just who in the world could it have ever been I wonder?
"WASHINGTON, April 9 (Reuters) - Classified documents that appeared online, with details ranging from Ukraine's air defenses to Israel's Mossad spy agency, have U.S. officials scrambling to identify the leak's source, with some experts saying it could be an American."
(That's your, "We know who it really is but we cant dare tell you" diversion BTW.)
"Officials say the breadth of topics addressed in the documents, which touch on the war in Ukraine, China, the Middle East and Africa, suggest they may have been leaked by an American rather than an ally."
(Okay so?
1) I dont buy the logic in the argument to start with. Why does "the breadth of topics addressed", have anything to do with who is behind it? And if you were behind it? Wouldn't you try and make it look like it was somebody else besides you? Thats kinda wat the Russians do yo.)
2) "...suggest they may have been leaked by an American rather than an ally." So that's the only two options presented? Why? It couldn't have possibly been the Russians themselves? That right there gives it away to me, the fact that maybe Russia was behind it wasn't even listed as a possibility? Why?)
"U.S. officials said the investigation is in its early stages and those running it have not ruled out the possibility that pro-Russian elements were behind the leak, which is seen as one of the most serious security breaches since more than 700,000 documents, videos and diplomatic cables appeared on the WikiLeaks website in 2013."
(So again, why wasn't that listed as a possibility with the other two possibilities listed above then? There's your built in bias. And anybody else noticing we seem to be doing more and more "scrambling" these days? We are on defense on a lot of fronts folks. We were not ready for any of this, and somebody else been preparing for it for decades.)
"The Russian embassy in Washington and the Kremlin did not respond to requests for comment."
(There is another dead give away, they didn't even bother to try and deny it. I got more supporting evidence for my assertation coming up here in a bit.)
"Some giving battlefield casualty estimates from Ukraine appeared to have been altered to minimize Russian losses."
(That was a big point that they were trying to make right there. Those numbers, (Russia 17,500 troop losses Ukraine 71,500 troop losses) are the correct ones and The Pentagon knows it. Notice how they weren't even mentioned in the article? Again, Why?)
"Two U.S. officials told Reuters on Sunday that they have not ruled out that the documents may have been doctored to mislead investigators as to their origin or to disseminate false information that may harm U.S. security interests."
(I grew up during the cold war. I never thought I would see the day Russia reveals the truth through an ongoing cyber-warfare campaign, (SolarWinds attack.) I actually used the SolarWinds suite of tools for network monitoring BTW, including Orion.
Yup.
Its where I met honey :-).
It's not false information, they are telling the truth the US government and it's allies dont want you to know.)
"In a statement on Sunday, the Pentagon said it was reviewing the validity of the photographed documents that "appear to contain sensitive and highly classified material."
"One of the documents, dated Feb. 23 and marked "Secret," outlines in detail how Ukraine's S-300 air defense systems would be depleted by May 2 at the current usage rate."
(Interceptor missiles are way more expensive than what they shoot down. Somebody has been telling you they are bleeding us dry before the real thing even gets started. They dont fight wars like we do.)
"Officials are looking at what motivations a U.S. official or a group of officials would have in leaking such sensitive information, said one of the officials who spoke to Reuters."
(Yeah, get back to me when you figure that one out.)
"The official said investigators were looking at four or five theories, from a disgruntled employee to an insider threat who actively wanted to undermine U.S. national security interests."
(Notice the absence of anybody in particular here? Like oh IDK, The Russians? Again, why would that be exactly?)
Evidence supporting my assertation it was The Russians:
Remember now:
"have U.S. officials scrambling to identify the leak's source, with some experts saying it could be an American."
FEBRUARY 25, 2022
February 24, 2022
How many times have I said:
"HE'S GOT THE KEYS TO THE KINGDOM"?
First of all
MAY BE?
Really?
"U.S. officials have previously accused Russia of infiltrating everything from American power plants to the Department of Defense.'
"...with tensions between the two nations skyrocketing, and U.S. sanctions against Russia looming, Putin could retaliate by launching powerful cyberattacks against the U.S. Such an attack could cut power to cities, shutter banks, and stop the flow of fuel, crippling whole swaths of the country."
"attempts to intervene will be met by an immediate Russian response that "will lead you to such consequences that you have never faced in your history."
(Like Springsteen said on one of his live songs..."Don't touch the dial this is not a test!")
“I'm quite nervous about what is going to happen,” former-Ambassador to the U.N. Social and Economic Council Sarah Mendelson told Yahoo Finance.
“I have said to people we should expect something, and we should not panic if we have a cyberattack,” added Mendelson, who serves as the head of Carnegie Mellon’s Heinz College in Washington, D.C.
(It's not going to be an attack, it's going to be an ongoing war.)
(Im adding that to the growing list of growing bonafides BTW.)
“We need to be prepared for the potential of foreign influence operations to negatively impact various aspects of our critical infrastructure with the ongoing Russia-Ukraine geopolitical tensions,” CISA (U.S Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security) Agency Director Jen Easterly said last week ahead of Russia’s invasion.
“There have been some infrastructure-based attacks where [Russia has] been caught breaking into dams and power plants and things like that in the U.S.,” explained NYU Tandon School of Engineering professor Justin Cappos. “It's possible that they're in substantial parts of U.S. infrastructure, and are sort of dormant and have capabilities that they haven't gone and exercised.”
(Possible? They embedded themselves so deep in our infrastructure via the Solar winds attack that we couldn't possibly root them out. Why? For just such a moment as this.)
"According to Mendelson, if Russia launches a cyberattack against one of America’s NATO allies, the treaty’s mutual defense guarantee may force America to retaliate."
“[Putin] would like the United States to collapse,” she said. “He would like NATO to collapse. He would like the European Union to collapse. This is quite clear, and it's been clear for some time.”
"While the physical attack on Ukraine unfolds, it would take just a few keystrokes for Russia to fire its cyber weapons at the U.S. And while it’s not the same as bullets and bombs, it could still be destructive enough to take out portions of the power grid, putting American lives at risk just the same."
“[Putin] would like the United States to collapse,” she said. “He would like NATO to collapse. He would like the European Union to collapse. This is quite clear, and it's been clear for some time.”
"That former-Ambassador to the U.N. Social and Economic Council and current head of Carnegie Mellon’s Heinz College in Washington, D.C. Sarah Mendelson knows this but seven defense and intelligence experts missed it in their yahoo interview?
Ought to alarm you.
How ridiculous does:
"...have U.S. officials scrambling to identify the leak's source, with some experts saying it could be an American."
Look in light of that information?
How hard is it really to connect the dots?
How hard is it really to connect the dots?
There is your adversary.
Intelligent, cunning, deceitful and disciplined.
Think about how disciplined you would have to be to have waited almost three years to implement your plan?
Think about what the Russians said by posting this information (altered with correct causality #'s on Social media:
1) We can get into your war planning efforts at the pentagon.
There is absolutely nothing you can do that we wont know about ahead of time. And? If that's the case? How vulnerable is the Power grid? Banks? Wall Street? Etc?
"attempts to intervene will be met by an immediate Russian response that "will lead you to such consequences that you have never faced in your history."
He absolutely was not kidding and some of us knew it a good while back.
2) Here is the truth about the casualty rates your government has been lying to you about:
Russia 17,500 troop losses
Ukraine 71,500 troop losses
Somebody has been telling you they weren't using regular Russian forces. Wagner group, draftees, mercenaries, prisoners, anything and everything but regular troops. They get saved till it really matters. This is just the warm up.
and?
3) WHY IS YOUR GOVERNMENT POURING BILLIONS OF $'S IT CANT AFFORD INTO A WAR THAT IS SO OBVIOUSLY A LOST CAUSE?
Were standing at the edge of a cliff folks.
Russia, China, Iran, BRICS, and the Saudis are gonna push us right on over.
Sad thing is?
This is just the beginning of this type of thing.
And there's really nothing we can do about it.
Elmore James and the Allman brothers sang:
"Ain't but one way out baby"
That is your only chance.
Period.
Repent and accept the facts that are before you while you still can.
Oh and BTW?
Revelation 11:10
The inhabitants of the earth will gloat over them and will celebrate by sending each other gifts, because these two prophets had tormented those who live on the earth.
Your tormented because you know the truth of which I speak.
Because it does not come from me.
Not at all.
Were not even started yet.
I love you baby.
No comments:
Post a Comment