I

 

mean really?

Directed Panspermia and Little, Green (Non-Existent) Men from Outer Space

Romans 1:22

"Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools,..."

"In Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, well-known British evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins, Oxford University’s 

Professor for Public Understanding of Science 

from 1995 to 2008, 

said concerning the possibility of intelligent design:

"It could be that at 

some earlier time, 

somewhere in the Universe, 

a civilization evolved by, 

probably, 

some kind of Darwinian means, 

to a very, very high level of technology, 

and designed a form of life 

that they seeded onto, 

perhaps, 

this planet. 

Now that is a possibility, 

and an intriguing possibility. 

(To him maybe)

And I suppose it’s possible 

that you might find evidence for that, 

if you look at the details 

of our chemistry, 

molecular biology, 

you might find 

(Really?

Might?)

a signature of some kind of designer. 

(Information in the DNA molecule)

And that designer 

could well be 

a higher intelligence 

from elsewhere in the Universe 

(Stein and Miller, 2008).

(Wrong, it's outside of the Universe, not just in it. 

It permeates this universe 

like a good smelling meal gives a flavorful aroma to a home etc. )

"So, according to Dawkins, there could be a designer, and we could find evidence of that designer in the “details of our chemistry.” Does that sound familiar? It should. That is one of the fundamental arguments theists have made for centuries in support of the existence of God—the Teleological Argument. There is clear design in the Universe, and design demands a designer."

Aliens seeded life here?

Is more plausible to this "man of science" than:

Genesis 1:1

"In the beginning 

God created 

the heavens 

and the earth."

"In the beginning"

Time

Past present and future.

"God created"

(Initiated, brought into being)

Energy

"The heavens"

Space.

Height width and depth.

"and the earth"

Matter

(Solid liquid and gas.)

A trinity of trinity's in the first 10 words 

that just happens to explain physics.

?

Anybody comes at me with that and its just so easy to put holes in that argument:

First of all:

The burden of proof 

lies with the one making the claim, 

not others to disprove.

And?

Panspermia

Doesn't explain the origin of life.

"Critics argue that it does not answer the question of the origin of life but merely places it on another celestial body. It is also criticized because it cannot be tested experimentally."

So here is 

"Oxford University’s Professor for Public Understanding of Science from 1995 to 2008"

Suggesting something that doesn't explain anything and can not be tested experimentally.

And he is a scientist?

"Science is supposed to be observation-based, according to the National Academy of Sciences. “The statements of science must invoke only natural things and processes. The statements of science are those that emerge from the application of human intelligence to data obtained from observation and experiment” (Teaching About Evolution…, 1998, p. 42, emp. added). The evolutionary community openly advocates this idea—at least, as long as it doesn’t get in the way of its baseless atheistic evolutionary presuppositions. Directed panspermia is a relatively recent example of evolutionists’ brazen contradiction of their own “observation and experiment” rule."

There is no evolutionarily theory of molecular biology that explains the information stored in the DNA molecule.

“DNA is like a computer program but far, far more advanced than any software ever created.”

Bill Gates

Hey thx bill, never knew...

Information everywhere else in the World is evidence of a conscious intellect.

So where did the information in DNA come from if that is the case?

It's been in every living organism plant of animal that every lived.

Where?

Did it come from?

Queue Brother Brian somebody...

"It's not complicated..."

Romans 1:22

"Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools..."

I mean its just nonsense designed for people who cant think critically and just dont want to believe what they know is really true...

He isn't the kind of "scientist" that I am enjoying reading about in this book.

The ones I find really interesting are the ones who have set out to prove not only that God doesn't exist but that he CANT exist and time after time recent discoveries are just proving them wrong over and over and lots have come to accept:

As Asrno Penzias, the physicist who won the Nobel Prize for his discovery of the cosmic background radiation, said  

"The best data we have 

are exactly what I would have predicted, 

had I nothing to go on 

but the first five books of Moses, 

the Psalms, the Bible as a whole."