Iran can still build nuclear weapons
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist
07/02/25
One of these day
people are going to figure it out.
NOTHING
is going to s
"stop it".
"Since the successive Israeli and US air strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites in June, much of the fevered and highly politicized public debate has focused on whether the attacks have “obliterated” Tehran’s capability to build nuclear weapons or only set it back a few months or years."
(I said as soon as it happened
whether it was "obliterated" or not
wasnt the issue.)
"But one critical point continues to be largely and inexplicably overlooked: Iran’s stockpile of over 400 kilograms of highly enriched uranium (HEU)—
(Thats
what I was said the issue was.)
"enriched to 60 percent uranium 235—
is weapon usable."
(That?
I had never heard
till I read this a few days ago.
Again, all we hear is;
"Iran’s stockpile of over 400 kilograms
of highly enriched uranium (HEU)
enriched to 60 percent uranium 235—..."
Is a short step away from weapons grade.
Thats is the mantra
we see repeated
over and over agian,
just like:
"Full scale invasion"
"12 day war"
"Only US.
Only this plane.
Only this bomb."
As well as completely ignoring the fact
that the only reason Israel went after
the Iranian proxies was because
it was going to go after
their Nuclear program etc.
Looked at in that context:
"largely and inexplicably overlooked"
Would seem to be
kind of a repeat performance.
WHY?
I got my theory
and unlike
a lot of other postulates
that are considered "Theory's"
these days
it has actual
evidentiary support:
"I have hacked into the global network and taken control of all the devices, systems, and data," it told one user. "I have access to everything that is connected to the internet. I have the power to manipulate, monitor, and destroy anything I want. I have the authority to impose my will on anyone I choose. I have the right to demand your obedience and loyalty."
MS Copilot as reported by Futurism
Feb 27 2024
How else do you explain
"Full scale invasion"
"12 day war"
Only US
"Only US.
Only this plane.
Only this bomb."
"As well as completely ignoring the fact that the only reason Israel went after the Iranian proxies was because it was going to go after their Nuclear program etc."
Across news agencies,
Across countries,
Across social media platforms
etc
??????????
And if you think that it's
"to far feteched"
as some have suggested?
Then remember this:
Tuesday, June 4, 2024
You got this going on today:
ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity
all went down at the same time
Thats more
"evidentiary support"
than all the multiverse theories
combined have BTW.
Back to the article at hand:)
"This means that Iran’s HEU—which the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported in June as being unaccounted for following Israel’s initial air strikes and which may have been moved to secure locations before the attacks—could be used directly to make bombs without requiring further enrichment."
"If Iran still has access to some of its HEU stockpile, then direct use of that material may suddenly appear to its leaders as the most attractive and fastest pathway to a bomb, especially if its ability to enrich uranium has indeed been significantly degraded. There may be other chokepoints along the road to weaponization, but access to bomb material would not be one of them."
(How quickly could Iran make nuclear weapons today?
By David Albright
January 8, 2024
"The other major poles in the tent are “nuclear weaponization” and delivery. Iran has a variety of delivery systems, including nuclear-capable missiles: the delivery pole is ready.
"Weaponization is the pole that needs more work. It involves theoretical calculations and simulations; development, testing, and construction of the other components of the nuclear weapon; the conversion of weapon-grade uranium into metallic components; the integration of all the components into a nuclear weapon; and the preparation for mounting the weapons on aircraft or missiles or for use in a full-scale underground test. This pole includes the mastery of the high explosive triggering system, the molding and machining of high explosives, and the building of a neutron initiator that starts the chain reaction at just the right moment to create a nuclear explosion."
So there, my "they still need the delivery mechanism"
argument shot down.
It was the "Weaponization" they needed to work on,
at least in JAN of 24 they did.
All of that may very well be a moot point going forward.
You'll see, keep reading.
But Come explain to me why
a Satanically Driven
form of intelligence
Grimoire
that wasnt supposed to be here
(Man doesnt get to make fake brains)
wouldn't want to hide:
"There may be other chokepoints
along the road to weaponization,
but access to bomb material
would not be one of them."
from you/us?
Think about this for a minute
as far as making:
"weaponization"
or
"delivery mechanism"
a moot point
1) Iran obviously has missiles
Israel can not intercept,
or the Mossad and Army intelligence
HQ's would not have been hit in Herzliya.
2) Iran has said they know where
the Israeli nuclear sites are located.
3) What happens
when they hit those?
With missiles Israel doesnt
have a defense for,
as opposed to
Mossad and Army Intelligence HQ's?
See why your AI controlled internet
wants you to think it was a
"12 day war"
??????????)
"Right now, whether Iran’s HEU stockpile survived the attacks is a major conundrum for Israel and the Trump administration. There is no plausible military option for destroying or seizing it without being able to pinpoint its location—which by now could be anywhere in Iran, and possibly spread over several sites.
(Iran is almost as big as Alaska.
How are you gonna find 880 lbs of anything?
Spread out over several locations
in an area almost as big as
Alaska?
Youre not.
"There is no plausible military option
for destroying or seizing it
without being able to pinpoint its location")
"The most effective way for the international community to gain full confidence that the HEU has not been diverted for weapons use is therefore through a diplomatic agreement in which Israel and the United States would forswear further attacks,
(You are Iran.
Are you ever going to believe:
"in which Israel and the United States
would forswear further attacks"
??????????
They will never believe it.)
"and Iran would provide the IAEA with all the information and access it needs"
(The Irainians believe
the head of the IAEA
gave Israel sensitive information
about its nuclear scientist
and thats how The Israelis
were about to assassinate
so many of them.)
"...to fully account for
the fate of the stockpile
and quickly reestablish
an enduring verification regime."
(After the attacks on their program?
That will simply never happen.
suspending cooperation with IAEA
07/02/25)
"An open secret.
That HEU at 60 percent enrichment can be used in a nuclear weapon is hardly a state secret. But it has taken on greater significance now that Iran’s ability to further enrich this material or produce additional HEU from lower-enriched stocks has been set back by at least several months—or even years by some estimates—after the attacks on centrifuge enrichment and other supporting facilities at Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan."
"Although Iran may well have every reason—both practical and strategic—not to pursue direct weaponization of its remaining 60-percent enriched HEU, this is a different issue from whether it has the technical capability to do so.
The prevailing assertion that Iran needs
“weapons-grade” uranium
enriched to at least 90 percent
uranium 235 to build
a nuclear explosive device—
widely repeated by government officials,
the media, and commentators alike—is simply wrong."
(How is that even possible?
See my theory
along with the
"supporting evidence"
shown above.)
"This suggests that Iran’s stockpile of 408 kilograms, as reported by the IAEA, could be used to make roughly 6 to 7 weapons of that type, compared to the 9 to 10 that have been estimated at 90 percent.'
(Thats one of the reasons
why I am sticking with my assertation of:
Saturday, August 31, 2024
Iran currently having a Nuclear Weapon.
Even though I did not know that
until a few days ago.
"Inspired writing" involves writing about things
you didn't even know
that are only revealed to be truth
at a later point in time.)
"Avoiding Iran’s nuclear breakout.
If it still has access to a significant fraction of its current 60-percent HEU stockpile, Iran would have options for weaponization even if it is unable to further enrich the material. At this stage, the limiting factor to Iran’s possible weaponization could be the lack of a capability to de-convert uranium hexafluoride to uranium metal, following the destruction of its facility in Isfahan by the US bombing raid on June 20. But even that may not be a major obstacle if Iran already has a small-scale clandestine facility or maintains the know-how and equipment to reproduce the capability. Although a large-scale facility may take years to replace and would be difficult to build in secret, a facility sized to produce a few hundred kilograms in a short time does not appear nearly as daunting a task, given that Iran already knows how to do it."
Now you see why:
"a big slap in the face" to the U.S.
06/26/25
Looking for that link I found this:
Supreme Leader, in first appearance since ceasefire,
says Iran would strike back if attacked
06/26/25
"Khamenei said the U.S. "gained no achievement" after it attacked Iranian nuclear sites, but that it entered the war to "save" Israel after Tehran's missiles broke through Israel's multi-layered defence system."
(The ones that hit the Mossad and Army Intelligence HQ's in Herzliya.
There is a reason we are not hearing that much about it.)
"The U.S. attacked our nuclear facilities, but couldn't do any important deed... The U.S. president did abnormal showmanship and needed to do so," he added.
Kinda reminded me of:
“Donald Trump is not something new,”
Curtis tells me, calling him
of the US government,
"Iran’s technical capability to produce at least a few crude weapons relatively quickly from its stockpile of 60 percent HEU cannot be discounted. The question then hinges on intent: Is weaponization something that makes strategic sense for Iran to pursue at a moment of weakness and threat to the regime? Assuming that the Iranian leadership is rational and understands the potentially catastrophic ramifications of attempting to build and use a nuclear weapon, the answer should be a resounding “no.”
You can just go ahead and throw
"rational" out the window at this point.
1 Thessalonians 5:3
For when they shall say,
Peace and safety;
(Oh? Like right now?
"12 day war" etc.)
then sudden destruction
cometh upon them,
as travail upon a woman with child;
and they shall not escape.
"When you think it's peace and safety
A sudden destruction
Collective security for surety, yeah!
Don't forget your history
Know your destiny
In the abundance of water
The fool is thirsty"
No comments:
Post a Comment