point to the sun, or perihelion
on Oct. 30...Shortly before this happens,
(Oct 2nd I believe it said somewhere)
the comet will also make
its closest approach to Mars.")
"or March 35:18 15th Actually March I forgot I'll cheat I'll have to look at my diagram I've 35:23 forgotten but the point is
it would if it did happen
it would always happen
the same time of year when
because that's where the orbits crossed
or came near 35:30 each other
but if they were both
in the right place
that they passed near each other
there'd be an energy transfer
35:35 and what's interesting about this model is that it would account for catastrophic events on a number of 35:42 occasions in fact seven of them in history apparently
(I wish he would have named them for us.)
"...at 701 BC by then they 35:47
stabilized to where their orbits are presently
you say that sounds pretty far-fetched"
(Not compared to the crap these nitwits
are pushing on us today it doesn't.)
"it's an interesting conjecture and so forth"
(Its no more far-fetched than:
"the nebular hypothesis,
the grand tack theory,
the multiverse etc"
And is supported by
the seven catastrophic events
and the ancients fear/worship
of the planet itself.)
"but the idea that Mars came that close to the Earth bothers a lot of 37:24 people it's surprising to discover that this theory that they've modeled a 37:30 great extent and it's got it's gotten some interesting publication
(Hard to find much or anything at all really on it these days.
I wonder why?)
(This time around I was able to find more)
"um seems to be validated by of all people 37:37 Jonathan Swift how many have ever read Gulliver's Travels are you at least familiar with it right okay 37:43 Jonathan Swift was an Irish political satirist and the Gulliver's Travels Anthology 37:50 were essays or stories that were intended to poke fun on some political 37:56 issues of that day we've lost that today because we're not familiar with this context but let me back up give you some 38:01 technology the early telescopes you all know that the Galileo invented a telescope in 1610 and he with it he 38:08 discovered the four moons of Jupiter and Saturn's rings which you can see through a good set of vernaculars actually if you know how to do it in 1781 Hershel 38:17 discovered Uranus technology is improving all the way here 1787 Herschel 38:22 discovered the two moons of Uranus in 1789 he discovered two more moons of Uranus in 1846 Laverrier discovered Neptune
38:32 and one of its moons in 1877 Asaph Hall using a brand new 38:39 telescope at the U.S Naval Observatory discovers the two moons of Mars he made 38:44 astronomical history because here we are uh you know in 1877 call it the almost 38:50 well it's a two centuries after the telescope history here no one knew that 38:55 Mars had any moons at all why because they're only a the moon's only about eight miles across and they're almost black they have a reflectivity and 39:02 Albedo of less than three percent but he made history there and I hear that with that background he and he 39:08 named him by the way Dimos and Phobos fear and panic it seemed appropriate for Mars God of 39:14 War see so it's interesting that Dimos has a a period of about 30 hours and 18 minutes 39:21 it's almost synchronous to Mars which is interesting Phobos is the only thing in 39:27 the solar system that rotates backwards Eastward not Western it's got a period 39:32 of 7 hours and 39 minutes it's only eight miles in diameter and so on so okay what's that got to do anything well 39:38 Jonathan Swift in 1667 through 1745 was his lifetime he wrote Gulliver's Travels and not the 39:45 first voyage of Gulliver we've all heard about the boys the little people the Lilliputian the third voyage he goes to 39:51 this place called luputa and while he's in laputa the astronomers of laputa are bragging to 39:57 Gulliver this fictional character here that they know about the two moons of Mars and the astronomers in London don't 40:04 and not only that the discussion in Jonathan Swift's a little story details their size their 40:11 revolutions and their orbits within less than 20 percent error 40:16 not precisely but disturbingly close the question is how and and see the 40:22 whole point is Swift published Gulliver's Travels 40:27 151 years before they were discovered by the astronomical world 40:32 so the question is how how on Earth did Jonathan Swift pull it off one conjecture it was a shrewd guess 40:39 I don't think so uh another one is that he somehow knew about the moons of Mars but he was a 40:44 friend of Herschel and so they would have they would have had some Commerce that way 40:49 the third possibility and it's the one that I think is the most likely is that go that Jonathan Swift Drew upon some 40:56 literature available to him that he probably presumed was just colorful uh 41:02 embroidery for us for his uh fiction and it's not likely that Swift realized 41:09 that what what he was drawing upon some ancient document that was in his possession 41:14 was actually an eyewitness account because that's the only way you could account for this is that somehow 41:21 somebody had seen the two moons of Mars and uh it's too far to be seen unless 41:26 Mars was as close as about 70,000 miles to the planet Earth so that implies that sometime in history 41:32 it did pass that close and somebody recorded the two moons and that somehow fell into Swift's thing and he used it 41:38 as embroidery for his novel
(Again more evidence for this "model"
than for the near misses of bodies
tilting the moons orbit:
Catastrophes,
Ancients Worship/Fear of Mars/
Change in the ancient calendars at 701 BC)
Speaking of which:
When did ancient months start?
"In the eighth century B.C.E., civilizations all over the world either discarded or modified their old 360 day calendars. The 360 day calendars had been in use for the greater part of a millennium. In many places, month lengths immediately after that change were not fixed, but were based instead upon observation of the sky."
(I can not tell who wrote that article
(It doesnt say)
but I have watched enough
and read enough of Chuck Missler
to say with a high degree of confidence
that it was not him
who wrote that.
So thats two people saying
for some strange reason:
"In the eighth century B.C.E.,
civilizations all over the world either discarded
or modified their old 360 day calendars."
WHY?
Becomes the question.
(and yes I read that entire article
on all the ancient calendars
and would encourage you to do the same.)
Also:
A Redit post from 13 years ago
Earth-Mars orbital resonance question.
"Please bear with me as I set up the back-story for my question.
I was listening to a radio program that was discussing the calendars of ancient cultures, and one of the speakers stated that most ancient cultures based their calendars on a 360-day year. However, at some point a few thousand years ago all the major civilizations switched their calendars to a 364-365 day year (or some variation).
Here is citation: http://www.webexhibits.org/calendars/calendar-ancient.html
The same radio speaker went on to say that
most people assume that those ancient civilizations
just got it wrong with the 360-day calendars,
and that as their astronomy got better
they were able to create more accurate calendars."
(That is not what Missler said above BTW)
"However, he believes that we don't give them enough credit to count the number of days in a year. So, he hypothesizes that there actually were 360 days in the year, and that something happened to the orbit of the Earth to lengthen its year. He uses a possible Earth-Mars resonance pattern to explain the 360-day calendars, and then states that something must have disrupted that resonance causing Earth to settle into it's current longer year. This would explain why most civilizations began switching to the newer calendars at about the same time."
"So my question to you: Regardless of what you think about his theory, is it possible that the orbits of Earth and Mars were in resonance as recently as a few thousand years ago, but that resonance has since been disturbed? Also, as a follow up question, how likely is it that their two orbits could come into resonance sometime in the future, and what effects would that have on the two planets?
Below are the responses
The second one of which
I found chilling:
"This seems unlikely. The closest major resonance is the 1:2 (in the time it takes Mars to orbit once Earth would orbit twice). For the 1:2 resonance the period ratio would be 0.5, while the current period ratio is 0.531. If Mars kept it's current semi-major axis then for Earth to be at resonance with Mars Earth's semi-major axis would have to be 0.9997 AU. From Laskar et al. 2004 (A&A 428, 261-285), that's just outside of what is expected for variation of Earth's semi-major axis."
(But the responder doesn't completely rule it out as being possible either)
Response I found chilling:
"Considering that the solar system existed for a few billion years,
Earth and Mars have been in a stable
1:2 orbital resonance for a very long time.
(Just because the solar system has:
"existed for a few billion years"
doesnt mean that:
Earth and Mars have been in a stable
1:2 orbital resonance
for that entire length of time.)
"I can't come up with any reason,
how their resonance could be affected."
(Well?
I sure can lol
"External influences
Objects coming from outside the Solar System can also affect it. Though they are not technically part of the Solar System for the purposes of studying the system's intrinsic stability, they nevertheless can change it. Unfortunately, predicting the potential influences of these extrasolar objects is even more difficult than predicting the influences of objects within the system simply because of the sheer distances involved."
(Oh!
That means something
like our interstellar comet.
Gotcha!
To be fair, we didn't have our first interstellar visitor
Oumuamua until just 8 years ago, so its not surprising
to not be considering something like that as a factor
13 years ago.)
"You need a massive object,
something a few factors larger
than a comet or asteroid
to do something like this.
another puzzling interstellar object
Phys.org 07/06/25
"This object is shockingly bright,
and it's very far away
from the Earth.
It is significantly bigger
than both of the interstellar objects
we've seen
(Oumuamua and Comet 2I/Borisov.)
—it is orders of magnitude
larger than 'Oumuamua."
(Seems to "fit the bill" if you ask me.)
2nd Redditt response continued:
"Also, some ancient civilizations had 365 day calendars,
like the mayans and egyptians.
(Ignores the fact
they switched to them
from 360 calendars.
33:14 mark of the Missler video:
"we discover by doing investigation
that all ancient calendars
at least 14 cultures I've been able to find
have calendars that were based on 360 day years"
"The 360-Day Year
All early calendars appear to be based on a 360-day calendar: the Assyrians, Chaldeans, Egyptians, Hebrews, Persians, Greeks, Phoenicians, Chinese, Mayans, Hindus, Carthaginians, Etruscans, and Teutons all had calendars based on a 360-day year; typically, twelve 30-day months.
In ancient Chaldea, the calendar was based on a 360-day year. It is from this Babylonian tradition that we have 360 degrees in a circle, 60 minutes to an hour, 60 seconds in each minute, etc."
The Biblical Year Is 360 Days
"It is also significant that the Biblical year is also based on a 360-day year reckoning. This critical insight unlocks several incredible prophecies which the reader is urged to discover-- in particular, the remarkable "70 Weeks" prophecy of Daniel 9, which is undoubtedly the most amazing passage in the Bible."
"All Calendars Change in 701 B.C.
In 701 B.C., Numa Pompilius, the second King of Rome, reorganized the original calendar of 360 days per year by adding five days per year. King Hezekiah, Numa's contemporary, reorganized his Jewish calendar by adding a month each Jewish leap year (on a cycle of seven every 19 years). 3
"The Roman year began with March, the month named after Mars. (They later reorganized their calendar in 364 B.C. to begin on January 1st.)
Most of the early cultures organized their calendars around either March or October. Why? Why was any change necessary after 701 B.C.? What happened to affect all the calendars after that year?"
"Mars Interferes?
The recent space age discovery of "orbital resonance"-the tendency of orbits to synchronize on a multiple of one another--has led to a fascinating conjecture that the orbits of the Earth and the Planet Mars were once on resonant orbits of 360 days and 720 days, respectively. A computer analysis has suggested that this could yield orbital interactions that would include a near pass-by on a multiple of 54 years, and this would occur on either March 25 or October 25. Such near pass-bys would transfer energy, altering the orbits of each."
"In near proximity,
such pass-bys would be accompanied by
meteors, severe land tides,
earthquakes, etc.,
and this would help explain why all the ancient cultures were so terrified by the Planet Mars and why calendars tended to reflect either March or October. A series of such pass-bys could also explain a number of the "catastrophes" of ancient history, including the famous "long day of Joshua" and several other Biblical episodes."
"Stability appears to have been attained during the last near pass-by in 701 B.C., resulting in Earth's and Mars' present orbits of 365 1/4 days and 687 days, respectively. Provocative, but where's the evidence?
(Then he gives the Johnathan Swift example already given above.)
But why the switch?
Quite obviously
Something
had to have happened.
Conclusion of Redditt Response #2:
"With 360-day calendars, the sun rises a few minutes earlier on the same "day" of a new whole year. With our calendar, the sun rises only a few seconds earlier on the same day of a whole new year."
(Kinda irrelevant but watever.)
Also?
Explains How Mars Got Its Moons
By Brian Koberlein -
November 22, 2024
"Earth and Mars are the only two rocky planets in the solar system to have moons. Based on lunar rock samples and computer simulations, we are fairly certain that our Moon is the result of an early collision between Earth and a Mars-sized protoplanet called Theia. Since we don't have rock samples from either Martian moon, the origins of Deimos and Phobos are less clear. There are two popular models, but new computer simulations point to a compromise solution."
Observations of Deimos and Phobos show that they resemble small asteroids. This is consistent with the idea that the Martian moons were asteroids captured by Mars in its early history. The problem with this idea is that Mars is a small planet with less gravitational pull than Earth or Venus, which have no captured moons. It would be difficult for Mars to capture even one small asteroid, much less two. And captured moons would tend to have more elliptical orbits, not the circular ones of Deimos and Phobos."
"An alternative model argues that the Martian moons are the result of an early collision similar to that of Earth and Theia. In this model, an asteroid or comet with about 3% of the mass of Mars impacted the planet. It would not be large enough to have fragmented Mars, but it would have created a large debris ring out of which the two moons could have formed. This would explain the more circular orbits, but the difficulty is that debris rings would tend to form close to the planet. While Phobos, the larger Martian moon, orbits close to Mars, Deimos does not. (23,500 km)
"This new model proposes an interesting middle way. Rather than an impact or direct capture, the authors propose a near miss by a large asteroid. If an asteroid passed close enough to Mars, the tidal forces of the planet would rip the asteroid apart to create a string of fragments.
(Our interstellar visitor?
"The current best guess is
that it could be up to 12 miles
(20 kilometers) across."
Thats a lot of damn fragments.)
"Many of those fragments would be captured in elliptical orbits around Mars. As computer simulations show, the orbits would shift over time due to the small gravitational tugs of the Sun and other solar system bodies, eventually causing some of the fragments to collide. This would produce a debris ring similar to that of an impact event, but with a greater distance range, better able to account for both Phobos and Deimos."
"While this new model appears to be better than the capture and impact models, the only way to resolve this mystery will be to study samples from the Martian moons themselves. Fortunately, in 2026 the Mars Moons eXploration mission (MMX) will launch. It will explore both moons and gather samples from Phobos. So we should finally understand the origin of these enigmatic companions of the Red Planet.'
(Or just wait and see what happens
"Shortly before"
Oct 3Oth
(Oct 2nd)
as our interstellar comet
"will also make its closest approach to Mars"
Reference: Kegerreis, Jacob A., et al.
" Origin of Mars's moons
by disruptive partial capture
of an asteroid. "
Icarus 425 (2025): 116337.
So thats:
Tuesday, July 8, 2025
Astronomers spot an interstellar object
zipping through our solar system
CNN 07/03/25
1) The comet will also whip by Mars on
October 2 at 18 million miles
(30 million kilometers)
from the red planet.
This is a relatively close pass,
astronomically speaking.
For reference, Earth is about 93 million miles
(150 million kilometers) from the sun.
So this thing?
Way larger than the others
(Interstellar visitors)
Is gonna pass by Mars
5x closer to it
(4x actually, my bad)
than the earth is to the Sun?
2)There is a theory
with a computer model
that says
"disruptive
(Broken apart)
partial capture
of an asteroid'
By Mars
is what is responsible
for its moons.
3) And 14 ancient calendars
all switched from
360 day years
to 365.25 day years
around the same time?
701 BC?
4) "Swift published Gulliver's Travels 40:27
(which seems to chronical Mars moons
with some 80% degree of accuracy)
151 years before they were discovered
by the astronomical world
HELLO?
ANYBODY HOME?
ANYBODY LISTENING?
It just put me down
for the count yesterday.
When I saw:
And went back
and reviewed the Missler video.
I simply could not function
the rest of the day.
By now?
I know how this works.
I dont run across something
(Things find me,
I dont go looking for em)
hardly anybody else
has ever heard about
(Mars Near Miss Hypothesis)
and it stokes my curiosity
and then
SOME EIGHT MONTHS
later
have it
"come into play"
all the sudden
Unless there is some
significant meaning behind it.
Unlike a lot of others?
Simply isnt an option for me/us.
Sometimes I have to say things
I dont want to.
This is one of those times.
It speaks for itself.
The Tribulation Period is here.
The Two witnesses are here.
The Antichrist is here.
The False prophet is here.
)The Ten Kings
without a kingdom are here.
(Unaccountable Tech Bros
The Beast
that comes out of the Abyss
is here.
Revitalized Ottoman Empire / Turkey)
Satanically led state of Israel is here.
SO
What is it going to take?
Haggai 2:6
For thus saith the Lord of hosts;
Yet ONCE,
(So much for bouncing
or cyclic cosmologies)
it is a little while,
and I will shake the heavens,
and the earth,
and the sea,
and the dry land;
When Christ died?
Only the Earth shook.
That was for mankind's salvation.
This time?
"once, it is a little while"
(A lil while
after the crucifixion
when everybody has had
enough time
to figure it out
2 Peter 3:9
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.)
"and I will shake the heavens,
and the earth,"
Last time?
just the earth shook.
This time?
Both the Heavens
and the earth shake.
Because the final battle
in this cosmic war
of Good vs Evil
that
STARTED IN HEAVEN
with Lucifer's
PRIDE
will be under way.
Godspeed.
Journey well friends.
BTW?
If there is a huge asteroid shower?
"a hypothetical scenario where the density of space debris in low Earth orbit (LEO) becomes so high that collisions between objects create even more debris, leading to a cascading chain reaction of collisions that could render large parts of LEO unusable for satellites and spacecraft."
Bev about the least of your concerns by then...
No comments:
Post a Comment