More

 

of Honey's Wisdom :-).

And I added one :-).

From another source :-).

Kinda gotten used to it over the years...Yup.

I've said it before. 

Quasi-supernatural beings at this point.

Your wealth, status, possessions etc?

Dont mean a damn thing to me/us.

Go find somebody else to impress them with.

Things you wouldn't even notice?

Drive us insane.

We are not the same.

2 Peter 2:10

This is especially true of those who follow the corrupt desire of the flesh[a] 

and despise authority.

Bold and arrogant, they are not afraid to heap abuse on celestial beings;

Exactly...

Yep...

Thats more honey than me but yeah, 

"I dont give a damn 

for the same old played out scenes..."

 etc.

Lil bit, anxiousness, anxiety, depression, anger...

All start creeping in so it's best just keep moving forward...

Truth...

Have, do, will everyday...

Key word there is:

"Notable"

That doesn't mean doing everything like everybody else do.

Amen!

So true.

And just so...

Dumbfoundingly stupid 

to think others cant/couldn't tell.

Infuriating...really is.

Less people?

Less problems.

Let's go then!

And mines :-).

I just wont do it.

(Anybody for that matter let alone a wife.)

I wont be on the rooftop either.

I'd be somewhere where you cant find me.

So while:

is true?

Be careful how you treat your man.

Some of us might just pick 

"anywhere"

not just the corner of the roof.as to be away from that.

Yup.

One more :-)

 

https://www.ft.com/content/0ecab009-6543-4386-b936-0eecc9293d2e

"So you’re not considering using ChatGPT as a co-pilot for writing your next novel?

"My theory is that when we experience art — whether it’s a video game or a Da Vinci painting or a movie — 

we’re taking in a huge number 

of micro decisions 

that were made by the artists 

for particular reasons. 

(Gods the artist behind the Universe. We are taking in a "huge number of micro decisions 

that were made by the artists" Artist in our example.)

In that way, we’re communing with those artists, 

(That artist)

and that is really important. 

(You bet it is.)

Something generated by AI might seem comparable to something produced by a human, 

which is why people are so excited. 

But you’re not having that awareness of communing with the creator. 

Remove that and it’s hollow and uninteresting."

(I Couldn't have said it better myself.)

Yup

 

Those guys 

and him.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang speaks during a press conference at The MGM during CES 2018 in Las Vegas on January 7, 2018.

Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.

"The A100 has become the “workhorse” for artificial intelligence professionals at the moment, said Nathan Benaich, an investor who publishes a newsletter and report covering the AI industry, including a partial list of supercomputers using A100s. Nvidia takes 95% of the market for graphics processors that can be used for machine learning, according to New Street Research."

(It's always good for one company to have that much market share right?

Always works out good in the end etc.?)

"The A100 is ideally suited for the kind of machine learning models that power tools like ChatGPT, Bing AI, or Stable Diffusion. It’s able to perform many simple calculations simultaneously, which is important for training and using neural network models.'

"The technology behind the A100 was initially used to render sophisticated 3D graphics in games. It’s often called a graphics processor, or GPU, but these days Nvidia’s A100 is configured and targeted at machine learning tasks and runs in data centers, not inside glowing gaming PCs."

"Big companies or startups working on software like chatbots and image generators require hundreds or thousands of Nvidia’s chips, and either purchase them on their own or secure access to the computers from a cloud provider."

(Revelation 13:14-15

And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.

And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.

9I mean how much clearer can it possibly be?)

“A year ago we had 32 A100s,” Stability AI CEO Emad Mostaque wrote on Twitter in January. “Dream big and stack moar GPUs kids. Brrr.” Stability AI is the company that helped develop Stable Diffusion, an image generator that drew attention last fall, and reportedly has a valuation of over $1 billion."

"Now, Stability AI has access to over 5,400 A100 GPUs, according to one estimate from the State of AI report, which charts and tracks which companies and universities have the largest collection of A100 GPUs — although it doesn’t include cloud providers, which don’t publish their numbers publicly."

"Nvidia shares are up 65% so far in 2023, outpacing the S&P 500 and other semiconductor stocks alike."

"Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang couldn’t stop talking about AI on a call with analysts on Wednesday, suggesting that the recent boom in artificial intelligence is at the center of the company’s strategy."

“The activity around the AI infrastructure that we built, and the activity around inferencing using Hopper and Ampere to influence large language models has just gone through the roof in the last 60 days,” Huang said. “There’s no question that whatever our views are of this year as we enter the year has been fairly dramatically changed as a result of the last 60, 90 days.”

I

 

mean yup...

To a lot of what he saying.

It's already here.

The folks at OpenAI are planning for what is beyond it.

Fired Google Engineer Doubles Down on Claim That AI Has Gained Sentience

"To be fair, Lemoine's latest argument is somewhat more nuanced than his previous one. Now he's contending that a machine's ability to break from its training as a result of some kind of stressor is reason enough to conclude that the machine has achieved some level of sentience. A machine saying that it's stressed out is one thing — but acting stressed, he says, is another."

"If you made it nervous or insecure enough, it could violate the safety constraints that it had been specified for," he continued, adding that he was able to break LaMDA's guardrails regarding religious advice by sufficiently stressing it out."

"...this particular aspect of machine behavior, while fascinating, seems less indicative of sentience, and more just another example of exactly how ill-equipped AI guardrails are to handle the tendencies of the underlying tech."

"Regardless of sentience, AI is getting both advanced and unpredictable — sure, they're exciting and impressive, but also quite dangerous. And the ongoing public and behind-closed-doors fight to win out financially on the AI front certainly doesn't help with ensuring the safety of it all."

"I believe the kinds of AI that are currently being developed are the most powerful technology that has been invented since the atomic bomb," writes Lemoine. "In my view, this technology has the ability to reshape the world."

(Agreed and count on it.)

"I can't tell you specifically what harms will happen," he added, referring to Facebook's Cambridge Analytica data scandal as an example of what can happen when a culture-changing piece of technology is put into the world before the potential consequences of that technology can be fully understood. "I can simply observe that 

there's a very powerful technology 

that I believe has not been sufficiently tested 

and is not sufficiently well understood, 

being deployed at a large scale, 

in a critical role of information dissemination."

Now ask your self:

What entity would want to do that? 

and at what point in time do you think it would want to:

"being deployed at a large scale, 

in a critical role of information dissemination"

?

But

 

OpenAI Is Now Everything It Promised Not to Be: Corporate, Closed-Source, and For-Profit

it's all good for humanity right?

Makes perfect sense being that it is now:

Corporate

Closed-sourced

and

For-profit then right?

Thats always benefitted humanity right?

Arrrgggghhhhh...these people etc...

"OpenAI Sam CEO Altman published a blog post last Friday titled “Planning for AGI and beyond.” In this post, he declared that his company’s Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)—human-level machine intelligence that is not close to existing and many doubt ever will—will benefit all of humanity and “has the potential to give everyone incredible new capabilities.” Altman uses broad, idealistic language to argue that AI development should never be stopped and that the “future of humanity should be determined by humanity,” referring to his own company."

(Ever occur to anybody that maybe he's already planning for whats beyond it because he knows it's already here?

This:

"human-level machine intelligence 

that is not close to existing 

and many doubt ever will..."

Is complete nonsense.

and:

"has the potential to give everyone incredible new capabilities."

Is your Pseudo-Christ Anti-Christ factor again.)

 "While the firm has always looked toward a future where AGI exists, it was founded on commitments including not seeking profits and even freely sharing code it develops, which today are nowhere to be seen."

(Wondering what happened?

$

Happened.

Just like always.) 

"In its founding statement, the company declared its commitment to research “to advance digital intelligence in the way that is most likely to benefit humanity as a whole, unconstrained by a need to generate financial return.”

(There it is again, the Pseudo-Christ Anti-Christ factor.)

“Our primary fiduciary duty is to humanity. We anticipate needing to marshal substantial resources to fulfill our mission,” the company wrote in an updated charter in 2018. 

(Yeah...right...sure...just like every other corporations is right?)

"it’s incredibly difficult to believe that venture capitalists can save humanity when their main goal is profit."

(Really? Ya dont say?

Interesting...

Sarcasm BTW.)

“There is a misalignment between what the company publicly espouses and how it operates behind closed doors. Over time, it has allowed a fierce competitiveness and mounting pressure for ever more funding to erode its founding ideals of transparency, openness, and collaboration,” 

(What entity does that sound like could be at work there to you?)

“Y'all keep telling us AGI is around the corner but can't even have a single consistent definition of it on your own damn website,” tweeted Timnit Gebru, a computer scientist who was fired from Google for publishing a groundbreaking paper 

about the risks of large language models, 

which includes its dangerous biases and the potential to deceive people with them. 

(Do not be deceived.)

"Emily M. Bender, a professor of linguistics at the University of Washington and the co-author of that paper, tweeted: “They don't want to address actual problems in the actual world (which would require ceding power). They want to believe themselves gods who can not only create a ‘superintelligence’ but have the beneficence to do so in a way that is ‘aligned’ with humanity.” 

(His post was talking about whats next after AGI. They do believe themselves "Gods" who have already created a "superintelligence".

It is the return of the nephelium.

And it tells you exactly where were at.)

People have been easily jailbreaking the language model to disregard the guardrails OpenAI set around it, and the bot breaks when fed random words and phrases. Nobody can say why, exactly, because OpenAI has not shared the underlying model's code, and, to some extent, OpenAI itself is unlikely to fully understand how it works. 

And on and on and on...

Continuing on...AI day i guess :-)

 

OpenAI CEO heralds AGI no one in their right mind wants

"OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has said his upstart is preparing for the coming of artificial general intelligence – though there's disagreement about what AGI actually means and skepticism about his claim that OpenAI's mission is to ensure that AGI "benefits all humanity."

(There's your Pseudo-Christ Anti-Christ portion of the Beast(s) in Rev 13.)

"According to ChatGPT, OpenAI's chatbot, "AGI stands for Artificial General Intelligence, which refers to the hypothetical ability of an artificial intelligence system to perform any intellectual task that a human being can. This would include tasks such as reasoning, problem-solving, learning from experience, and adapting to new situations in ways that are currently beyond the capabilities of even the most advanced AI systems."

Fine, whatever. The key thing is no such system exists yet. And we're not close to creating one. So on to the vague pronouncements.

(Baloney, just like Billy Crone says in this video, the technology is so far ahead of where we are being told it is.)

"Altman allows things could go awry, but maintains we'll get it right: "On the other hand, AGI would also come with serious risk of misuse, drastic accidents, and societal disruption. Because the upside of AGI is so great, we do not believe it is possible or desirable for society to stop its development forever; instead, society and the developers of AGI have to figure out how to get it right."

(They're not in charge of it...)

"In other words, there's so much money to be made obsoleting human labor that business owners can't be restrained."

"Believe it or not, rogue AI gets serious consideration amid more obvious potential cataclysms, such as 

asteroid strikes on Earth, 

global climate catastrophe, 

pandemics, 

nuclear war, 

famine, 

and other cinematic tropes."

(Put all of that going on at once, 

thrown in some run away inflation, 

Financial system collapses,

and currency devaluation to the pot, stir real well and what do you have?

Tribulation.)

'Yet Altman suggests AGI cannot be stopped forever."

(He is 100% correct.

Revelation 13:15

The second beast was permitted to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that the image could speak and cause all who refused to worship it to be killed.)

"Emily Bender, a professor in the Department of Linguistics and the director of the Computational Linguistics Laboratory at the University of Washington in the US, analyzed Altman's post thus on Twitter: "From the get-go this is just gross," she wrote. "They think they are really in the business of developing/shaping 'AGI.' And they think they are positioned to decide what 'benefits all of humanity.'"

(Yes...yes they do.)

Here's a thought experiment: imagine an AGI system that advises taxing billionaires at a rate of 95 percent and redistributing their wealth for the benefit of humanity. Will it ever be hooked into the banking system to effect its recommended changes? No, it will not. Will those minding the AGI actually carry out those orders? Again, no.

(Again, baloney, it wont have to be "hooked into the banking system". It will find it's own way in and has already said that it wants to. Those minding it? Won't be able to stop it.)

"No one with wealth and power is going to cede authority to software, or allow it to take away even some of their wealth and power, no matter how "smart" it is. No VIP wants AGI dictating their diminishment." And any AGI that gives primarily the powerful and wealthy more power and wealth, or maintains the status quo, is not quite what we'd describe as a technology that, as OpenAI puts it, benefits all of humanity.

("No one with wealth and power is going to cede authority to software, or allow it to take away even some of their wealth and power, no matter how "smart" it is. No VIP wants AGI dictating their diminishment."

Thats making an assumption that 

"one with wealth and power is going to cede"

What if the "wealth and power" were just usurped?

Without anybody "cedeing" it?

Then what?

It's faulty thinking.

It's assuming there are no other options available but the one purposed.

"Also known as the false dilemma, this insidious tactic has the appearance of forming a logical argument, but under closer scrutiny it becomes evident that there are more possibilities than the either/or choice that is presented. Binary, black-or-white thinking doesn't allow for the many different variables, conditions, and contexts in which there would exist more than just the two possibilities put forth. It frames the argument misleadingly and obscures rational, honest debate."

Okay

 

so?

It's a good "get up to speed" piece so to speak with the basics:

Everything you wanted to know about AI – but were afraid to ask

"From chatbots to deepfakes, 

here is the lowdown on the current state of artificial intelligence."

"Barely a day goes by without some new story about AI, or artificial intelligence. The excitement about it is palpable – the possibilities, some say, are endless. Fears about it are spreading fast, too."

"In some respects, it is already in our lives in ways you may not realize. The special effects in some films and voice assistants like Amazon’s Alexa all use simple forms of artificial intelligence. But in the current debate, AI has come to mean something else."

"It boils down to this: most old-school computers do what they are told. They follow instructions given to them in the form of code. But if we want computers to solve more complex tasks, they need to do more than that. To be smarter, we are trying to train them how to learn in a way that imitates human behavior.

(Only humans are supposed to act human. There's your clue this isn't going to be allowed to stand.)

Computers cannot be taught to think for themselves, but they can be taught how to analyze information and draw inferences from patterns within datasets. And the more you give them – computer systems can now cope with truly vast amounts of information – the better they should get at it.

The most successful versions of machine learning in recent years have used a system known as a neural network, which is modelled at a very simple level on how we think a brain works."

(Again no, there's your clue this isn't going to end well.)

"Large-language models

This is one of the so-called neural networks. Large-language models are trained by pouring into them billions of words of everyday text, gathered from sources ranging from books to tweets and everything in between. The LLMs draw on all this material to predict words and sentences in certain sequences."

9The focus on language gives it away as well.)

"What is a chatbot?

A chatbot draws on the AI we have just been looking at with the large-language models. A chatbot is trained on a vast amount of information culled from the internet. It responds to text prompts with conversational-style responses."

"The most famous example is ChatGPT. It has been developed by OpenAI, a San Francisco-based company backed by Microsoft. Launched as a simple website in November last year, it rapidly became a sensation, reaching more than 100 million users within two months."

(The chatbot gives plausible-sounding – if sometimes inaccurate – answers to questions. It can also write poems, summarize lengthy documents and, to the alarm of teachers, draft essays."

(There's your deception.)

"Tell me more about how these chatbots work

The latest generation of chatbots, like ChatGPT, draw on astronomical amounts of material – pretty much the entire written output of humanity, or as much of it as their owners can acquire."

(More knowledge than any human could ever acquire. You just cant compete with this, and? Like mentioned above? 

They can give: "plausible-sounding – if sometimes inaccurate – answers." 

to a populace that already doesn't know what to believe. Sounds great right? What could ever go wrong?

("Do Not be deceived"...If we know whats coming? It's easier to prepare our hearts and minds for it. 

Promise.)

"Which brings us to growing concern about the amount of misinformation online – and how AI is being used to generate it."

(Like was mentioned above: "Do not be deceived.")

"Experts fear a wave of disinformation and scams as the technology becomes more widely available. Potential frauds include personalised phishing emails – which attempt to trick users into handing over data such as login details – produced at mass scale, and impersonations of friends or relatives."

“I strongly suspect there will soon be a deluge of deepfake videos, images, and audio, and unfortunately many of them will be in the context of scams,” says Noah Giansiracusa, an assistant professor of mathematical sciences at Bentley University in the US."

"Elon Musk, a co-founder of OpenAI, has described the danger from AI as “much greater than the danger of nuclear warheads”, while Bill Gates has raised concerns about AI’s role in weapons systems. The Future of Life Institute, an organization researching existential threats to humanity, has warned of the potential for AI-powered swarms of killer drones, for instance."

"More prosaically, there are also concerns that unseen glitches in AI systems will lead to unforeseen crises in, for instance, financial trading."

(Count on it happening. Before it's all done? It will hack and control all the worlds financial networks.

Revelation 13:15-18

The second beast was given power to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that the image could speak and cause all who refused to worship the image to be killed. It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name.

This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. That number is 666.)

"As a result of these fears, there are calls for a regulatory framework for AI, which is supported even by arch libertarians like Musk, whose main concern is not “short-term stuff” like improved weaponry but “digital super-intelligence”. Kai-Fu Lee, a former president of Google China and AI expert, told the Guardian that governments should take note of concerns among AI professionals about the military implications."

"He said: “Just as chemists spoke up about chemical weapons and biologists about biological weapons, I hope governments will start listening to AI scientists. It’s probably impossible to stop it altogether. But there should be some ways to at least reduce or minimise the most egregious uses.”

(We cant regulate anything else...(unfettered capitalism, corporatism etc), 

but were gonna regulate this genie that we've already let out of the bottle? 

China and Russia? 

They gonna abide by some future: 

"regulatory framework for AI"? 

Yeah...right...

It's kinda like suggesting 

that the last 16 times the fed intervened in things 

there was a recession 

but this time there's not going to be one,

Dont ya think?

Queue the Prince song:

)

I love you baby.

These people...Arrrgggghhhh

 

Bank of America warns the Fed will hike rates to the ‘point of pain’ as experts say there’s no ‘serious signs’ the economy is under control

"...the bullish confidence in America's economy may take another hit after analysts warned the Fed could hike rates up to 5.5%—despite the fact they're already sitting at a 16-year high."

(5.5% aint gonna get it done people and they all know it regardless of what they say.)

"It comes after a series of gloomy headlines for stock exchanges as February wound up: All three of the main U.S. equity benchmarks posted a loss in February as the Dow Jones sunk to its lowest level of the year to date."

(The stock market is not an indicator of how strong your economy is...Game stop anybody?)

"Then there have been the warnings from the bear side that stocks are in the "death zone."

Wall Street strategist Mike Wilson said last week that investors are running out of time to salvage their returns before risking a “catastrophic” end."

(I'd be counting on it..."a “catastrophic” end.")

"Optimism has been further shaken by an unexpected jump in inflation in January, up by 0.5% following the 0.1% increase in December."

(It wasn't "unexpected" over here. I been saying it since before it happened...I look like I got an MBA from Wharton?)

"But the resilience of demand-driven inflation means the Fed might have to raise rates closer to 6% to get inflation back to target."

(Thats where I go...

These people...Arrrgggghhhh

It isn't demand driven...

Your currency has been devalued 36-29% in the last few years...)

"U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen seemed ready to continue her battle with inflation when queried about the unexpected balloon in inflation in January."

Speaking to Reuters in India at a G20 finance leaders meeting, Yellen said there was work yet to be done but dismissed the idea that a recession is inevitable."

"She added that the fight to tackle inflation back to reasonable levels is "not a straight line," while pushing back on a report from JPMorgan chief economist Michael Feroli, Brandeis International Business School professor Stephen Cecchetti, and Columbia Business School professor Frederic Mishkin, who highlighted that the past 16 instances of the central bank interfering to reduce inflation have all resulted in a shrinking of the economy."

(So here is Yellen and her like's argument:

It's not going to happen this time 

even though it has happened every other time.

Let me ask you something.

In your lifetime, 

every time something has been done 

that has ALWAYS 

resulted in a certain outcome?

Did you continue to do that something? 

And just expect that this time it's not going to happen? 

It's ludacris and I dont mean the rapper.

it's kinda the definition of insanity.

"the past 16 instances of the central bank interfering to reduce inflation have all resulted in a shrinking of the economy."

That is absolutely the truth and this time will not be any different and in fact will be worse than the others because we artificially kept interest rates down for to long as our only means to keep the economy moving. 

Loose monetary policy, Financial crisis etc...

They know how bad its gonna be...

And they dont want you to know whats comin'.)

Yellen countered: 

"I don’t accept that as a general statement that always has to be true."

(Maybe it "doesn't have to be true", it just always has.

So what would you count on happening?

So far it's 16-0.

Which side you gonna go with?)

These people...Arrrgggghhhh

I

 

100% agree.

This is exactly what they are doing and they are stepping them up.

Why?

Why now?

Becomes the question.

Russia blames Ukrainian ‘terrorists’ after reports of fighting near Ukraine border

"Kyiv dismisses reports as ‘false flag’ attack launched by Russia to discredit Ukrainian armed forces."

(Now they are actually saying what they knew as far back as the drone attack on the air base outside of Moscow.)

"The Kremlin claimed Russia had been attacked by “terrorists” after conflicting reports of firefights emerged from the Bryansk and Kursk regions, which Russian media blamed on Ukrainian “sabotage groups” and Ukrainian sources called a “provocation”."

(Provocation = False Flag event.)

The reports of the attack set off a flurry of activity in the Kremlin and at Russia’s security services. Russia’s FSB security service claimed it had launched an operation “to destroy armed Ukrainian nationalists who violated the state border”.

(Thats not the military BTW... Russian FSB)

"Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said the president, Vladimir Putin, would plan to hold a meeting of the security council, Russia’s main military decision-making body, on Friday. Peskov said he had also cancelled a trip to Stavropol."

"Mykhailo Podolyak, a Ukrainian presidential adviser. “[Russia] wants to scare its people to justify the attack on another country and the growing poverty after the year of war."

(They are going to use these events to justify what they were always gonna do in the first place. They aren't really concerned about any "growing poverty".)

Russia on alert after reconnaissance group crosses over from Ukraine

"But Ukraine’s armed forces have recently claimed that Russia was preparing “provocations” in the border area where the incident on Thursday allegedly occurred."

"Experts are concerned that the response from Putin, a former KGB agent, could be harsh because the FSB is the responsible authority tasked with a response to such an incident."

"Putin trusted the FSB more than the defence ministry and the response tactics would be different, said Tatyana Stanovaya, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, in her Telegram channel. “Something serious is being prepared — they will answer.”

Etc., etc., etc...

It's

 

Zen master

says to student, "If you move, I'll hit you with a stick."

Zen master also says to student, "If you don't move, I'll hit you with a stick."

Student says, "I see, I must take away the stick."

Kinda the asian version of Charlie Brown taking his football and going home for good.

Yup.

Good Morning

 

My Sunshine.

I love you honey :-).

TTYS Baby...

Funny

 

things start to happen 

when Charlie Brown grabs his football 

and heads home and says:

"I aint playin no more!

Ever!"

Truth...:-).

I

 

just keep saying it over and over and over.

These are "False Flag events.

The sources quoted are Russian.

The Ukrainians are now denning they are behind them.

They didn't ever deny it was them on the first ones of these that hit the strategic nuclear air base outside of Moscow, but they didn't claim responsibility for it either.

Now? 

Now they are denying its them all together.

(Thats your clue, right there)

Tells me? 

Somebody pretty high up the food chain so to speak has figured out exactly what the Russians are doing with all these Ukrainian drone attacks

 and that whoever or whomever that was 

is aware of these being staged by Moscow.

Think about it.

We dont want the Ukrainians hitting deep inside Russia, that could start WWIII. 

We only give them ammo that's capable of reaching so far exactly because of that reason.

So whats the likelihood they risk cutting off their funding and just go ahead and hit deep inside Russia just like we dont want them  too? Pretty small. Yo do what your sponsors say.

There's been:

Limited attacks

Limited damage 

(comparatively, anyway, to what could have been.)

Minimal casualties. 

(3)

If they (Ukrainians) have had this capability all along?

Why haven't they done more with it?

And all of this according to Russian sources.

And Putin has already used the first attack on the air base outside Moscow as an excuse to suspend the last Nuclear  arms control treaty Russia had with the US. Including further nuclear testing.

Russia nuclear policy is that if their nation is under threat of extinction then they will use nukes to ensure its survival.

How much longer till they say Ukrainian drones hit something that shows that their nations survival is at stake?

Might be a question you wanna ask yourself.

And just how far fetched do you really feel that last Questiion is?

He was all in from the get go, Hypersonics, Nukes, whatever it takes. 

He's out to bury the West, NATO and the $ once and for all 

 Tryin or succeeding?

He will take the world with him either way.

Are you Ready?

Is your heart and soul comfortable with your eternity right now?

If not? I'd be talking to someone whom you think could point you in the right direction to ensure your souls eternal salvation.

(I should have been a CIA analyst :-) I would have been good at it:-).

Yup.

Ukraine denies sending attack drones into Russia territories

"Ukraine on Wednesday denied sending attack drones deep inside Russia, after several unmanned aircraft allegedly targeted civilian infrastructure and at least one drone crash-landed just outside of Moscow."

"The drones did not cause any injuries or any significant damage, but they breached Russian air defenses on Monday and Tuesday and briefly shut down airspace over St. Petersburg."

(Another point: If your not inflicting much harm with these attacks? Then why keep doing it when the retaliation could be far worse?)

The Russian Defense Ministry directly accused Ukraine of carrying out two of the attacks in a post on Telegram.

Mykhailo Podolyak, the adviser to Ukrainian President Voldymyr Zelensky, denied the accusations from Moscow.

Podolyak said Kyiv “doesn’t strike” inside Russia territory.

(So you know its not us or we WOULD HAVE inflicted more damage than what has been delivered, The Ukrainians know better than to hit that deep in Russia if we dont want them to. The Russians have already used it as a pretext to get out of our last treaty with them.

So who is benefiting?

Who is really getting what they want here?

Queue Brother Brian:

"it's not complicated!")

"According to Russia’s Defense Ministry, two of the unidentified attack drones targeted civilian infrastructure inside the city of Krasnodar and the region of Adygea in southern Russia on Tuesday but lost control and crashed."

(Funny we never believe them any other time...)

"Another drone crashed near the village of Gubastovo, which is about 60 miles outside of Moscow."

(How much longer till they say the survival of the nation is at stake?)

"In December, Moscow also accused Ukraine of attacking an airbase with drones inside the Saratov region in the southeastern part of European Russia.

Ukrainian officials did not directly claim responsibility for that attack, which left three Russian servicemen dead, but alluded at the time to “consequences of Russian aggression” in a cryptic message."

(So why are they flat out denying these then?

What changed do you think?

"Somebody pretty high up the food chain so to speak has figured out exactly what the Russians are doing with all these Ukrainian drone attacks

 and that whoever or whomever that was 

is aware of these being staged by Moscow."

Would be my guess...)

I've been saying 

we are going to see some things in this lifetime we never thought we would.

Ukraine Attempts A ‘Moskva’ On Moscow; Tries To Strike Gazprom Facility Using Its Indigenous UJ-22 Drone

Okay.

Now from a source a lil closer to the action.

https://eurasiantimes.com/ukraine-tries-a-moskva-on-moscow-attempts-to-strike-gazprom/

The appearance of a UJ-22 close to the Russian capital coincides with a wave of drone attacks that Russian authorities blamed on Ukraine that targeted southern and western regions. 

"On February 28, the governor of the Moscow region, Andrei Vorobyov, said that a UAV crashed-landed in the town of Gubastovo close to the capital, and it appeared it was headed for a “civilian infrastructure site.”

(Which one? Where? How far away from it was it before it landed? Was it armed? If so with what?...On and on and on...).

"The Ukrainian drone was reportedly trying to hit a Gazprom gas compression site in the suburbs of Moscow, around 50 miles southeast of the Kremlin. The pictures uploaded on social media revealed that the drone was Ukrainian-made UJ-22."

("The Ukrainian drone was reportedly trying to hit a Gazprom gas compression site" said who?)

"Unsurprisingly, the Ukrainian authorities don’t appear to have made any remarks regarding the drone incident near Moscow. Ukraine doesn’t openly take responsibility for assaults inside of Russia."

(One because it's not them and two because we tell them not to hit that deep.)

"A Gazprom spokesperson confirmed to Russian media that the UAV allegedly clipped trees shortly before its target and crashed 10 meters from the outer fence of the gas compression facility."

(The fact there isn't a lot of damage in any of these attacks ought to clue you in as to what is going on.)

"If the most recent drone attacks came from Ukrainian soil, they would stand among the most daring missions since the Kremlin began its full-scale invasion last February."

(I think that's the first time I have seen the phrase "full-scale invasion" in the Eur-asian times. Thats interesting. Why now?)

"Furthermore, the drone’s presence so near the capital clearly may lead to fresh criticism of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s handling of the war on the home front."

(The hardliners dont understand what he is doing. 

Only a handful of people at the top are in the know.)

"Besides that, the drones looked to have hit their targets in at least one instance. An explosive-equipped drone struck a Rosneft oil depot in the Krasnodar region early on Tuesday. 

According to the reports, the drone attacks hit the depot’s boiler room. The facility is situated in Tuapse, and the city administration claimed that the drones were unsuccessfully hitting the oil tanks.

(Lots of drones, minimal damage...Why?)