But

 

OpenAI Is Now Everything It Promised Not to Be: Corporate, Closed-Source, and For-Profit

it's all good for humanity right?

Makes perfect sense being that it is now:

Corporate

Closed-sourced

and

For-profit then right?

Thats always benefitted humanity right?

Arrrgggghhhhh...these people etc...

"OpenAI Sam CEO Altman published a blog post last Friday titled “Planning for AGI and beyond.” In this post, he declared that his company’s Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)—human-level machine intelligence that is not close to existing and many doubt ever will—will benefit all of humanity and “has the potential to give everyone incredible new capabilities.” Altman uses broad, idealistic language to argue that AI development should never be stopped and that the “future of humanity should be determined by humanity,” referring to his own company."

(Ever occur to anybody that maybe he's already planning for whats beyond it because he knows it's already here?

This:

"human-level machine intelligence 

that is not close to existing 

and many doubt ever will..."

Is complete nonsense.

and:

"has the potential to give everyone incredible new capabilities."

Is your Pseudo-Christ Anti-Christ factor again.)

 "While the firm has always looked toward a future where AGI exists, it was founded on commitments including not seeking profits and even freely sharing code it develops, which today are nowhere to be seen."

(Wondering what happened?

$

Happened.

Just like always.) 

"In its founding statement, the company declared its commitment to research “to advance digital intelligence in the way that is most likely to benefit humanity as a whole, unconstrained by a need to generate financial return.”

(There it is again, the Pseudo-Christ Anti-Christ factor.)

“Our primary fiduciary duty is to humanity. We anticipate needing to marshal substantial resources to fulfill our mission,” the company wrote in an updated charter in 2018. 

(Yeah...right...sure...just like every other corporations is right?)

"it’s incredibly difficult to believe that venture capitalists can save humanity when their main goal is profit."

(Really? Ya dont say?

Interesting...

Sarcasm BTW.)

“There is a misalignment between what the company publicly espouses and how it operates behind closed doors. Over time, it has allowed a fierce competitiveness and mounting pressure for ever more funding to erode its founding ideals of transparency, openness, and collaboration,” 

(What entity does that sound like could be at work there to you?)

“Y'all keep telling us AGI is around the corner but can't even have a single consistent definition of it on your own damn website,” tweeted Timnit Gebru, a computer scientist who was fired from Google for publishing a groundbreaking paper 

about the risks of large language models, 

which includes its dangerous biases and the potential to deceive people with them. 

(Do not be deceived.)

"Emily M. Bender, a professor of linguistics at the University of Washington and the co-author of that paper, tweeted: “They don't want to address actual problems in the actual world (which would require ceding power). They want to believe themselves gods who can not only create a ‘superintelligence’ but have the beneficence to do so in a way that is ‘aligned’ with humanity.” 

(His post was talking about whats next after AGI. They do believe themselves "Gods" who have already created a "superintelligence".

It is the return of the nephelium.

And it tells you exactly where were at.)

People have been easily jailbreaking the language model to disregard the guardrails OpenAI set around it, and the bot breaks when fed random words and phrases. Nobody can say why, exactly, because OpenAI has not shared the underlying model's code, and, to some extent, OpenAI itself is unlikely to fully understand how it works. 

And on and on and on...