The Universe is a hologram: Stephen Hawking's final theory, explained by his closest collaborator
Wow...
Agreeing (sort of)
with Hawking and Republican's?
On the same day?
Unprecedented :-).
In 1998 Stephen Hawking took me on as his PhD student “to work on a quantum theory of the Big Bang”. What started out as a doctoral project evolved over some 20 years into an intense collaboration that ended only with his passing five years ago on March 14, 2018.
("a quantum theory of the Big Bang"
is covered pretty extensively
In:
)"The enigma at the centre of our research throughout this period was how the Big Bang could have created conditions so perfectly hospitable to life. What are we to make of this mysterious appearance of intent?"
("Intent" is the key here. Cars dont just "intend" to start themselves any more than the universe could have "intended" to bring itself into existence. The universe shouldn't even exist, or have come into existence and we shouldn't be here and if you press these types? And have the right questions? And speak their language? They will tell you it's a miracle the universe is here, let alone that it's habitable and that we (Humans) are here at all.
So?
maybe they have:
"mysterious appearance of intent"
I sure don't.
)And the Big Bang didn't:
"create conditions so perfectly hospitable to life"
It was acted upon and brought into that state.
(A creator "personally involved" in their creation.
"Theism".)
How did you reach such a conclusion you ask?
Well?
My creator gave me an intellect which allows me to understand:
Information degrades:
Over time.
Over distances.
And with temperature extremes.
Any information included about how the state of the universe should be today that was at its beginning? Would have had to survive the intense heat of the big bang (10 billion kelvins) as well as travel through space at the speed of light (or there abouts) for 14 billion years.
Do a test. Go run you an internet (Ethernet) cable
100 feet long and go hook up your computer outside and see how much you like your connection some time.
Case closed.
It was acted upon by a theistic agent (God)
as it evolved to make it hospitable for life.
"how the Big Bang could have created conditions so perfectly hospitable to life"
It simply didn't.
We dont see any evidence of any other information that could have survived all of those factors listed but for some reason certain scientist wanna tell us that all of this information on how the universe should evolve was included with the package at the beginning?
It's beyond preposterous.
It really is.
How many other arguments do scientist make where they say:
"Hey you know that stuff that doesn't exist ?
It did once 14 billion years ago and managed somehow to continue to exist and instruct the cosmos on how to evolve to this day.
Were only three paragraphs in BTW lol.)
"He (Hawking)made us feel as if we were writing our own creation story, which, in a sense, we did."
(No, it was written a long time ago and not by them/us etc.)
"The idea that time had a beginning in a Big Bang was championed in the early 1930s by the Belgian priest-astronomer Georges Lemaître. Albert Einstein famously rejected it, because it reminded him of Christian dogma. But eventually Hawking and Roger Penrose proved Lemaître right."
(How bout "tough" what it reminds you of? How about that option?)
"Ever since, the origin of time has been the cornerstone, but also the Achilles’ heel of Big Bang cosmology. For how exactly could time pop into existence?
(Simple, it had to have been created:
)"Hawking’s final theory of the Big Bang provides a bold and surprising answer. It envisages the Universe as a holographic projection."
(Remember, we are walking around in 96%, 97% of what we are not able to experience.)
"In a familiar hologram, a third dimension of space emerges from the lines and scribbles on a screen. In the cosmos-as-hologram idea, which has become the talk of the town among theoretical physicists, it is the dimension of time that can be holographically encoded."
(I'm in tune with this to a large degree I really am
Two sides, same coin etc)
but the question for me becomes:
WHERE DID THE ENCODING COME FROM?
AND WHAT ENTITY WAS RESPONSABLE FOR IT?
THINGS DONT JUST ENCODE THEMSELVES!
ANY MORE THAN VEHILCES OR LAWNMOWERS START ON THEIR OWN!
Information is indicative of a conscious intelligence!
Everywhere.
Everywhere you see information?
There was a conscious intelligence behind it.
Everywhere.
(cave paintings)
Every single time.
(Music)
No exceptions.
(Books)
None.
(Recipes)
Ever.
(Instruction manuals)
Still to this day, no example of information any where ever without a concsious intelligence behind it
Somebody/something/somewhere/sometime was trying to tell you something
Information is organized/created by an entity to try and tell you something.
Period.
A monkey can through magnetic letters on a refrigerator. It doesn't mean anything. It's just a bunch of grabbled up letters. A conscious intelligence on the other hand could arrange the letters to convey (spell out) a message.
So what entity did the encoding?
en·code
/inˈkōd,enˈkōd/
verb
gerund or present participle: encoding
convert into a coded form.
"using this technique makes it possible to encode and transmit recorded video information"
COMPUTING
convert (information or an instruction) into a particular form.
"the amount of time required to encode a wav file to mp3 format"
BIOCHEMISTRY
(of a gene) be responsible for producing (a substance or behavior).
"this is the gene that encodes the yeast mating type protein"
(Genes contain information as well...differnt off ramp for a different day lol)
"Stephen liked to visualise this idea in a disk-like image of the kind shown above. The outer circle depicts a timeless hologram consisting of countless entangled qubits.
"The disk shows the evolution of an expanding Universe that projects down from this. The origin of the Universe lies at the centre of the disk and it expands outward in the radial direction."
"It is as if there is a code operating on the entangled qubits that brings about the Universe and this is what we perceive as the flow of time.'
(Where did the information the code come from?
How did it get there?
When did it get there? etc...)
"There can be nothing before the Big Bang, because the past that holographically emerges doesn’t extend further back."
(The problem here is this:
IF THIS IS THE CASE?
HOW DID THE PAST
(HOLOGRAPHIC ENCODED WERE ASSUMING HERE)
GET ENCODED?
IT JUST DID IT ON ITS OWN?
THIS IS OBSERVABLE ELSEWHERE IN NATURE?
WHERE?
I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION SCIENCE LOOKS AT THE FACTS AND DATA AVAILABLE TO MAKE CONCLUSIONS.
NOT JUST PRE ASSUMING CONDIDTIONS BEFORE HAND.
SOMETHING HAD TO HAVE DONE THE ENCODING PRIOR TO THE BIG BANG.
"But the discovery of holography advances a radically different view of cosmogenesis.'
(MAYBE.
But what conscious intellect did the encoding?
It's information is it not?)
"It says that physics itself fades away when we journey back into the Big Bang. The Big Bang emerges from holography not so much as the beginning of time but more as the beginning of laws."
"What is left, then, of the age-old question of the ultimate cause of the Big Bang? It would seem to evaporate, the late Hawking held. Not the laws as such but their capacity to change and transmute has the final word."
"What is left, then,
of the age-old question
of the ultimate cause of the Big Bang?
It would seem to evaporate,
the late Hawking held"
How did it get encoded?
By what entity?
And when?
It may be a
"...radically different view of cosmogenesis."
It still doesn't answer basic questions that
Genesis 1:1
solves in the first 10 words.
Kinda hard to disprove something that's true yo.
ps
This article came across my feed just a few days after talking (in my residence) about a "revelation" I had where...the horizon just happened to look like a huge movie screen split into and bounced up and down for an instant before rejoining itself. (I haven't done any hallucinogens in 35 years btw) and I was just done thinking about what I had read earlier in the day about Quantum Mechanics etc).
Much indebted to Stephen C. Meyer and his work:
I'd love to meet him some day :-).
And the philosopher who came up with:
"Information is indicative of a conscious intelligence."
IDK who it was but that no where near an original thought of mine.
I just didn't wanna spend hours looking for the name lol...
but it's in the book somewhere. :-).
I looked.
For a minute lol.
Somebody can just share w me sometime who it was that came up witht that.
But it's true...
Information doesn't just generate itself.
Somebody was trying to tell you something.
I love you baby.
Heading home honey :-).
No comments:
Post a Comment