me in with these guys...
Christian writers such as Justin Martyr, Eusebius, Clement of Alexandria, Origen, and Commodianus believed that the "sons of God" in Genesis 6:1–4 were fallen angels who engaged in unnatural union with human women, resulting in the begetting of the Nephilim.[1] Some scholars view Jesus' comment in Matthew 22:30 that angels in heaven do not marry, as a refutation to this view.[1]
"They left their habitation"
Jude 1:6
Jude 6
King James Version
"And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.
Doesn't just mean they left home...
It just explains way to much...
Like what?
Oh IDK, like every mystery of mankind you could think of.
Stonehenge served as an ancient solar calendar Date: March 1, 2022
“Such a solar calendar was developed in the eastern Mediterranean in the centuries after 3000 BC and was adopted in Egypt as the Civil Calendar around 2700 and was widely used at the start of the Old Kingdom about 2600 BC,” said Professor Darvill. This raises the possibility that the calendar tracked by Stonehenge may stem from the influence of one of these other cultures. Nearby finds hint at such cultural connections - the nearby Amesbury archer, buried nearby around the same period, was born in the Alps and moved to Britain as a teenager.
"Professor Darvill hopes future research might shed light on these possibilities. Ancient DNA and archaeological artefacts could reveal connections between these cultures. Nevertheless, the identification of a solar calendar at Stonehenge should transform how we see it."
“Finding a solar calendar represented in the architecture of Stonehenge opens up a whole new way of seeing the monument as a place for the living,” he said, “A place where the timing of ceremonies and festivals was connected to the very fabric of the universe and celestial movements in the heavens.”
Church took a wrong turn watering this down in the fourth century (I believe it was), largely because the powers that be at the time didn't think near as many people would believe in Christianity if they went with that view. Any time we water down Gods word we've made it loose it effectiveness. Look around if you need a case in point.
So yeah Im going with this interpretation:
"Angels: All of the earliest sources interpret the "sons of God" as angels. From the third century BCE onwards, references are found in the Enochic literature, the Dead Sea Scrolls (the Genesis Apocryphon, the Damascus Document, 4Q180), Jubilees, the Testament of Reuben, 2 Baruch, Josephus, and the book of Jude (compare with 2 Peter 2). This is also the meaning of the only two identical occurrences of bene ha elohim in the Hebrew Bible (Job 1:6 and 2:1), and of the most closely related expressions (refer to the list above). In the Septuagint, the interpretive reading "angels" is found in Codex Alexandrinus, one of four main witnesses to the Greek text.
(There are a bunch of interpretations of "Sons of God" in Genesis 6, but given all that it explains? and what I just shared above? I'm going with the Angel view of Genesis 6. Do your own research, be a Berean like in Acts and make up your own minds. Acts 17:11, Now the Bereans were more noble-minded than the Thessalonians, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if these teachings were true.)
I told pastor Bridgette my thoughts about the Nephilim and that they were in agreement with Chuck Missler's views and others and that it just explains way to many things including the pyramids and Stonehenge and I stepped out of her vehicle at the library and about 30 minutes later was seeing that story. I told her about it the following day, you can ask her, she knows it's true.
Also here recently I was telling some folks about how you can see proof of the big bang on an old TV set and that math was the architecture by which the universe is designed and these two articles came across my news feed the very next day:
How to prove the Big Bang with an old TV set
Math error: A new study overturns 100-year-old understanding of color perception.
(And one of the individuals just happened to have an issue with color perception, go figure)
They know who they are, they know what I am saying is true as well.
Literally just thinking things and they show up at this point.
"Were gonna see here in a minute if the computer kicks me off again"
which it wasn't supposed to do and it did, and it was nowhere near the 3:44 seconds and three individuals were in agreement that it was much closer to a minute than it was the 3:44 seconds it was supposed to be.
"a hypothetical psychic ability allowing a person to influence a physical system (Environment, others around them) without physical interaction."
Matthew 19:26
Jesus looked at them and said, “With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”
Revelation 10:7
"But in the days of the voice of the seventh angel, when he is about to sound his trumpet, the mystery of God will be fulfilled, just as He proclaimed to His servants the prophets.”
You either believe it or you don't.
Decision times is approaching.
Choose wisely.
I flat out stated a while back:
"The two most powerful people on the face of the earth since Old testament times are here and about to join forces."
I'll stand by it forever.
I know its true.
I love you baby :-)
No comments:
Post a Comment