“Alice laughed.
'There's no use trying,'
she said.
'One can't believe impossible things.'
I daresay you haven't had much practice,' said the Queen. 'When I was your age, I always did it for half-an-hour a day. Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast. There goes the shawl again!”
WARNING:
He is going to go:
"OUT THERE".
(It's kinda why I like him, he isnt afraid to.)
As in you may think:
"Thats just too far out there Drew,
I just cant buy it."
It is more than a lil odd to me that people have no problem with:
Anunnaki being Alien Space Gods,
a Multiverse existing,
Souls of aliens traversing the cosmos on laser beams,
Alien space craft existing
(problems include:
space dust.
limitless energy,
radiation,
overcoming the expansion rate
of the universe etc.)
and all of those are all without
any credible evidence whatsoever,
but then people are quick to dismiss things
such as Dr Missler is going to be presenting here.
Before watching or reading etc?
I would highly recommend
getting your self at least a lil familiar
with a few things,
including:
Missler Genesis Session 5 Genesis 1:14-19 supplement
Why Are Rocky Planets Closer To The Sun?
"Do All Solar Systems Have Rocky Planets Closer To Their Stars?
"So is it a pattern that we see everywhere? Do other solar systems in other parts of the universe show the same trend of having the rocky planets closer to the star, while the massive gas giants are quite far away?
The answer is no.
"Scientists have found many solar systems in which gaseous planets (many of which are even more massive than the gas giants of our solar system) are the ones closest to their stars."
(My question is:
How many solar systems have we found
with gaseous planets being the ones closest to their stars?
In all the universe, just 15 percent of solar systems are like ours
"The find boils down to a statistical analysis: in the last four years, the MicroFUN survey has discovered only one solar system like our own -- a system with two gas giants resembling Jupiter and Saturn, which astronomers discovered in 2006 and reported in the journal Science in 2008.
(And notice they dont tell you if the star in that system was one like our sun.
Thats a common refrain of mine BTW
Interesting.
I wonder why they didn't bother to say?)
Back to:
Why Are Rocky Planets Closer To The Sun?
Conclusion
"The answer to the question of why the rocky planets are closer to the Sun lies in the past, in a time full of chaos for our solar system, where huge streams of energy and matter coming from the newly formed Sun blew away the gaseous layers of the planets closest to it, leaving them small and rocky.
How lucky for us!"
Here is a whole nuther list of things
that could be included in the
"How lucky for us"
list.
"Here are the most celebrated and widely accepted examples of fine-tuning for the existence of life:
Cosmic Constants
Gravitational force constant
Electromagnetic force constant
Strong nuclear force constant
Weak nuclear force constant
Cosmological constant
Initial Conditions and “Brute Facts”
Initial distribution of mass energy
Ratio of masses for protons and electrons
Velocity of light
Mass excess of neutron over proton
“Local” Planetary Conditions
Steady plate tectonics with right kind of geological interior
Right amount of water in crust
Large moon with right rotation period
Proper concentration of sulfur
Right planetary mass
Near inner edge of circumstellar habitable zone
Low-eccentricity orbit outside spin-orbit and giant planet resonances
A few, large Jupiter-mass planetary neighbors in large circular orbits
Outside spiral arm of galaxy
Near co-rotation circle of galaxy, in circular orbit around galactic center
Within the galactic habitable zone
During the cosmic habitable age
Effects of Primary Fine-Tuning Parameters
The polarity of the water molecule
Here is what Stephen Hawking
had to say about those:
“The remarkable fact is
that the values of these numbers
[the constants of physics]
seem to have been very finely adjusted
to make possible the development of life.”
Stephen Hawking
A Brief History of Time, p. 125.
"The new book On the Origin of Time reveals that the great late Stephen Hawking believed that the reductionistic paradigm he defended for much of his life is incorrect.
Ultimately, Hawking felt that the mainstream narrative failed to explain:
“How the Universe could have created conditions so perfectly hospitable to life.”
Because
the universe didn't create
the conditions
God did.
And now Rodger Penrose:
"One way of summarizing the initial conditions is to speak of the extremely low entropy (that is, a highly ordered) initial state of the universe. This refers to the initial distribution of mass energy. In The Road to Reality, physicist Roger Penrose estimates that the odds of the initial low entropy state of our universe occurring by chance alone are on the order of 1 in 10 10(123). This ratio is vastly beyond our powers of comprehension. Since we know a life-bearing universe is intrinsically interesting, this ratio should be more than enough to raise the question: Why does such a universe exist? If someone is unmoved by this ratio, then they probably won’t be persuaded by additional examples of fine-tuning."
"This ratio is vastly beyond our comprehension"
Remember?
'One can't believe impossible things.'
from earlier?
And?
Does it Sound familiar?
Isaiah 55:9
For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.
And as far as:
"Why does such a universe exist?"
For us to exist in it.
"The values of the constants are in the range that allows complex systems such as stars, planets, carbon, and ultimately humans to evolve.
(Our genetic code didnt evolve,
funny nobody ever mentions that)
Physicists have discovered that if we tweaked some of these parameters by just a few percent, it would render our universe lifeless. The fact that life exists, therefore, takes some explaining."
And all of that?
That is just getting
the conditions right
for life to exist.
All of that avoids even trying to begin to explain where the information in the DNA molecule came from or how it arrived where it did. Which, I might add, the Neil deGrasse Tysons and Brian Coxes of this world, dont even want you to know about.
To them and others that subscribe to the religion of scientism? Its all about the having the right conditions for life, nothing else matters, they never once even start trying to explain the origins of the information that is needed or how that information was imbedded in complex life on this plant because they know there is only one possible answer and they simply hate it."
Some more background information:
New discovery upends our understanding of the Solar System’s formation and history
New research points to an undiscovered Earth-like planet in our solar system
THE LONG STORY SHORT?
If it was anything else?
Except having the conditions in the universe just right for life?
They would be telling you what they know
which is to many coincidences aren't a coincidence
and that it had to have been designed that way from the outset.
(Which is something else they never wanna talk about either the Initial Conditions
that led to our universe AND the initial conditions that led to our physical Laws.)
With all of that being said?
Here we go.
Enjoy.
Peace,
its my prayer for everyone.
"0:09 the Book of Genesis and
we are in the fifth session f
ourth 0:15 day in the fifth session
the fourth day
that's chapter
still chapter one
verses 14 through 19.
Genesis 1:14-19
14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:
15 And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.
16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.
17 And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,
18 And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good.
19 And the evening and the morning were the fourth day.
I should mention we're 0:21 going very very uh casually through the first chapter 0:26 don't extrapolate from a present Pace that will be in the Book of Genesis uh 0:32 you know at the end of the Millennium or something we intend to review the Book of Genesis 0:38 in about 24 total sessions and we're in the fifth of those but we have decided because of the 0:44 foundational nature of the so-called creation week the first chapter particularly 0:50 that it justifies some careful review especially since so much of what's in 0:57 these verses is misunderstood by most readers if for no other reason 1:03 than due to a lack of understanding of modern science many people have embraced myths and 1:11 conjectures of a scientific nature that are wrong
(20 or whatever years ago and its only gotten way worse, I wonder what entity could be behind such a thing and what time does that entity think it is currently? I just never for one moment in my life thought I would see the day when intelligent, educated people believe such nonsense.)
that are now known by most thinking 1:17 investigators uh to be incorrect that we spent a little bit of time some people 1:22 may think too much time on some of these issues with particle physics and so forth so um but in any case we are 1:30 doing this because we believe that your view of the creation is 1:36 foundational for your eternity
(God created it.
He is the sole moral authority of it.
He will judge it
Currently in the process of doing so.)
you don't get saved by understanding the 1:42 creation properly however it's astonishing to me to discover how often God points to his 1:50 creation as his yardstick for you Romans 1 is one of the classic examples 1:57 as others we've talked about that in the past but anyway let's get in this we're going to look through these days now we had an introduction the first session 2:03 was an introduction to the Torah and the main point that we want to come away with there is you have no need to have 2:10 any second guessing as to who wrote the Torah in general the Book of Genesis in particular the five books of Moses 2:16 because Jesus told you all these this pseudo scholarship that has confused the issue for some decades
(Again, what entity would be responsible for that?)
2:23 is easily disproven on Scholastic grounds but set that all aside 2:29
Jesus told you who wrote the books of Moses many times he quotes from them 2:34 attributes them to Moses and so forth and so you can really dismiss that and 2:39 and I wouldn't get hung up on the age of the Earth
(And Christians in the last 20 years or so have just went right on ahead and done so anyway.)
but over 50 scientists have published a book explaining why they 2:45 believe the creation occurred in six days and we've of course touched on that as we've gone through and we'll touch on it 2:51 more and our problem with that issue is not in the book of Genesis 2:56 the word Yom and all that we set that aside your problem is Exodus 20 verse 3:02 11. where the ruler of the universe specifically 3:09 designates the Creations having taken place in six days he wrote it in stone with his own 3:15 finger right in the middle of the ten commandments so that's the issue and so uh we need to get comfortable with that 3:21 we talked in the second session we got into this whole business of the Gap theory in the origin of Satan and more specifically the nature of Light which 3:28 undergirds so much of the rest of this in the second day Monday we had the 3:34 whole nature of space the fabric of space hyper dimensions and some of the quantum physics that I think many of you 3:40 are glad is now behind us and uh in the previous session we talked about 3:46 the origin of life went through the photosynthesis and the interdependency of things molecular chemistry and we also touched on the 3:52 anthropic principle well on the fourth day we'll call it Wednesday the major topics we're going to touch 3:59 upon is the nebular hypothesis um we touched a little bit of 4:04 extraterrestrial life prospects last time we'll touch on we'll summarize that briefly but then we're going to talk a 4:10 little bit about
the purpose of the Stars
it may surprise you
and we'll talk about uh 4:17 what God seems to indicate with in
in the appointed times
so let's just review the passage it was let's just use this4:24 as an occasion to check back to Genesis 1 verse 1. In the beginning God created 4:29 the Heaven and the Earth and if you understand that verse and embrace it everything else falls into place and uh it it it's the sweeping 4:37 comprehensive statement that Embraces it all it's interesting when you ask somebody 4:43 when was the earth created
it appears it was created before day one
4:50 because all the way here the Earth's around so that course leads to the Gap Theory 4:56 we talked some of that stuff anyway verse two and the Earth was without form or some people would 5:01 translate but the Earth became without form and void and the Darkness was on the face of the deep and the spirit of 5:06 God brewed it or moved upon the face of the waters and God said let there be 5:12 light and there was light and God saw the light and it was good and God divided the light from the darkness and God called the light day 5:19 and the Darkness he called night
and the evening in the morning were day one
and we've talked about the fact that 5:24 that word Erev and Boker currently mean evening and morning but 5:30 may have meant something more General long long time ago and the terms of these the the reduction of entropy and 5:37 so on and God said let the there be a firmament in the midst of the waters and let it 5:43 divide the waters from the waters and God made the firmament and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which are above the firmament 5:49 and it was so and God called the firmament Heaven and the evening and the morning were the 5:55 second day now this is a uh uh this was where we 6:01 took the occasion to understand what the Rakiah this the what what the real fabric of space is all about I won't go through 6:07 all that again except to highlight something very provocative about this particular day 6:13 we'll call it Monday and that is that God did not bless that day 6:19 God saw that all the other days he saw what he did and it was good but he doesn't on Monday I'm not suggesting 6:24 anything wrong with Monday don't misunderstand me but when we get to Tuesday God said let the waters under Heaven be 6:30 gathered under into one place and let the dry land appear and it was so and God called the dry land Earth and the 6:36 Gathering Together of the waters he called the Seas and God saw that it was good and and God said let the Earth 6:42 bring forth grass and the herb yielding seed
(:-), sorry, just have to :-)
and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind whose seed is in itself 6:48 upon the Earth and it was so the Earth brought forth grass the herb yeilding seed after his kind and the tree 6:54 yielding fruit whose seed was in itself after his kind and God saw that it was good 7:00 and the evening in the morning were the third day it's interesting that on Tuesday you 7:05 have two blessings the one that was missing from Monday apparently and because of this of course in the 7:11 Jewish Community they call Tuesday the day of double blessing and that's why weddings are usually on Tuesdays 7:16 and I'd love to say that's why we have our Bible study on Tuesdays but we really have it for some other pragmatic reasons we don't want to compete with 7:22 the churches which Wednesday or or the weekend would imply so 7:27 in any case Erve and Boker made up the third day
so now we get to tonight's passage
God 7:35 said let there be lights in the firmament of heaven to divide the day from the night
and let them be
for signs and for seasons
and for days and years that's verse 14.
I want you to remember 7:47 that verse
because we're going to it's going to be a pivot of some very interesting things
First time the stars had aligned like that in 3000 years.
6000 years ago was the dawn of civilization,
3000 years ago was the height of the Bronze age
so I dont think its to hard to figure out what this last time meant.
Beginning, Middle, End as it were.
Revelation 12:1-6
The Woman and the Dragon
"A great sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun,
with the moon under her feet and a crown of twelve stars on her head.
She was pregnant and cried out in pain as she was about to give birth."
About is the key word there.
Christ new church is almost born.
Satan knows it.
His days are over.)
7:54
verse 15
and let them be for lights in the form of Heaven to give light upon the Earth and it was so and God made two 8:00 great lights the greater light to rule the day and lesser light to rule the night 8:05
he made the Stars also
I love that phrase I have it on my tie and he made the Stars also and I got 8:14 this from Answers in Genesis when I was in Brisbane but uh he gets a lot of when I'm in a certain context I always wear 8:19 it and what's that oh he made the Stars also who what you know they brought it up they asked about my tie say it so 8:25 anyway he made the Stars also we're going to talk a little bit about that what did he 8:31 make them for may surprise you what he made them for
(Not me it doesn't, see above about Sept 23rd 2017)
and God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the Earth to 8:37 rule over the day and over the night and to divide the light from the darkness and God saw that it was good and the 8:42 Erev and the Boker made up the fourth day
okay 8:47 let's talk a little bit Again by review but to put us into perspective here 8:52
an entropy profile of the universe entropy think of it as Randomness, disorder 8:59 the opposite of entropy is order or information I have entropy maximized at the bottom 9:06 of the chart minimized at the top because we're going to when you create something you build you reduce the entry 9:11 you're building by reducing that entropy and uh if you look on the right hand side of 9:17 the chart order is at the top chaos at the bottom and in the the word Erev originally was 9:24 the just the ability I should say the inability to discern 9:29 order it implies chaos and because as the light disappears and it gets dark you're 9:36 less able to discern order
(Which is where our world is right now BTW.
Complete Evil Confusion)
that term later becomes the root but from which we get the word for evening 9:44 Boker in the early mornings as the light starts you begin to be able to discern 9:49 order as it goes from this from dark to light so Things become discernible and 9:54 Boker then later becomes to mean mourning but it's interesting it's our conjecture that Erev and Boker 10:02 are steps in reducing the entropy
(I 100% agree)
and uh I'll prove to you why we think that why 10:08 that seems to be confirmed from Erev and Boker makes day one and then Erev and Boker makes day two 10:15 which we've just covered and then Erev and Boker makes day three 10:21 and uh this is where we are going to talk about our our 10:27 um planets and so forth now 10:33 uh not the point I was going to make when you get to day seven 10:38 God rests he is no longer reducing the entropy and day seven has no evening and morning 10:46 so that's a clue perhaps what they really mean also if you stop and think of course because of the evening and morning usage 10:53 that's why Jewish days start at sundown and because it's that Sundown that someone has previously ceremony defiled 11:00 he's clean again and so forth um but you stop and think about it if evening and morning were really the 11:07 brackets of the days you'd be only you'd only have night times
see it's not from evening to the next 11:13 evening see
evening and morning were day two
you mean day two was just between 11:19you know six and six or something you say you follow me there's a there's a logical problem here and it really unravels when you recognize that the 11:26 Erev and Boker as used there it means something much deeper much fundamental just as we pointed out when it speaks of 11:33 waters um there are four states of matter not three solid gas solid liquid and gas no 11:39 also plasma and there's lots of reasons from the hints of the text we it's what we would I'm not suggesting Moses should 11:46 have had vocabulary for plasma but I am suggesting thats really what's in view there the more you know about particle physics and the more the more comfortable you 11:52 become with just reading through Genesis 1.
(Amen)
but let me talk a little bit 11:57 about the nebular hypothesis um I think most of us if we've had any 12:04 of this material in school or even if you are a graduate astronomer 12:12 you have been exposed to conjectures that the planets came out of the Sun 12:17 some other sun was there and somehow some forces extracted some material that 12:23 cool became planets there's various forms of that and there are various 12:28 variations of those conjectures are called the nebular hypothesis somehow that our our solar system the Sun and 12:36 its planets came out of the Sun
well it's interesting 12:41 I like to open this by quoting from Lewis Carroll or Charles Dodson who 12:46 wrote Under Lewis Carroll from Alice Through the Looking Glass how many have read Alice in Wonderland well Allison 12:52 you're familiar with Alice and the Looking Glass it's interesting when she encounters the queen 12:58 she says you don't believe uh you you you um
you don't believe in impossible 13:03 things Alice one can't believe in impossible things Alan's left Alice left I dare say you haven't had much practice 13:09 said the queen when I was your age I always did it for half an hour a day why sometimes I believed as many as six 13:16 impossible things before breakfast
now if you're familiar with it uh 13:21 Charles Dodson's writings Lewis Carroll's writings they are children's stories but his tongue is in his cheek all the way through and most of the 13:28 content is very sophisticated paradoxes from mathematics uh you could one of the 13:34 most interesting books you can get is an annotated Alice what goes where it's footnoted which Martin Gardner typically 13:39 of uh mathematics editor for a Scientific American published one of these and there's all kinds of anyway 13:46
here of course he's he's poking fun at exactly what we're talking about here 13:51
see the nebula hypothesis let me give you just a couple of questions it's typically attributed to Emmanuel Kant in 13:58 1755. in his publication General history of Nature and the theory of the heavens 14:04 and I'll just give you a brief quote there "some four billion years ago the sun had ejected a tail or a filament of 14:11 material that cooled and collected and thus formed the planets that's the flavor of the nebula hypothesis" and 14:16 you'll find many variations of it even in the contemporary literature today what most people don't know is he didn't
14:24Kant did not invent that idea it appears to have originated 21 years 14:29 earlier by a guy by the name of the Emanual Swedenborg he's very popular to a group 14:37 The swedenborgians um he published his Publications in Latin 14:42 in 1734. some 21 years earlier
(Look it up, its the truth)
but neither case were talking 18th century material 14:49 now the Swedenborg who originated this idea you want to know a little bit about he was a mining engineer 14:54 who had a wide variety of interests among which he claimed to have psychic powers 15:00 and he can
he claimed that his theory about nebular the nebular hypothesis was 15:06 confirmed in seances by men from Jupiter Saturn and some other places even more distant
(Its Satanic from the start.)
15:13 now for some of us that starts to raise some doubt about his credibility but we'll move on 15:20 you see some 20 years prior to this when he was about 24 years old in 1712 he did 15:26 have an opportunity to visit with Edmund Halley in Cambridge and he's of course 15:31 well known because he forced predictions regarding the comet that still bears his name Haley's Comet 15:37 so Swedenborg had a chance to meet that's the matter record had met with with Hallie and it's it's it's our 15:45 conjecture that's where he got some of these ideas or at least possibilities 15:50 now here's where the problem occurs in um uh uh Pierre Simon Laplace who lived 15:58 between 1749 and 1827. he lent his endorsement to Kent's Theory 16:03 Swedenborg gave it to Kant, Kant espoused it LaPlace endorsed it but he did it without 16:09 checking the math and there are mathematical violations involved that he was capable of 16:16 providing and he didn't so this apparently was just an oversight because of Kant's reputation so forth 16:24
Laplace didn't check you know didn't look at it critically and because of Laplace's endorsement and 16:31 Kants apparent uh origination this became widely respectable 16:37 although people who have a mathematics background quickly have some real problems with this I'll show you why
16:44 and uh so Through The Years different writers have 16:50 embellished the nebular hypothesis in ways to try to get around some of these problems but they really make it worse 16:57 rather than better
(They aint stopped lol.
And not just with the Nebular Hypothesis
Dr Kent Hovind on the conservation of angular momentum :-).
It's only a minute long.
It's pretty good.
I disagree with his summary but he poses a lot of interesting questions.
And if God can do anything?
Why couldnt he have caused the big bang?)
they say Chuck what are we getting at well there's some problems with the 17:03 theory that the planets came out of the Sun
it turns out that the sun contains 17:10 99.86 percent of all the mass of the solar system we see these little models of the sun 17:16 and the planets we fail to appreciate the size of the sun in contrast to all 17:22 the planets put together see all the planets put together are what 15 hundredths of a percent of the 17:29 mass of the solar system
you know when I talk about the solar system I'm not about a whole galaxy I'm talking about our sun the planets go around the Sun
okay 17:36 now even though the sun has 99.86 percent of the mass
it contains only 1.9 percent of the 17:44 angular momentum Now what on Earth is angular momentum momentum is someone's 17:49 mass times velocity if you if you push somebody on a skateboard take some energy get them going but once you've 17:56 got them scoring he'll Coast until the friction or whatever catch up when you talk about something spinning 18:03 there is also a momentum it's not it's not linear it's angular momentum you see 18:08 this exemplified with a skater you've all seen ice skaters or roller skaters that will do a twirl with something 18:15 extended their hands or something and as they bring bring that weight in closer to them they spin faster 18:21 they actually are there's they're not gaining energy they're really transferring that energy in a different 18:26 way the energy that uh started them in the turn 18:31 with their hands say extended is going slower when they bring that weight closer in in order to conserve the 18:38 principle of angular momentum they spin faster and uh often in the physics class some schools 18:44 will have a a chair that's on a you know on a bases on my piece of plywood you can 18:50 hold it down but the chair is spinning chair and they'll typically be two give you two bricks 18:56 and have you put your hold your arms out sit in the chair and they move you very slowly in fact that's why they don't do 19:01 too often because you're tempted to do more go very very slowly and says okay put the put the bricks in your lap 19:07 as your brain put into laps it scares the Dickens out of you because you really wrap up pretty fast even though 19:12 it can be moving very slowly at first it's a demonstration angular momentum but you've all seen it in skaters and so forth well see the problem is the sun 19:20 contains only 1.9 percent of all the angular momentum the nine planets contain 98 of the momentum 19:27 they're further out not closer in that makes it even more 19:33 exaggerated you follow me now by the way 19:38 this all was known during the days of Laplace 19:43 and so uh that that's one of the reasons he's sort of indicted by his endorsement because he obviously hadn't thought it 19:49 through he did it and we've all done that I suppose given endorsement without rechecking things 19:54 but uh there is no plausible explanation that can support a solar origin of the 20:02 planets people have tried and nothing really holds up
(So why are we being force fed multiverse nonsense when they wont bother to even tell us this simple truth? The question kinda answers itself honestly)
and now 20:10 um James Jeans now we're moving a century ahead later 20:15 pointed out that the outer planets are far larger than the inner ones that alone is bizarre you would expect it to 20:22 be the other way around almost Jupiter is 20:27 5750 times as massive as mercury and almost three thousand times as massive as Mars and so forth 20:34 and so this is also a difficulty even with the current theories
(Remember from the beginning now:
"the MicroFUN survey has discovered only one solar system like our own -- a system with two gas giants resembling Jupiter and Saturn"
They didnt say what type of Star.
If it was like ours it seems like they would have said so.
Thats all I could find. They may have found solar systems around a star like ours since then But if they have? They sure arent talking it. At a minimum, our solar system with our star is an outlier, not the rule.
SO WHY DONT THESE PEOPLE
WANT YOU TO KNOW ALL OF THIS?
(Or the problem of the information needed for life. Or the physical constants being so exact etc.
Find me an exoplanet
(5000 or so discovered so far)
in a solar system like ours.
(One found so far apparently
and they didn't say what kind of star was involved,
which pretty well tells you it wasn't like ours.)
So good luck finding one.
Now then thrown in plate tectonics.
(Needed to recycle elements needed for life)
Oceans.
Habitable zone.
Atmosphere etc
and no
I do not have to wait around
for anybody to find anything
because as I am just
going to keep hammering away with:
8 billion character codes
do not self create, self assemble
or evolve.
LIFE HERE WAS NO ACCIDENT!
The universe was specifically created for conscious intelligent life.
HERE.
US.
Period.
Revisit grand tack hypothesis etc.
This is a religious
(faith based belief system)
disguised as science
and it doesn't take all that much
scrutiny before it all just falls apart.)
20:40 there are some other enigmas as we examine the planets carefully 20:46 we discover something weird they are in pairs 20:51 there are three pairs of Rapid spin rates among our planets each within 20:57 three percent of each other and as you look at these 21:04 next to each other but there's always a pair that have about the same spin rates within three 21:10 percent Earth and Mars have the same spin rates Jupiter and Saturn have this roughly the same spin rates and Neptune 21:18 and Uranus have the same spin rates and to someone that's just investigating with open mind you can't help but wonder 21:24 why that implies that there's some relationship with these and these things are not necessarily adjacent to each 21:31 other
Earth and Mars also have virtually identical spin axis tilts they both have 21:40 about 23.5 degree tilt both Earth and Mars and
why
?
21:46
you see what this leads to is a belief by some cosmologists 21:52 that um from the angular momentum issues and from the orbital calculations 22:00 it would seem to appear that three pairs of these planets may 22:06 have been brought here from elsewhere how might that have happened 22:11 well because a comet that has a lot of mass in some other system might catch 22:17 two of the planets in that system and as it passes by here deposit them there are mathematics that would suggest 22:24 that it would and if that's true it looked it would seem that on three different occasions at three 22:31 different occasions there were a pair that did this
now these these aren't necessarily provable conjectures
(Dr Missler tells you:
"these these aren't necessarily provable conjectures"
Do the cosmologist of today do the same?)
but
22:36
there isn't any reasonable explanation to explain how they happen unless they just happened okay and that's that's a 22:43
cop-out too well God just did it that way okay maybe he did or maybe there's much more history here than we have no 22:49 idea but it's another question as you talk about Mars and so forth Mars has craters 22:56 on it have you ever noticed that by the way let's just back up there's another concept here that I think we've talked about but let's get it out too 23:03 the common belief the common teaching in schools and I'm talking about colleges not just high schools is that things 23:09 have always things are uniform they're just the way they've always been well that sounds pretty good until you 23:15 get a pair of binoculars look at the Moon look at the moon it's beat up 23:21 you know
and and also as we send space probes to all the other planets in the solar system they all have these craters 23:26 you quickly come to the conclusion that our solar system is a rough neighborhood
Reference
as well
for an appropriate response.)
23:32
okay but when you look at Mars here's something that most people don't realize 23:38 Mars has 93% of its craters on just one hemisphere 23:45 and that in fact and only seven percent and the other it creates the impression that most of 23:53 those craters happened within a half an hour
(I have no idea where he is getting "within a half an hour" from. But the 93% of Mars craters in one hemisphere is 100% correct and as the paper the link above goes to states, nobody knows why that is.)
what does that imply the main point we 23:59 don't we there's no way we can we need we do not need to indulge in conjectures about that the point it does tell us 24:04 though is
it leads us to a family of views called catastrophism
24:10
you'll discover that scientists that specialize in cosmology of this kind fall in two categories the common dictum 24:16 is that things are uniform the whatever's happening has always happened that way there's another group that say just the 24:22 opposite we see evidence all over of catastrophic changes 24:28 and they they don't necessarily they're not necessarily biblically oriented people although most biblically oriented 24:33 thinkers are in that category because of Noah's flood because of all kinds of catastrophes we know about from the scripture 24:39 we know that this world hasn't always been the way it is and so now 24:45 about 80 percent of the craters appear to have occurred within a single half 24:50 hour so that's kind of exciting strange enough we're going to talk a little bit about this when we get to Genesis chapter 6, 7, and 8 with Noah's flood
24:58
because there's there are some scientists that believe the planet Mars had a role in uh Noah flood 25:04 but we had mentioned Mars I want to talk a little bit about that that's the fourth major planet from the Sun 25:09 it's named after the Roman God of War right Mars Means War that's why we speak 25:15 of martial arts right and so forth we still use those terms and uh what's interesting that most early 25:22 civilizations were terrified of Mars
25:27 many of them worshiped Mars when you read about Baal in the Old 25:33 Testament it can mean Heavenly Bodies In general but very often it appears to 25:39 specifically be talking about the planet Mars the Baal of the Old Testament 25:45 Second Kings 23:5
(Off ramp for a second:
NIV
5 He did away with the idolatrous priests appointed by the kings of Judah to burn incense on the high places of the towns of Judah and on those around Jerusalem—those who burned incense to Baal, to the sun and moon, to the constellations and to all the starry hosts.
KJV
And he put down the idolatrous priests, whom the kings of Judah had ordained to burn incense in the high places in the cities of Judah, and in the places round about Jerusalem; them also that burned incense unto Baal, to the sun, and to the moon, and to the planets, and to all the host of heaven.
I never use solely the NIV for reference.
General purposes only.
Even then I cross reference to try and ensure accuracy.
But I have just seen to many instances just like that above.
If NIV was your only source?
you would never know it said:
"and to the planets".
Why so many versions of the Bible?
To make $.
To be a "different version"
of a copyrighted work?
It takes a minimum of
a 10% differentiation
from the original.
Money changers in the temple
aint exactly a new concept if you catch my drift.
I wonder what entity could be behind such a thing?
KJV
Ethiopian
Geneva
Hebrew Greek lexicon.
Concordance
all I need these days.
But a lot of my notes are in my old NIV lol)
well lots of places you've all run into that before the question is why 25:51 you and I are arguably more sophisticated in terms of space with since we've have our 25:59 astronauts visit the moon and you know we've lived in a culture in which it would consider itself very 26:06 sophisticated with regards to space but I'll bet you there isn't anyone in 26:12 this room or let's say very few people in this room that could go outside and point out the 26:18 planet Mars
(Ive been more sophisticated in that regard
for a good lil while now:
The more you know about your reality
from the subatomic world
to the large scale structures of the universe
the more you will become convinced
not only CAN there be a god,
but that there HAS to be one etc.)
now just recently in the last few months it's been closer to the Earth and it's been in a long long time
(I remember that.
I had a cheap telescope at that time :-).
26:24 so it's been in the news a bit but even with all that unless you've done a little reading and got some coaching you wouldn't know 26:30 where to look for it right and yet the ancient cultures 26:35 were terrified of Mars you see something doesn't compute here does it 26:42 well there are some alternative views the uniform uniformitarians I mentioned 26:47 they claim to the presumption that things have remained essentially unchanged over billions of years we reject that for lots of reasons the
26:52
catastrophe catastrophists say that the Universe has been subjected to a series of catastrophic events 26:58 and Fiat Creationist are that's us are included in this view people who believe that creation came by the word of God 27:04 and so on now the uniformity of delusions I mentioned this you can view any surface in the solar system see the 27:10 craters and I don't mean just the moon uh look at all the pictures that come back from Pioneer and all the others
27:16
um you may not realize that the the planet Earth itself 27:24 has a constant reign of interplanetary debris and we accumulate about 100 tons of dust 27:34 every day every day
(Its still a closed system
because the universe
is a closed system.
4 billion years old.
100 tons of dust a day.
Life only comes here once?
Thats for all you
freaks out there.
Get a clue.
I just cant imagine why they would omit that can you?)
one of the arguments for a young Moon 27:41 is in the astronauts got there the dust was so shallow it couldn't have been falling for as 27:47 long as people sometimes previously thought that the thickness of the Dust is one way of measuring age in that 27:53 sense because you know what the rates are roughly and you can make some estimates
did you know that there's over a hundred 27:59 craters here on the Earth most of them are hard to see because the erosion is softened their impact but if 28:05 you've been at the Winslow you know the crater near the Winslow Arizona
(Long off ramp/detour
Left from Louisville, to Nashville, to Memphis, to Little Rock, To Oklahoma City, to Amarillo, To Albuquerque, Grand Canyon, LA, San Francisco, Reno, Salt lake City, Denver, Kansas City, St Louis and back to Louisville.
Two weeks
Petrified forest.
Pikes Peak.
Ate on Fisherman's Wharf in Frisco.
Alcatraz was right out the window
Lombard street.
(SF)
Got up every morning and went with dad to fill up,
check the tires, oil, put water in the battery etc.
(Yeah you used to have to do that back in the day lol.
And besides:
"Well, I'm a-standin' on a corner
in Winslow, Arizona
And such a fine sight to see
It's a girl, my Lord, in a flat-bed Ford
Slowin' down to take a look at me"
is one of them and there's and there's a few others that are still quite visible from 28:10 an aircraft in Siberia at tunguska and secular on 28:16 June 30th of 1908 there's a very very famous event in which 2000 square 28:23 kilometers of forest was destroyed and it was uh it was so remote 28:30 from civilization that it wasn't really explored until about 17 years later and it's very famous for that reason 28:37 the bomb on Hiroshima was about a 20 kiloton it's nominally a unit of measuring these things 28:43 our uh nominal thermonuclear Warheads are four Megaton this thing was about a 28:50 15 Megaton equivalent they figured and of course I made reference to the meteor Creator near Winslow Arizona it's about 28:55 a mile across and there's a huge crater there on the Yucatan Peninsula it was discovered in 1991 some some speculated had something 29:03 to do it may reason the dinosaurs disappeared um there's a much better explanation for 29:09 why the dinosaurs disappeared it's called Noah's flood but let's move on it was Six Mile in diameters about a 29:14 hundred Megaton equivalent apparently and uh what's interesting statistically 29:19
scientists expect that there's something like this about every 300 years 29:24 and one in three of these things land on land see many of them land in the ocean that's why we don't see the many craters 29:29 so that gives people a certain sense of insecurity but what's interesting the Ancients 29:36 worship these things the meteorites
a meteorite is behind the Kaaba in mecca that was 2000 years before Muhammad by the way Kaaba is not it's something that Islam 29:46 adopted didn't create it.
29:4
it's interesting that Cairo which is the site of the Great 29:54
Pyramid is named after Mars almiriykh is the Arabic name for Mars 30:00 so is there a relationship between worshiping Mars and the Great Pyramid no one knows there's all kinds of conjectures
30:06 and it's interesting in Athens we all talk about Mars Hill 30:11 right Iraq West it's named after Aries not the constellation areas which is 30:18 spelled differently Ares was the uh Greek for Mars and Mars is was pictured in the 30:25 mythology as the source of judgment so Mars Hill was named after Mars which 30:31 suggested to the Athenian mind judgment and uh it's uh it had there was an 30:37 ancient institutional Court there the Aeropagus and acts 17 of course uh uh is 30:43 a very key site where Paul chooses to preach there and by Dionysus was a member of that 30:48 sect according to Acts 17. that uh anyway
but this leads to something else
30:54
I'd like to mention because these things impact your perspective of the scripture 30:59 one of the problems that Christians have isn't just did the did the Lord create 31:04 the the universe in six days well that's what he said he did I take him out his word but the other problem some of us 31:11 run into is the long day of Joshua the day wasn't long enough for Josh's battles and he actually asks for extra 31:17 time and the Lord grants it and a lot of people have trouble with that the Battle of Beth-horon 31:24 the kings that he was fighting Joshua and his his his his countrymen across 31:29 the Jordan and they were facing Seven Nations and uh they they attacked they tackle 31:35 the capital first at uh Jericho capital of the Amorites but anyway as things go on here the 31:41 kings that they're fighting Confederate themselves under a leader who calls himself Adonai Zedek he was the king of 31:48 Jerusalem apparently and uh Adonai the Lord of righteousness detecting righteousness 31:54and uh at this battle at Beth-horon these kings are defeated by God 32:02 with stones of fire from heaven now they could be maybe there's some 32:07 very special stones or maybe they were meteorites very skillfully put in the right place 32:12 um but Joshua asked the Lord 32:17 to have the sun stand still in order to give them time to complete their victory 32:24 and the scripture tells us the Sun and the Moon by the way both extended uh an 32:31 entire day made it longer now most of us have trouble with that trying to visualize it because we presume that that meant the Earth had to 32:37 stop or slow down and the inertia there's all kinds of reasons why that is it would seem to be untenable what we 32:44 don't realize is all you have to do is change the precession a little bit and you accomplish the same thing but in any case the kings that are 32:50 defeated they hide in a cave until they're finally dealt with 32:55
(Tech bros got their bunkers, whats the difference?)
and this whole event the Battle of Beth-horon Joshua 10 completes the southern 33:01 strategy of the conquest of Canaan and of course the rest from this point on is just mop up in the in the in the Book of 33:08 Joshua but let's get at this key event that bothers many people the sun Stood Still
33:14 we discover by doing investigation that all ancient calendars at least 14 33:19 cultures I've been able to find have calendars that were based on 360 day years
the Assyrians, Chaldeans, Egyptians, Hebrews, Persians, Greeks, Phoenicians, Chinese, Mayans, Hindus, Carthaginians, Etruscans, and Teutons all had calendars based on a 360-day year; typically, twelve 30-day months.
In ancient Chaldea, the calendar was based on a 360-day year. It is from this Babylonian tradition that we have 360 degrees in a circle, 60 minutes to an hour, 60 seconds in each minute, etc.)
All individually developed
or one common source?
What is more logical
and probable?
There is one calendar that predates em all by about 6000 years that marks the precession.
Reference/Revisit:
Eight and a half hours about a Calendar lol
if you need to.
And?
There is a petrified boat nearby where every creed culture and faith in the area said it was all along too. So where do you think those 12 calendars he is talking about all came from?
1 Enoch
(Ethiopic)
81:2
Preserve these books my son.
(Heavenly tablets.)
33:25
and uh the the all these ancient calendars apparently changed 33:32 after 701 BC um we also find that Mars was worshiped 33:40 by these ancient cultures have mentioned and out of all this comes an interesting hypothesis I'm not going to go into all 33:45 the details here because it's just it's peripheral to our purpose but I want you at least be aware of it the uh the 33:52 ancient calendars changed the Romans added four and a quarter days the uh other other cultures did 33:58 different things the the Hebrews did something really weird they add a month 34:04 about every seven years they actually add a month seven times on a 19-year 34:11 cycle and it's complicated um and you find the ancient rabbinical 34:17 literature speculates different reasons why Hezekiah who did 34:23 all this did it that way what they don't talk about that puzzles us even more is they don't explain why 34:29 the calendar had a change in the first place because the Romans change their calendar every change account and uh the theory
there's a theory there's 34:36 a hypothesis about a near pass by of Mars
(And if you got no problem accepting the nebular hypothesis, The grand tack theory, the multiverse etc? All of that garbage?
But then you have a problem with this?
Well?
I got a problem with that)
as we have learned about 34:43 orbital resonance
all of you that have some musical background understand what resonance is or if you're electrical engineer what resonances orbits also 34:49 resonate things that are in orbit and near each other pass energy and Earth and Mars the conjecture is 34:57 were originally on resonant orbits the earth on a 360 day orbit and Mars on a 35:03 720-day orbit and uh in resonance however every108 years they would have 35:12 a near pass by because of the geometry the pass by would always occur October 25th or March 35:18 15th Actually March I forgot I'll cheat I'll have to look at my diagram I've 35:23 forgotten but the point is it would if it did happen it would always happen the same time of year when because that's where the orbits crossed or came near 35:30 each other but if they were both in the right place that they passed near each other there'd be an energy transfer 35:35 and what's interesting about this model is that it would account for catastrophic events on a number of 35:42 occasions in fact seven of them in history apparently
(I wish he would have named them for us.)
at 701 BC by then they 35:47 stabilized to where their orbits are presently
let me just look be clear when I show you the diagram 35:53 and so we have the Earth on an elliptical orbit around the sun 36:00 on the on the screen there you have Mars on a a a elliptical orbit 36:07 they would cross now their resin Earth 360 Mars 720. 36:12 now on March 20th or 21st roughly there'd be an if they if they passed 36:19 near each other in the springtime that would be after they both have passed the Sun so it's just after 36:25 perihelion that's the time we were closer to the Sun um one the Earth would lose energy to 36:30 Mars um and and one would gain and one would lose if on the other hand they're passing in 36:37 the fall if the other time the orbits are near each other's in the fall on October 25th and Mars would be coming from the 36:44 outside would pass behind Earth Earth would lose energy and Mars would gain it 36:49 so each time there was a near pass by there'd be a transfer
when you get finally to the seventh time this that we 36:56 know of that this happened the last time it happens they stabilize so the Earth by then had picked up five and a quarter 37:03 days and Mars will have lost uh almost 40 days well about uh What uh 13 and about 37:11 33 days to the the orbits that they have today now 37:17
you say that sounds pretty far-fetched
(Not compared to the crap these nitwits
are pushing on us today it doesn't.)
it's an interesting conjecture and so forth
(Its no more far-fetched than:
"the nebular hypothesis, the grand tack theory, the multiverse etc"
And is supported by the seven catastrophic events
and the ancients fear/worship of the planet itself.)
The near misses modelthat tries to explain the tilt of the moons orbit has nothing like that to back it up.)but the idea that Mars came that close to the Earth bothers a lot of 37:24 people it's surprising to discover that this theory that they've modeled a 37:30 great extent and it's got it's gotten some interesting publication
(Hard to find much or anything at all reallyon it these days.
I wonder why?)
um seems to be validated by of all people 37:37 Jonathan Swift how many have ever read Gulliver's Travels are you at least familiar with it right okay 37:43 Jonathan Swift was an Irish political satirist and the Gulliver's Travels Anthology 37:50 were essays or stories that were intended to poke fun on some political 37:56 issues of that day we've lost that today because we're not familiar with this context but let me back up give you some 38:01 technology the early telescopes you all know that the Galileo invented a telescope in 1610 and he with it he 38:08 discovered the four moons of Jupiter and Saturn's rings which you can see through a good set of vernaculars actually if you know how to do it in 1781 Hershel 38:17 discovered Uranus technology is improving all the way here 1787 Herschel 38:22 discovered the two moons of Uranus in 1789 he discovered two more moons of Uranus in 1846 Laverrier discovered Neptune
38:32 and one of its moons in 1877 Asaph Hall using a brand new 38:39 telescope at the U.S Naval Observatory discovers the two moons of Mars he made 38:44 astronomical history because here we are uh you know in 1877 call it the almost 38:50 well it's a two centuries after the telescope history here no one knew that 38:55 Mars had any moons at all why because they're only a the moon's only about eight miles across and they're almost black they have a reflectivity and 39:02 Albedo of less than three percent but he made history there and I hear that with that background he and he 39:08 named him by the way Dimos and Phobos fear and panic it seemed appropriate for Mars God of 39:14 War see so it's interesting that Dimos has a a period of about 30 hours and 18 minutes 39:21 it's almost synchronous to Mars which is interesting Phobos is the only thing in 39:27 the solar system that rotates backwards Eastward not Western
it's got a period 39:32 of 7 hours and 39 minutes it's only eight miles in diameter and so on so okay what's that Got to do anything well 39:38 Jonathan Swift in 1667 through 1745 was his lifetime he wrote Gulliver's Travels and not the 39:45 first voyage of Gulliver we've all heard about the boys the little people the Lilliputian the third voyage he goes to 39:51 this place called luputa and while he's in laputa the astronomers of laputa are bragging to 39:57 Gulliver this fictional character here that they know about the two moons of Mars and the astronomers in London don't 40:04 and not only that the discussion in Jonathan Swift's a little story details their size their 40:11 revolutions and their orbits within less than 20 percent error 40:16 not precisely but disturbingly close the question is how
and and see the 40:22 whole point is Swift published Gulliver's Travels 40:27 151 years before they were discovered by the astronomical world 40:32 so the question is how how on Earth did Jonathan Swift pull it off one conjecture it was a shrewd guess 40:39 I don't think
so uh another one is that he somehow knew about the moons of Mars but he was a 40:44 friend of Herschel and so they would have they would have had some Commerce that way 40:49 the third possibility and it's the one that I think is the most likely is that go that Jonathan Swift Drew upon some 40:56 literature available to him that he probably presumed was just colorful uh 41:02 embroidery for us for his uh fiction and it's not likely that Swift realized 41:09 that what what he was drawing upon some ancient document that was in his possession 41:14 was actually an eyewitness account because that's the only way you could account for this is that somehow 41:21 somebody had seen the two moons of Mars and uh it's too far to be seen unless 41:26 Mars was as close as about 70 000 miles to the planet Earth so that implies that sometime in history 41:32 it did pass that close and somebody recorded the two moons and that somehow fell into Swift's thing and he used it 41:38 as embroidery for his novel
(Again more evidence for this "model"
than for the near misses of bodies
tilting the moons orbit:
Catastrophes,
Ancients Worship/Fear of Mars/
Change in the ancient calendars at 701 BC)
so let's talk about the long day briefly a 41:43 third of a million men were Beth Horon on October 25th the 1404 BC Mars is in a 41:50 polar pass at about 70 000 miles from the Earth it would rise from the Horizon about 50 41:55 times the size of the Moon it would be priests there would be severe earthquakes and land Tides not 42:02 water tides land tides and this would be preceded and followed 42:07 by meteors and bolides meteors are like iron ore or hard chunks bolides are 42:13 explosions these are meteors that are have that are chemically reactive and uh 42:18 but uh and most of course explode before they get close to us the uh a polar 42:24 shift about five degrees would cause the day to be lengthened the meteors would follow two or three hours later at about 42:30 30 000 miles an hour and I'll tell you what's interesting these meteors 42:35 are so accurately positioned that they only kill Israel's enemies and doesn't kill Israel
42:41 now that is in this text there's no way to explain it except by God's handiwork
(God can create the universe but that's a problem for people?)
so even though there may 42:49 be some naturalistic issues here God knew in advance that that 42:54 Joshua would need this and uh apparently arranged it so 43:00 now what's interesting this event is also included in the ancient legends other ancient legends of folklore were 43:05 indebted to Emmanuel vilakowska who discovered that there is a tradition of a long night in China at about this time
43:12
so kind of fun
and of course this is a the southern campaign involved the Treaty of the 43:17
gibanites the battle Beth horon and so forth and it's at Beth horn that this all that we have a series of these 43:23 attacks the rest of this uh is the is the rest of the campaign in the north was just cleanup after the this decisive 43:30 victory at Beth horon one last thing I'd love to point out before we leave Joshua 43:36
it's interesting that Joshua is a variant of Yeshua
it's always provocative to me
when I 43:42 find a book in the Old Testament named after Yeshua
I wonder why
here's a guy
that's the military 43:48 commander
dispossessing the usurpers
he undertakes a seven-year campaign to 43:55 do so
and he's against seven of an original Ten Nations 44:00
it's interesting to me how the Torah is ignored at Jericho the Sabbath is 44:05 ignored and the Levites are involved both are prohibited by the by the Torah 44:10 um remember this they were supposed to rest on not do anything on the Sabbath day they also uh Levites were not to go
44:18 to war remember they're the first ones in the procession
and
the first thing this that Joshua
44:24 does he sends in two witnesses
(The first thing he does.
The very first thing.
It mirrors Revelation
Its us, were here
look out)
Moses 40 years earlier had sent in 12 44:29 and 10 didn't do many good so that's what some people like to say he's sending two witnesses there may be lots of reasons for that they certainly 44:36 weren't spies because there's no intelligence that they brought back that was the basis of his battle plan 44:41
all they did is get Rahab saved a gentile bride ultimately
(The Church
With her dirty filthy history.
Gets saved
by God using
two witnesses
RESONATES)
44:48 the seven trumpet judgments are echoed there in effect because they're pre it's they they March around Jericho once a 44:54 day for Six Days on the seventh day they March around seven times keeping silence until the 7th of the seventh and then 45:01 get some more silence for have in heaven for half an hour in Revelation
(I think looking at a visual representation helps,
from my notes:
"they March around Jericho once a 44:54 day for Six Days
on the seventh day they March around seven times"
Chuck Missler - Joshua (Session 3) Chapters 5-6
Highly recomended BTW)
enemies are confederated under a leader 45:07 in Jerusalem Adam Isaac means the Lord of righteousness ???? and all and he's ultimately defeated with hailstones and 45:13 fire from heaven signs of the Sun and the Moon and so forth and uh so and of course the Kings hide in caves like 45:19 rocks fall on us and so forth as you notice this you can't help have an echo in your ears of what 45:26 Revelation is talking about as you go through the Book of Revelation you can it's interesting to see the parallel structurally with Joshua on the one hand 45:34 in Revelation another Joshua of course being the military commander dispossessing the land of Canaan from the usurpers and
Yeshua coming as a 45:43 military commander to dispossess the planet Earth of the usurpers that is 45:48 running things
and the parallel I think is provocative
(And the first thing to go are the armies of the world
and they are currently in the process of being assembled
right in front of our eyes in our lifetime.
It is time
for the start
of the weeding out
of the evil in this world.
The start of the start
of the end as it were.)
I mentioned only so that as you dig into either or both books 45:55 you'll see that you might explore the possibilities
I said we talk a little bit about 46:00 extraterrestrial communication it's interesting to me that when scientists look for the signs of of Life 46:06
(These people...Part #66,787,046,056,037,485,978,143,490)
they look for information as and uh Project Ozma was a 46:11 unsuccessful initial attempt the uh the communication extra extraterrestrial 46:17 intelligence conference in Byurakan Russia is fascinating proceedings to read Because 84 of the top scientists 46:22 met to discuss this whole possibility of life in space and what's interesting about those papers from every field of 46:29 science they come to the conclusion that there's no evidence for it and the probability of ever finding it is 46:34 diminishes and uh so there's they use the green Bank formula this is a classic formula by Frank Drake that uh 46:42
the number of civilizations in our galaxy would be equal
to well but the rate of star formation whatever that is 46:47
(They are still doing it today
where does the information come from
Beecause
"as far as we know"
It's needed.
To simply leave it out of that equation?
Well, results in a built in bias to say the least.)
there's speculation that what fraction of those would have planets
which how many of those planets would have a mean 46:53 would have a life capable ecology
how many of those what fraction of those would actually have life
and what 46:59 fraction of those would have intelligent beings enough
to develop into a communication phase
and then the what's 47:05 the mean lifetime of technological civilizations
if you can come up with those estimates you can come up with a guess
as to what what the likelihood is 47:11 of finding any civilizations in our galaxy
(Good luck pretty much.
Entire concept is stupid
and the people that promote it?
NEVER
MENTION
THE INFORMATION
Needed
for complex life to exist.
and all.)
and as they go through this the in effect are lending their expertise to 47:20 the reality that all of these are disqualifying and uh the probability of finding life 47:27in this universe from a scientific point of view is very they still like to look but it's it's very hard to justify
(Its a waste of time and $.
Period.)
47:33 now um you say what is how does a Christian really often you Chuck do you believe 47:39 there's life in outer space somehow I'm setting aside Angels that's what I mean in the nationalistic sense 47:45 and
if there's life out there you got one of two problems
it's either sinless
or it's sinful
47:54 and you can't follow that down very far on either path and find you got problems
you mean they're sinless life out there 48:00 then why is he bothering with us huh?
well if there's sinful life out there 48:06 then Christ paid for it on a cross in Judea on planet Earth
that's hard to it's you know in other 48:12words uh so
net of all of this I don't believe there is
I think we are unique for lots of reasons
(We are.
This is where
all of the observable evidence leads.
So?
Its really not:
but let's talk we'll 48:19 talk about stars a little bit I hope you can see this uh this is a picture of a spiral galaxy
48:24
uh it it is light years are a measure of distance not time 48:30 it's the distance that light travels at its present rate uh in the year this 48:35 galaxy is about two million light years away apparently
here's another one
you see these pictures in magazines and 48:41 all the time here's a Galaxy spiral nebula that's 18 million light years 48:48 away so it's about nine times as far as the previous one I showed you here's one in fact two
but they're about 48:54 the big one the main one here is 25 million light years away
these are Big distances especially at the speed of 49:01 light uh set that aside there here's one that's 32 million light years away
here's one that's 65 million light years 49:08 away
I want these are all spiral galaxies they're lots of other nebula but these are spiral nebula
and here's a 49:13 one that's 106 million light years away
now I don't know if you've noticed as I 49:19 was flashing through these things but here they all are at one time
and uh 49:26 do you notice anything strange about these galaxies
(He kinda jumps around between galaxies and nebula, so for the record
"A nebula is a cloud of dust and gas, usually tens to hundreds of light years across. A galaxy is much larger — usually thousands to hundreds of thousands of light years across. Nebulae are one of the many things that galaxies are made of, along with stars, black holes, cosmic dust, dark matter and much more.
See unlike the astrophysicist, cosmologist, evolutionary biologist etc? I don't mind to point out where I see discrepancies between what's being said.)
one's only two million light years away 1 18 1 25 one three I put 49:33 in I put them in deliberately put them in in distance order okay 49:39 do you notice that their arms are spread out 49:44 almost the same what's that got to do with anything well here's the point 49:49
the furthest galaxies had to release their light 49:55 long before the closer galaxies
obviously okay because light's not 50:02 infinite it's finite has a finite speed whatever it is the further galaxies 50:08 did not have as much time to rotate and twist their arms we should be seeing the further galaxies 50:14 earlier in their in their cycle right 50:19 thus the closer galaxies should have the most twist 50:24 but they don't
the furthest Galaxies have just as much twist as the near one which says they're 50:31all done at the same time the speed of light even if this if the speed of light was a million times 50:36 faster in the past that would account for them being so similar 50:42 this is another one of the reasons that the speed of light issue starts to tie things together that would 50:48 be otherwise be very mysterious
some other insights it's interesting that from Job printing we talked about 50:54 Job last time Job 38 where's the where's the way that light's Dynamics darkness 50:59 is static that these are all these are remnant of some of the things we point out from job we went through Job 38 last time 51:05 and this can thou bind the influences of Pleiades or loose the bands of Orion these two constellations are the only 51:11 two in the heavens that are gravitationally linked other constellations look like a 51:16 grouping but the really not because some are closer or far but these Pleiades and Orion 51:23 are in fact have a great gravitational relationship and so it's I don't know how job knew 51:28 that because most most astronomers today don't realize that let's keep moving here
there's something else I want to 51:33
talk about
these appointed times
this Rabbi Hirsch says the Jews catechism 51:39 is his calendar and uh I think most of us know in in 51:44 Genesis 1 14 it says God said let there be lights in the affirmative heaven to divide the day from the night
and let 51:49
them be for signs ah
and for seasons
and for days and for years
that's an unfortunate translation 51:55 the word is
the word isn't Seasons
it's the appointed times
let them be for signs 52:02
and the appointed times
and for days and for years
(He is going to go into great detail about times for appointed feast etc, for our purposes
the appointed time we need to concern ourselves with
was told to us by our creator on Sept 23 2017.
you know I think most of us recognize
the Jews have a hepatic calendar there's 52:09
a week of days we all know about seven days it also has a week of weeks the Shabbat thing we have a week of months 52:14 the religious year goes from nice on to tishiri and the week of years the sabbatical year right
you plow the 52:22 ground six years literally follow
the seventh
and then you've got
the Jubilee
or seven weeks of years
plus one makes 52:28
the Jubilee year
all land reverts to its owners
all slaves Go free
all debts are forgiven
52:34 it's known as
a time of restitution of all things
and that's exactly what Peter called the 52:40 second coming of Jesus Christ
the time the restitution of all things so
these things are God's intended 52:47 design
the appointed times
(Equidistant Letter Sequence)
it appears only once 54:16 in Genesis
and it appears at an interval of 70 centered on Genesis 1:14.
how many 54:21 think that happened by accident
people say no secret code to the Bible yes there is there's one right here 54:27 doesn't mean all these things you hear are right but does mean that this one is for Real the odds of this being occurring by an unaided 54:34 chance is more than 70 million to one or about the chance of you winning the lottery
(There is a ruler of the universe folks.
And his word
is the only thing
on this earth
from outside
our time space continuum.
How many crazy coincidences you got factor by each other
till you understand they aren't crazy coincidences?
And that it isnt going to matter
if you believe it or not.
IT IS
=
I AM.)
54:39 okay the Feast of Israel the three in the first month there's three and there's three in the 54:46 seventh month and there's this weird one in the middle that is that has leavened bread not unleavened bread interesting 54:52 and they Passover familiar with ads on the 10th of design the lamb was offered between the evenings on the 14th that 55:00 evening the 14th was Friday the 13th on the Gentile calendar that's why Friday the 13th select unlucky that's when all 55:05 the Egyptians got killed not a bone is to be broken and so forth Jesus is our Passover the scripture in John 1:29 55:12 First Corinthians 5:7 identifies Jesus as our Passover so the Passover is predictive of his his uh death and it's also 55:21 fulfilled on the day it's observed then it's followed by the Feast of unleavened bread the next day 55:27 leaven is a symbol of sin this is unleavened bread there are three matzahs you may recall if you've ever celebrate this 55:32 with the Jewish household one's broken and hidden and uh this is 55:37 First shows up in Joseph and the wine the Baker and the wine Steward in Genesis and the the the the whole
the whole uh 55:44 Passover thing has four cups:
the bringing out,
the delivering,
the blessing
and taking out
the third cup
is the one he introduced the Lord's supper
with he 55:51 hasn't finished
the next one he's going to drink
when we're all together
( I believe in
Apostles creed
"When we all get to Heaven
what a day of rejoicing that shall be.
When we all see Jesus,
We’ll sing and shout the victory!"
Etc)
the morrow after the Sabbath after the 55:56 Passover Leviticus 23
the Feast of first fruits
it's the morning after Shabbat
after Passover Pastor could be any day 56:02 of the week depending on what year it was because it was nailed to the 14th of the Sun but the morning after the Sabbath after that so it's always a Sunday morning 56:08 it's a feast of first fruits and Jesus Christ of course was resurrected on the Feast of first fruits and uh 56:15 the other thing I love to point out is when did the flood of Noah end well it turns out the Genesis 8:4 tells 56:22 us the ark rested on the seventh month of the 17th day of the month upon the mountains of Araatt well Rosh Hashanah of course is in the 56:28 fall but when you get to uh when you get to Exodus 12 where guidance use ??? the 56:34 Passover he says a strange thing to Moses this month shall be the unto you the beginning of months it shall be the 56:40 first month that's the month of Nissan that's not the in the fall thats in the spring
but they have
thus they have two 56:45 calendars
the old calendar of Genesis tissue is the first month the Lilith trough Nassan was the seventh of those 56:52 months under the new calendar instituted at the Passover in Exodus 12
the first month is Nisan 56:59 and Tishri is the seventh month because it's a different cycle the ark 57:04 came to rest on the 17th day of the seventh month of the year the question is why 57:11 does the Holy Spirit want you to know that the ark came to rest 57:17 on the 17th day of the seventh month
(It wouldn't have been made known if it didn't natter.
It matters, thats why it was made known.)
be reading if you're reading Genesis 8 57:24 you come to verse four
(Matthew Henry Commentary
Genesis 8:4
BTW
God has times and places of rest for his people after their tossing; and many times he provides for their seasonable and comfortable settlement, without their own contrivance, and quite beyond their own foresight. God had told Noah when the flood would come, yet he did not give him an account by revelation, at what times and by what steps it should go away. The knowledge of the former was necessary to his preparing the ark; but the knowledge of the latter would serve only to gratify curiosity; and concealing it from him would exercise his faith and patience.
AGIAN
RESONATES...
A TON.)
the Ark came to rest on the 17th day of seventh month
if you're normal well-adjusted human being you go on keep reading
57:29 if you've been to one of my Bible studies you're no longer a normal religious human being
(Bout fell out lol :-).
because you remember that I told you 57:36 this weird idea that every detail in the scripture is there deliberately by Design
(The Jewish mystics of old believe even the spaces between the letters will have meaning. You simply can not duplicate 65,000 cross references 1400 years apart, with 40 different authors, 3 different languages on three different continents with one recurring theme. It was done on purpose, to show you what entity it came from.)
57:41 why the Holy Spirit wants you to know that the ark came to rest on the 17th day of the seventh month well that's under the Genesis calendar 57:47 you have to go through all this to understand people interpret this the seventh month was the month of Nissan 57:54 how long was Jesus in the grave crucified on the 14th he's three days 58:01 and three nights so he he's resurrected on the 17th
in other words
God 58:06 begins our new beginning in Christ
on the anniversary of the new beginning of the planet Earth
(He aint the first to come up with that BTW.
Plenty of others before him had figured that out as well.
"Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers
(4) The seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month.—As the months had each thirty days (see Note on Genesis 8:14), this makes exactly 150 days (see Genesis 7:11). The seventh civil month would be Abib; and the Speaker’s Commentary (1871 BTW) notices the following remarkable coincidences:—“On the 17th day of Abib the ark rested on Mount Ararat; on the 17th day of Abib the Israelites passed over the Red Sea; on the 17th day of Abib, Christ, our Lord, rose again from the dead.”
(1819–1905)
YOU COULDNT SET OUT TO DO ALL OF THIS AND HAVE IT ALL RECONCILE WITH EACH OTHER IF YOU TRIED. PROVES ITS FROM OUTSIDE OUR TIME SPACE CONTINUM AND IS AUTHORED BY THE ALMIGHT, THE ALL RULER WHO BENDS THE COURSE OF HUMAN EVETS TO HIS WILL, WE ARE SEEING IT IN OUR LIVES FOLKS, IT WILL END JUST LIKE HE SAID.)
58:14 this represents the birthday of the new Earth under Noah the Ark came rest the the uh we have a whole new beginning 58:22 that whole new beginning is on the anniversary in advance of our new beginning in Jesus Christ 58:28 tell me that this isn't all designed boy and Feast of Shavot the counting of the Omar only this that's one of the most
58:34
interesting uh feasts to study it's prophetic of the birth of the church and it didn't the church was born 58:42 on the Feast of what we call the Feast of Pentecost for nine days after the Feast of leaven and 58:47 notice there's leaven bread used here
you know uh Enoch's an interesting guy
(Yeah we do :-)
he said
the 58:53
oldest prophecy uh in the Bible
is uttered by by Prophet was Enoch
and so
the second 58:59 coming of Christ
uttered Before the Flood of Noah wow
he was apparently
the Jews believe he 59:05 was born on Shavout the day that they celebrated they also believe he was raptured on his 59:11 birthday I don't know if he was or not I can't quite figure out why they believe that but that is a prevailing tradition among 59:17
the Jews I wonder if the church is going to be raptured 59:22 on his on its birthday I wander the Jewish clock will restart on the same feast day that it was stopped 59:29 who knows then we have a feast of Trumpets which is coincident with Rosh Hashanah but it's actually a different 59:35 holiday the great blowing and some people try to tie it to the last Trump but that's uh confusing because they 59:41 don't understand the background here but it's followed by Yeoman Noreen which is the days of Affliction which of course 59:47 is followed by Yom Kippur they have National repentance the high priest enters the holy of holies there's a scapegoat all these things point to 59:53 Jesus Christ then we have the final in the Feast of Tabernacles and some believe that the 59:59 Transfiguration in Matthew 17 occurred either on or anticipation of feast of Tabernacles said so why that's why Peter 1:00:06 wants to build these booths see and that's when they leave their temporary dwellings for their permanent 1:00:11 ones in the celebration of ???? one last thing and we'll try this off 1:00:16 we talk about these codes and stuff what about the code for Israel and how do how do those letters show up in the Torah in 1:00:23 the first 10 000 letters of Genesis from -100 to plus 100 it appears only twice 1:00:29but the intervals are interesting intervals of 7 and 50. 1:00:35 you see the the 50 is familiar to any Jewish person that's the the the Sabbath observance Genesis one 31 02:3 1:00:42 and then the other the the you know the seven of course is the Jubilee year after seven Schmitz and so forth
so kind
1:00:48
of interesting stuff well uh
We've run a little long I'm afraid but let's uh we we've we've talked about the introduction we went through day one uh 1:00:55 we went through the nature of space hyper thing so whether we we've talked about uh the origin of life itself and 1:01:01 vegetation terms and so on molecular chemistry and all that we've gone through some of these topics here signs in the heavens what have you
next time 1:01:08
fifth day
we're going to talk about
the fallacy of evolution
it's not an option
anyone that has 1:01:15 anyone that's thinking and is informed should have no problem with this foolishness that we insist upon feeding 1:01:21 our kids we'll talk about evidences of designed some of them are very amusing some of them are simple and yet really 1:01:27 profound we'll talk about the whole issue of biodiversity its implications and a few other topics but then that all 1:01:33 set the stage because following that we will talk about animals as we have mammals and so what and man 1:01:40 and we'll talk about all the frauds in the paleontology
but we'll also talk about DNA
and the 1:01:45 role of information and all of this
and we'll talk about the architecture of man and uh 1:01:50 then we get to shabbat the seventh day and we'll talk about what some there's 1:01:57 some real surprises we feel in this whole seventh day thing and especially regard we also take on the whole 1:02:03 institution of marriage and God's purposes in that
so let's stand for a closing word of Prayer well father we thank you for who you are and we thank you for your creation as we stand back in awe as we behold the heavens and we are just stunned by your awesome power he had father even more amazed as you begin to realize that behind the fabric of your creation there's a message for all of us and oh Father how we aspire to understand more of it we just pray father through your Holy Spirit you'd open our hearts and lives to your word and open your word to our lives that in all these things father we indeed might continue to grow and in Grace and in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and father we thank you for our lives we thank you for the creation that you've allowed us to enjoy but father we thank you even more for the extremes that you have gone to that we might live not just in this brief mortal coil but throughout eternity and that you've provided a mechanism by which eligibility can be imputed to us that we might abide with you throughout eternity father we know that we are sinners we know that we Merit none of these things and yet father we're overwhelmed by the realization that you love us so much is to provide us this Redemption we would father that you would just teach us help us to understand what you've done for us as we commit ourselves without any reservation into your hands in the name of Yeshua our Lord and
Savior Jesus Christ amen
No comments:
Post a Comment