Showing posts sorted by relevance for query air defenses. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query air defenses. Sort by date Show all posts

Sunday, July 20, 2025

Just because you

 


think its over.

Doesn't mean they do.


Israel speeds up long-range interceptor resupply 

with large-scale order.

The Times of Israel 7/17/25


An order is one thing

getting them delivered is another.


"Israel’s Arrow 2 and 3 long-range missile defense systems were used extensively during Israel’s 12-day war with Iran last month, as well as amid repeated Houthi attacks from Yemen. There had been speculation that Israel’s supplies of the interceptors had been significantly depleted by the attacks."


"In a statement, the director general of the Defense Ministry, Amir Baram, says, “accelerating the production rate of the Arrow and other critical systems is a central component of the ministry’s strategy to expand production capabilities and improve operational readiness for the continuation of the war and future campaigns.”


Meanwhile:

Iran says it has replaced air defenses 

damaged in Israel war

The Jerusalem Post 7/20/25


"Iran has replaced air defenses damaged during last month's conflict with Israel, Iran's Defah Press news agency reported on Sunday, quoting Mahmoud Mousavi, the regular army's deputy for operations."

"During the conflict in June, Israel's air force dominated Iran's airspace and dealt a heavy blow to the country's air defenses while Iranian armed forces launched successive barrages of missiles and drones on Israeli territory."

(Thats pretty unbiased reporting right there.)

"Some of our air defenses were damaged; this is not something we can hide, but our colleagues have used domestic resources and replaced them with pre-arranged systems that were stored in suitable locations in order to keep the airspace secure," Mousavi said."

"Prior to the war, Iran had its own domestically-made long-range air defense system, Bavar-373, in addition to the Russian-made S-300 system. The report by Defah Press did not mention any import of foreign-made air defense systems to Iran in past weeks."

"Following limited Israeli strikes against Iranian missile factories last October, Iran later displayed Russian-made air defenses in a military exercise to show it recovered from the attack."


So its domestically produced

probably not near as good as the Russian one.

And Israel took those out pretty  easy.


But they need the missiles etc etc etc...

Point is:


Just because you

think its over.

Doesn't mean they do.


Tuesday, February 14, 2023

This

 


one is going to be like writing a book.

Almost every paragraph gets a comment.

WARNING;

(I'm going to say a lot of:

'I said..."

It wasn't me saying it but the Holy Spirit working through me to say it.

Just try and keep it in mind. :-).


Western intelligence shows Russians amassing aircraft on Ukraine border


"Nato allies to prioritise rapid shipments of air defences and ammunition as conflict enters new phase.

(It's been going on a year

but now we decide they need:


"rapid shipments of air defences and ammunition"

(Im not even out of the headline and I'm commenting...probably a pretty good indicator of where this one is headed...)


(Please use the sharing tool lol...

Hey?

Sue me, 

I live in a garage, 

like I care, 

I wouldn't even have transportation to court etc?

Seein' the built in advantage for livin like I am now?

Anyway...)


"Intelligence shared among Nato allies shows that Russia is amassing fixed-wing and rotary aircraft on the border with Ukraine, according to two officials briefed on its contents.";

"In meetings with allied countries supporting Ukraine on Tuesday, US defence secretary Lloyd Austin highlighted the threat of Russia’s significant remaining air force."


“He was very clear that we have a short window of time to help the Ukrainians to prepare for an offensive and that they had some pretty specific needs,” a senior US administration official said.

(If the Ukrainians need air defenses?

And Russia's air force is largely intact?

Why wasn't it being utilized in such a 

"FULL SCALE"

 invasion?

And why diont the Ukrainians have adequate Air defenses bt now?

I brought all these point up a pretty good while ago in a "presentation" I did.)



“The Russian land forces are pretty depleted so it’s the best indication that they will turn this into an air fight. If the Ukrainians are going to survive . . . they need to have as many air defence capabilities and as much ammunition . . . as possible,” the official added.


(“The Russian land forces are pretty depleted'

Baloney. maybe the ones right there are.

But They have used only 2 out of 10 army units.

This has largely been:

The Wagner group, 

Draftees, 

inexperienced units with limited training, 

prisoners, 

volunteers, 

militias from the eastern providences of Ukraine 

and Chechens.

Notice the official said:

"If the Ukrainians are going to survive..."

Not:

"If the Ukrainians are going to be victorious" 

but :

"If they are going to live."

basically.)



"In a news conference later on Tuesday, Austin said the US did not see imminent signs of a “massive aerial attack” from Russia on Ukraine, but that Washington and its allies are rushing as much air defence capability to the country as they possibly can."

(Why wasn't this done a long time ago? 

We wouldn't be in such a rush rn. I mean I flat out said that all they (Ukrainians) had was old soviet era stuff for air defenses and that Russia wasn't using it's Air Force and this was a good while ago.)



We do know Russia has substantial aircraft . . . and a lot of capability left,” Austin said. Ukraine’s current air defences were “not enough and we’re going to keep pushing until we get more because that threat is out there”, he said. “We want to make sure they have the ability to protect themselves in the event Russia decides to introduce its air force into the fight.”


(We do know Russia has substantial aircraft . . .I'd be curious to know what was said where the ...was put in that statement.

And?

"...in the event Russia decides to introduce its air force into the fight."


That's the US secretary of defense talking.

Anytime somebody wants to come and explain to me how a 

"FULL SCALE INVASION"

DOESNT INCLUDE AN AIR COMPONENT IN IT?

IM ALL EARS...

"...in the event Russia decides to introduce its air force into the fight."

I've said since the convoy stalled on the way to Kiev:

"They are sandbagging."

 (= deceptive behavior intended to lower someone's expectations 

so that they can be taken by surprise later.)

Well guess what?

Looking like later is about here already according to NATO.)



(I mean:


“We want to make sure they have the ability to protect themselves in the event Russia decides to introduce its air force into the fight.”

Since the first weeks of the war, following President Vladimir Putin’s full-scale invasion on February 24 last year"


(Those two sentences are back to back in different paragraphs.

So how was it a "Full Scale Invasion" again?

 If it didn't include but only a small portion of the Russian Air Force?

I'm all ears... 

I got a table and a chair for who ever wants t come explain it to me.)




"Russia has used its sizeable air forces sparingly, relying instead on long-range missiles, artillery and land-based troops.

Western analysts had speculated that this could have been due to a fear in Moscow that Ukraine’s air defence systems posed a threat to Russian aircraft, or because its fleet was in poor condition."


(One:

"Russia has used its sizeable air forces sparingly..."

Defines sandbagging basically.


Two:

"Western analysts had speculated that this could have been due to a fear in Moscow that Ukraine’s air defence systems posed a threat to Russian aircraft, or because its fleet was in poor condition."

No. Not at all. Thats the dog that dont hunt they tried to sell ya.

I mean if that's the best Western analysts can do?

The we need a whole new set of analysts cause that is so far off as to be laughable at this point.)

"But intelligence assessments indicate that Russia’s air force is “actually quite preserved”, a senior Nato diplomat said.


“More than 80 per cent probably is safe and available . . . So we are expecting that they’re preparing to launch an air campaign and they’ve been trying to [disable] Ukrainian air defenses with attacks,” the diplomat said.


(All that you heard about the Russians:

"attacking civilian infrastructure"?

They were, don't get me wrong, but they knew there were  reconnaissance drones circling their positions on the ground and providing "real time" information and coordinates about their troop locations and movements so that they could be targeted. The relay towers relaying that real time information from the drones to  on the Ukrainians on the ground has been all but taken out at this point. So that, along with Elon Musk taking down the Ukrainians Starlink access? Yeah they have been disabling Ukrainian air defenses for a while. This will not be like it was a year ago and they are still using inexperienced, ill trained and ill equipped draftees. Still sand bagging.)


"The US is expected to announce another assistance package later this week, which will mostly include air defence and ammunition, according to people familiar with the matter."


"Ukrainian and Nato officials have in recent days warned of ammunition shortages, with western capitals growing concerned at the effect of strained defence supply chains and dwindling domestic stockpiles."


(Ever occur to any of these highly esteemed "Western Analyst" that this was part of the game plan all along? 

1st? They probe to see what your tactics will be in response. Then later (now) at their choosing? They adjust tactics based off what they have learned. Then? They get you depleting your weapons stockpiles, cause they knew the "Real" big one is still coming. They use the aforementioned hodgepodge of armed services members, (Chechens, prisoners', etc...) They use old rations, old ammo/equipment etc...Not because they were out but because they were saving it for when it matters the most. No "Western Analyst" can figure this out? Nobody reporting on it anywhere etc? Makes perfect sense...I mean where are peoples brains these days?

Where is the guy that is making more sense? Is my question.

I got a few things I wanna ask him about.)


"These immediate needs trumped longer-term requests for materiel such as fighter jets or quicker shipments of western battle tanks, officials said, given Russia’s new offensive, which Nato said on Monday had already begun.

“​​What Ukraine tells us that they really need is ammunition and additional air defence capabilities,” a western official said."


(This was over before it started. Other people don't fight wars like we do. Some countries don't care about battlefield losses. Some wars are drawn out on purpose to "break" the other side and that's exactly what this is doing, its a war of attrition the West was not prepared to fight post Covid.)


"President Joe Biden has said the US will not send F-16s but American officials concede they are likely to provide Ukraine with more sophisticated air power as the war drags on — or at least give a green light to the transfer of F-16s from other powers.'

(Were conceding that this gonna drag this now...)



"The allies’ meeting could also include talks about a greater number of more direct contracts between Kyiv and western defence companies, brokered and financed by allied countries, two officials said. That would streamline the flow of supplies from production line to deployment, while also acknowledging that western militaries have little more to give from their reserves."

(Think its an accident they launched their new offensive when they did?)




It's old school 'attritional warfare" and were loosing and were gonna continue to loose.


I still want somebody come explain to me how a 

FULL SCALE INVASION" 

doesn't use an air force? 


I love you baby.

TTYS honey.







 















Thursday, April 13, 2023

How

 


many times somebody gotta tell you stuff before the experts do? (or it gets leaked) Before you believe in the spiritual gift of prophecy?

Hum?

How any times exactly?


Here are the 7 biggest revelations from the US leaks so far


"...records detail alleged U.S. spying on allies, insights into American thinking on the war in Ukraine..."


(Who does that benefit again?

Us? or Russia?

So who do you really think did it?)


"...the Justice Department is overseeing a criminal investigation of the leak."


(Well hold on to your pants were gonna have a criminal investigation. Well golly gee willickers...One country is conducting acts of war, another ones going to have a criminal investigation. awesome.)



"At least one of the documents containing casualty estimates appears to have been altered"

(To the correct numbers, that's about as bad as they did it (Leak) to start with. And notice now how when they talk about that they are not publishing the altered 3's? Why?

17.500 Russia

71,500 Ukraine )


"...the leak has already done a lot of damage, forcing crucial U.S. allies to respond in what has become an arguably embarrassing incident for Washington.'


(It's just the start. 

I'm telling you this is exactly what the SolarWinds campaign was all about.)



"Ukraine air defense systems in peril"

(Who told you? 

Who went off on a rant explaining why the Russians weren't using there technologically more advanced and much more numerous aircraft?  

There ya go:

Air Defenses

Get ya some of that.

Every time the phrase was ever used on here.

Have fun.

I wrote it I know what it says.

The thing about writing things is?

You remember it longer, you think about it more, and it commits it to long term memory etc. I even deconstructed a Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) "the world’s oldest and the UK’s leading defence and security think tank" piece they did on it. Thats bye-bye RUSI and CSIS. Who needs ya? Not me.)


"Munitions for Soviet-era air defense systems deployed by Ukraine will soon run out, potentially imperiling Kyiv in the war against Russia, documents show."

(Well no kidding, go back to the air defenses search linked above. You aint gotta go rushing in all guns a blazing destroying everything all John Wayne cowboy style. You can make the other side use up all their ammo and just walk in eventually...Thatas another thing the leak was about: this is over. "You are loosing and you are going to continue to loose" was the message sent. )


"The S300 missile defense system is expected to run out of munitions by May and the SA-11 Gadfly system at the end of March, a document dated in February says."

"Both systems make up about 89 percent of Ukraine’s air defenses and are vital to fending off frequent Russian missile strikes."

"The Pentagon documents suggested that Ukraine could withstand only a few more waves of Russian missile strikes."


(They're out of missiles remember? 

Somebody was telling ya otherwise.)



"Pentagon casts doubt on Ukraine’s spring counteroffensive"

"Ukraine is expected to launch a major counteroffensive this spring, but the U.S. is doubting Kyiv’s ability to retake significant territory, a “top secret” document says."


"An early February assessment indicates “force generation and sustainment shortfall” for Ukraine’s military, The Washington Post reported."


(There is your proof of 

17,500 Russian, 

71500 Ukrainian BTW

...and now with minimal air defenses left...)


"Publicly, the Biden administration has signaled that Ukraine will regain territory in the coming offensive."

"But the documents paint a darker picture, with Kyiv likely to struggle against entrenched Russian positions in southeastern Ukraine and with “deficiencies” in training and munitions, according to The Post’s review.'

(Everything what they were telling you about The Russians? Is exactly whats been going on with the Ukrainians. Thats just how Orwellian our world is rn.)


"US intel on Russia could now be compromised"

(Everything we have is compromised. Everything. Lil hard to win a war when the people you are fighting know what you are going to do ahead of time dont you think?)


"Israeli spy agency supported domestic protests"


"South Korea was concerned about supplying munitions to US"

"Other documents also pointed to potential U.S. spying on South Korea, a major ally in the Indo-Pacific, on support for Ukraine."

9Thats what we need in the pacific right now...perfect...sarcasm yo.)

"The leaked papers said South Korea was open to supplying the U.S. with artillery shells to replenish American stocks — but privately, Seoul was concerned about the munitions being diverted to Ukraine."



'Egypt secretly planned to supply Russia with rockets'


"UAE agreed to work with Russian spy agents against US, UK"



Friday, October 4, 2024

I

 


Satellite images show dozens of Iranian missiles struck near Israeli air base


knew when they didn't talk about it 

for so long after it happened 

that it was worse 

than they were letting on to.


Its one of the reasons were there, 

to augment 

their multilayered air defense systems.


Wednesday, 

November 1, 2023

Read

“The fact that there’s another front directly to the south raises the risk that Israel (air defenses) can be overwhelmed and then it can be that much more worrying” if Hezbollah, Hamas and others launch massive missile barrages.


(That is another reason this is SO significant.

The JV team

(Iranians)

can and probably will

overwhelm and exhaust

Israeli air defenses.


And if they can do that?

They can get us to exhaust 

some of our carrier groups

missile defenses as well.

Right as were leading into 

China and Taiwan etc.)


Its kinda why I don't really worry 

or care about peoples 

scripture interpretations.


Shit like that right there.


Nowto the article.

"Researchers have used commercial satellite imagery to identify more than 30 points where Iranian missiles appear to have impacted an air base in southern Israel.

(Showing them they can hit them anywhere.)


"The imagery, taken by the company Planet the day after the strike, shows damaged hangars, buildings, taxiways, and a crater on one of the runways at Nevatim Airbase. Videos posted to social media showed multiple warheads striking the base during the Oct. 1 attack by Iran."


"A complex picture

But Jeffrey Lewis, a professor at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey who led the analysis, says his work "complicates the picture a lot."


"We see more than 30 craters and damaged buildings," Lewis says, "suggesting that more than 30 missiles hit the base."


"Based on preliminary calculations of what happened at Nevatim, Lewis believes a substantial number of Iranian missiles may have reached their targets."

"If Nevatim is representative, that would suggest that more than half got through," he says."


Pick and choose

There are several reasons why so many Iranian missiles may have penetrated Israel's air defenses. Israel's vaunted Iron Dome missile defense system can only intercept low-flying, short-range missiles of the type used by Hezbollah and Hamas. To intercept Iran's medium-range ballistic missiles requires Israel's more powerful and expensive Arrow 2 and Arrow 3 missile defense systems.


(Talked about that years back as well:

"Israel's vaunted Iron Dome missile defense system can only intercept low-flying, short-range missiles of the type used by Hezbollah and Hamas."

It is what it was designed to do.)


"It is possible that the Arrow system failed to perform as expected, Lewis says, but he thinks it's more likely that Israel may have decided not to defend Nevatim, in order to save its interceptors to protect population centers like Tel Aviv."


(This is the whole problem.

Iran has way more missiles

than Israel does interceptors.


Its gonna be Israel's air force 

against Iran's army 

and as stated before 

it will be a draw, 

and draw everybody else in

along the way.)


"It may be that they just don't have that many Arrow 2 and Arrow 3 missiles," Lewis says. 

(Thats what I would be going with, yup.)


"If that were true, then "the Iranians have succeeded in overwhelming the system and the Israelis have had to pick and choose."

(And its only going to get a lot worse.)


"That would be my guess," Lewis adds. "It did not look like they were trying to defend this base."


"Lewis notes that although over 30 missiles landed inside the base perimeter, the damage caused was still somewhat limited. That's notable because Iran is believed to have used some of its most advanced Fattah missiles."


"Even these missiles, which look substantially more accurate, still struggled to do damage," he says.


"Still, he thinks the attack has shown that Iran can strike at targets well inside Israel. "They can definitely get missiles through," he says."









Thursday, November 17, 2022

Discernment Alert

 

Poland, NATO say missile strike wasn’t a Russian attack


"NATO member Poland and the head of the military alliance both said Wednesday that a missile strike in Polish farmland that killed two people appeared to be unintentional and was probably launched by air defenses in neighboring Ukraine. Russia had been bombarding Ukraine at the time in an attack that savaged its power grid."

(It's not just the power grid they are going after, it's the radars and the relay stations of real time information as well. Thats the part were not being told about, it's all about civilian infrastructure and the power grid in western media accounts.)


Ukraine’s defense was launching their missiles in various directions, and it is highly probable that one of these missiles unfortunately fell on Polish territory,” said Polish President Andrzej Duda. “There is nothing, absolutely nothing, to suggest that it was an intentional attack on Poland.”

(Like all the qualifying terms yet? Just wait.)


"The assessments of Tuesday’s deadly missile landing appeared to dial back the likelihood of the strike triggering another major escalation in the nearly 9-month-old Russian invasion of Ukraine."

(lets just completely ignore Putin's stated goals of fracturing the alliance shall we?)


"Zelenskyy told reporters he had “no doubts” about a report he received from his top commanders “that it wasn’t our missile or our missile strike.” Ukrainian officials should have access to the site and take part in the investigation, he added.

“Let’s say openly, if, God forbid, some remnant (of Ukraine’s air-defenses) killed a person, these people, then we need to apologize,” he said. “But first there needs to be a probe, access — we want to get the data you have.”


(Okay tons of questions raised here:

The people who supposedly fired the missile say it wasnt theirs.

Their leader (Zelenskyy) says he has "no doubts" it wasn't theirs based on information received from his top commanders.

Ukrainian officials apparently dont have access to the site of the blast and aren't taking part in the investigation. (That I can understand as they aren't part of NATO but it would still seem to be a good idea to include the people you say fired the missile in the investigation dont you think?

And they dont even have the data Poland and NATO do? the people that fired the missile dont have the data about where it landed or why? Why is that?)


On Tuesday, he (Zelenskyy)  called the strike “a very significant escalation.”

(I agree for a variety of reasons I'll explain later.)


"Before the Polish and NATO assessments, U.S. President Joe Biden had said it was “unlikely” that Russia fired the missile but added: “I’m going to make sure we find out exactly what happened.”


(Just because you dont want to believe it doesn't mean its not true.)


"The Polish president said the missile was probably a Russian-made S-300 dating from the Soviet era."


"Ukraine’s military said 77 of the more than 90 missiles fired were brought down by air defenses, along with 11 drones."

(Thats just a lil unrealistic, even by Patriot  or THADD or Iron Dome or NASMS metrics that's just a lil skewed to say the least.

And besides, Russia is running out of missiles says all the think tankers right? remember that? If they are running out of missiles? Why does each missile barrage keep getting bigger? 

.)


"A Washington-based think tank, the Institute for the Study of War, said Ukraine’s downing of so many Russian missiles Tuesday “illustrates the improvement in Ukrainian air defenses in the last month,” which are being bolstered with Western-supplied systems."

(So lets think about this for a second...

The people that dont know where their missile went? 
Are saying they shot down 77 of the 90 that Russia launched? 
Seems to me like if you knew how many enemy missiles came into your territory and you knew how many you shot down? 
You'd know where yours landed. 
The Ukrainians themselves are saying, "It wasnt ours.")


"Army Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, said he tried to speak to his Russian counterpart Wednesday, but those efforts were not successful. Milley didn’t elaborate on the efforts, but the lack of a conversation, at a time when there were questions about whether Russia had struck a NATO ally, raises concerns about high-level U.S.-Russian communications in a crisis."

(I dont know what that says to you? but is says a lot to me. It ought to raise concerns alright, on a wide variety of levels.)


"Power shortages caused extensive train delays extending into Wednesday, but there were no cancellations because diesel locomotives were pressed into service, rail officials said.

Kyiv resident Margina Daria said Tuesday’s strikes knocked out cellphone service in her area.

“We have already adapted to life without light, because we have scheduled outages every day, but without communication it was quite disturbing,” she said. “There was no way to even tell our families that we were OK.”

(Its not about attacking civilian infrastructure. It's about knocking out power to the radars and the relay stations.)

Lets review the list of "qualifiers" in that article shall we?:

I got:

"appeared to be unintentional"
"was probably launched"
"highly probable that one of these missiles unfortunately fell on Polish territory"
"appeared to dial back"
unlikely” that Russia fired the missile"
"the missile was probably a Russian-made S-300"

by my count.

For this day in age?
Thats a lot of qualifiers.
Particularly a day or two later.


Submitted for your consideration:

the positioning of our and China's forces in the pacific from 10/28 until now.
(That was a lot of movement in a short amount of time basically)

Add to that, the fact that Washington was recently trying to persuade Ukraine to negotiate with Russia.

The missile landed in Poland when Biden was out of the country.

 Ukraine commanders  says it wasn't theirs and they are not being included in the investigation etc.

The fact that gen Millay couldn't reach his Russian counterpart speaks volumes, or at least it should.


I think it's pretty easy to deduce the following:

If more and more "stray" missiles hit other NATO countries, or keep landing in Poland?
Then it should be pretty obvious who is behind it and its not the Ukrainians.

Everybody ready to go to war to fight for Poland and Lithuania raise your hand.

Exactly.
It's kinda what somebody else figures too.














Saturday, November 9, 2024

Timeline of Events (Added as an addendum to: The Case For Iran Having Nuclear Weapons)

 

Jun 22, 2018


The Air Force Wants Its B-52s To Carry Mysterious 20,000lb Weapons Under Their Wings

"The service says the bombers need new underwing pylons for particularly heavy bombs or missiles, but hasn't identified any specific types."



Leases on Qatari Air Bases In Qatar renewed

January 2, 2024

US quietly reaches agreement with Qatar to keep operating largest military base in Middle East



July 26, 2024

CIA chief to meet Israeli, Qatari and Egyptian officials for Gaza talks, source says

(Said right then it had nothing to do with hostage negotiations and that they were planning a war.)


(Notice how AP doesn't tell you who the officials were, that aint hostage negotiations folks, there's getting ready to be a massive war in the middle east. Three heads of intelligence services? For hostage negotiations? No wonder AP didnt say who they were.)


(Then? The very next day)

July 27, 2024

B-52 Traverses Middle East as US Troops in Iraq and Syria Are Attacked

"The B-52 did not land while in CENTCOM, but did rendezvous and fly with Qatari F-15QAs, a U.S. official said."




September 22, 2024

Trump says he met with Qatari leaders in Florida



October 30 2024

Israel took out primary Iranian air defenses, left it ‘essentially naked’ – report


Radar systems in Iran breached prior to Israel's Saturday counter-strike - report

(Some in Syrian as well as some in Iran.

So Thats advance warning Radars and air defenses, gone basically, 

Gee I wonder why?

Keep reading for the answer.)



November 7th 2024

US Parks Nuclear Bomber Fleet on Iran's Doorstep in Warning to Tehran

(Don't be fooled by the headline, Nukes got nothing to do with it.)




The answer to: 
"Thats advance warning radars 
and air defenses, gone basically, 
Gee I wonder why?" 
Is because these behemoths (B-52): 



Fly low and slow, 
particularly when weighed down with: 
"particularly heavy bombs."
Refer back to the first event 
listed in this timeline.


And now today we have:

11/09/24


"Qatar told Hamas that it must close its diplomatic office in Doha roughly ten days ago following a request by the US, senior Biden administration officials tell The Times of Israel.

Qatar has hosted Hamas officials in Doha since 2012, amid requests from successive US administrations 

(That includes Trump BTW)

"who felt it was important to have a communication channel with the terror group."

Following Hamas’s October 7 onslaught, the US informed Qatar that it would not be able to maintain “business as usual” with the terror group. However, it held off on asking Doha to shutter the Hamas office, viewing it as critical for the negotiations toward a ceasefire and hostage deal."

(Me and Honey have both maintained all along that the ceasefire and hostage negotiations were a front to give Israel and its allies time to maneuver "assets" into position. And now with those assets in place? There is no longer any need for "ceasefire and hostage negotiations.")



November 8, 2024



"charging a man who said he had been tasked by a government official 
(Iranian that is) before this week’s election with planning the assassination of the Republican president-elect."

"Investigators were told of the plan to kill Trump by Farhad Shakeri, an accused Iranian government asset who spent time in American prisons for robbery"

"Shakeri is at large and remains in Iran."

(That's more than a Lil convenient don't you think? And? Consider the source: AP, the propaganda wing of the US government. Who was it that was given a picture from a social media post that they geolocated to the top of the roof where Trumps alleged "assassin" was? OH yeah, the AP. Interesting.

And? if "Shakeri is at large and remains in Iran"? As stated above?

Then how were:

"Investigators were told of the plan to kill Trump by Farhad Shakeri"?

Makes absolutely 0 sense. If something doesn't make sense? Then it's either a lie, they are crazy, or its the Holy Spirit. I know which one Id go with in this case.

And for the love of God? Does nobody have a brain in this country any more? Can nobody read that AP piece and see that what is being said just doesnt make any sense?)

"Shakeri told the FBI..."

(If he is running around free in Iran? Then how did he do that then?)

"Shakeri, an Afghan national who immigrated to the U.S. as a child but later was deported after spending 14 years in prison for robbery, also told investigators that he was tasked by his Revolutionary Guard..."

(He was deported 14 years ago and is freely roaming Iran but he is able to tell FBI investigators? 
WTF? yo.)

"The criminal complaint says Shakeri disclosed some of the details of the alleged plots in a series of recorded telephone interviews with FBI agents while in Iran. The stated reason for his cooperation, he told investigators, was to try to get a reduced prison sentence for an associate behind bars in the U.S."

(And if you believe that line of hog wash???

"in a series of recorded telephone interviews 
with FBI agents while in Iran."

)


"...though officials determined that some of the information he provided was false, 

(A convicted thief lied?
No way!)

his statements regarding a plot to kill Trump and Iran’s willingness to pay large sums of money were determined to be accurate."

(From a convicted thief no less, plz...)


"The plot, announced by the Justice Department just days after Trump’s defeat of Democrat Kamala Harris, is part of what federal officials have described as ongoing efforts by Iran to target U.S. government officials, including Trump, on U.S. soil.'

(So why weren't we told anything about all this until then? Here in this instance and in lots of others, TIMING gives a lot of things away.)

"Iranian operatives also conducted a hack-and-leak operation of emails belonging to Trump campaign associates in what officials have assessed was an effort to interfere in the presidential election and harm Trump’s campaign."

"Intelligence officials have said Iran opposed Trump’s reelection, seeing him as more likely to increase tension between Washington and Tehran. Trump’s administration ended a nuclear deal with Iran,

(If you honestly think he was the sole entity behind the decision to end JCPOA? Might wanna go listen to the George Straight song again.)

"reimposed sanctions and ordered the killing of Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani, an act that prompted Iran’s leaders to vow revenge."

"Trump spokesman Steven Cheung said the president-elect was aware of the assassination plot and nothing will deter him 
“from returning to the White House 
and 
restoring peace around the world.”

(Fits right in...

Daniel 8:25

And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.)


THIS IS ALL BEING SET UP 

(THE COMING ATTACK 
ON IRANS NUCLEAR PROGRAM)

TO MAKE IT LOOK LIKE 
ONE PERSON WAS BEHIND IT ALL:



As this timeline proves conclusively?


Nothing 
could be farther 
from the truth.

THIS?




Isnt all that far removed from this:



(JFK's motorcade route.

No way in hell anybody agrees
to that hard right turn
slowing things down to a crawl
snaking through Daley plaza.)

And Hey
How are all those investigations 
into Trumps assassination attempt 
going these days huh?

Whatever happened to all of those?

Clay Higgins

Anybody found Officer Rambo yet?


Meanwhile?

Matthew 24:3-4.

And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, his disciples came unto him apart, saying, 
Tell us when these things shall be, 
and 
what sign 

(Singular, as in ONE.)

shall be of thy coming, 
and of the end of the world.

And Jesus answered, and said unto them, 
Take heed that no man deceive you.

Timing gives this piece of bull shit away.
If what this AP article is saying 
was really the case?

Then why didn't we hear about it 
before the election?

"Well you said that about AI too".


Daniel 8:25
"...and by peace shall destroy many:"

Yeah?

1 John 2:18

Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.


So what is your point?