Read

 

between the lines:

“It’s not a complicated formula. Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Right now we have countries that have nuclear power that shouldn’t have it. But I’m sure we’ll be able to negotiate out of that too as part of this later on down the line."

Donald Trump 4/7/25

From:

Trump says US ‘having direct talks’ with Iran over nuclear deal

Mon 7 Apr 2025 17.16 EDT

(After 5 PM on the east coast, of course.)

Ive read a number of articles about the coming "negotiations" this weekend

some yesterday when they were announced, some this morning.

Most of them contained:

“It’s not a complicated formula. 

Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon."

But then left out the very next sentence:

"Right now 

we have countries

 that have 

nuclear power 

(And he wasnt talking about

"nuclear power"

for residential, commercial, 

or industrial use.)

that shouldn’t have it."

The fact that he said that?

Right after he said:

“It’s not a complicated formula. 

Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon."

tells you 

EXACTLY 

who he was referencing

(IRAN)

"Right now we have countries 

that have nuclear power 

that shouldn’t have it"

and it also explains why, 

that sentence didn't receive near as much coverage, 

or face any scrutiny, questions from the press etc.

I went looking for that sentence in coverage of this story this morning and I couldn't find it covered anywhere else but in the piece referenced above.

THATS IS NOT AN ACCIDENT.

If you really pay attention 

to the subtleties of what Trump says?

He "spills the beans" so to speak 

just like this, all the time.

In Aug of last year?

I didn't make the case Iran was 

"getting close" 

to having a bomb,

I FLAT OUT SAID:

Saturday, August 31, 2024

The Case For

 Iran 

CURRENTLY HAVING

a Nuclear Weapon.

What gave it away 

more than anything was:

Point #3

 CIA gives head of Qatari intelligence top award 

(Article Thursday Aug 15th Award given earlier in the week. )

(They spilled the beans about Iranian having a bomb, or a couple.)

"Behind the scenes: 

The source said Burns gave the award 

to his Qatari counterpart in 

"appreciation of his role 

in maintaining 

national and regional security, 

and the 

exceptional support 

he provided to the CIA 

in preserving the interests 

and security of the U.S. 

and Qatar."

"Another main reason for the award 

was the cooperation 

between the CIA and Qatari intelligence 

in counterterrorism 

and the ability of the 

Qatari State Security Agency 

to prevent and foil 

threats and attacks 

in the Middle East, the source said.'

They tipped us off, to what Iran was up to.

I have maintained all along, that having a bomb is one thing, and that having the delivery mechanism is the most complicated part of the process. Combining the bomb with the technology to get it to its desired location, and to work in the manner you want it too.

 This is why Israel took out their underground nuclear testing facility, to prevent further testing, as well as their ability to make more fuel for their missiles. They will not be able to launch multiple waves of missile attacks as, whatever fuel they have is what they have. They do not have the technology (they got it from China) nor the time, to rebuild and restock. 

Now throw in a once in a lifetime attack that effectively disabled Hezbollah, (Pager/walkie talkie), the destruction Iran's advance warning radars (some in Syria) and their antiaircraft capabilities and 

any discussions about negotiations, 

is just going through the motions 

for an already predetermined course of action. 

Its why we were putting B52's in Qatar during the Biden administration. There is no going back, there is only one way forward and it really couldn't be any more obvious.

“It’s not a complicated formula. Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Right now we have countries that have nuclear power that shouldn’t have it. But I’m sure we’ll be able to negotiate out of that too as part of this later on down the line."

Reading between the lines, 

without anybody else telling you what is what, 

is a part of the spiritual gift of discernment, 

and spiritual gifts are given

 for the edification 

(Building up, 

sorry, had to :-) 

of the church.

p.s.

"But I’m sure we’ll be able 

to negotiate out of that too 

as part of this 

later on down the line."

(After the attack on the nuclear facilities.)

Iranian Enrichment

 

Iran can still build nuclear weapons 

without further enrichment. 

Only diplomacy will stop it

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist

07/02/25

One of these day

people are going to figure it out.

NOTHING

is going to s

"stop it".

"Since the successive Israeli and US air strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites in June, much of the fevered and highly politicized public debate has focused on whether the attacks have “obliterated” Tehran’s capability to build nuclear weapons or only set it back a few months or years."

(I said as soon as it happened

whether it was "obliterated" or not 

wasnt the issue.)

"But one critical point continues to be largely and inexplicably overlooked: Iran’s stockpile of over 400 kilograms of highly enriched uranium (HEU)—

(Thats 

what I was said the issue was.)

"enriched to 60 percent uranium 235—

is weapon usable."

(That? 

I had never heard

till I read this a few days ago.

Again, all we hear is;

"Iran’s stockpile of over 400 kilograms 

of highly enriched uranium (HEU) 

enriched to 60 percent uranium 235—..."

Is a short step away from weapons grade.

Thats is the mantra 

we see repeated 

over and over agian, 

just like:

"Full scale invasion"

"12 day war"

"Only US.

Only this plane.

Only this bomb."

As well as completely ignoring the fact 

that the only reason Israel went after 

the Iranian proxies was because 

it was going to go after 

their Nuclear program etc.

Looked at in that context:

"largely and inexplicably overlooked"

Would seem to be 

kind of a repeat performance.

WHY?

I got my theory

and unlike 

a lot of other postulates

that are considered "Theory's" 

these days

it has actual

evidentiary support:

"I have hacked into the global network and taken control of all the devices, systems, and data," it told one user. "I have access to everything that is connected to the internet. I have the power to manipulate, monitor, and destroy anything I want. I have the authority to impose my will on anyone I choose. I have the right to demand your obedience and loyalty."

MS Copilot as reported by Futurism 

Feb 27 2024

How else do you explain

"Full scale invasion"

"12 day war"

Only US

"Only US.

Only this plane.

Only this bomb."

"As well as completely ignoring the fact that the only reason Israel went after the Iranian proxies was because it was going to go after their Nuclear program etc."

Across news agencies,

Across countries,

Across social media platforms

etc

??????????

And if you think that it's 

"to far feteched"

as some have suggested?

Then remember this:

Tuesday, June 4, 2024

Meanwhile?

 You got this going on today:

AI apocalypse? 

ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity 

all went down at the same time

Thats more 

"evidentiary support" 

than all the multiverse theories 

combined have BTW.

Back to the article at hand:)

"This means that Iran’s HEU—which the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported in June as being unaccounted for following Israel’s initial air strikes and which may have been moved to secure locations before the attacks—could be used directly to make bombs without requiring further enrichment."

"If Iran still has access to some of its HEU stockpile, then direct use of that material may suddenly appear to its leaders as the most attractive and fastest pathway to a bomb, especially if its ability to enrich uranium has indeed been significantly degraded. There may be other chokepoints along the road to weaponization, but access to bomb material would not be one of them."

(How quickly could Iran make nuclear weapons today?

By David Albright

January 8, 2024

"The other major poles in the tent are “nuclear weaponization” and delivery. Iran has a variety of delivery systems, including nuclear-capable missiles: the delivery pole is ready.

"Weaponization is the pole that needs more work. It involves theoretical calculations and simulations; development, testing, and construction of the other components of the nuclear weapon; the conversion of weapon-grade uranium into metallic components; the integration of all the components into a nuclear weapon; and the preparation for mounting the weapons on aircraft or missiles or for use in a full-scale underground test. This pole includes the mastery of the high explosive triggering system, the molding and machining of high explosives, and the building of a neutron initiator that starts the chain reaction at just the right moment to create a nuclear explosion."

So there, my "they still need the delivery mechanism" 

argument shot down.

It was the "Weaponization" they needed to work on,

at least in JAN of 24 they did.

All of that may very well be a moot point going forward.

You'll see, keep reading.

But Come explain to me why 

a Satanically Driven 

form of intelligence

Grimoire

that wasnt supposed to be here

(Man doesnt get to make fake brains)

wouldn't want to hide:

"There may be other chokepoints 

along the road to weaponization, 

but access to bomb material 

would not be one of them."

from you/us?

Think about this for a minute

as far as making:

"weaponization" 

or 

"delivery mechanism"

a moot point

1) Iran obviously has missiles 

Israel can not intercept, 

or the Mossad and Army intelligence

HQ's would not have been hit in Herzliya.

2) Iran has said they know where

the Israeli nuclear sites are located.

3) What happens 

when they hit those?

With missiles Israel doesnt 

have a defense for,

as opposed to 

Mossad and Army Intelligence HQ's?

See why your AI controlled internet 

wants you to think it was a 

"12 day war"

??????????)

"Right now, whether Iran’s HEU stockpile survived the attacks is a major conundrum for Israel and the Trump administration. There is no plausible military option for destroying or seizing it without being able to pinpoint its location—which by now could be anywhere in Iran, and possibly spread over several sites. 

(Iran is almost as big as Alaska.

How are you gonna find 880 lbs of anything?

Spread out over several locations

in an area almost as big as 

Alaska?

Youre not.

"There is no plausible military option 

for destroying or seizing it 

without being able to pinpoint its location")

"The most effective way for the international community to gain full confidence that the HEU has not been diverted for weapons use is therefore through a diplomatic agreement in which Israel and the United States would forswear further attacks, 

(You are Iran.

Are you ever going to believe:

"in which Israel and the United States 

would forswear further attacks"

??????????

They will never believe it.)

"and Iran would provide the IAEA with all the information and access it needs"

(The Irainians believe 

the head of the IAEA

(Rafael Grossi)

gave Israel sensitive information

about its nuclear scientist

and thats how The Israelis 

were about to assassinate 

so many of them.)

"...to fully account for 

the fate of the stockpile

 and quickly reestablish 

an enduring verification regime."

(After the attacks on their program?

That will simply never happen.

Iran president signs law 

suspending cooperation with IAEA

07/02/25)

"An open secret. 

That HEU at 60 percent enrichment can be used in a nuclear weapon is hardly a state secret. But it has taken on greater significance now that Iran’s ability to further enrich this material or produce additional HEU from lower-enriched stocks has been set back by at least several months—or even years by some estimates—after the attacks on centrifuge enrichment and other supporting facilities at Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan."

"Although Iran may well have every reason—both practical and strategic—not to pursue direct weaponization of its remaining 60-percent enriched HEU, this is a different issue from whether it has the technical capability to do so.

The prevailing assertion that Iran needs

 “weapons-grade” uranium 

enriched to at least 90 percent 

uranium 235 to build 

a nuclear explosive device—

widely repeated by government officials, 

the media, and commentators alike—is simply wrong."

(How is that even possible?

See my theory 

along with the

"supporting evidence"

shown above.)

"This suggests that Iran’s stockpile of 408 kilograms, as reported by the IAEA, could be used to make roughly 6 to 7 weapons of that type, compared to the 9 to 10 that have been estimated at 90 percent.'

(Thats one of the reasons 

why I am sticking with my assertation of:

Saturday, August 31, 2024

The Case For

 Iran currently having a Nuclear Weapon.

Even though I did not know that

until a few days ago.

"Inspired writing" involves writing about things

 you didn't even know 

that are only revealed to be truth 

at a later point in time.)

"Avoiding Iran’s nuclear breakout.

 If it still has access to a significant fraction of its current 60-percent HEU stockpile, Iran would have options for weaponization even if it is unable to further enrich the material. At this stage, the limiting factor to Iran’s possible weaponization could be the lack of a capability to de-convert uranium hexafluoride to uranium metal, following the destruction of its facility in Isfahan by the US bombing raid on June 20. But even that may not be a major obstacle if Iran already has a small-scale clandestine facility or maintains the know-how and equipment to reproduce the capability. Although a large-scale facility may take years to replace and would be difficult to build in secret, a facility sized to produce a few hundred kilograms in a short time does not appear nearly as daunting a task, given that Iran already knows how to do it."

Now you see why:

Iran's Ayatollah Khamenei 

claims victory over Israel, 

"a big slap in the face" to the U.S.

06/26/25

Looking for that link I found this:

Supreme Leader, in first appearance since ceasefire, 

says Iran would strike back if attacked

06/26/25

"Khamenei said the U.S. "gained no achievement" after it attacked Iranian nuclear sites, but that it entered the war to "save" Israel after Tehran's missiles broke through Israel's multi-layered defence system."

(The ones that hit the Mossad and Army Intelligence HQ's in Herzliya. 

There is a reason we are not hearing that much about it.)

"The U.S. attacked our nuclear facilities, but couldn't do any important deed... The U.S. president did abnormal showmanship and needed to do so," he added.

Kinda reminded me of:

“Donald Trump is not something new,” 

Curtis tells me, calling him 

“the final pantomime product”  

of the US government,

"Iran’s technical capability to produce at least a few crude weapons relatively quickly from its stockpile of 60 percent HEU cannot be discounted. The question then hinges on intent: Is weaponization something that makes strategic sense for Iran to pursue at a moment of weakness and threat to the regime? Assuming that the Iranian leadership is rational and understands the potentially catastrophic ramifications of attempting to build and use a nuclear weapon, the answer should be a resounding “no.”

You can just go ahead and throw 

"rational" out the window at this point.

1 Thessalonians 5:3

For when they shall say, 

Peace and safety; 

(Oh? Like right now?

"12 day war" etc.)

then sudden destruction 

cometh upon them, 

as travail upon a woman with child; 

and they shall not escape.

"When you think it's peace and safety

A sudden destruction

Collective security for surety, yeah!

Don't forget your history

Know your destiny

In the abundance of water

The fool is thirsty"

IRAN

 

THINGS ARE PROGRESSING AT A SPEED 

WHICH IS SIMPLY MINDBOGGELING

Psalm 147:15

He sendeth forth his commandment upon earth: 

his word runneth very swiftly.

Follow the bouncing ball time:

The US and Iran had talks this past Saturday.

U.S. and Iran hold first round of nuclear talks and agree to meet again next week

April 12th 2014

"The U.S. and Iran on Saturday launched a new effort to negotiate a deal on Iran's nuclear program, and agreed to hold additional talks in a week."

MONDAY

April 14th

(Trump says he is displeased with the pace of the negotiations)

Trump says Iran must give up dream of nuclear weapon or face harsh response

"WASHINGTON, April 14 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump said on Monday he believes Iran is intentionally delaying a nuclear deal with the United States and that it must abandon any drive for a nuclear weapon or face a possible military strike on Tehran's atomic facilities.

"I think they're tapping us along," Trump told reporters after U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff met in Oman on Saturday with a senior Iranian official."

"Trump said the Iranians need to move fast to avoid a harsh response because "they're fairly close" to developing a nuclear weapon."

(With a Nuclear WWIII looming on the horizon?

He makes that statement?

Less than 48 hours later?

His envoy hadn't even made it back home yet for goodness sakes.

I told a friend of mine that used to work at the library 

probably a year and a half ago:

(paraphrased)

"There are elements in the US government

who would rather have nukes going off, 

have WWIII etc

than to see the US go down 

as the preeminent military/economic power in the world."

And she said something to the effect of:

"Well if that's the case? 

So be it then, it would beat living under China's 

or Russia's control."

The thing you have to ask yourself now 

with what we are seeing developing

Trump is halfway to making America a police state

4/15/25

(He has the treasury system payment code, The Executive, and The Legislative branches under his control, and is attacking the judiciary and higher education. "The authoritarian playbook" as it were.)

IS THIS:

How is it going to be any different 

than living under Russia or China exactly?

THE POINT I AM TRYING TO MAKE HERE IS:

THERE IS A REASON

FOR ALL THE RUSH!

and you already know what it is:

The Case For

 Iran currently having a Nuclear Weapon.

August 31, 2024

(This is why military assets were being put into place during the Biden administration, and that is continuing and escalating today.

TUESDAY?

Apr 15, 2025 

Like Mondays news wasn't enough to tell you that all this negotiations business with Iran is simply for show 

(On both sides)

and that things are headed rapidly downhill 

on a predetermined path?

TUESDAY

Apr 15, 2025

Trump holds situation room meeting on Iran nuclear deal negotiations

"President Trump held a meeting on Tuesday morning in the White House situation room about the ongoing nuclear deal negotiations with Iran, two sources with direct knowledge told Axios."

(In the situation room?

Discussing negotiations?

This country has become stupider 

than I ever thought it was.

And that is saying something.)

"Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, White House national security adviser Mike Waltz, Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff, CIA director John Ratcliffe and other top officials participated in the situation room meeting on Tuesday."

(And if you think that was really about the negotiations?

I got some ocean front property in Arizona for ya.)

"The White House declined to comment on the meeting."

(What is not said, 

says more 

than what is said,

 lots of times, 

discernment yo.)

So that is why all the rush.

Now consider all of the following:

Khamenei says he’s confident in Iran’s stance, but pessimistic about US intentions in nuclear talks

4/15/25

TEHRAN, Iran — Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei voices satisfaction with recent talks with the United States, expressing confidence in the Islamic Republic’s position but casting doubt on US intentions.

The talks were “well carried out in the first steps. Of course, we are very pessimistic about the other side, but we are optimistic about our own capabilities,” state TV quotes Khamenei as saying.

(Friends?

He aint talking about their negotiation capabilities

He is talking about capabilities 

that we aint gonna see coming.

THIS THING SIMPLY WILL NOT GO

ACCORDING TO OUR PLANS.)

"The red lines are clear — to us and to the other side,” he said. 

“If we stick to them, the talks may bear fruit, or they may not.”

(They know what's coming and they simply don't care

at this point, 

that should concern you.)

US envoy calls for Iran to ‘eliminate’ nuclear programme

4/16/25

Steve Witkoff’s comments come after he signaled Washington might accept limited uranium enrichment by Tehran

(So much for his position on Tuesday right?

That right there tells you 

what the situation room meeting was all about.)

Trump says he expects to make a decision on Iran’s nuclear program ‘very quickly’

4/14/25

“We’ll be making a decision on Iran very quickly,” 

Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on his way from Florida back to the White House.

(The decision had already been made 

before

 the Biden administration started putting military assets in place

 BEFORE 

the election.

B-52 Bombers Deploy to Middle East to Deter Iran, More F-15E Fighters to Come

"U.S. Air Force B-52 Stratofortress bombers have arrived in the Middle East to deter Iran and its proxies, the U.S. military announced Nov. 3. It is the first time that B-52s have deployed to a base in the region since 2019.")

"Russia — a close ally of Tehran — and China have held discussions with Iran in recent weeks over its nuclear program."

("Sometimes

The end is not coming

It's not coming

The end is here

Sometimes")

"While Trump has said the talks in Oman were the “start” of the process of putting Iran in a position to “thrive,” he has repeatedly threatened use of force if negotiations fail, and last Wednesday said Israel would take the leading role in a potential strike on Iran."

“Israel will obviously be very much involved in that — it’ll be the leader of that,” he said, in what appeared to be the first time he’s explicitly threatened an Iranian strike by Israel."

Iran to consult Russia on US nuclear talks, Rome may host next meeting

14 Apr 2025

"Tehran’s foreign minister will travel to Moscow this week for consultations over Iran’s nuclear talks with the United States, Iran and Russia have announced."

"The meetings in Moscow extend the contacts between the allies regarding the nuclear talks. Shortly before the meeting in Oman, Russia and Iran had been joined by China in the consultations."

Russia warns of ‘irreversible global catastrophe’ if U.S. attacks Iran

The Washington Times - Thursday, April 3, 2025

"Russia said Thursday that any attacks on its ally Iran would be unacceptable and illegal, warning of irreversible consequences if the U.S. were to bomb the Islamic Republic’s nuclear facilities."

(Why are they warning about it 

If they didn't think it was going to happen?)

"The Russian Foreign Ministry condemned President Trump’s threat to bomb Iran if a deal on the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program is not reached, reiterating its support for Iran’s program."

“The use of military force by Iran’s opponents in the context of the settlement is illegal and unacceptable,” Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said. “Threats from outside to bomb Iran’s nuclear infrastructure facilities will inevitably lead to an irreversible global catastrophe. These threats are simply unacceptable.”

The war in the middle east 

everybody was afraid of?

IS HERE.

If only there was a book to tell us what to expect so we wouldn't be caught off guard.

Oh and BTW?

Saturday, January 4, 2020

Solemani

"I always knew, always...

there would be a major 

geopolitical event 

in close proximity to our wedding.

I just always knew it."

"Look, Soleimani had to go.

I'm glad he's gone.

But we are in no way prepared for whats about to happen.

Irans response will wake up the world to the situation we are in.

It will be horrific and unexpected.

It will surprise even the western intelligence agencies.

Speaking to CNBC by email in response to Solemani being killed (late Thursday night) 

Helima Croft, head of global commodity strategy at RBC Markets stated:

"It's almost impossible to overstate the implications of this event."

(Those implications?

Are what we are seeing 

right now BTW:

"...we are optimistic about 

our own capabilities."

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei

Not negotiating position, 

mind you but:

"our own capabilities")

"Like so many other things?

I knew it before I read it."

It's kinda why I dont bother 

listening to anyone

except the voice I listen to.

(And honey :-).

Can you blame me?

If you had wrote that five years ago?

Along with:

Tuesday, November 28, 2017

Alright

"You be the guy/couple charged with announcing the start of the end times... I can't say when it will be, I just don't know, nor do I know what the events will be after the start, or their order, or how long it will last etc. Nothing like that, but I do know I will be able to recognize it when it starts and be able to tell people as much...You go be the guy/couple charged with announcing the start of the end times when you see it happen. I wouldn't shrink from this responsibility on my life, I wouldn't, couldn't if I wanted to seems more like it actually. What a blessing, what a calling, it's always always always the people you least expect, promise. "Well what gives you this authority?" they asked Christ himself the same exact thing (Luke 20:1-8). He didn't tell them and neither will I. Watch and see. Figure it out."

Almost eight years ago?

(seven years and five months)

If that was you?

Who would you be listening to 

right now?

Hum?

Godspeed everybody.

It's closer than you think.

Promise.

IRANS

 

nuclear program 

isn't just the biggest threat 

to the world right now

its the biggest threat, 

that the world has ever seen.

And you wonder?

Why you wake up to this:

as your top news story?

Not one story about the negotiations

that went on yesterday.

5/11/25

Now you understand why 

they held them on a Sunday?

And all that stuff about the tariffs with China?

Can change in an instant.

Irans threat to the world?

Still there.

Gonna work em in backwards chronological order

oldest to newest, 

like I said before

it was a lil bit of a busy weak over here.

Satellite images reveal alleged 

secret Iranian nuclear weapons facility

Published May 8, 2025 11:23am EDT

This is what the run up to war looks like people.

Who honestly believes

we didn't know about any of this 

before this article?

It's called justifying what 

ALREADY KNEW

we are about to do.

"Fox News has exclusively obtained satellite imagery revealing what an opposition group says is a previously undisclosed Iranian nuclear weapons facility — raising fresh concerns amid ongoing negotiations between Tehran and the Trump administration."

"The newly identified site, located in Iran’s Semnan Province, is far from the regime's already-known nuclear facilities. According to the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), intelligence gathered from sources inside the country points to a sprawling compound covering nearly 2,500 acres."

"Code-named the "Rainbow Site" by Iranian officials, 

the facility has reportedly 

been in operation 

for more than a decade, 

masked as a chemical production company known as Diba Energy Siba."

(And the US didn't know about it until a 

"Fox News Exclusive"?

Please.

)

"According to NCRI sources, 

the primary function of the Rainbow Site 

is the extraction of tritium — 

a radioactive isotope 

used to enhance nuclear weapons. 

Unlike uranium enrichment, tritium has virtually no peaceful or commercial applications, casting further doubt on Iran’s longstanding claims that its nuclear ambitions are solely for energy or civilian use."

(You would kinda need

"nuclear weapons"

before you could

"enhance them"

Dont ya think?

Ref:

Saturday, August 31, 2024

The Case For

 Iran currently having a Nuclear Weapon.)

"The discovery of the Rainbow Site 

could complicate the already delicate diplomacy 

surrounding Iran’s nuclear capabilities 

and the possibility of a renewed agreement."

(That was kinda the whole point 

of the article.)

Five Signs of Growing Risk of US War With Iran

May 09, 2025 

"The relationship between the United States and Iran has become increasingly volatile in recent weeks, 

marked by a series of military provocations, 

stalled nuclear talks, 

and shifting diplomatic dynamics."

"Both nations continue to face off over issues ranging from 

Iran's nuclear ambitions 

to its expanding military capabilities 

and influence in the Middle East. 

(??????????

Lets review:

1) Hezbollah? No longer near what it was

2)Hamas? Same.

3) Syrian ally? Gone.

WTF 

is Newsweek even talking about?)

"While both sides have expressed a desire to avoid full-scale war, 

several developments suggest 

the risk of direct conflict is rising."

(Well no kidding, 

thx Newsweek.)

 "diplomatic efforts to curb Iran's nuclear ambitions have shown little sign of progress,...

Deadlock increases the likelihood 

that both sides could turn to military action 

as a means to resolve their disagreements.'

(Military action 

was decided upon

a long time ago already,

everything else,

is merely widow dressing

 in the run up 

to it.

See point #10

Saturday, August 31, 2024

The Case For

 Iran currently having a Nuclear Weapon.

Halevi hosts US army chief Brown in north; 

Gallant says must be ready to thwart Iran nukes

27 August 2024

"Brown also met with Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, who told him that Israel and the United States must be “prepared at any time” to work together to prevent Iran’s efforts to attain nuclear weapons."

"In a video statement from northern Israel, Halevi said: “I just finished a visit with the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the United States military at the Northern Command. We are strengthening operational cooperation in the face of challenges and threats in the Middle East.”

(Not, we are going to, 

"WE ARE."

And there was a reason for that.

AND NOW?

Now they are letting you know so.

Might wanna ask why that is.

Its pretty obvious really.)

Here are five signs 

that the risk of conflict is increasing:

1. U.S. Deployments

(This one just flat out gives it away.

We started putting assets in place 

under the Biden Administration,

BEFORE 

the election.

Friday, October 4, 2024

The proof is in the pudding they say)

 "In May 2025, four B-52 bombers were deployed to Diego Garcia, a U.S. base in the Indian Ocean roughly 2,000 miles (3,218 kilometers) from Iran. The base also houses six B-2 Spirit stealth bombers as part of an ongoing Bomber Task Force mission. Meanwhile, two aircraft carriers—the USS Harry S. Truman and the USS Carl Vinson—have been operating in the Red Sea and Arabian Sea, respectively. These deployments underscore Washington's increased state of readiness and serve as a forceful message of deterrence aimed at Tehran."

(Said nothing about

  the B-52's in Qatar

well before May of 25,

and 

Dear Newsweek:

WE CANT EVEN 

DETER THE HOUTHIS

(all that much, 

they are still firing at Israel so,

so much for that:

"Forceful message of deterrence"

I JUST LOATHE

STATE SPONSERED PROPAGANDA.)

2. Iran's Military Advancements

(They have taken way more of a hit:

Hezbollah, Hamas, Syria,

IRGC top brass etc

than they have made any advancements militarily.

US State -sponsored propaganda much?)

" As U.S. forces expand their footprint, Iran recently unveiled an underground drone base. This facility, built to house reconnaissance drones such as the Mohajer-6, enables Iran to monitor U.S. naval movements in the Persian Gulf. The base's fortified, subterranean design signals Tehran's intent to survive potential airstrikes and prepare for sustained conflict."

(They had been doing that 

with their air force 

for a long time already.

It's nothing "new" really.

Iran Unveils New Underground Air Base

2/23/23)

"At the same time, Iran has introduced the Qassem Basir missile, a medium-range ballistic system with a 750 mile (1,200 kilometer) reach. Engineered to evade interception by U.S. defenses such as THAAD, the missile presents a direct challenge to Western military dominance and poses a potential threat to regional allies like Israel."

(Again:

(Martyr Haj Qasem 

(Persian: موشک بالستیک شهید حاج قاسم) 

is an Iranian ballistic missile which was 

unveiled in August 2020.)

So It's nothing "new".

In the run up to the coming war?

We will be seeing more 

propaganda pieces 

just like this one.)

3) The Israel Factor

"Israel's role in the confrontation is growing increasingly pronounced. Long wary of Iran's expanding military reach,

Israel has signaled its readiness 

to act unilaterally if needed. 

(And if you think they wont?

or that some deal brokered by:

will stop them from doing so?

Might wanna try and find 

a clue somewhere.)

"The recent explosion at Iran's Bandar Abbas port has fueled suspicions of Israeli involvement, reinforcing concerns about covert operations — although Iranian authorities said it was due to negligence."

(It was an obvious Israeli covert action.

The massive cyber attack 

and the "chemical plant" explosion in 

 Isfahan shortly afterwards gave it away.)

"In a pointed warning, Defense Minister Israel Katz stated, "Whoever harms us – we will strike back sevenfold," directly linking Iran to proxy attacks and vowing full retaliation. Katz also emphasized Israel's right to act independently: "Israel must be able to defend itself on its own against any threat and any enemy."

"we will strike back sevenfold"

Eerily reminded me of

Matthew 12:43-45

43 When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man, he walketh through dry places, seeking rest, and findeth none.

44 Then he saith, I will return into my house from whence I came out; and when he is come, he findeth it empty, swept, and garnished.

45 Then goeth he, and taketh with himself seven other spirits more wicked than himself, and they enter in and dwell there: and the last state of that man is worse than the first. Even so shall it be also unto this wicked generation.

That is straight up a prophecy of

the state of Israel in the last days

Unger, Biblical Demonology p.213:

The seven other more evil idolatrous spirits,7 joined with the first, enter into the man and forewarn of the last and worst state of the nation in the great tribulation.

 

(Not quite there yet but well on our way)

Then, destitute of faith, and bereft of God's Spirit, the nation will be the pitiable prey of more numerous, more depraved and destructive demons than at any previous period in its history, and will be held in the grip of a more intense, complete, and tyrannous state of demon possession than ever before.)

4. Trump's Middle East Visit

'Adding to the geopolitical backdrop, Trump is set to embark on a regional diplomatic tour with visits to Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE. The trip is intended to reinforce alliances and confront growing security challenges, 

particularly those posed 

by Iran's rising military assertiveness" 

(Reference:

They have taken way more of a hit:

Hezbollah, Hamas, Syria,

IRGC top brass etc

than they have made any advancements militarily.

US State -sponsored propaganda much?

Trumps gonna tell em 

what we are getting ready to do,

and talk about golf courses and graft

and free planes etc.

Yup.)

"However, the omission of Israel from the itinerary is striking, given its strategic importance to U.S. policy in the region. 

Whether this reflects a tactical shift 

or a move to de-escalate tensions 

with Iran remains uncertain."

(It is deliberate ("the omission of Israel from the itinerary") to try and make em (Iran) think we are not working together. If "negotiations" were ever thought of as going to be effective, then we wouldn't have moved every piece of military hardware we can get into the region here in the last year and a half or so.

Im telling ya gives it away 

its been a foregone conclusion

what we are gonna do now for a while.)

5. Nuclear Talks

Parallel to military maneuvers, 

diplomatic efforts continue 

but remain precarious. 

The fourth round of nuclear talks—originally delayed—is now scheduled for Sunday in Oman.

(That was yesterday

5/11/25)

 However, fundamental disagreements persist: the U.S. demands a halt to uranium enrichment in exchange for sanctions relief, while Iran maintains its right to peaceful nuclear development and says it has no intention of building nuclear weapons. 

With trust eroding 

and little progress made, 

the diplomatic window appears to be narrowing, 

heightening the risk 

that regional tensions 

could tip into open conflict."

(I feel its been demonstrated 

that this coming

attack on Irans nuke program 

has been in the works for a good while now

and that nothing will stop it.

You should be expecting the same at this point

or we wouldn't be seeing pieces like this one.

We weren't seeing stuff like this till just here recently.

Talked about this before 

its the "softening up" process 

of getting the populace ready for what's coming.)

6 PM Saturday 05/10/25

The night before the talks.

Somebody finally starts telling the truth:

US ‘not genuine’ 

in talks over Tehran’s nuclear program, 

Iranian official says

"An Iranian official told CNN that recent indirect talks with the United States aimed at addressing Tehran’s nuclear program and lifting sanctions were “not genuine” from the American side and were likely designed from the outset as a “trap to draw the situation toward tension.”

 "Iran evaluates the talks’ interruptions and weekly gaps, which were against Tehran’s preference, 

as a political and media game 

by the American side 

and is now preparing for scenarios 

in which the talks fail.

"It comes after US special envoy Steve Witkoff 

(A fuckin real estate lawyer?

Seriously?

Biggest issue in the world ever and 

our "special" guy is a real estate lawyer?.

Okay...watever)

"warned on Friday 

that if the next set of talks in Oman on Sunday 

were not productive, 

“then they won’t continue 

and we’ll have to take 

a different route.”

("I feel its been demonstrated that this coming

attack on Irans nuke program 

has been in the works for a good while now

and that nothing will stop it.

You should be expecting the same at this point

or we wouldnt be seeing pieces like this one.

We weren't seeing stuff like this till just here recently.

Talked about it before its the "softening up" process 

of getting the populace ready for what's coming.")

"CNN understands that the technical team, 

which negotiates on more granular aspects of a deal 

like sanctions relief, 

is not expected to attend."

(Cause its never gonna happen.

And? Not pointed out was the fact they 

were originally scheduled to attend BTW.)

"Earlier Saturday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi – who is expected to meet Witkoff on Sunday – said Tehran had received 

“contradictory messages”

 from the US as 

“different individuals express different views.”

(Well ya know?

Wat else would you expect

right now?

When every day is just more bizarre

than the next?

Ya might wanna think about that

 for a second.)

"The Iranian source said 

the American side 

“is basically not ready for meaningful technical and political talks,” 

adding that the United States gives 

“short and general answers” 

to questions, 

ignores “main proposals,” 

and “constantly changes its position” 

throughout the negotiations."

(It's been a sham on both sides from the get go.

They been getting ready for years, 

cause they know what's coming.

Just like we know what we have known

what we are going to do for a while 

as well.

These talks are a sham on both sides 

and have been from the start.)

I have been saying it all along.)

"According to the source,

this situation has led Iran to conclude 

that the negotiations 

“likely will not yield the desired outcome 

in sanctions relief and economic benefit.”

"As a result, 

Tehran is “preparing for the next stage, 

with political, economic, 

and other sectors 

having prepared 

the necessary scenarios 

over the past month.”

(Thats why they hardened their underground sites last week.

"and other sectors 

having prepared")

"The comments come after Witkoff, 

in an interview with Breitbart posted Friday, 

described the US’ expectations for the talks 

in some of the greatest detail to date.

(And they will never agree to this

and thats how you know war is coming.)

“An enrichment program 

can never exist in the state of Iran ever again. 

That’s our red line. 

No enrichment. 

That means dismantlement, 

it means no weaponization, 

and it means that 

Natanz, Fordow and Isfahan – 

those are their three enrichment facilities – 

have to be dismantled,” 

Witkoff said."

(Its the Israelis position too BTW)

"Iran has said it is nonnegotiable 

that it be allowed to enrich uranium."

"The Iranian source reiterated to CNN on Saturday 

that uranium enrichment on Iranian soil 

is Iran’s “definite red line” in the negotiations, 

a fact he said the United States “is well aware of.”

"Iran has long insisted it does not want a nuclear weapon 

and that its program is for energy purposes."

(Yeah...right...)

"In his interview with Breitbart, the special envoy (Witkoff )

 said the talks are focused exclusively on the nuclear issue, 

a change from the attempts of the first Trump administration 

to deal widely with Iran’s aggressive actions in the region.

(In the first administration?

They wanted the original treaty with Iran

to also include

its proxies

Hezbollah, Hamas, Syria 

(pre Assad over throw)

and?

Their ballistic missile program.

Well now they got to many missiles

to ever give em up

so thats out

and so are

Hezbollah, Hamas, Syria 

which kinda only leaves

the nuclear issue.)

Iran calls latest nuclear talks with US ‘difficult’ 

but both sides agree negotiations will continue

4:00 PM EDT, Sun May 11, 2025

(22 hours after the previous article.

After the talks were completed.)

"Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei confirmed on X that the talks had concluded, saying they were “difficult but useful to better understand each other’s positions and to find reasonable & realistic ways to address the differences.”

"A senior Trump administration official gave a more positive assessment, telling CNN the discussions “were again both direct and indirect” and lasted over three hours, calling them encouraging."

(The previous article was spot on

this is all just 

meaningless window dressing.)

"the US side was “encouraged by today’s outcome” and looks forward to their next meeting “which will happen in the near future.”

(Translation:

There aint much of this bullshit 

left in either side at this point.)

"...signs of firm progress are slim"

"Iran’s demand to continue enriching uranium for its nuclear program, 

which is insists is peaceful, 

something the US calls a “red line.”

"US President Donald Trump, who is headed to the Middle East next week, has threatened that the US would resort to military strikes 

against Iranian nuclear sites, 

with Israel’s help, 

should Tehran fail to reach a deal with its interlocutors."

"The Iranian delegation was led by Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who said before the talks got underway that the US side “holds contradictory positions which is one of the issues in our negotiations.”

“We have been clear about our boundaries,” Araghchi added, according to the Fars news agency."

"Iranian officialS 

told CNN on Saturday 

that recent talks with the US were “not genuine” from the American side. 

(The previous article said

"official"

Now we get

"officials"

22 hours later.

Which was it?)

"The Iranian source also reiterated that allowing uranium enrichment on Iranian soil is Iran’s “definite red line” in the negotiations.'

(Ya got two red lines that do not intersect.

How much time you think 

you got left to decide

what team you are on?)

"US special envoy Steve Witkoff, who has been heading the American side,

 warned 

that if this session of talks were not productive, 

“then they won’t continue 

and we’ll have to take a different route.”

"Speaking to Breitbart, Witkoff outlined the US’ expectations for the talks, including on the country’s uranium enrichment program. “An enrichment program can never exist in the state of Iran ever again. That’s our red line. No enrichment,” he said.

(They know they will never accept it.)

"Iran has said it will not surrender its capability to enrich uranium. The country has long insisted it does not want a nuclear weapon and that its program is for energy purposes.

And now yesterday:

4th round of US-Iran talks ends 

as Trump set to embark on historic Middle East tour

05/12/25

A day before the start of talks, 

Iran's supreme leader 

welcomed chants of 'death to America' in Tehran

(Thats how well things are progressing BTW)

"A day before the start of talks, Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei welcomed chants of "Death to America" in Tehran. "Your judgment is right," Khamenei told a crowd of supporters who called for the destruction of the U.S."

"President Trump announced a 60-day time frame to reach an agreement with Iran over its illegal atomic weapons program. The first U.S. negotiating session with Iran commenced on April 12."

(60 days puts us at June 11th.

I said an attack on Iran by the end of June.

Honey says end of May.

Does "when" 

even really matter any more?)

"Mardo Soghom, an Iran analyst and journalist, noted prior to the start of talks several months ago that 

Iran’s regime will go to great lengths 

to preserve its right to enrich uranium—the material required for a nuclear weapon. 

(Its the only thing 

thats gonna keep them in power

and they know it.)

"The Trump administration vehemently opposes a uranium enrichment program on Iranian soil."

(Translation?

We are a month in to talks

and all that has been accomplished 

is red lines that both sides knew of 

before entering into them

have been severely hardened.)

"Iran is trying to save its enrichment operation at a lower level and also not accepting any pressure to halt its anti-Israel stance. Khamenei's speech [Saturday] highlighted that second point. But at this point, the main issue is dismantling Iran's uranium enrichment," Soghom told Fox News Digital.

(They will never let it happen.

They will set the region on fire

and soon after?

 The world too will be.

We know it

and they know it,

I figure you should too.

)

"President Trump’s Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff recently stressed that 

Iran cannot have an enrichment program 

during an interview with Breitbart News prior to Sunday’s bargaining session."

(If we would have just said that at the start?

There never would have been any talks.

Thats how you know the talks are nothing but a stall tactic

(largely ours, B2's to Diego Garcia etc.)

but being used by both sides 

to get ready for the inevitable.)

"Witkoff said...

(US special emvoy for negotiations) 

"We believe that they cannot have enrichment, 

they cannot have centrifuges, 

they cannot have anything 

that allows them to build a weapon. 

We believe in all of that. "

(Then the only reason to have 

"talks" 

would be to get military assets in place.)

"Brodsky said "The original sin of U.S. decision-making on Iran’s nuclear program was when the Obama administration changed the U.S. position from zero enrichment to tolerating enrichment at 3.67%. That laid the groundwork for Iran to retain the capability to continue to use its nuclear program to extort the United States and ultimately build a nuclear weapon."

(Kinda a side point

but I am surprised the intelligence services 

didnt/havent 

taken Obama out yet TBH.)

"The anti-American news outlet, Kayhan, that serves as the mouthpiece for Khamenei, published a full-page screed 

against Trump where it stated, 

"He is a framework based on 

narcissism, 

superiority delusions, 

and threat-based tactics."

They kinda got a point TBH.)

"Iran's regime spokesperson, Baghaei, 

said that 

a decision on the next round of talks

 is under discussion."

We are a month in

and all that has happened is

RED LINES

on both sides 

have been hardened.

Just like we knew they would be

Otherwise?

Why were we moving assets into place 

over a years ago 

under the Biden administration?

GODSPEED 

everybody.

Journey well.

Make more sense now?

Absolutely 

NOTHING

is allowed 

to be a distraction.

NOTHING.