Q&A Before Closest Approach of 3I/ATLAS to Earth
Avi Loeb Medium 12/11/25
Q: You dubbed the perihelion of 3I/ATLAS as a probable ‘black swan’ event. What are your thoughts on its closest flyby to Earth?
A: 3I/ATLAS will pass closest to Earth on December 19, 2025. Fortunately, this date coincides with a new moon when the view of the sky will not be contaminated by moonlight, making it an ideal observing night for Earth-based telescopes. My hope is that we will gain new insights into the nature of 3I/ATLAS at that time thanks to data from hundreds of observatories, including the Hubble and Webb space telescopes.
In particular, spectrographs on large telescopes can measure the speed and composition of the outflowing material in the jets of 3I/ATLAS. If these jets originate from pockets of ice on the surface of a rock, then their thermal speed would be smaller than a few hundreds of meters per second. This speed is much smaller than expected from technological thrusters.
Q: Can we possibly deduce a connection between the surge in solar flares and 3I/ATLAS? Would that be speculative sci-fi?
A: It is unlikely that the surge in solar flares is connected to 3I/ATLAS. However, our imagination is mostly limited by the technologies we possess.
(Interesting to me he didn't bring up anything
about the Coronal Mass Ejection
that hit 3I/ATLAS
the week before it's closest pass-by of Mars
and all the ensuing events thereof.
Wednesday, November 26, 2025
Apparently, we've struck a nerve
"Just Remember this:
NASA never mentioned
the IAWN "exercise"
in their "Live event."
Transcript of a Q&A About 3I/ATLAS
Avi Loeb Medium 11/22/25
Near Mars
It started moving sideways:
"This was the first image we have
where the direction of motion
is not aligned with
the direction to the Sun,
because in the past 3I/ATLAS
was approaching us and the sun,
but near Mars
it was moving sideways."
Avi Loeb."
Lets consider some more issues:
Avi Loeb changed 3I/ATLAS from going to go past Mars at 2 AU, to going past it at .02 AU, with a chance of a slight course correction making that 0 AU, all without any explanation, none whatsoever.
See why the focus is now on:
"accurate astrometric measurements
and
orbit predictions"
"challenges
to estimate comet trajectories"
"improve tracking methodologies"
and:
"scenarios that might carry
greater uncertainty."
Apparently there is good enough reason
to want to improve all of that.
See above about going
from 2 AU to .02 AU
without any explanation.
Nobody, I mean nobody, not even Avi
is talking about it having been hit
a week prior to
its closest approach to Mars
??????????
Think that might have
altered the trajectory?
Bouncing the fuck off Mars?
These guys know physics right?
That CME blew it right into Mars.
Thats why its going sideways now.
HELLO?
DUH...
Avi Loeb switched from wanting images taken from the HiRISE instrument on the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiteer on Oct 3rd (when it was the closest to Mars) to wanting the ones taken on Oct 2nd
??????????
Again without any explanation being given
as to why that was so?
Avi switched from stating the images "were taken" by the HiRISE instrument on Oct 3rd, to saying they "could have been taken" the day of the NASA live event
??????????
And the damn thing is now flying sideways
??????????
And he is using pictures from amateurs
Not NASA?
Even though an entire armada of their spacecraft has been watching this object since it came into our solar system?
The day of the NASA event Avi calls 3I/ATLAS an "iceberg" for the first time, after saying it weights 33 Billion tons? Thats a shit ton of ice my brother, seems like it would have outgassed a lot more than it did to me but hey, i'm not the head of the Harvard Astronomy department.
No pictures from NASA from the HiRISE instrument on Oct 3rd when it was the closest to Mars?
The image released at the NASA live event
were from Oct 2nd
and they were fuzzy
??????????
Avi says:
"Hopefully we wont get any surprises from 3I/ATLAS
during the upcoming Holidays multiple times?
He told NASA they should be monitoring
around Mars for "satellites" from 3I/ATLAS.
Well I wonder why?
This is the guy
that said it could be 0 AU
when it passed by the red planet,
and now its flying sideways?
And the nucleus still hasn't been resolved
??????????
And There was a meteorite found on Mars
that shouldn't have been there
???????????
An IAWN is conducting an
"exercise"?")
Q: What is the best evidence so far
that suggests
we are probably not alone
in the universe?
A: It is arrogant to believe that we are alone in the Milky-Way because it contains 100 billion stars. Since we emerged from a soup of chemicals which is common on habitable Earth-mass planets, common sense suggests that the galaxy is teaming with life.
Where's the beef?
There's not a single shred of evidence
in any of what he just said.
NONE.
Adhere to the rigid dogma
of scientism much there Avi?
One by one
on what Avi presents as evidence:
"It is arrogant to believe
that we are alone in the Milky-Way
because it contains 100 billion stars."
That is the faith of this cult right there.
That is what they "hope" exist
that they have 0 evidence of.
Hebrews 11:1
"Now faith is the substance of things hoped for,
the evidence of things not seen,"
That just don't mean squat lol.
"Numbers don't equal life."
~
Funny how that cosmologist isn't
a "media personality".
I wonder why that is?
But what he said
is absolutely 100% true.
Thinking there
has to be life
"out there"
because of the sheer volume of stars
just is not evidence of any
and to date,
no "life" has ever been found
anywhere else but here.
"Since
we emerged from
a soup of chemicals
which is common
on habitable Earth-mass planets..."
Again,
where is the evidence
that was asked for?
And it takes more than chemicals
as there is no
chemical, biological
or physical process
by which information results
to produce new life.
Avi is a lil behind the times seems like.
Again
this is the faith based belief system
of the exclusive, elitist cult of scientism
on full display.
Avi should pay a visit
to Harvard's Biology Department
and he would soon find out
that what I am saying is true.
Although the Biologist tend not to
say it much in public,
hum...I wonder why that could be?
"common sense suggests
that the galaxy is teaming with life"
Well the if that is the case?
Common sense also says
you should have found some by now
if :
"the galaxy is
"teaming with life"
Then where is it?
Here is what common sense also says:
Common sense says,
codes don't create themselves
by their very nature they are
pre-panned, sequenced
and arranged
which takes preplanning.
It can not be done
by a random arbitrary process
chemical or otherwise.
It takes an intelligence
to be able make a code,
a recipe, a blueprint, whatever you wanna call it
it's all still:
information etc.
Everything that has ever processed oxygen
to exist, the only place we know has had
and does have life?
Has had a 3 billion character code
(DNA) in it. Call it a blue print, recipe whatever,
if it wasnt there?
We wouldn't have life here.
Therefore,
for there to be life somewhere else?
Common sense says
that life form would need
a genetic code, DNA, blueprint
instructions (information) etc. as well.
So where did that life's
information come from?
Simple.
It came from nowhere
cause there isnt any.
Life here wasnt an accident.
Life here took an intelligence.
Therefore it wasnt an accident.
Given that
there are no
chemical, biological
or physical process
by which information results
to produce new life?
Then there is 0 chance in hell
of it ever arising anywhere else
by random arbitrary processes either,
and informed intelligent people
not beholden to a false dogmatic
faith based belief system
know it
and accept it.
See how hard that was?
So the best, simplest shortest answer
to the question:
"Q: What is the best evidence so far
that suggests we are probably
not alone in the universe?"
There isn't any.
No comments:
Post a Comment