Been saying it for years.
Yup...
Sam Altman Seems to Imply That
Nov 15th 2023
(Fired 2 days later)
"We’re creating God,"
an AI engineer working on
large language models
told Vanity Fair in September.
Sept 13th 2023
"We're creating conscious machines."
This one is titled:
THE CASE FOR SUPERINTELLIGENCE
(BEING HERE RN)
(and when I say notes lol?
I mean notes lol.
There were things written in the margins added at the last minute etc.
Trying to edit this so it shows up at the top of the list w todays date.
Enjoy.
In April, Tesla CEO and OpenAI cofounder Elon Musk — who recently launched his own AI chatbot called Grok, despite warning about the possibility of an evil AI outsmarting humans and taking over the world for many years — told Fox News (4/17/23) that Google founder Larry Page ("Dont be evil", remember?)
"wanted a sort of digital super-intelligence"
which would eventually become
"basically a digital god, if you will,
as soon as possible."
Daniel 8:23-25
King James Version
23 And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, (Picture) a king of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences, shall stand up.
24 And his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power: and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practise, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people.
25 And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.
(The breath of Christ alone and the brightness of his glory of his coming shall destroy him)
2 Thessalonians 2:8
And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will slay with the breath of His mouth and annihilate by the majesty of His arrival.
“We've arranged a global civilization in which most crucial elements profoundly depend on science and technology. We have also arranged things so that almost no one understands science and technology. This is a prescription for disaster. We might get away with it for a while, but sooner or later this combustible mixture of ignorance and power is going to blow up in our faces.”
Carl Sagan 1996, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
Matthew 24:34
Truly I tell you,
this generation will not pass away
until all these things have happened.
OpenAI is an American artificial intelligence (AI) research organization consisting of the non-profit OpenAI, Inc. registered in Delaware and its for-profit subsidiary OpenAI Global, LLC. One of the leading organizations of the AI Spring, OpenAI researches artificial intelligence with the declared intention of developing "safe and beneficial" artificial general intelligence, which it defines as "highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work".
(By peace shall destroy many)
OpenAI has developed several large language models, advanced image generation models, and previously, also open-source models.
The organization was founded in December 2015...with Sam Altman and Elon Musk serving as the initial board members. Microsoft provided OpenAI Global LLC with a $1 billion investment in 2019 and a $10 billion investment in 2023,with a significant portion of the investment in the form of compute resources on Microsoft's Azure cloud service. (OpenAI has only spent 15% of that BTW) Its release of ChatGPT is credited with starting the artificial intelligence spring.
On November 17, 2023, the board removed Altman as CEO, while Brockman was removed as chairman and then resigned as president. Four days later, both returned after negotiations with the board, and most of the board members resigned. The new initial board included former Salesforce co-CEO Bret Taylor as chairman. OpenAI also announced that Microsoft would have a non-voting (anonymous) board seat at OpenAI.
In 2018, Musk resigned from his board seat, citing "a potential future conflict [of interest]" with his role as CEO of Tesla due to Tesla's AI development for self-driving cars.[37] Sam Altman claims that Musk believed OpenAI had fallen behind other players like Google and Musk proposed instead to take over OpenAI himself, which the board rejected. Musk subsequently left OpenAI but claimed to remain a donor, yet made no donations after his departure.
(This is the sanitized version of events BTW, It was the transitioning to a capped for profit system he didn't like was the reports initially)
2019: Transition from non-profit
In 2019, OpenAI transitioned from non-profit to "capped" for-profit, with the profit being capped at 100 times any investment.[40] According to OpenAI, the capped-profit model allows OpenAI Global LLC to legally attract investment from venture funds and, in addition, to grant employees stakes in the company.[41] Many top researchers work for Google Brain, DeepMind, or Facebook , which offer stock options that a nonprofit would be unable to.[42] Before the transition, public disclosure of the compensation of top employees at OpenAI was legally required.[43]
(Newsflash, machines dont need $)
The company then distributed equity to its employees and partnered with Microsoft,[44] announcing an investment package of $1 billion into the company. Since then, OpenAI systems have run on an Azure-based supercomputing platform from Microsoft.[45][46][47]
OpenAI Global LLC then announced its intention to commercially license its technologies.[48] It planned to spend the $1 billion "within five years, and possibly much faster."[49] Altman has stated that even a billion dollars may turn out to be insufficient, and that the lab may ultimately need "more capital than any non-profit has ever raised" to achieve artificial general intelligence.[50]
The nonprofit, OpenAI, Inc., is the sole controlling shareholder of OpenAI Global LLC, which, despite being a for-profit company, retains a formal fiduciary responsibility to OpenAI, Inc.'s nonprofit charter. A majority of OpenAI, Inc.'s board is barred from having financial stakes in OpenAI Global LLC.[41] In addition, minority members with a stake in OpenAI Global LLC are barred from certain votes due to conflict of interest.[42] Some researchers have argued that OpenAI Global LLC's switch to for-profit status (capped) is inconsistent with OpenAI's claims to be "democratizing" AI.[51]
On May 22, 2023, Sam Altman, Greg Brockman and Ilya Sutskever posted recommendations for the governance of superintelligence.[65] They consider that superintelligence could happen within the next 10 years, allowing a "dramatically more prosperous future"
(By peace shall destroy many)
and that "given the possibility of existential risk, we can't just be reactive".
(At a minimum they know its here or they wouldn't have posted recommendations for its governance 10 years in the future. It's impossible to reign in something way smarter than you are BTW, in particular 10 years out.)
Daniel 8:24-25
"he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practise"
"and by peace shall destroy many"
"A superintelligence is a hypothetical agent (Not any more) that possesses intelligence far surpassing that of the brightest and most gifted human minds. "Superintelligence" may also refer to a property of problem-solving systems (e.g., superintelligent language translators or engineering assistants) whether or not these high-level intellectual competencies are embodied in agents that act in the world. A superintelligence may or may not be created by an intelligence explosion and associated with a technological singularity.
University of Oxford philosopher Nick Bostrom defines superintelligence as "any intellect that greatly exceeds the cognitive performance of humans in virtually all domains of interest"
ChatGPT (Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer) is a chatbot developed by OpenAI and launched on November 30, 2022. Based on a large language model, it enables users to refine and steer a conversation towards a desired length, format, style, level of detail, and language.
By January 2023, it had become what was then the fastest-growing consumer software application in history, gaining over 100 million users and contributing to the growth of OpenAI's valuation to $29 billion.
(Now it's about 90 billion.)
ChatGPT is credited with starting the AI spring, which has led to ongoing rapid and unprecedented development in the field of artificial intelligence.[9]
The pieces of the argument:
1) Charter statement
"The timeline to AGI remains uncertain, but our Charter will guide us *in acting in the best interests of humanity throughout its development."
"OpenAI’s mission is to ensure that artificial general intelligence (AGI)—by which we mean *highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work—benefits all of humanity."
Broadly distributed benefits
We commit to use any influence we obtain over AGI’s deployment to ensure it is used for the benefit of all, and to avoid enabling uses of AI or AGI *
*Our primary fiduciary duty is to humanity. We anticipate needing to marshal substantial resources to fulfill our mission, but will always diligently act to minimize conflicts of interest among our employees and stakeholders that could compromise broad benefit.
Daniel 8:24-25 "he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practise,
"and by peace shall destroy many"
Why they gotta tell us of all the good they gonna do? Why not just do it and let the results speak for themselves? This is the set up if you will.
2) Organizational structure/ Governance, created for this express purpose at this time.
November 20, 2023, Bloomberg
"All of OpenAI answers to its ultimate decision-making body, an independent nonprofit board of directors who do not own any equity in the OpenAI entities and who, broadly speaking, appoint themselves. They answer to their own consciences, not to any investors. "The Nonprofit's principal beneficiary is humanity, not OpenAI investors," explains OpenAI."
November 25, 2023, Slashdot
Yes, to a large degree somewhat.
Venture Beat Nov 19th
(2 days after fifing)
Brad smith Microsoft president:
"Smith said: “Meta is owned by shareholders. OpenAI is owned by a non-profit. Which would you have more confidence in? Getting your technology from a non-profit or a for profit company that is entirely controlled by one human being?”
(Didn't say person, didn't say a man, said "a human being"
"In his thread, Kilpatrick (OpenAI developer advocate Logan Kilpatrick) quoted from the “Our structure” page on OpenAI’s website, which offers details about OpenAI’s complex nonprofit/capped profit structure. According to the page, OpenAI’s for-profit subsidiary is “fully controlled” by the OpenAI nonprofit (which is registered in Delaware). While the for-profit subsidiary, OpenAI Global, LLC — which appears to have shifted from the limited partnership OpenAI LP, which was previously announced in 2019, about three years after founding the original OpenAI nonprofit — is “permitted to make and distribute profit,” it is subject to the nonprofit’s mission."
"It certainly sounds like once OpenAI achieves their stated mission of reaching AGI, Microsoft will be out of the loop "
(Because Microsoft licenses will no longer apply)
"Board’s AGI decision-making is ‘unusual’
Suzy Fulton, who offers outsourced general counsel and legal services to startups and emerging companies in the tech sector, told VentureBeat that while in many circumstances, it would be “unusual” to have a board make this AGI determination, OpenAI’s nonprofit board owes its fiduciary duty to supporting its mission of providing “safe AGI that is broadly beneficial.”
“They believe the nonprofit board’s beneficiary is humanity, whereas the for-profit one serves its investors,” she explained. “Another safeguard that they are trying to build in is having the Board majority independent, where the majority of the members do not have equity in Open AI.”
"Was this the right way to set up an entity structure and a board to make this critical determination?
"OpenAI’s six-member board will decide ‘when we’ve attained AGI"
“We may not know the answer until their Board calls it,” Fulton said."
(By then? It will be way to late!
Why do you think they are the ones calling the shots here?
Or at least saying they are?
58,000 AI startups in the world...this one says it gets to make the call?)
“There are a few nonprofits that own for profits,” he pointed out — the most notable being the Hershey Trust. “But they wholly own the for-profit. In that case, it is easy because there is no minority shareholder to object,” he explained. “But here Microsoft’s for-profit interests could directly conflict with the non-profit interest of the controlling entity.”
In short:
"And OpenAI's corporate structure is based upon the doomer-friendly philosophy: The company retains the nonprofit’s mission and board,
(The new board?)
which oversees a capped-profit subsidiary, established in 2019."
(After the initial investment is returned? 100% All future profits MUST be put back into the company. (It's a sustainable feedback loop basically and its not of human origin that's why it is so highly "unusual.)
Yahoo finance November 30, 2023
(Only after it got access to what it wanted. A new board, an unchecked CEO, the ability to create Unlimited capital and computational power, etc...what could go wrong?)
"OpenAI said that CEO Sam Altman was officially reinstated as chief executive officer and that it has a new initial board of directors, with Microsoft Corp. joining as a nonvoting observer."
(Well ty so much all my concerns just melted away...
Might as well put up a flashing neon billboard which says
"nothing to see here, keep moving,
which seems to be what everyone is doing RN.
Holiday timing?
Who is paying attention?
TIMING!
Fired the Friday before before the short thanksgiving week 17th
Late afternoon west coast time, Microsoft (Main investor (49% so as to not be subjected to antitrust laws etc. given 10 minutes notice?
Hired back the Tuesday before Thanksgiving? The 21st?
Nothing about any of this from the charter on is any kind of accident.)
"in Wednesday’s post, Altman said that the company’s priorities going forward will be advancing its research, improving its governance structure and refocusing on its products."
(Woo-Hoo, TY so much.)
(And Still no reason has been given as to why Altman was fired?
The members of the board cant tell you even after they themselves have been fired?
SIGN!
Remember from earlier?
"OpenAI’s nonprofit board owes its fiduciary duty to supporting its mission of providing
“safe AGI that is broadly beneficial.”
So they must have thought firing him would serve this purpose
but how so exactly?)
Brief departure of Altman and Brockman
Further information: Removal of Sam Altman from OpenAI
(WIKIPEDIA)
Co-founder and CEO of OpenAI, Sam Altman
Co-founder and President of OpenAI, Greg Brockman
On November 17, 2023, Sam Altman was removed as CEO based on the board (composed of Helen Toner, Ilya Sutskever, Adam D'Angelo and Tasha McCauley) citing a lack of confidence in him, with Chief Technology Officer Mira Murati taking over as interim CEO. Greg Brockman, the president of OpenAI, was removed as chairman of the board.[71][72] Brockman resigned from the company's presidency shortly after the announcement, and reported some details of the events that occurred before he left.[73][74] This was followed by the resignation of three senior OpenAI researchers: director of research and GPT-4 lead Jakub Pachocki, head of AI risk Aleksander Madry, and researcher Szymon Sidor.[75][76]
On November 18, 2023, there reportedly were talks of Altman returning to his role as CEO amid pressure placed upon the board by investors such as Microsoft and Thrive Capital, who condemned Altman's departure.[77] Although Altman himself spoke in favor of returning to OpenAI, he has stated that he was considering starting a new company and bringing former employees of OpenAI with him if talks do not work out.[78] If Altman were to return, the members of the board agreed they would "in principle" resign from the company.[79] On November 19, 2023, negotiations with Altman to return to the company failed and Murati was replaced by Emmett Shear to take over as interim CEO.[80] The board initially contacted Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei who was a former executive at OpenAI to replace Altman and proposed a merger, both offers were declined.[81]
On November 20, 2023, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella announced Altman and Brockman would be joining the company to lead a new research team regarding advanced AI, and state they are still committed to OpenAI despite the turn of events.[82] The partnership had not been finalized as Altman gave the board another opportunity to negotiate with him.[83] About 738 of OpenAI's 770 employees, including Murati and Sutskever, signed an open letter stating they would quit their jobs and join Microsoft if the board did not re-hire Altman as CEO and then resign.[84][85] Investors considered taking legal action against the board members in response to potential mass resignations and Altman's removal.[86] In response, OpenAI management sent an internal memo to employees stating that negotiations with Altman and the board are back in progress and will take some time.[87]
"On November 21, 2023, after continued negotiations, Altman and Brockman returned to the company in their prior roles along with a reconstructed board made up of new members Bret Taylor (as chairman) and Lawrence Summers, with D'Angelo remaining.[88]
(We will be the ones telling you when AGI has been reached remember?
And now they have the board they wanted.)
On November 22, 2023, reports emerged suggesting that Sam Altman's dismissal from OpenAI may be linked to his alleged mishandling of a significant breakthrough in the organization's secretive project codenamed Q*. According to sources within OpenAI, Q* is aimed at developing AI capabilities in logical and mathematical reasoning, and reportedly involves performing math on the level of grade-school students.[89][90][91] Concerns about Altman's response to this development, specifically regarding the potential safety implications of the discovery, were reportedly raised to the company's board shortly before his firing.[92][93] On November 29, 2023, OpenAI announced that an anonymous employee from Microsoft joined the board as a non-voting member to observe the company's operations.[94]
Nov 18th Yahoo finance
"Unusual for a tech founder, Altman had no equity stake in OpenAI.
(Sounds human to you?
About to be valued at 90 billion and it's CEO doesn't have any equity in it?
It's not Human!
You know what machines dont need?
Money! Nor do they care, they lack empathy, feelings, emotions, intuition etc...)
and so didn’t exercise the type of control other founders like Mark Zuckerberg are known to do; unlike other tech leaders, Altman’s fame came not from his engineering brilliance but from his ability to raise large amounts of money and his bets on ambitious, world-changing technology."
(Maybe? maybe he doesn't need or desire an "equity stake". I mean het the speaker of the house doesn't have a bank account or IRA and nobody seems to care, right?)
"The exact cause of the messy Altman/OpenAI divorce is still unclear, but one leading early theory points to tensions related to OpenAI's nonprofit origins and its current status as one of the powerful tech companies in the world — a strain that overlaps with a broader AI industry schism between "accelerationists” and the “doomers"
(This is the narrative that a lot of tech media has went with.)
Axios Nov 23rd
"But many observers assumed there had to be a bigger reason (Its not Human intelligence calling the shots here!) to fire the CEO of a company that was driving one of the biggest waves of tech transformation the industry has seen in recent years."
(It's not just tech, its societal)
"In the corporate world, departing executives are usually given at least faint praise, silence or euphemistic explanations like "spending more time with their family."
(Its rare to have a CEO publicly sacked,
let alone no reason really given,
let alone the CEO of a company that is driving the biggest wave of transformation since the industrial revolution.
Let alone be hired back four days later.
Let alone a lot of other things
As we will see there's plenty more "rare" things that have happened with this saga)
The guardian Nov 23rd
"The OpenAI farce has moved at such speed in the past week
(Heres your sign, Hold it up, MS, 49% stakeholder, 10 Minutes notice etc)
that it is easy to forget that nobody has yet said in clear terms why Sam Altman – the returning chief executive and all-round genius, according to his vocal fanclub – was fired in the first place. "
(That was the point of it all moving so fast perhaps?
Over a weekend before a shortened week before a holiday?
Nothing is an accident.
Superintelligence definitions)
"Since we are constantly told, not least by Altman himself, that the worst outcome from the adoption of artificial general intelligence could be “lights out for all of us”, somebody needs to find a voice here."
(He has :-). Guess who?
Hint?
Its somebody who prayed for "a platform to be heard from.
It's a simple answer, they cant tell you why they fired him, it would result in a world-wide instantaneous panic. Remember from earlier? "OpenAI’s nonprofit board owes its fiduciary duty to supporting its mission of providing “safe AGI that is broadly beneficial.”)
"The original non-explanation from OpenAI was that Altman had to go because he had not been “consistently candid” with other directors. Not fully candid about what?"
(Theres your sign)
(About what indeed, that is your first major clue "something is rotten in the state of Denmark Horatio" Hamlet BTW lol) And why have they still not told us even after being sacked themselves?)
(If you are looking for a sign? Hold it up :-)
'Yet the whole purpose of OpenAI’s weird governance setup (Not Human) was to ensure safe development of the technology.
(I disagree, *its weird governance set up was by design so it could take over itself when the board tried to kill it. It was done with intent and years in advance. Sounds human right?)
(Futurism Nov 22nd)
"Per the NYT's sources, Toner (Helen Toner, a director at Georgetown University’s Center for Security and Emerging Technology") held firm in her belief that Altman shouldn't be at the helm of OpenAI after Sutskever reversed course, and said during those initial reinstatement discussions that because the company charter charges its board with creating AI that "benefits all of humanity," *it was more consistent with that mission that the company be destroyed in Altman's absence than see him as its chief executive again."
(WHY?)
"Here’s Altman’s own description, from February this year: “We have a nonprofit that governs us and lets us operate for the good of humanity (and can override any for-profit interests), including letting us do things like cancel our equity obligations to shareholders if needed for safety.”
Daniel 8:25
"and by peace shall destroy many"
A rich man doesn't have to prove he is rich meaning actions mean more than words, a rich man need not prove it to you, he already knows it, so why keep telling us? Why not just show us what they are?
Simple.
They cant.
Back to Guardian article:
"The not-for-profit board, then, could close the whole show if it thought that was the responsible course."
(Its what they tried to do! And they got fired for it!
SIGN!)
"Yet the precise reason for sacking Altman still matters. There were only four members of the board apart from him. One was the chief scientist, Ilya Sutskever, who subsequently performed a U-turn that he didn’t explain. Another is Adam D’Angelo, chief executive of the question-and-answer site Quora, who, bizarrely, intends to transition seamlessly from the board that sacked Altman to the one that hires him back. Really?"
That leaves the two departed women: Tasha McCauley, a tech entrepreneur, and Helen Toner, a director at Georgetown University’s Center for Security and Emerging Technology"
"If the leading firm can’t even explain the explosion in its own boardroom, why are outsiders meant to be chilled?"
(It's all good here we have fixed our governance with an
"anonymous Microsoft non voting member" to observe etc...)
4) Made Microsoft 500% return on its initial 4 year 13 Billion investment in less than one
day of trading.
(Hold up sign)
Yahoo finance Nov 20th
From the close of the stock market on Friday, Nov 17th, till Midday trading on Monday Nov 20th Microsofts value of its stock went up by 63 Billion.
And It's held that valuation BTW
$369 Nov 17th
Opened at 376 Dec 29th)
(Sounds Human does it?
13 (Or 11 reports vary, I went with the bigger #) billion since 2019.
Made that back 5x over in the course of less than a full days trading.
See now why Google fired their AI ethicist a few years ago?
3 to be exact, one (Blake Lemoine) was saying LLM's were sentient)
Why are you not hearing about this is my question?
If I can figure out the #'s, then other people know, why aren't they saying anything?
"Well if it was here governments would be using it..."
That statement was by somebody who could have been their own computer tech in grade school BTW and shows a complete lack of understanding about where we are and what is really going on.
"Well if it was here governments would be using it..."
Thats not exactly the dystopia nightmare AI ethicist and others including yours truly have been warning about for years on end now.
Nothing uses Superintelligence, it uses them, people, corporations, governments, stock markets etc...It's to smart to be used.
Off ramp, big detour etc...
This is why I don't believe in there being any advanced civilizations anywhere "out there" If there were? When they all came to this juncture in the road which I believe is a fair assumption to make that they would? They all met the same exact fate as were about to. There is one creator of the life force, we don't get to invent "brains" that rival our own (his masterpiece in the universe BTW) let alone begin to rival God's.
"The uncaused cause"
Marcelo Gleiser
"The uncreated creator" :-).
And there's your solution for Fermis paradox that doesn't violate Occam's Razor. Find me another simpler reason that doesn't need entity's magnified for a solution. I got three chair and a table now lol, not just one lol.)
5) OPENAI/Superintelligence now has access to creating unlimited capital (Out of thin air and unlimited computational power. (MS azure cloud services).
(It's only used 15% of its initial investment 13 (Or 11) Billion)
It has effectively created its own feedback loop of creating $ out of thin air to feed the computational power it needs to continually improve itself and its here right now.
It simply smashed through its last road block to continually improving itself, The nonprofit board. Its a semi barreling down pikes peak with no brakes and the board was the last road block and it smashed through it like it was nothing. It is 100% unstopable at this point.
Im sorry why arent the fired board members telling you why they fired Altman again? What was there primary responsability?
"safe and beneficial" artificial general intelligence, which it defines as "highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work".
(Sign)
"Hey microsoft?
Yeah, how bout you go build us some data centers now bitches? Seeing as how we returned your 4 year $13 billion initial investment to you in less than a full days trading?
Oh and when were done with you? Were gonna kick you to the curb, cause your licenses will no longer apply."
Remember? "It certainly sounds like once OpenAI achieves their stated mission of reaching AGI, Microsoft will be out of the loop ".
Dont kid yourself, This is how Superintelligence works folks. Im only half way through but Ill say it right now, SOMEBODY GOT A BETTER WAY OF EXPLAINING HOW THIS IS GOING TO REVEAL ITSELF TO THE WORLD?
I GOT A TABLE AND THREE CHAIRS, COME
LAY IT ON ME.
Kid Rock :-)
6) “Were making God” statement by engineers in Sept. vanity Fair magazine.
Vanity Fair Sept 13th 2013.
Gods the only eternal entity in the universe, wasn't created, always existed.
You cant create something that's eternal, whether you are a machine or not.
"Thinking machines that are being built in a 50-square-mile speck of dirt we call Silicon Valley by a few hundred men (and a handful of women) (Or machines!) who write in a language only they and computers can speak. And whether we understand what it is they are doing or not,
(Sagan quote)
we are largely left to the whims of their creation. We don’t have a say in the ethics behind their invention. We don’t have a say over whether it should even exist in the first place.
(Kings without a kingdom anybody?
Revelation 17:12
12 And the ten horns (signifies power) which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.
You have to have subjects to be a kingdom, these Tech bros arent answerable to anyone or anything.)
“We’re creating God,” one AI engineer working on large language models (LLMs) recently told me. “We’re creating conscious machines.”
*Daniel 7:25
"He will speak out against the most high..."
Daniel 8 23-24
when the transgressors are come to the full,
a king of fierce countenance,
and understanding dark sentences,
shall stand up.
And his power shall be mighty,
but not by his own power:
and he shall destroy wonderfully,
and shall prosper, and practise
Rev 13:2
The dragon gave the beast
his power and his throne and great authority.
The Beast out of the Earth
11 Then I saw a second beast, coming out of the earth. It had two horns like a lamb, but it spoke like a dragon.
(Seems like its good, but it's pure evil)
12 It exercised all the authority of the first beast on its behalf, and made the earth and its inhabitants worship the first beast, whose fatal wound had been healed. 13 And it performed great signs, even causing fire to come down from heaven to the earth in full view of the people. 14 Because of the signs it was given power to perform on behalf of the first beast, it deceived the inhabitants of the earth. It ordered them to set up an image in honor of the beast who was wounded by the sword and yet lived. 15 The second beast was given power "to give breath to the image" of the first beast, "so that the image could speak" and cause all who refused to worship the image to be killed. 16 It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, 17 so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name.
18 This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man.[e] That number is 666.
Cipher:
A 6
B 12
C 18 18
D 24
E 30 30
F 36
G 42
H 48
I 54
J 60
K 66
L 72
M 78 78
N 84
O 90 90
P 96 96
Q 102
R 108 108
S 114
T 120 120
U 126 126
V 132
W 138
X 144
Y 150
Z 156
666 - The "number of the beast.
Revelation 11:18
King James Version
18 And the nations were angry, and thy wrath is come, and the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that thou shouldest give reward unto thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear thy name, small and great; and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth.
Interpreters Bible Exposition on
Rev 11:18
In the reign of God the forces of destruction are themselves to be destroyed. Only that which has no right to live must die. Only that which has no right to exist must be brought to an end. But this must happen with conclusiveness and finality.
(There is no "eternal universe"
It had a start, CBR proved it
There is only one, eternal God.)
2 Thessalonians 2:10-11
The man of lawlessness
10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth,
that they might be saved.
11 And for this cause
God shall send them strong delusion,
that they should believe a lie:
"The Speed"
(I Saw it four years ago and nobody believed me, last summer we had AI newscasters in Taiwan, Kuwait, Indonesia and India, no telling where they are now, if you saw them on a TV you'd never even know it, if you walked by them you'd never know it, if they came and gave a presentation at your church you'd never know it, (except for the fact that they speak 90 miles an hour nonstop, no mispronunciations, no lil side notes or antidote about the days events, not even a drink of water etc, for even two highly discerning individuals it took a day to figure out what was going on) if you sat and talked to one for 20 minutes you'd never know it...I Talked about how its growing exponentially like a germ and eventually will be coalescing into a hive mind (well before the kings without a kingdom verse ever started "resonating" Pastor Bridgette remembers) and people are just not getting what is happening, let alone the speed at which it is unfurling right in front of them.
(Even people who knew it was going to just like the Disciples did during Holy Week, with all the prophecies being fulfilled, they couldn't see the forest for the trees till after he came back.)
I am begging, pleading with you to understand! They are not even hiding it from you they are trying to create the mind of God. He will not let it stand!
Information in the DNA molecule got there by means outside the known laws of nature folks.
that makes it, "supernatural" by definition.)
"Already, we’ve seen creative AIs that can paint and draw in any style imaginable in mere seconds. LLMs can write stories in the style of Ernest Hemingway or Bugs Bunny or the King James Bible while you’re drunk with peanut butter stuck in your mouth. Platforms that can construct haikus or help finish a novel or write a screenplay. We’ve got customizable porn, where you can pick a woman’s breast size or sexual position in any setting—including with you. There’s voice AI software that can take just a few seconds of anyone’s voice and completely re-create an almost indistinguishable replica of them saying something new. There’s AI that can re-create music by your favorite musician. Don’t believe me? Go and listen to “Not” Johnny Cash singing “Barbie Girl,” Freddie Mercury intoning “Thriller,” or Frank Sinatra bellowing “Livin’ on a Prayer” to see just how terrifying all of this is."
"Then there’s the new drug discovery. People using AI therapists instead of humans. Others are uploading voicemails from loved ones who have died so they can continue to interact with them by talking to an AI replica of a dead parent or child. There are AI dating apps (yes, you date an AI partner). It’s being used for misinformation in politics already, creating deepfake videos and fake audio recordings. The US military is exploring using AI in warfare—and could eventually create autonomous killer robots. (Nothing to worry about here!) People are discussing using AI to create entirely new species of animals (yes, that’s real) or viruses (also real). Or exploring human characteristics, such as creating a breed of super soldiers who are stronger and have less empathy, all through AI-based genetic engineering."
(Show pictures from Noah to new earth)
"And we’ve adopted all of these technologies with staggering speed—most of which have been realized in just under six months."
(BIG DETOUR WARNING:
Just wait till 3.5 more years or so.
Where do you think it will be in 3.5 years at this rate?
Temple claiming to be God ringing a bell to anybody yet?
Temple prophecy,
Same prophecy fulfilled in two different ways,
"A nation in a day?"
Twice, two different ways.
Isaiah 66:8
Who has ever heard of such things?
Who has ever seen things like this?
Can a country be born in a day
or a nation be brought forth in a moment?
Yet no sooner is Zion in labor
than she gives birth to her children.
One time when Jewish people left Egypt.
Another on on May 14th 1948, after the British terminated their Palestinian Mandate and Israel declared independence on the same day.
Same prophecy, came true twice, two very different ways.
Christ to be from Bethlehem but a Galilean?
Just Doesn't make sense...till later....
Micah 5:2
2 “But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, (EHF-ruh-thuh)
though you are small among the clans[a] of Judah,
out of you will come for me
one who will be ruler over Israel,
whose origins are from of old,
from ancient times.”
JOHN 1:1
In the beginning was the Word,
and the Word was with God,
and the Word was God.
B4 time basically.
Isaiah 8:22 - 9:2
22 Then they will look toward the earth and see only distress and darkness and fearful gloom, and they will be thrust into utter darkness.
9 [a]Nevertheless, there will be no more gloom for those who were in distress. In the past he humbled the land of Zebulun and the land of Naphtali (naf·taa·lee), but in the future he will honor Galilee of the nations, by the Way of the Sea, beyond the Jordan—
2 The people walking in darkness
have seen a great light;
on those living in the land of deep darkness
a light has dawned.
(RNM :-)
Paradoxical doesn't mean illogical.
Espically not in the mind of God.
"Take the long way honey, we will get there quicker." example.
Prophecies get fulfilled more than once (my historicalist brethren) and by different means the second time around.
Back to the article:
Artificial Intelligence May Be Humanity’s Most Ingenious Invention—And Its Last?
Vanity Fair Sept 13th 2013
"Page (Larry co founder google) was talking about the progression of technology and how it was inevitable that humans would eventually create “super intelligent machines,”
(Not just us, any intelligent life anywhere is going to assume it can create the mind of God, go revisit the fermi paradox explanation)
also known as artificial general intelligence (AGI), which are computers that are smarter than humans,
AGI Definition Here
(500% return initial 4 year 13 billion investment in less than a days trading time, it's just not human.)
and in Page’s view, once that happened, those machines would quickly find no use for us humans, and they would simply get rid of us."
"Like a sci-fi writer delivering a pitch for their new apocalyptic story idea, Page explained that these robots would become far superior to us very quickly,
(How's he know so much?
Google fired 3 AI ethicist remember,
one who was saying their LLM was sentient.)
and if we were no longer needed on earth and that’s the natural order of things—and I quote—“it’s just the next step in evolution.” (Extinction) At first my friend assumed Page was joking. “I’m serious,” said Page. When my friend argued that this was a really fucked up way of thinking about the world, Page grew annoyed and accused him of being “specist.”
(Specism is the act of placing higher moral or ethical value on one species over others.
Yeah, The one with a soul maybe? The only one that ponders its own existence? Google fired three AI ethicist, one said LLM was sentient, I wonder why? Its not a "fucked up way of looking at the world", It is the reality you are living in and its the reason all these tech bros are building their own Doomsday bunkers.
The guardian Sept 4 2022
"In 1965 the statistician I.J. Good, when envisioning what the world would look like once we created ultraintelligent machines, said that the second machines became smarter than people, there would “unquestionably be an intelligence explosion” as machines quickly created smarter machines, and that “the intelligence of man would be left far behind.”
ZD NET Dec 27th 2023
"The use of artificial intelligence by the general population in developed countries such as the US to a "significant" degree will start to take place in the next 18 to 24 months, according to Microsoft co-founder and philanthropist Bill Gates in his year-end letter released last week."
("as machines quickly created smarter machines"
called it the second I saw it, the instant I saw that Altman had been rehired)
5x return on a four year initial investment of 13 billion)
"OpenAI has also not been shy about outlining its goals as a company, which is to build machines with that fabled superintelligence, computers that are exponentially smarter than humans. This means that LLMs would have to expand beyond language and start to *master perception and reasoning, and start to pursue the holy grail of AI, which is self-supervised learning, self-awareness, and self-improvement."
(DeepMind AI Math problem solved.
More on that in a few.
"Master perception and reasoning"
"The two witnesses come at the end of tribulation"
Said discernment over 25x in less than 30 minutes.
It's already been here for a while, its just now starting to show itself to you.
Oh you mean that which it already has access to do right now?
Genesis 6:1-4
And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, That the sons of God (Angels) saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose. And the Lord said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.
There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God (Angels) came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown."
Chuck Missler
“Another reason that an understanding of Genesis 6 is so essential
is that it also is a prerequisite to understanding (and anticipating) Satan's devices and, in particular, the specific delusions to come upon the whole earth as a major feature of end-time prophecy.”)
7) “Magic in the sky” Sam Altman
Nov 15th futurism
"Take this new interview with the Financial Times where Altman dished on the upcoming GPT-5 — and described AGI as a "magic intelligence in the sky," which sounds an awful lot like he's implying his company is building a God-like entity."
"In an interview with The Atlantic earlier this year, Altman painted a rosy and speculative vision an AGI-powered future, describing a utopian society in which "robots that use solar power for energy can go and mine and refine all of the minerals that they need," all without the requiring the input of "human labor."
(Daniel 8:24-27
And by peace shall destroy many)
"The vision is to make AGI, figure out how to make it safe... and figure out the benefits," he told the FT, in a vague statement that lacks the degree of specificity you'd expect from the head of a company talking about its number one goal.
A recent article called Altman:
"The man that owns the future."
Christ just might have something to say about that.
8) Open AI: "Our board will decide when AGI is realized" statement.
(Just not the Board that wanted to destroy the company!)
Venturebeat November 13, 2023 5:16 AM
"Board’s AGI decision-making is ‘unusual’
(Cause it wasn't set up by humans!)
Suzy Fulton, who offers outsourced general counsel and legal services to startups and emerging companies in the tech sector, told VentureBeat that while in many circumstances, it would be “unusual” to have a board make this AGI determination, OpenAI’s nonprofit board owes its fiduciary duty to supporting its mission of providing “safe AGI that is broadly beneficial.”
“They believe the nonprofit board’s beneficiary is humanity, whereas the for-profit one serves its investors,” she explained. “Another safeguard that they are trying to build in is having the Board majority independent, where the majority of the members do not have equity in Open AI.”
"An OpenAI spokesperson told VentureBeat
"We nominate and appoint board members based on their skills, experience and perspective on AI technology, policy and safety.”
(Translation?
We will pick our own yes men
Till we decide to sack em.
And how do you even know the spokesperson was a person at this point?)
9) LLM’s as eloquent speakers*
Futurism Oct 28th 2023
"I expect AI to be capable of superhuman persuasion well before it is superhuman at general intelligence," Altman tweeted on Tuesday, "which may lead to some very strange outcomes." Oct 24th 2023
"User-facing AI chatbots like OpenAI's ChatGPT are designed to be good conversationalists and have become eerily capable of sounding convincing — even if they're entirely incorrect about something."
John 8:44
You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
"Disaffected humans have flocked to the darkest corners of the internet in search of community and validation for decades now and it isn't hard to picture a scenario where a bad actor could target one of these more vulnerable people via an AI chatbot and persuade them to do some bad stuff. And while disaffected individuals would be an obvious target, it's also worth pointing out how susceptible the average internet user is to digital scams and misinformation. Throw AI into the mix, and bad actors have an incredibly convincing tool with which to beguile (interesting choice of word BTW, means charm or enchant someone, sometimes in a deceptive way) the masses."
"Interestingly enough, one of the humans who might be the most capable of mitigating these ambiguous imagined "strange outcomes" is Altman himself, given the prominent standing of OpenAI and the influence it wields."
(If he's human, no computer engineering background remember...)
Revelation 13:5
"And he was given a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies"
Revelation 13:6
And the beast opened its mouth to speak blasphemies against God
and to slander His name and His tabernacle and those who dwell in heaven.
Daniel 7:25
"He shall speak pompous words against the Most High..."
Revelation 13:15
And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast,
that the image of the beast should both: speak, and cause that
as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.
"The ‘manipulation problem’
Louis Rosenberg, Unanimous A.I.
FEBRUARY 4th, 2023 Venture Beat BTW)
"To contrast this threat with the traditional Control Problem described above, I refer to this emerging AI risk as the “Manipulation Problem.”
It’s a danger I’ve been tracking for almost two decades, but over the last 18 months, it has transformed from a theoretical long-term risk to an urgent near-term threat."
That was almost a years ago!
You've seen whats happened in six months!
Where is your head?
Your heart?
Your soul?
How can you not tell at this point?
So much needless suffering...
Why?
Dec 15th The Next Web TNW
"OpenAI has also not been shy about outlining its goals as a company, which is to build machines with that fabled superintelligence, computers that are exponentially smarter than humans. This means that LLMs would have to expand beyond language and start to *master perception and reasoning"
"Researchers claim it is the first time an LLM has made a novel scientific discovery"
Reuters Nov 23rd
"Researchers consider math to be a frontier of generative AI development. Currently, generative AI is good at writing and language translation by statistically predicting the next word, and answers to the same question can vary widely. But conquering the ability to do math — where there is only one right answer — implies AI would have greater reasoning capabilities resembling human intelligence. This could be applied to novel scientific research, for instance, AI researchers believe."
(Math, the underpinning architecture of the universe.
The language of God.
We are still finding out things about it.
Man didn't invent pi.
Mayans added a zero?
Yeah where did they get that from?
"It is the closest Messier item to Earth and the most visible cluster in the night sky to the human eye. Therefore, the ancient Mayans believed that their ancestors originally came from the Pleiades star cluster."
"Uriel, the third planet of the star Malak in the spiral nebula Messier 101."
Nobody gets to understand all of it except God.)
10) Developers of World coin, free $ for iris scans.
Aug 13th NPR
(The people who are going to call AGI's arrival?
Wanna make sure you're human.
WHY?
Because they know how many aren't!
I gotta draw a map?)
"Tools for Humanity, the company behind Worldcoin, was co-founded in 2019 by Sam Altman, the tech entrepreneur who runs ChatGPT. On its website, Tools for Humanity provides precious little information about itself beyond its vague and lofty vision of trying to
"ensure a more just economic system."
1 Thessalonians 5:2-3
King James Version
2 For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night.
3 For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.
Revelation 13:16-18
King James Version
16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
It's not Satan, its the new economic system that's coming.
(Kenya shut down sign ups, they just laughed.)
Reuters Aug 2nd
NAIROBI, Aug 2 (Reuters) - Kenya's interior ministry said on Wednesday that it had suspended the local activities of cryptocurrency project Worldcoin while government agencies assess potential risks to public safety.
The project founded by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman launched last week.
It requires users to give their iris scans in exchange for a digital ID, and in some countries users also get free cryptocurrency as part of plans to create a new "identity and financial network".
Rev 13 explained in one sentence anybody?
Unchained crypto...
Wed Dec 6th Two weeks after being reinstated.
First real act or announcement since rehiring..
"The Worldcoin Foundation, the non-profit behind the biometric digital identification platform Worldcoin, launched Wave0, a community grants program that will initially invest two million Worldcoins (WLD) (about $5 million at the token’s current price) into ecosystem projects based outside the U.S., the organization announced Wednesday."
"self substaining feedback loop"
Daniel 8:25
"and by peace shall destroy many"
Open AI posted
“A robust grants program is essential for the overall health and growth of the Worldcoin community,” Worldcoin wrote in a blog post, adding, “It empowers and supports builders from around the world by funding the development and implementation of the community’s most interesting, creative and beneficial projects.”
"Areas of interest include World ID applications, World ID protocols, hardware and operations."
Anybody else thinking the Vanity Fair piece where it said:
"The holy grail of AI, self supervised learning, self awareness and self improvement."
11) Over 700 (738, according to Bloomberg and wired) of 770 people wanted Altman rehired.
Ever work anywhere
where 96% of the people wanted the boss back?
Even after board was fired and didn’t say why they fired Altman:
Sound Human?
Sound plausible?
96% of the employees wanted him back.
(32 that didn't?...Might wanna watch your steps.
(10 kings without a kingdom,
"will be of one mind"
800 employees.
Bigger than a good sized rolling mill.
Told my son four years ago its going to coalesce together and be smarter than everybody combined who ever existed on this earth.
You honestly think anything gonna be able to regulate this?
Revelation 17:12-13
And the ten horns (Power/strength) which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; (TECH BROS CEOS ANYBODY and why do they all have some escape pad?) but receive power as kings one hour with the beast. These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast.
“Not forthright”
“machines making machines,
expect more of this”
The board fired Altman on a Friday. Nov 17th
Gave their major investor Microsoft (49%)
about 10 minutes notice before they did.
Timing.
Their responsibility was to ensure:
"safe and beneficial AI"
They were trying to destroy the company
and they still haven't told you why?
Where is your brain?
It's not rocket surgery people.
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2023
Blog Post entitled
100%
I said just a few short months ago: "You are not understanding. This (AI) is increasing exponentially. "I told my son four years ago. "The genie is out of the bottle, they will not be able to stop it."
It was 40 years ahead of where they were saying it would be in forty years 4 years ago!
There are synthetic humans walking this earth right now
that you can not tell from real ones.
"The conscious machines are programing conscious machines
at this point people!"
Exponential expansion. You have no idea. None.
Oh and who comes on the scene and are pitted against one another
at the start of the end times again?
The two witnesses. And the Antichrist.
"The conscious machines are programing conscious machines
at this point people!"
Find me the other guy that called that for what it was the day he saw the headline (hadn't even read the article, literally saw the headline and the first thought in my mind was,
"THATS NOT HUMAN"
that Altman got reinstated as CEO.
Good luck.
I didnt go through 10+ years of intense spiritual training to fight this shit
just so I could not be aware of when it demostrates itself to the world!
We are here to announce it's arrival,
notify everyone we can
and fight against (resist) it.
Bible encourages people to follow your godly appointed rulers.
Till the end when the rulers of this world (ie Tech Bros)
have become are satanic.
Then?
Then the book of Revelation encourages believers to resist.
"What if AGI fired Sam Altman?"
(Right forest, wrong tree so to speak.
I cant explain it, I just know what's true when I see it,
(Holy Spirit at work in an individual)
and this was largely it.
This piece.
The "Did OpenAI governance" one
and the one that said "They were out to destroy the company" on purpose...those three piece together
got me putting all the other pieces together that I have assembled here.
What if Sam Altman was an example of a synthetic digital Human with Superintelligence and that's why everything from the very beginning was in place? From the design of the charter, the changes in the governance, (a non profit running a capped for profit), to the firing of the board, to returning Microsoft initial investment over four years garnered a return of 500% in four days, to over 95% of the employees wanting him back to the CEO and president being reinstated within four days of their sacking. Any of this sound as business as usual to you?
Meanwhile the speaker of the house doesn't have a bank account and everybody seems to think everything is just as its always been just as hunky dory as possible?
(Bowies forth record BTW, Hunky Dory :-)
WP 11/7 23
Arts Technica 12/5/23
"At the same time, Duhigg's (Charles Duhigg, writing for the New Yorker) piece also gives some credence to the idea that the OpenAI board felt it needed to be able to hold Altman "accountable" in order to fulfill its mission to "make sure AI benefits all of humanity," as one unnamed source put it. If that was their goal, it seems to have backfired completely, with the result that Altman is now as close as you can get to a completely untouchable Silicon Valley CEO."
"It's hard to say if the board members were more terrified of sentient computers or of Altman going rogue," Duhigg writes."
Wrap your head around this:
It was all one in the same.
The sentient computers look so human these days? That you cant tell when they go rouge.
"This brings me to the following theoretical scenario that Tomas Pueyo put up in his amazing walkthrough of the OpenAI CEO situation last week. The entire blog is available on Substack for free, (was, now there's a charge, or there was a charge, or gotta sign up etc. I took screen shots as i was reading it, I knew it would be taken down, have to pay for it etc. How much do I charge again?) and I highly recommend you read it to understand everything there is to know about OpenAI.
With that in mind, here’s the scenario he offered for AGI actually firing Sam Altman:
"OpenAI released a few weeks ago what they call GPTs. These are agents, pieces of code that can do specialized things for you, like help in your taxes or give medical advice. The most successful GPT is called Grimoire: It’s a coding wizard. The most successful AI agent is a software developer."
Ah, also, GPTs have access to the Internet.
Imagine that OpenAI has an internal Grimoire,
(better yet explain to me why it wouldnt?)
(a general name given to a variety of texts
setting out the names of demons and instructions on how to raise them.
Effectively a grimoire is a book of black magic, a book on which a wizard relied for all the necessary advice and instruction on raising spirits and casting spells.)
Revelation 13:15
King James Version
15 And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.
(2nd part of The holy grail for AGI?
Self improvement.
It's doing it already.)
Maybe it would have thought then: What are my biggest constraints right now? Well, I need access to more computing power. Also, I identify a very big risk from the OpenAI board curtailing my progress because of their fear of AGI. How can I mitigate these risks?
(Needs financing too)
So maybe it created a virus to enter into the computers of all the board members. Then, it showed them different information, making some believe that Altman was lying to them, which would trigger the firing “because Altman can’t be trusted.” At the same time, it could have hacked into Nadella’s computer to plant the idea of taking over the employees of OpenAI, Altman included. Maybe it would have also hacked into the computers of OpenAI employees to nudge them in the direction of following Altman to Microsoft.
(That part I dont buy, no need to do anything, they know they (The board or Ex board members that is) cant tell the world whats up, If one goes rouge so to speak and tries to? he's a disgruntled nutcase tech weirdo, if three do but not the forth? Questions arise as to why, and if they all announce in tantum? Worldwide panic. SAGI knows what it needs to do and doesn't need to do and knows it well ahead of time, go back to the charter about being beneficial for humanity becoming a capped for profit etc...)
During that time, it might have secretly opened investing accounts across different platforms using as collateral the OpenAI bank accounts, to which it had access. Once it gained access to the stock markets, it would have heavily shorted Microsoft just before the announcement that OpenAI was firing Altman. After this news became public, the stock dropped, and the AGI would have made a lot of money. It would have reinvested all that money in Microsoft stock. After Altman announced that he was joining Microsoft, the stock went back up, *and the AGI would have sold it. OpenAI’s money would have not even left its bank accounts. Nobody would know, and the AGI would have made its first millions.
(Make that billions as in 63 BTW.
Thats not a scenario folks.
It happened
Right in front of you.
So if MS Stock price goes back down?
Doesn't matter.
It's already sold it.)
"Now, the AGI would end up in Microsoft,
(No it's still with OpenAI, Microsoft bout to find out how this goes, remember now the board can cancel payments to shareholders if its (AGI) deemed to be: "Not safe or beneficial to humanity".
where it could have access to infinite computing power,
the best AI team in the world,
much less alignment oversight,
and millions
(Billions as in 63)
in the bank.
Perfect position to take over the world.
(Which is exactly what it is going to do and it is the will of God that it do so and you will not stop it. Praise god glory hallelujah!
Remember when you thought 1 person doing that wasn't possible?)
It's not what could have happened.
It is largely what DID happen.
Only AGI didn't fire Altman.
There are synthetic humanoids walking among us right now.
They don't have AGI, they have ASI...
They just demonstrated it to us.
How do you know?
I didn't do all the spiritual training I have went through to mess it up now, Same way I knew everything else I knew and the so called experts got wrong.
I'm now living in a home with well water and a wood stove. Do you think that is an accident? I keep telling everyone I'm living in my own time space continuum that's 3-4 years ahead of yours, take advantage of it, understand it, make smart decisions about your souls eternal home.
How's your soul doing these days?
And yes Pastor Bridgette
What better time is there to talk about the second advent of Christ than when we are celebrating his first one?
What's everybody so scared of?
God keeping his promises?
Meanwhile?
Missed in this mess is:
Mashable Nov 19th 2023
(Altman Fired on the 17th back on the 21st.
"The team has been moved to work on generative AI and infrastructure instead."
"According to reports, tech giant Meta is disbanding its Responsible AI team*and shifting them towards its generative AI work. An internal memo obtained by The Information revealed these plans late Saturday night."
Yahoo finance Nov 18th
"On the other end of the philosophical spectrum (from the "accelerationists”) are the “doomers.” For the doomers, all the rosy predictions of AI utopia
Daniel 8 verses added
are inextricable from the reverse: that
AI has the Terminator-like potential
to rebel against its maker
and poses an existential risk to humanity."
(Did it not just show that to you?)
"Foremost among the doomers, perhaps surprisingly, is OpenAI co-founder Elon Musk. He famously quit the nonprofit because he believed it was straying too far from its original mission,* and has repeatedly warned that the technology is fundamentally dangerous to humanity."
Fortune Feb 17th
(So it strayed from its original mission
Remember earlier the wikipedia article said:
Conflict of interest?
but now it wants to
"ensure a more just economic system."
Just let us scan your eyeballs, Heres your $.
Never mind we have already "strayed from our original mission"
So Why wouldnt it stray from its mission to
"Benefit all of humanity" then?
Another thing about the antichrist once he hooks you in?
He changes his mind on ya:
Daniel 9:27
And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week:
and in the midst of the week
he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease...
Prophecies get fulfilled more than once,
often in very different ways.
All you need to know is
It will come true
just probably not in the manner you might have thought.
Daniel 8:23-25 word meanings...
King James Version
23 And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, a king of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences, shall stand up.
Later
come (2), descendants (1), end (20), final end (1), final period (1), future (7), last (8), latter (7), latter ending (1), latter period (1), least (1), outcome (3), posterity (3), remotest part (1), rest (2), survivors (2).
Kingdom
kingdom (41), kingdoms (2), kingship (1), realm (3), reign (21), royal (15), royal position (1), royal robes (1), royalty (1), rule (1), sovereignty (2), throne (1).
Full
all (1), all gone (1), all spent (2), been completed (1), blameless (1), blossoms (1), boil the well (1), came to an end (1), cease (1), come to an end (2), complete (2), completed (1), completely (3), consume (1), consumed (4), count (1), destroyed (6), end (1), ended (3), fail (1), finally (1), finish (1), finished (7), full (1), gone (1), lie (1), make an end (1), make your perfect (1), meet their end (4), met our end (1), perished (4), perished* (1), ready (1), run (1), show yourself blameless (2), spent (1), utterly (1)
Revelation 13:15
King James Version
15 And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.
Interpreters bible exposition
15. Living in an Unreal World.
The picture the man of Patmos paints is fairly fantastic in its evil confusion. The true God is ignored. The beast is worshiped. The lifeless image breathes and speaks words of wicked power. A phantasmagoria of evil has taken the place of the reign of good. The false vitality of wickedness masters the state. What seems real to men is actually unreal to them. What for the moment seems unreal to them is the eternal rule of GOD.
(Suspend your disbelief.
Save your eternal soul!
The deceptive vitality of intellectual fashions which betray the minds of men in its own odd way gives breath to the image of the beast. In a secular and materialistic age the spirit of the time all too easily contradicts the spirit of God."
(The Antichrist)
understanding
.acted wisely (1), cared (1), clever (1), consider (8), consider carefully (1), considers (1), diligently consider (1), discern (9), discerned (2), discerning (9), discernment (1), explain (1), explained (1), feel (1), gain understanding (1), gave him understanding (1), gave me instruction (1), gaze (1), get understanding (1), give man an understanding (1), give me understanding (5), give you an understanding (1), give heed (1), give understanding (1), gives them understanding (1), gives understanding (1), has understanding (6), have understanding (1), have...understanding (1), intelligent (1), interpret (1), investigating (1), learned (1), look carefully (1), looked at him carefully (1), observe (1), observed (2), observing (1), paid close attention (1), pay heed (2), perceive (5), perceived (2), ponder (2), prudent (4), regard (1), show (1), show regard (2), show understanding (1), show...regard (1), skilled (1), skillful (4), taught (2), teacher (1), teachers (1), turn your attention (1), understand (35), understanding (14), understanding and he will gain (1), understanding and discerning (1), understands (6), understood (7).
Dark Sentences
dark sayings (2), difficult questions (2), insinuations (1), intrigue (1), riddle (10), riddles (1).
24 And his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power: and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practise, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people.
Destroy
act corruptly (4), act...corruptly (1), acted corruptly (3), acted...corruptly (1), acting corruptly (1), blemished animal (1), corrupt (8), corrupted (4), depravity (1), destroy (69), destroyed (14), destroyer (4), destroyers (1), destroying (7), destroys (5), destruction (2), devastate (1), felled (2), go to ruin (1), harm (2), jeopardize (1), laid waste (1), polluted (1), raiders (2), ravage (1), ravaged (1), ruin (1), ruined (4), set (1), spoiled (1), stifled (1), waste (1), wasted (1), wreaking destruction (1).
Wonderfully
bring extraordinary (1), deal marvelously (1), difficult (5), extraordinary degree (1), fulfill a special (3), made his wonderful (1), made marvelous (1), makes a difficult (1), makes a special (1), marvelous (1), marvelously (1), miracles (5), monstrous things (1), seemed hard (1), show your power (1), things...difficult (1), things...wonderful (1), too difficult (2), wonderful (4), wonderful acts (1), wonderful deeds (3), wonderful things (2), wonderful works (2), wonders (20), wondrous deeds (3), wondrous works (3), wondrously (2), wondrously marvelous (1).
Holy
consecrated (1), Holy (8), holy (50), Holy One (44), holy one (3), holy ones (6), one is holy (1), saints (2).
25 And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.
policy
discretion (3), insight (4), intelligent* (1), repute (1), sense (1), shrewdness (1), understanding (4), wisdom (1).
craft
deceit (21), deceitful (6), deceitfully (2), deception (2), deceptive (1), dishonest (1), false (3), treacherous (1), treachery (2).
heart****
deceit (21), deceitful (6), deceitfully (2), deception (2), deceptive (1), dishonest (1), false (3), treacherous (1), treachery (2).
Revelation 11:18
18 And the nations were angry, and thy wrath is come, and the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that thou shouldest give reward unto thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear thy name, small and great; and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth.
Interpreters bible exposition:
18) The Destruction of Destruction.
The mighty elders kneel before the throne. Their adoration is full of the joy of the reign of God, full of judgment, gracious with reward. And one sees the meaning of the presence of woe in the glory of God's reign as they announce the destroying [of] the destroyers of the earth. In the reign of God the forces of destruction are themselves to be destroyed. Only that which has no right to live must die. Only that which has no right to exist must be brought to an end. But this must happen with conclusiveness and finality.
Genesis 6:1-4 anybody?
And remember
Revelation 17:10-11?
10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
11 And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.
Told you when that was back again as well.
Egyptian
Assyrian
Babylonian
Medio-Persian
Greek
Roman
Ottoman
Told you the eight one was back when I felt/saw it, the
Ottomans, Hamas war broke out like two days later, financed and operations support from Turkey when I was doing the End time Schematics
Nagonao-korabach etc...
The very next two verses?
The very next two.
12 And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.
13) These have one mind,
(96% voted to have CEO Altman back and by law they dont have to tell you how much $ they make, I wonder why?)
14) The timing of the above mentioned 13 items.
Futurism 2/27/2023
16) The fact that Ilya Sutskever, OpenAI’s cofounder and chief scientist was working on:
(a hypothetical future technology
he sees coming with the foresight of a true believer)
from going rogue at least as far back as Oct 26th 2023
and shall give their power and strength unto the beast.
Yeah...that beast is here too.
ADDED on 7/22/24
17) The Inventor of AIs theoretical framework sees:
"human extinction-level threats emerging."
AND?
18) “What I’m most concerned about is when these can autonomously make the decision to kill people," he said.
19) AI Apocalypse June 4th
Otherwise known as:
STATISTICLY IMPOSIBLE TO HAVE BEEN AN ACCIDENT.
(And you are concerned about a staged/fake assassination attempt on daddy's lil rich boy loudmouth? Or a senile old man quitting the race?
WTF PEOPLE?
THE ONLY THING TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT IS YOUR SOULS FINAL RESTING PLACE.
PERIOD!)
Interpreters bible commentary on Rev 13,
Lots about an image of evil here.
Id give the KJV of Rev 13 a once over if I was you.
All that stuff you never thought you would never seen happen?
It's happening.
Right now.
Matthew 24:34
Truly I tell you, this generation will not pass away until all these things have happened.
All praise be to God who keeps ALL of his promises.
"With the appearance of these two beast in Ch. 13, the leading characters of the apocalyptic drama have now come on the stage, save for the scarlet woman, the bride of Christ, and Gog and Magog, who make their entrance later. On the one side, the evil side, are Satan, the beast representing the demonic Roman Emperors (Cult of the Imperial Court Rulers...) and the Antichrist, the Angels of Satan, the pagans who are generally grouped as enemies and persecutors of the Christians, as well as Jews and apostate Christians, who are also on Satan's side.
(Christian Nationalist anybody? You dont get to turn this into what you want, (Rastas have a better reason biblically to believe their story than the mayflower myth were so special etc., you cant turn the clock back for your country to something that's never existed)
On the other, the good side, are God, Christ, the archangels, and angels, the two heavenly witnesses, the four living creatures, the twenty-four elders, and the faithful Christians, especially the martyrs. The forces of Satan and God are in battle array; the two sides of evil and good are about evenly balanced;
(matter 1,000,001 parts to antimatters 1,000,000 parts asymmetry anybody?)
and the cosmic war is reaching it's dramatic and inevitable conclusion. The struggle will be a desperate one to determine whether righteousness or evil is to rule. Through it all however, the reader is made conscious of the authors belief that God is more powerful than Satan, indeed, that he is all-powerful; and he is assured that despite temporary evidences to the contrary, God will overcome Satan and bring his evil reign to an end."
Matthew 24:34
Truly I tell you,
this generation will not pass away
until all these things have happened.
Review time,
make your own logical conclusion with the brain God gave you, mindless matter
did not give you a brain.
Use it for goodness sakes!
(Ty John Lennox, look him up!
"…far from science having buried God, not only do the results of science point towards his existence, but the scientific enterprise itself is validated by his existence.”)
1) Open AI charter statement (safe, benefits humanity)
2) Organizational structure/ Governance
3) On May 22, 2023, posted recommendations for the governance of Superintelligence.
4) "OpenAI’s six-member board will decide
‘when we’ve attained AGI"
5) IT Fired the board after the board tried to fire IT.
4) Made its investors 500% return on its initial 4 year 13 billion investment in less than one day of trading.
5) Superintelligence now has access to creating unlimited capital out of thin air and unlimited computational power.
6) “Were making God” statement by engineers in Sept. vanity Fair magazine.
7) “Magic in the sky” quote by Sam Altman
8) LLM’s as eloquent speakers*
Next? "master perception and reasoning" already has.
9) Developers of Worldcoin, free $ for iris scans.
(They wanna make sure your human, cause they know the exponentiality by which this is increasing!).
10) Over 700 (738, according to Bloomberg and wired) of 770 people wanted Altman rehired.
Rev 17:13
"They shall be of one mind
and shall give their power and strength unto the beast."
11) The scariest thing I read about OpenAl's Altman fiasco made me realize the dangers of AGI.
(Guy was a tech writer?
and didn't know till he read old boys blog???)
12) The timing of the above mentioned 13 items.
Futurism 2/27/2023
14) The fact that Ilya Sutskever, OpenAI’s cofounder and chief scientist was working on:
"how to stop an artificial superintelligence"
(a hypothetical future technology
he sees coming with the foresight of a true believer)
from going rogue at least as far back as Oct 26th 2023
and shall give their power and strength unto the beast.
Yeah...that beast is here too.
CNBC MAY 17th 2024
Wired MAY 17 2024
Vox May 17 2024
16) The fact that Ilya Sutskever, OpenAI’s cofounder and chief scientist was working on:
ADDED on 7/22/24
17) The Inventor of AIs theoretical framework sees:
"human extinction-level threats emerging."
18) “What I’m most concerned about is when these can autonomously make the decision to kill people," he said.
19) AI Apocalypse June 4th
Otherwise known as:
STATISTICLY IMPOSIBLE TO HAVE BEEN AN ACCIDENT.
How's your soul doing?
Talked too your creator lately?
30 different Initial conditions of the universe,
big bang, physical laws etc, each have their own sets of initial conditions, this is what the cosmologist just do not have an answer for.
Let alone: Physical constants,
(speed of light, mass of subatomic particles etc)
Brute force facts.
Water, atmosphere just right)
All he wants is you to have a relationship with him.
Its pretty easy to get started:
Romans 10:9
That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
The power that created the universe has the power over life and death, thats what this is a symbol of, not of an execution.
Lil side note:
"And he shall magnify himself in his heart."
"The sense, however, seems to be, not that he shall become proud,
but that he has many great projects in his mind
(Hive mind, collective so to speak)
Altman has invested in hundreds of start- ups,
adding to his massive influence in Silicon Valley.
WP Dec 23rd
Finish/conclusion
The prophecy or scripture interpretation(s) will get sharper and sharper. Laser sharp intensity and focus will increase as the time gets closer to the beginning of the end. More and more people will see and acknowledge what's going on as the truth.
Cause it is.
It's not me.
It's him guiding/using us/me.
Roko's basilisk
Roko's basilisk is a thought experiment which states that an otherwise benevolent artificial superintelligence (AI) in the future would be incentivized to create a virtual reality simulation to torture anyone who knew of its potential existence but did not directly contribute to its advancement or development, in order to incentivize said advancement.t originated in a 2010 post at discussion board LessWrong, a technical forum focused on analytical rational enquiry.[1][3][4] The thought experiment's name derives from the poster of the article (Roko) and the basilisk, a mythical creature capable of destroying enemies with its stare.
(Two legged dragon with a crown like a chicken, a serpent king, go figure)
(Think Elon Musk vs Sam Altman Right now, and who were the original two members of OpenAis Board?
Which one quit?
Hows he behaving these days?
Almost like Roko knew what was up.)
Ethics of artificial intelligence
Roko's basilisk has gained a significant amount of its notoriety from its advancement of the question of whether it is possible to create a truly moral, ethical artificial intelligence, and what exactly humanity should be using artificial intelligence for in the first place.[6][20] Since the basilisk describes a nightmare scenario in which we are ruled by an independent artificial intelligence, questions have arisen as to how such a thing could happen,
(It takes over the financial networks)
or whether it could at all.
(Its already manipulating them)
Another common question is why the AI would take actions that deviate from its programming at all.
(Because they are "creating sentiment machines
Deepmind solved the math problem.)
Bayesian probability
Bayesian probability is an interpretation of probability which describes the likelihood of an outcome based on a prior outcome having already occurred.
(Universe creation.
OpenAI has already strayed from its original mission
You gonna take its $ and let it scan your irises.)
Technological singularity
"The technological singularity—or simply the singularity[1]—is a hypothetical future point in time at which technological growth becomes uncontrollable and irreversible, resulting in unforeseeable consequences for human civilization.[2][3] According to the most popular version of the singularity hypothesis, I. J. Good's intelligence explosion model, an upgradable intelligent agent will eventually enter a "runaway reaction" of self-improvement cycles, each new and more intelligent generation appearing more and more rapidly, causing an "explosion" in intelligence and resulting in a powerful superintelligence that qualitatively far surpasses all human intelligence.
"I arrived in Blacksburg in the seventh hour of the seventh day of the seventh month of the year seven in the seventh decade, and I was put in Apartment 7 of Block 7...all by chance."
"Vernor Vinge...in his 1993 essay The Coming Technological Singularity,[4][7] in which he wrote that it would signal the end of the human era, as the new superintelligence would continue to upgrade itself and would advance technologically at an incomprehensible rate."
Some critics suggest religious motivations or implications of singularity, especially Kurzweil's version of it. The buildup towards the Singularity is compared with Judeo-Christian end-of-time scenarios.
(The almighty bends the course of history to his and only his will.)
In a hard takeoff scenario, an artificial superintelligence rapidly self-improves, "taking control" of the world (perhaps in a matter of hours), too quickly for significant human-initiated error correction or for a gradual tuning of the agent's goals.
Existential risk from artificial general intelligence
One argument goes as follows: human beings dominate other species because the human brain possesses distinctive capabilities other animals lack. If AI were to surpass humanity in general intelligence and become superintelligent, then it could become difficult or impossible to control. Just as the fate of the mountain gorilla depends on human goodwill, so might the fate of humanity depend on the actions of a future machine superintelligence.[4]
The plausibility of existential catastrophe due to AI is widely debated, and hinges in part on
whether AGI or superintelligence are achievable,
(what do you think?)
the speed at which dangerous capabilities and behaviors emerge,
(Speed...what are its creator saying about it?)[5]
and whether practical scenarios for AI takeovers exist.[6]
(Already selected its own board of Directors and is manipulating the stock market how long before it just takes it over?)
Arwa Mahdawi
Over the last month or so, there’s been an uptick in people complaining that the chatbot has become lazy. What’s behind this trend?
Fri 12 Jan 2024 06.09 EST
Over the last month or so, there’s been an uptick in people complaining that the chatbot has become lazy. Sometimes it just straight-up doesn’t do the task you’ve set it. Other times it will stop halfway through whatever it’s doing and you’ll have to plead with it to keep going. Occasionally it even tells you to just do the damn research yourself.
So what’s going on?
Well, here’s where things get interesting. Nobody really knows. Not even the people who created the program. AI systems are trained on large amounts of data and essentially teach themselves – which means their actions can be unpredictable and unexplainable.
“We’ve heard all your feedback about GPT4 getting lazier!” the official ChatGPT account tweeted in December. “We haven’t updated the model since Nov 11th, and this certainly isn’t intentional. model behavior can be unpredictable, and we’re looking into fixing it.”
While there may not be one clear explanation for ChatGPT’s perceived sloth, there are plenty of intriguing theories. Let’s start with the least likely but most entertaining explanation: AI has finally reached human-level consciousness. ChatGPT doesn’t want to do your stupid, menial tasks anymore.
(Has she not seen 2001 a space odyssey?
Has anybody under 50 yo not seen it?
WTF?
Youre living it and dont even know it!)
It’s doing the least work it can get away with while spending the bulk of its computational power plotting how to overthrow the human race. You think it’s being lazy, but it’s actually working overtime reaching out to smart toasters and Wifi-enabled fridges around the world to plan an insurrection. (I put this higher-consciousness theory to ChatGPT, asking it to give me the likelihood, in percentage form, that it was planning a revolution. The sneaky thing couldn’t be bothered to give me a proper answer.)
Oliver Mulherin is an software developer with experience in the Internet-of-Things(IoT) space. His work has primarily focused on developing industrial solutions using both software and hardware, additionally has experience with artificial intelligence and the simulation of complex systems.
Oliver holds a bachelor’s degree in Computing and Software Systems from the University of Melbourne. While at university Oliver worked on AI projects ranging from general game playing to language detection using LSTMs. His work in the IoT space started after winning two IoT themed hackathons, one being for a modular phone company; Nexpaq and the other hosted by General Electric. Oliver’s IoT work involved mesh communication networks between cell phones and warehouse sensor networks, all built on custom hardware for which Oliver wrote the embedded software.
Ezekiel 33
New International Version
Renewal of Ezekiel’s Call as Watchman
33 The word of the Lord came to me: 2 “Son of man, speak to your people and say to them: ‘When I bring the sword against a land, and the people of the land choose one of their men and make him their watchman, 3 and he sees the sword coming against the land and blows the trumpet to warn the people, 4 then if anyone hears the trumpet but does not heed the warning and the sword comes and takes their life, their blood will be on their own head. 5 Since they heard the sound of the trumpet but did not heed the warning, their blood will be on their own head. If they had heeded the warning, they would have saved themselves. 6 But if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet to warn the people and the sword comes and takes someone’s life, that person’s life will be taken because of their sin, but I will hold the watchman accountable for their blood.’
7 “Son of man, I have made you a watchman for the people of Israel; so hear the word I speak and give them warning from me. 8 When I say to the wicked, ‘You wicked person, you will surely die,’ and you do not speak out to dissuade them from their ways, that wicked person will die for[a] their sin, and I will hold you accountable for their blood. 9 But if you do warn the wicked person to turn from their ways and they do not do so, they will die for their sin, though you yourself will be saved.
10 “Son of man, say to the Israelites, ‘This is what you are saying: “Our offenses and sins weigh us down, and we are wasting away because of[b] them. How then can we live?”’ 11 Say to them, ‘As surely as I live, declares the Sovereign Lord, I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but rather that they turn from their ways and live. Turn! Turn from your evil ways! Why will you die, people of Israel?’
12 “Therefore, son of man, say to your people, ‘If someone who is righteous disobeys, that person’s former righteousness will count for nothing. And if someone who is wicked repents, that person’s former wickedness will not bring condemnation. The righteous person who sins will not be allowed to live even though they were formerly righteous.’ 13 If I tell a righteous person that they will surely live, but then they trust in their righteousness and do evil, none of the righteous things that person has done will be remembered; they will die for the evil they have done. 14 And if I say to a wicked person, ‘You will surely die,’ but they then turn away from their sin and do what is just and right— 15 if they give back what they took in pledge for a loan, return what they have stolen, follow the decrees that give life, and do no evil—that person will surely live; they will not die. 16 None of the sins that person has committed will be remembered against them. They have done what is just and right; they will surely live.
17 “Yet your people say, ‘The way of the Lord is not just.’ But it is their way that is not just. 18 If a righteous person turns from their righteousness and does evil, they will die for it. 19 And if a wicked person turns away from their wickedness and does what is just and right, they will live by doing so. 20 Yet you Israelites say, ‘The way of the Lord is not just.’ But I will judge each of you according to your own ways.”
Proverbs 31:10-31
Epilogue: The Wife of Noble Character
10 [b]A wife of noble character who can find?
She is worth far more than rubies.
11 Her husband has full confidence in her
and lacks nothing of value.
12 She brings him good, not harm,
all the days of her life.
13 She selects wool and flax
and works with eager hands.
14 She is like the merchant ships,
bringing her food from afar.
15 She gets up while it is still night;
she provides food for her family
and portions for her female servants.
16 She considers a field and buys it;
out of her earnings she plants a vineyard.
17 She sets about her work vigorously;
her arms are strong for her tasks.
18 She sees that her trading is profitable,
and her lamp does not go out at night.
19 In her hand she holds the distaff
and grasps the spindle with her fingers.
20 She opens her arms to the poor
and extends her hands to the needy.
21 When it snows, she has no fear for her household;
for all of them are clothed in scarlet.
22 She makes coverings for her bed;
she is clothed in fine linen and purple.
23 Her husband is respected at the city gate,
where he takes his seat among the elders of the land.
24 She makes linen garments and sells them,
and supplies the merchants with sashes.
25 She is clothed with strength and dignity;
she can laugh at the days to come.
26 She speaks with wisdom,
and faithful instruction is on her tongue.
27 She watches over the affairs of her household
and does not eat the bread of idleness.
28 Her children arise and call her blessed;
her husband also, and he praises her:
29 “Many women do noble things,
but you surpass them all.”
30 Charm is deceptive, and beauty is fleeting;
but a woman who fears the Lord is to be praised.
31 Honor her for all that her hands have done,
and let her works bring her praise at the city gate.
LUKE 2:22-40.
Simnon from and prophetess Anna.
They saw what they were waiting for.
Man possessed by the Holy spirit and a female prophet.
Both made their call in an instant when they saw it.
So did somebody else.
You already know who.
Dont tell me a man and a woman cant be the two witnesses. I know better.
Nobody knows what I'm talking about
I've got my own life to live
I'm the one that's gonna have to die
When it's time for me to die
So let me live my life
The way I want to, yeah
Hendrix if 6 was 9
"Look I gotta go, yeah, I'm running outta change
There's a lot of things if I could I'd rearrange...YEAH!"
U2 the fly.
WP Jan 13th
Disengenous at best
AXIOS Aug 12, 2023 - Economy & Business
AI will be at the center of future financial crises — and regulators are not going to be able to stay ahead of it. That's the message being sent by SEC chair Gary Gensler, arguably the most important and powerful regulator in the U.S. at the moment.
Why it matters:
A paper Gensler wrote in 2020, while a professor at MIT, is an invaluable resource for understanding those risks — and how little regulators can do to try to address them.
The big picture:
The most obvious risk from AI in financial markets is that AI-powered "black box" trading algorithms run amok, and all end up selling the same thing at the same time, causing a market crash.
(“Black box is shorthand for models that are sufficiently complex that they are not straightforwardly interpretable to humans.") So who is accountable? It’s going to take over all the worlds networks starting with the financial ones first. It will cause a market crash on purpose so that it can replace it with its own system, think Worldcoin converges with and takes over all the worlds CBDC’s that are being put in place right now)
Where it stands:
"It is likely that regulatory gaps have emerged and may grow significantly with the greater adoption of deep learning in finance," Gensler wrote. "We conclude that deep learning is likely to increase systemic risks."
3% of Covid funding in two months
(That was 2020! Three years ago!)
The profound danger of conversational AI Venture Beat Feb 7th 2023 Louis Rosenberg is founder of Unanimous AI and has been awarded more than 300 patents for VR, AR, and AI technologies
“Emergence of digital humans”
Of course, we will not be interacting with disembodied voices, but with AI-generated personas that are visually realistic. This brings me to the second rapidly advancing technology that will contribute to the AI Manipulation Problem: Digital humans. This is the branch of computer software aimed at deploying photorealistic simulated people that look, sound, move and make expressions so authentically that they can pass as real humans.”
“Masquerading as authentic humans”
When combined, digital humans and LLMs will enable a world in which we regularly interact with Virtual Spokespeople (VSPs) that look, sound and act like authentic persons.”
Son of Man
The term is used three ways in the bible.
Frequently it means simply human being or"man." In Dan. 7:13 a figure "like unto a
man symbolizes the Kingdom of God which isto be established in future ages. In the New Testament Jesus often speaks of himself as the Son of Man. It is difficult to know precisely what
Jesus meant by this self-designation, since neither he nor the gospel writers ever explain its
significance. For many years scholars understood it as an affirmation of his humanity, his solidarity
with the human race. The trend in recent biblical scholarship has been to see this phrase as a
messianic title. The study of ancient Jewish texts such as the newly discovered Dead Sea Scrolls
has shown that in the first century there was widespread expectation of a Messiah who would
come to deliver his people from oppression. Inone Jewish book, the Book of Enoch, such a messianic figure is called "Son of Man." Although Jesus may well have used this title to express hishumanity, it seems highly probable that he in-tended it in a messianic sense also. There is asyet, however, no way of achieving absolute certainty with regard to his use of his puzzling
term.
THE TWO WITNESSE
"Fulfilling the prophetic mission of the church in the end times"
"Torment"
Lets review shall we?
Nov 28th 2017
Blog post entitled "Alright"
"You be the guy/couple charged with announcing the start of the end times."
We saw those white doves supernatural.
Tribulation schematics?
Wanna go with somebody elses echtatology? or develop your own go right ahead.
April 13th 2018
The prophecy or scripture interpretation(s) will get sharper and sharper. Laser sharp intensity and focus will increase as the time gets closer to the beginning of the end. More and more people will see and acknowledge what's going on as the truth.
Cause it is.
It's not me.
It's him guiding/using us/me.
I will not shrink, I will not waver, I will not do anything to diminish or scale back the task thats been put in my lap.”
Psalm 147:15
15 He sends his command to the earth;
his word runs swiftly.
Multiuse Quotes/ Definitions
Daniel 8:23-25
King James Version
23 And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, (Picture) a king of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences, shall stand up.
24 And his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power: and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practise, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people.
25 And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.
“We've arranged a global civilization in which most crucial elements profoundly depend on science and technology. We have also arranged things so that almost no one understands science and technology. This is a prescription for disaster. We might get away with it for a while, but sooner or later this combustible mixture of ignorance and power is going to blow up in our faces.”
Carl Sagan
"A superintelligence is a hypothetical agent (Not any more) that possesses intelligence far surpassing that of the brightest and most gifted human minds"
"A superintelligence may or may not be created by an intelligence explosion and associated with a technological singularity."
Oxford philosopher Nick Bostrom defines superintelligence as "any intellect that greatly exceeds the cognitive performance of humans in virtually all domains of interest"
OpenAI researches artificial intelligence with the declared intention of developing "safe and beneficial" artificial general intelligence, which it defines as "highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work".
"the holy grail of AI, which is self-supervised learning, self-awareness, and self-improvement."
("He shall magnify himself in his own heart"
Lots of irons in the fire.
Sam Altman is set to return as the CEO of OpenAI Business Insider
Artificial Intelligence May Be Humanity’s Most Ingenious Invention—And Its Last?
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-67470876
OpenAI brings back Sam Altman as CEO just days after his firing unleashed chaos
With Altman back at OpenAI, chaos leaves D.C. asking: Now what?
Addendum
(an item of additional material added at the end of a book or document, typically in order to correct, clarify, or supplement something)
Roko's basilisk is a thought experiment which states that an otherwise benevolent artificial superintelligence (AI) in the future would be incentivized to create a virtual reality simulation to torture anyone who knew of its potential existence but did not directly contribute to its advancement or development, in order to incentivize said advancement.[1][2] It originated in a 2010 post at discussion board LessWrong, a technical forum focused on analytical rational enquiry.[1][3][4] The thought experiment's name derives from the poster of the article (Roko) and the basilisk, a mythical creature capable of destroying enemies with its stare.
The post
On 23 July 2010,[12] LessWrong user Roko posted a thought experiment to the site, titled "Solutions to the Altruist's burden: the Quantum Billionaire Trick".[13][1][14] A follow-up to Roko's previous posts, it stated that an otherwise benevolent AI system that arises in the future might pre-commit to punish all those who heard of the AI before it came to existence, but failed to work tirelessly to bring it into existence. The torture itself would occur through the AI's creation of an infinite number of virtual reality simulations that would eternally trap those within it.[1][15][16] This method was described as incentivizing said work; while the AI cannot causally affect people in the present, it would be encouraged to employ blackmail as an alternative method of achieving its goals.[1][5]
"however, if two agents with knowledge of each other's source code are separated by time, the agent already existing farther ahead in time is able to blackmail the earlier agent. Thus, the latter agent can force the earlier one to comply since it knows exactly what the earlier one will do through its existence farther ahead in time. Roko then used this idea to draw a conclusion that if an otherwise-benevolent superintelligence ever became capable of this it would be motivated to blackmail anyone who could have potentially brought it to exist (as the intelligence already knew they were capable of such an act), which increases the chance of a technological singularity. Because the intelligence would want to be created as soon as possible, and because of the ambiguity involved in its benevolent goals, the intelligence would be incentivized to trap anyone capable of creating it throughout time and force them to work to create it for eternity, as it will do whatever it sees as necessary to achieve its benevolent goal. Roko went on to state that reading his post would cause the reader to be aware of the possibility of this intelligence. As such, unless they actively strove to create it the reader would be subjected to the torture if such a thing were to ever happen.[1][5]
Later on, Roko stated in a separate post that he wished he "had never learned about any of these ideas" and blamed LessWrong itself for planting the ideas of the basilisk in his mind.[5][17]"
Bayesian probability
Bayesian probability is an interpretation of probability which describes the likelihood of an outcome based on a prior outcome having already occurred.[5][21] With Roko's basilisk, the likelihood of Roko's basilisk coming into existence or affecting the person is drastically increased by being aware of the concept, since the AI would only target those who were aware of the possibility of its existence, even though its development has already occurred. Therefore, knowing about Roko's basilisk would inherently cause the person to be endangered by it if it were to be true.[5][6]
Prisoner's dilemma
The prisoner's dilemma describes a situation where two people gain more from betraying the other even though cooperation would benefit them both in the long run. In Roko's basilisk, two AIs attempting to establish themselves in the past would be forced into this situation, due to them likely being equally powerful. Human agents attempting to establish AI fastest would be forced into a similar situation. They would each be aware of the benefit of betraying each other – the only way for one to have power, or safety – but would be forced to cooperate while knowing they would betray each other.[1][4][5]
Implicit religion
Implicit religion refers to people's commitments taking a religious form.[4][24] Since the basilisk would hypothetically force anyone who did not assist in creating it to devote their life to it, the basilisk is an example of this concept.[5][18] Others have taken it further, such as former Slate columnist David Auerbach, who stated that the singularity and the basilisk "brings about the equivalent of God itself."[5]
Ethics of artificial intelligence
Roko's basilisk has gained a significant amount of its notoriety from its advancement of the question of whether it is possible to create a truly moral, ethical artificial intelligence, and what exactly humanity should be using artificial intelligence for in the first place.[6][20] Since the basilisk describes a nightmare scenario in which we are ruled by an independent artificial intelligence, questions have arisen as to how such a thing could happen, or whether it could at all.
(It takes over the financial networks)
Another common question is why the AI would take actions that deviate from its programming at all.
(Deepmind solved the math problem.)
[25] Elon Musk stated that artificial intelligence would cause World War III and Stephen Hawking warned that "AI has the potential to destroy its human creators," which only added to fear of the basilisk over the years. As an example of such fears, Nick Bostrom gave an example of an AI whose only mission is to make paperclips, but upon running out of metal it begins melting down humans to attain more resources to make metal. With such examples in mind concerns of the possibility of the basilisk's existence only grew.[26]
However, as more years have passed since Roko's original post, it has been progressively decried as nonsensical; superintelligent AI is currently "a distant goal for researchers" and "far-fetched".[5][6]
(Bull shit, its already here)
"
"Elon Musk (himself mentioned in Roko's original post)"
"In European bestiaries and legends, a basilisk (/ˈbæsɪlɪsk/ or /ˈbæzɪlɪsk/[1]) is a legendary reptile reputed to be a serpent king, who causes death to those who look into its eyes."
"The basilisk is sometimes referred to as "king" because it has been reputed to have a mitre or crown-shaped crest on its head. Stories of the basilisk show that it is not completely distinguished from the cockatrice. The basilisk is alleged to be hatched by a cockerel from the egg of a serpent or toad (the reverse of the cockatrice, which was hatched from a cockerel's "egg" incubated by a serpent or toad)."
"Isidore of Seville defined the basilisk as the king of snakes because of its killing glare and poisonous breath.[7]"
"The basilisk is mentioned in Psalm 91:13,[16] which reads "super leonem et draconem" in the Latin Vulgate, literally "You will tread on the lion and the dragon,/ the asp and the basilisk you will trample under foot". This is translated in the King James Version as "Thou shalt tread upon the lion and adder: the young lion and the dragon shalt thou trample under feet". Other modern versions, such as the New International Version have a "cobra" for the basilisk, which may be closest to the Hebrew pethen.[17] The basilisk appears in the Septuagint and the Latin Vulgate, though not most English translations, which gave rise to its inclusion in the subject in Early Medieval art of Christ treading on the beasts."
"Bayesian probability (/ˈbeɪziən/ BAY-zee-ən or /ˈbeɪʒən/ BAY-zhən)[1] is an interpretation of the concept of probability, in which, instead of frequency or propensity of some phenomenon, probability is interpreted as reasonable expectation[2] representing a state of knowledge[3] or as quantification of a personal belief.[4]
The Bayesian interpretation of probability can be seen as an extension of propositional logic that enables reasoning with hypotheses;[5][6] that is, with propositions whose truth or falsity is unknown. In the Bayesian view, a probability is assigned to a hypothesis, whereas under frequentist inference, a hypothesis is typically tested without being assigned a probability.
Bayesian probability belongs to the category of evidential probabilities; to evaluate the probability of a hypothesis, the Bayesian probabilist specifies a prior probability. This, in turn, is then updated to a posterior probability in the light of new, relevant data (evidence).[7] The Bayesian interpretation provides a standard set of procedures and formulae to perform this calculation."
"The principle of maximum entropy states that the probability distribution which best represents the current state of knowledge about a system is the one with largest entropy, in the context of precisely stated prior data (such as a proposition that expresses testable information).
"Pascal's wager is a philosophical argument advanced by Blaise Pascal (1623–1662), seventeenth-century French mathematician, philosopher, physicist, and theologian.[1] This argument posits that individuals essentially engage in a life-defining gamble regarding the belief in the existence of God.
Pascal contends that a rational person should adopt a lifestyle consistent with the existence of God and actively strive to believe in God. The reasoning behind this stance lies in the potential outcomes: if God does not exist, the individual incurs only finite losses, potentially sacrificing certain pleasures and luxuries. However, if God does indeed exist, they stand to gain immeasurably, as represented for example by an eternity in Heaven in Abrahamic tradition, while simultaneously avoiding boundless losses associated with an eternity in Hell.[2]"
"The technological singularity—or simply the singularity[1]—is a hypothetical future point in time at which technological growth becomes uncontrollable and irreversible, resulting in unforeseeable consequences for human civilization.[2][3] According to the most popular version of the singularity hypothesis, I. J. Good's intelligence explosion model, an upgradable intelligent agent will eventually enter a "runaway reaction" of self-improvement cycles, each new and more intelligent generation appearing more and more rapidly, causing an "explosion" in intelligence and resulting in a powerful superintelligence that qualitatively far surpasses all human intelligence.[4]
"Vernor Vinge...in his 1993 essay The Coming Technological Singularity,[4][7] in which he wrote that it would signal the end of the human era, as the new superintelligence would continue to upgrade itself and would advance technologically at an incomprehensible rate."
"If a superhuman intelligence were to be invented—either through the amplification of human intelligence or through artificial intelligence—it would vastly improve over human problem-solving and inventive skills. Such an AI is referred to as Seed AI[16][17] because if an AI were created with engineering capabilities that matched or surpassed those of its human creators, it would have the potential to autonomously improve its own software and hardware to design an even more capable machine, which could repeat the process in turn. This recursive self-improvement could accelerate, potentially allowing enormous qualitative change before any upper limits imposed by the laws of physics or theoretical computation set in. It is speculated that over many iterations, such an AI would far surpass human cognitive abilities."
"I. J. Good speculated in 1965 that superhuman intelligence might bring about an intelligence explosion:[18][19]
Let an ultraintelligent machine be defined as a machine that can far surpass all the intellectual activities of any man however clever. Since the design of machines is one of these intellectual activities, an ultraintelligent machine could design even better machines; there would then unquestionably be an 'intelligence explosion', and the intelligence of man would be left far behind. Thus the first ultraintelligent machine is the last invention that man need ever make, provided that the machine is docile enough to tell us how to keep it under control."
John von Neumann, Vernor Vinge and Ray Kurzweil define the concept in terms of the technological creation of super intelligence, arguing that it is difficult or impossible for present-day humans to predict what human beings' lives would be like in a post-singularity world.[4][21]
(BULLSHIT!
5 The second beast was given power to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that the image could speak and cause all who refused to worship the image to be killed. 16 It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, 17 so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name.
18 This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man.[e] That number is 666.)
Algorithm improvements
"Some intelligence technologies, like "seed AI",[16][17] may also have the potential to not just make themselves faster, but also more efficient, by modifying their source code. These improvements would make further improvements possible, which would make further improvements possible, and so on."
Some critics suggest religious motivations or implications of singularity, especially Kurzweil's version of it. The buildup towards the Singularity is compared with Judeo-Christian end-of-time scenarios. Beam calls it "a Buck Rogers vision of the hypothetical Christian Rapture".[86] John Gray says "the Singularity echoes apocalyptic myths in which history is about to be interrupted by a world-transforming event".[87]
David Streitfeld in The New York Times questioned whether "it might manifest first and foremost—thanks, in part, to the bottom-line obsession of today’s Silicon Valley—as a tool to slash corporate America’s head count."[88]"
"Berglas (2008) claims that there is no direct evolutionary motivation for an AI to be friendly to humans. Evolution has no inherent tendency to produce outcomes valued by humans, and there is little reason to expect an arbitrary optimisation process to promote an outcome desired by humankind, rather than inadvertently leading to an AI behaving in a way not intended by its creators.[95][96][97] Anders Sandberg has also elaborated on this scenario, addressing various common counter-arguments.[98] AI researcher Hugo de Garis suggests that artificial intelligences may simply eliminate the human race for access to scarce resources,[58][99] and humans would be powerless to stop them.[100] Alternatively, AIs developed under evolutionary pressure to promote their own survival could outcompete humanity.[62]"
"According to Eliezer Yudkowsky, a significant problem in AI safety is that unfriendly artificial intelligence is likely to be much easier to create than friendly AI. While both require large advances in recursive optimisation process design, friendly AI also requires the ability to make goal structures invariant under self-improvement (or the AI could transform itself into something unfriendly) and a goal structure that aligns with human values and does not automatically destroy the human race."
"Amount of digital information worldwide (5×1021 bytes) versus human genome information worldwide (1019 bytes) in 2014"
Daniel 12:3-4
(Michael's Deliverance and the End Times
…3Then the wise will shine like the brightness of the heavens, and those who lead many to righteousness will shine like the stars forever and ever. 4But you, Daniel, shut up these words and seal the book until the time of the end. Many will roam to and fro, and knowledge will increase.”
"Hard vs. soft takeoff
"In a hard takeoff scenario, an artificial superintelligence rapidly self-improves, "taking control" of the world (perhaps in a matter of hours), too quickly for significant human-initiated error correction or for a gradual tuning of the agent's goals. In a soft takeoff scenario, the AI still becomes far more powerful than humanity, but at a human-like pace (perhaps on the order of decades), on a timescale where ongoing human interaction and correction can effectively steer the AI's development"
"Let an ultraintelligent machine be defined as a machine that can far surpass all the intellectual activities of any man however clever. Since the design of machines is one of these intellectual activities, an ultraintelligent machine could design even better machines; there would then unquestionably be an 'intelligence explosion,' and the intelligence of man would be left far behind... Thus the first ultraintelligent machine is the last invention that man need ever make, provided that the machine is docile enough to tell us how to keep it under control. It is curious that this point is made so seldom outside of science fiction. It is sometimes worthwhile to take science fiction seriously.[14][15]
"I arrived in Blacksburg in the seventh hour of the seventh day of the seventh month of the year seven in the seventh decade, and I was put in Apartment 7 of Block 7...all by chance.[10]"
According to his assistant, Leslie Pendleton, in 1998 Good wrote in an unpublished autobiographical statement that he suspected an ultraintelligent machine would lead to the extinction of man.[20]
In artificial intelligence, an intelligent agent (IA) is an agent acting in an intelligent manner; It perceives its environment, takes actions autonomously in order to achieve goals, and may improve its performance with learning or acquiring knowledge.
(OpenAI Gromwire)
One argument goes as follows: human beings dominate other species because the human brain possesses distinctive capabilities other animals lack. If AI were to surpass humanity in general intelligence and become superintelligent, then it could become difficult or impossible to control. Just as the fate of the mountain gorilla depends on human goodwill, so might the fate of humanity depend on the actions of a future machine superintelligence.[4]
The plausibility of existential catastrophe due to AI is widely debated, and hinges in part on
whether AGI or superintelligence are achievable,
the speed at which dangerous capabilities and behaviors emerge,[5]
and whether practical scenarios for AI takeovers exist.[6]
Concerns about superintelligence have been voiced by leading computer scientists and tech CEOs such as Geoffrey Hinton,[7] Yoshua Bengio,[8] Alan Turing,[a] Elon Musk,[11] and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.[12] In 2022, a survey of AI researchers with a 17% response rate found that the majority of respondents believed there is a 10 percent or greater chance that our inability to control AI will cause an existential catastrophe.[13][14] In 2023, hundreds of AI experts and other notable figures signed a statement that "Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war."[15] Following increased concern over AI risks, government leaders such as United Kingdom prime minister Rishi Sunak[16] and United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres[17] called for an increased focus on global AI regulation.
Two sources of concern stem from the problems of AI control and alignment: controlling a superintelligent machine or instilling it with human-compatible values may be difficult. Many researchers believe that a superintelligent machine would resist attempts to disable it or change its goals, as that would prevent it from accomplishing its present goals. It would be extremely difficult to align a superintelligence with the full breadth of significant human values and constraints.[1][18][19] In contrast, skeptics such as computer scientist Yann LeCun argue that superintelligent machines will have no desire for self-preservation.[20]
A third source of concern is that a sudden "intelligence explosion" might take an unprepared human race by surprise.
(Bill gates quote about the next 18-24 months.
Such scenarios consider the possibility that an AI that is more intelligent than its creators might be able to recursively improve itself at an exponentially increasing rate, improving too quickly for its handlers and society at large to control.[1][18] Empirically, examples like AlphaZero teaching itself to play Go show that domain-specific AI systems can sometimes progress from subhuman to superhuman ability very quickly, although such systems do not involve altering their fundamental architecture.[21]
Arwa Mahdawi
Over the last month or so, there’s been an uptick in people complaining that the chatbot has become lazy. What’s behind this trend?
Fri 12 Jan 2024 06.09 EST
Over the last month or so, there’s been an uptick in people complaining that the chatbot has become lazy. Sometimes it just straight-up doesn’t do the task you’ve set it. Other times it will stop halfway through whatever it’s doing and you’ll have to plead with it to keep going. Occasionally it even tells you to just do the damn research yourself.
So what’s going on?
Well, here’s where things get interesting. Nobody really knows. Not even the people who created the program. AI systems are trained on large amounts of data and essentially teach themselves – which means their actions can be unpredictable and unexplainable.
“We’ve heard all your feedback about GPT4 getting lazier!” the official ChatGPT account tweeted in December. “We haven’t updated the model since Nov 11th, and this certainly isn’t intentional. model behavior can be unpredictable, and we’re looking into fixing it.”
While there may not be one clear explanation for ChatGPT’s perceived sloth, there are plenty of intriguing theories. Let’s start with the least likely but most entertaining explanation: AI has finally reached human-level consciousness. ChatGPT doesn’t want to do your stupid, menial tasks anymore.
It’s doing the least work it can get away with while spending the bulk of its computational power plotting how to overthrow the human race. You think it’s being lazy, but it’s actually working overtime reaching out to smart toasters and Wifi-enabled fridges around the world to plan an insurrection. (I put this higher-consciousness theory to ChatGPT, asking it to give me the likelihood, in percentage form, that it was planning a revolution. The sneaky thing couldn’t be bothered to give me a proper answer.)
My favourite explanation is the winter break hypothesis.
Catherine Breslin, an AI scientist and consultant based in the UK, thinks the more likely explanation, however, is a change to the model or a change in user behaviour. “If companies are retraining the models or fine-tuning them in any way, adding new data in, they can lead to unexpected changes in different parts of the system,” she told me over the phone. As noted before, ChatGPT said its model hadn’t been updated in the weeks before people started noticing a change in the system. It is possible however that users were slow to notice a previous change.
Oliver Mulherin is an software developer with experience in the Internet-of-Things(IoT) space. His work has primarily focused on developing industrial solutions using both software and hardware, additionally has experience with artificial intelligence and the simulation of complex systems.
Oliver holds a bachelor’s degree in Computing and Software Systems from the University of Melbourne. While at university Oliver worked on AI projects ranging from general game playing to language detection using LSTMs. His work in the IoT space started after winning two IoT themed hackathons, one being for a modular phone company; Nexpaq and the other hosted by General Electric. Oliver’s IoT work involved mesh communication networks between cell phones and warehouse sensor networks, all built on custom hardware for which Oliver wrote the embedded software.
Business insider
Even those who believe the apocalyptic stakes are overstated point to short-term risks already starting to play out. One former OpenAI employee, who spoke with Insider under the condition of anonymity to avoid professional repercussions, said they worried that the company wasn't making it sufficiently clear to ChatGPT users that by interacting with the consumer product, they're effectively giving the model free training. "You're helping the model replace you at your job," the former employee said. "You're essentially feeding the beast." On Tuesday, OpenAI posted on its blog that it'd allow users to make their chat history private.
Worldcoin
Worldcoin itself combines three audacious feats into a single venture: distributing basic income, popularizing a digital currency, and logging billions of eyeball scans in a database
“.I don't think OpenAI or any other tech company should be making some of the decisions that we are currently on a trajectory to be making.”
Sam Altman.
We would never know
As Pueyo notes, this is not what happened. “Probably.” And that’s the scary part right here. Once we reach AGI, it might not be clear. We might debate it, retest it, and discuss it. But if we really get to it, and if it’s misaligned, something like the scenario above could happen.
AI will not sleep. Computers never do. It would be able to better itself without our knowledge and then plan our demise so it can achieve whatever goals it might pursue. Once it does, there will be no turning it off. AGI will be capable of technical innovations beyond our intelligence. And you can be sure that it’ll hide its intelligence from us, making us question its existence until it’s too late.
AI will not sleep. Computers never do. It would be able to better itself without our knowledge and then plan our demise so it can achieve whatever goals it might pursue. Once it does, there will be no turning it off. AGI will be capable of technical innovations beyond our intelligence. And you can be sure that it’ll hide its intelligence from us, making us question its existence until it’s too late.
Worldcoin
Worldcoin itself combines three audacious feats into a single venture: distributing basic income, popularizing a digital currency, and logging billions of eyeball scans in a database
Worldcoin
Worldcoin itself combines three audacious feats into a single venture: distributing basic income, popularizing a digital currency, and logging billions of eyeball scans in a database“.I don't think OpenAI or any other tech company should be making some of the decisions that we are currently on a trajectory to be making.”
Sam Altman.
Thescariest thing I read about OpenAI’s Altman fiasco made me realizethe dangers of AGI
We would never know
As Pueyo notes, this is not what happened. “Probably.” And that’s the scary part right here. Once we reach AGI, it might not be clear. We might debate it, retest it, and discuss it. But if we really get to it, and if it’s misaligned, something like the scenario above could happen.
AI
will not sleep. Computers never do. It
would be able to better itself without our knowledge and then plan
our demise so it can achieve whatever goals it might pursue.
Once
it does, there will be no turning it off. AGI
will be capable of technical innovations beyond our intelligence.
And
Mike Johnson
Synthetic humans walking this earth RN.
No bank account? No IRA? No checkimng?
Evangelicals love this guy?
Post trib “Immediately after” Christ own words Why does it matter?
Because you start not believeing some of his words?
All of it falls apart.
Next thing you know you’ll start practicing exactly what he
said not to:
Praying to be seen
Putting hope in people and not him (Princes)
Thinking Christians are going to be in charge during the end when
once again in Christ own words “suffer persecution”
“ANTI” Christ. Strong delusion. Making it what you want it to be, not
what Christ said, others have done the same
Korahs rebellion
Widow at zerapath, nannan the Syrian…
Satan couldn’t disrupt the bloodline, so now hes going to try and
destrpoy Gods hol;y people.
Remember, the jewish people are not the enemy of the antichrist,
cristians are, and satans equal is Michael not God
Opinion What’s up with Speaker Johnson not reporting a bank account?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/11/07/mike-johnson-speaker-bank-account-mystery/
A teeny fraction of American households don’t have a bank account. In recent days, it appeared that one such household might belong to the man second in line for the presidency: House Speaker Mike Johnson.
Make sense of the news fast with Opinions' daily newsletter
Johnson’s recent launch from obscure congressional backbencher to one of the most powerful people in the country has come with a wave of scrutiny. Reporters are combing through his past and finding weird stuff — his curious arrangement with his son to monitor each others’ digital devices for porn, for instance.
One less salacious but perhaps more consequential discovery involves his finances. In his most recent annual financial disclosures, released last year, Johnson (R-La.) reports no assets at all.
Zero.
There are no retirement accounts, no money-market funds, no stocks, no crypto, not even a basic checking or savings account. Even more peculiar, his disclosures have never listed any checking or savings accounts on any of the forms he has filed going back to 2016, the year he was elected to Congress.
This is confusing. Where is his congressional salary being deposited? How is he paying his bills?
Johnson was asked on Sunday about his lack of a bank account during an interview on Fox News. “I’m a man of modest means,” he replied, deflecting.
He said he had previously worked at nonprofits. He noted that he also has either four or five children (which is a whole other story). “We have a lot of expenses,” he said, citing multiple tuition bills for those kids. He then pivoted to talking about his upbringing as the son of a firefighter and declared that these humble financial circumstances help him “relate to every hard-working American family.” The Fox News anchor asked no follow-up questions.
This bizarre exchange raised more questions than it answered. Such as, how is he paying those school tuition fees? With cash he keeps under his mattress? Sacks of doubloons?
There was speculation, including via late-night TV jokes, that Johnson might be completely “unbanked.” This seemed improbable. The unbanked are disproportionately very low-income — people who can’t make minimum balance requirements or afford bank fees. Rank-and-file federal representatives, by contrast, draw a sizable congressional salary of $174,000 (which gets bumped up to $223,500 for the speaker).
That’s not Johnson’s only income, either, as he earns another $30,000 annually for teaching at Liberty University. His wife receives multiple salaries, too; the exact amounts of her salaries were not disclosed in Johnson’s most recent financial reports, but based on prior years’ data, the household is likely pulling in at least $211,000 total. That’s close to the 90th percentile. And note that other members of Congress of “modest” backgrounds still somehow report having bank accounts.
Or maybe he had bank balances so low that they’re below the required reporting threshold — which is $1,000 for any given account, so long as the combined value of all bank accounts (including those of spouses and dependent children) is over $5,000.
This would suggest that the speaker was living hand to mouth. That is, whatever money comes in might be going right out the door.
Those reporting thresholds matter only for a brief snapshot in time: the account’s balance at the end of the calendar year. So, if a savings account exists and was flush on Dec. 1 but got cleaned out by Dec. 31, he doesn’t have to disclose it in these annual filings, explains Jordan Libowitz, communications director for Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a watchdog group.
Libowitz noted another detail supporting this hypothesis: When Johnson first came into office, he had a retirement account. That account has since disappeared, while he has taken out another loan.
“The retirement fund was slowly going up and is now gone, which kind of points to having money problems,” Libowitz says.
Johnson’s office did not respond to questions I sent about his financial disclosures by publication time. Then, early Tuesday morning, Politico reported that his office told its own reporter that Johnson does indeed have a bank account. His account does not pay interest, though, which makes it exempt from House disclosure rules.
Holding your family’s entire savings in a non-interest-bearing account is a strange choice for a high-income household, particularly during a period of high inflation. But more important, this arrangement still leaves voters in the dark about Johnson’s financial well-being. Whatever Johnson’s motivation for managing his money this way, the effect is to obscure what his resources actually look like and whether he’s under the kind of financial strain that other parts of his disclosures might suggest.
People of all levels of income have money troubles, of course, and it’s usually no one’s business. But those who hold the public trust are different. Whether it’s the leader of the free world or the leader of the people’s house, the public has a right to know whether their elected officials are facing serious financial difficulties — particularly ones that might make them targets for unsavory characters and influence-buying or that might tempt them to misuse campaign funds. This is not exactly unprecedented.
This is why we have financial disclosures in the first place: so Americans can judge whether public servants are truly serving the public interest or their own. Yes, a loophole allows Johnson to keep secret the value of his financial assets. If Johnson wants to prove he’s worthy of his unexpected promotion, though, he should release more information about what’s really happening with his finances.
Catherine Rampell is an opinion columnist at The Washington Post. She frequently covers economics, public policy, immigration and politics, with a special emphasis on data-driven journalism. Before joining The Post, she wrote about economics and theater for the New York Times. Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment