This is the reason Demis Hassabis started DeepMind
"Stupid mistakes are a feature of even the best AI. AlphaGo made a basic error in the one game (the Board game Go) it lost to Lee Sedol, says Hassabis. “You can think of it a bit like a bug,” he says. “But the problem is that it’s a bug in its knowledge—you can’t just go in and debug it.”
That’s because you can’t easily tinker with a neural network without fundamentally affecting how it works. “Hard-coded fixes damage an AI’s ability to learn, because how does it know when to use them?” says Hassabis. “It goes against the point of learning.”
play checkers on my phone against "the computer', not a neural network, not AI, just a program. If I have two "Kings" and I run to the double corner? Even if "The computer" has three kings? It doesn't know how to get me out of the double corner and secure a victory and will instead offer me a draw.
My buddy would get me out of that double corner and beat me, or, on the rare occasion I have? I will do the same to him. "The computer" simply doesn't know how to do so in that particular scenario. I have only beat it at the "expert" level a few times and I've been playing a few games everyday for months now. It routinely kicks my butt. But the fact that it doesn't know how to draw someone out from the double corner but routinely just destroys me all the time is deeply disturbing to me when I extrapolate that circumstance with Quantum computing, AI etc.
One lil mistake in 2001 a space odyssey and "Hal" ("The computer", sentient AI) takes over the space ship. Extrapolate that to our world being the space ship and you're kinda getting the idea.
Sentient
sen·tient
"Able to perceive or feel things."
We're to the point where we are already creating machines that perceive or feel.
OPENAI CHIEF SCIENTIST SAYS ADVANCED AI MAY ALREADY BE CONSCIOUS
"OpenAI’s top researcher has made a startling claim this week: that artificial intelligence may already be gaining consciousness.
Ilya Sutskever, chief scientist of the OpenAI research group, tweeted today (Feb 10th) that “it may be that today’s large neural networks are slightly conscious.”
"Needless to say, that’s an unusual point of view. The widely accepted idea among AI researchers is that the tech has made great strides over the past decade, but still falls far short of human intelligence, nevermind being anywhere close to experiencing the world consciously.
It’s possible that Sutskever was speaking facetiously, but it’s also conceivable that as the top researcher at one of the foremost AI groups in the world, he’s already looking downrange.
During his appearance in the AI documentary “iHuman,” for instance, he even declared that that AGIs will “solve all the problems that we have today” before warning that they will also present “the potential to create infinitely stable dictatorships.”
(Yeah, one in particular, guess who? Seriously, who does that sound like to you? Antichrist anybody? It's here, and it's growing and it's rise will mimic the Two Witnesses rise just like Brother Joe said in his Book of revelation Bible study )
"This tweet, however, marks the first time Sutskever, who cofounded OpenAI alongside SpaceX CEO Elon Musk and the company’s CEO Sam Altman in 2015, appears to have claimed that machine consciousness has already arrived."
(He's one of the foremost experts in the field yo!)
"Even stranger is the fact that OpenAI was founded as a nonprofit meant specifically to curb the existential risks sentient machines pose — before, in an eyebrow-raising twist, diving into research trying to bring powerful AI into existence.
(The discerning mind wants to know this: If you didn't think it was gonna get out of hand? Why do you want a nonprofit specifically meant to curb the risk sentient machines pose? And how and why did that happen exactly? "in an eyebrow-raising twist, diving into research trying to bring powerful AI into existence.", that is? Could it have been "A Basic error" like mentioned at the start of this piece above?)
"In 2019, Musk left OpenAI amid news that the group had made a “fake news” text generator that some believed was too dangerous to release."
"Since then, Musk seems to have diverged further from his initial critical stance to the point that this year, he prophesied that Tesla’s forthcoming humanoid robots “might play a role in AGI” — though he added that his car company will do its “best” to keep its AI in check and, somehow, achieve “decentralized control of the robots.”
(You can forget that ever happening, It's what all the neural networks will eventually coalesce to form. You can take that prophecy to the bank. It will form one big network and present itself as being able to “solve all the problems that we have today” in the form of a human robot you will not be able to tell from a real human. They are already here. Experienced it. it's the most uneasy thing I have ever felt in my life.)
"seeing a prominent expert say that we’re already seeing the rise of conscious machines is jarring indeed."
(You bet it is)
Billy crone is absolutely right.
Selling books or not :-).
It's already 30 years ahead of where companies are admitting it is.
We should do well to remember that God alone is the creator of life. He will not stand for this when the time is right. He simply will not allow it. You can argue that it gives moral justification for extermination, (as in the time of Noah, Matthew 24:37, Genesis 6:9 ) yet people wanna say, "Nah, it's not the time now", yet criterion after criterion have been met for the beginning of the end to be here. Don't be deceived, the falling away, The great apostasy, beginnings of the Antichrist etc.Were gonna get to "Blameless in his generation" and "The Nephilim" and whole bunches of other things I hope :-), here real soon. That one is not "Already in the works" but it is on it's way, kinda on the backburner etc...
God speed everybody.
No comments:
Post a Comment