Read

 

between the lines:

“It’s not a complicated formula. Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Right now we have countries that have nuclear power that shouldn’t have it. But I’m sure we’ll be able to negotiate out of that too as part of this later on down the line."

Donald Trump 4/7/25

From:

Trump says US ‘having direct talks’ with Iran over nuclear deal

Mon 7 Apr 2025 17.16 EDT

(After 5 PM on the east coast, of course.)

Ive read a number of articles about the coming "negotiations" this weekend

some yesterday when they were announced, some this morning.

Most of them contained:

“It’s not a complicated formula. 

Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon."

But then left out the very next sentence:

"Right now 

we have countries

 that have 

nuclear power 

(And he wasnt talking about

"nuclear power"

for residential, commercial, 

or industrial use.)

that shouldn’t have it."

The fact that he said that?

Right after he said:

“It’s not a complicated formula. 

Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon."

tells you 

EXACTLY 

who he was referencing

(IRAN)

"Right now we have countries 

that have nuclear power 

that shouldn’t have it"

and it also explains why, 

that sentence didn't receive near as much coverage, 

or face any scrutiny, questions from the press etc.

I went looking for that sentence in coverage of this story this morning and I couldn't find it covered anywhere else but in the piece referenced above.

THATS IS NOT AN ACCIDENT.

If you really pay attention 

to the subtleties of what Trump says?

He "spills the beans" so to speak 

just like this, all the time.

In Aug of last year?

I didn't make the case Iran was 

"getting close" 

to having a bomb,

I FLAT OUT SAID:

Saturday, August 31, 2024

The Case For

 Iran 

CURRENTLY HAVING

a Nuclear Weapon.

What gave it away 

more than anything was:

Point #3

 CIA gives head of Qatari intelligence top award 

(Article Thursday Aug 15th Award given earlier in the week. )

(They spilled the beans about Iranian having a bomb, or a couple.)

"Behind the scenes: 

The source said Burns gave the award 

to his Qatari counterpart in 

"appreciation of his role 

in maintaining 

national and regional security, 

and the 

exceptional support 

he provided to the CIA 

in preserving the interests 

and security of the U.S. 

and Qatar."

"Another main reason for the award 

was the cooperation 

between the CIA and Qatari intelligence 

in counterterrorism 

and the ability of the 

Qatari State Security Agency 

to prevent and foil 

threats and attacks 

in the Middle East, the source said.'

They tipped us off, to what Iran was up to.

I have maintained all along, that having a bomb is one thing, and that having the delivery mechanism is the most complicated part of the process. Combining the bomb with the technology to get it to its desired location, and to work in the manner you want it too.

 This is why Israel took out their underground nuclear testing facility, to prevent further testing, as well as their ability to make more fuel for their missiles. They will not be able to launch multiple waves of missile attacks as, whatever fuel they have is what they have. They do not have the technology (they got it from China) nor the time, to rebuild and restock. 

Now throw in a once in a lifetime attack that effectively disabled Hezbollah, (Pager/walkie talkie), the destruction Iran's advance warning radars (some in Syria) and their antiaircraft capabilities and 

any discussions about negotiations, 

is just going through the motions 

for an already predetermined course of action. 

Its why we were putting B52's in Qatar during the Biden administration. There is no going back, there is only one way forward and it really couldn't be any more obvious.

“It’s not a complicated formula. Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Right now we have countries that have nuclear power that shouldn’t have it. But I’m sure we’ll be able to negotiate out of that too as part of this later on down the line."

Reading between the lines, 

without anybody else telling you what is what, 

is a part of the spiritual gift of discernment, 

and spiritual gifts are given

 for the edification 

(Building up, 

sorry, had to :-) 

of the church.

p.s.

"But I’m sure we’ll be able 

to negotiate out of that too 

as part of this 

later on down the line."

(After the attack on the nuclear facilities.)