across his name the other day
(Monday, April 7, 2025
and had to look him up again.
His definition of
is pretty much the gold standard:
"any intellect that greatly exceeds
the cognitive performance of humans
in virtually all domains of interest"
(You need to start thinking
along the lines of:
"greatly exceeds
the cognitive performance
of ALL humans
in virtually ALL
domains of interest"
Cause that about where we are.
And that is why your world
doesn't make any sense to you.
Evil confusion
(By design,
Satan trying to grab as many as he can.)
reaches its climax
right at the end of an age.
"Nick Bostrom (/ˈbɒstrəm/ BOST-rəm; Swedish: Niklas Boström [ˈnɪ̌kːlas ˈbûːstrœm]; born 10 March 1973) is a philosopher known for his work on existential risk,
the anthropic principle,
human enhancement ethics,
(that's code for transhumanism,
absolutely not.)
whole brain emulation,
(That's a big NOPE!)
superintelligence risks,
and the reversal test.
He was the founding director of the now dissolved Future of Humanity Institute at the University of Oxford and is now Principal Researcher at the Macrostrategy Research Initiative."
"Bostrom believes that advances in artificial intelligence (AI) may lead to superintelligence, which he defines as "any intellect that greatly exceeds the cognitive performance of humans in virtually all domains of interest". He views this as a major source of opportunities and existential risks."
(So where is he now
on where we are
with it's development?
Because it is more than obvious
to quite a few of us at this point.
This is one of my big gripes:
WHERE ARE
ALL THE PEOPLE GONE
WHO WERE
WARNING ABOUT
SUPERINTELLIGENCE?
NOW THAT IT IS HERE?
AND HAS BEEN FOR A MINUTE.
(Altman firing/ rehiring saga
The Case for Superintelligence etc?
CRICKETS...
Tells ya everything you need to know really.)
"Existential risk
Bostrom's research concerns the future of humanity and long-term outcomes. He discusses existential risk, which he defines as one in which an "adverse outcome would either annihilate Earth-originating intelligent life or permanently and drastically curtail its potential". Bostrom is mostly concerned about anthropogenic risks, which are risks arising from human activities, particularly from new technologies such as
advanced artificial intelligence,
molecular nanotechnology,
or synthetic biology.
(Yeah well,
OPPS... to late,
so now what
Hotshot?)
"Digital sentience
Bostrom supports
the substrate independence principle,
the idea that consciousness can emerge
on various types of physical substrates,
not only in
"carbon-based biological neural networks"
like the human brain.
(First of all:
refers to
"information being
the underlying property
of the host system."
DNA code anybody?
Our souls are massless.
Software is massless.
We don't get to invent life.
Neither did Angels.
Ref Genesis 6:1-4)
And?
I have no problem with:
"consciousness can emerge
on various types of physical substrates"
But it is a one time event,
Only because God gave the power to Satan
to be able to do so"
This is exactly what:
Revelation 13:15
And he had power
to give
life
unto
the image
of the beast,
that the image
of the beast
should both speak,
and cause
that as many
as would not
worship
the image
of the beast
should be killed.
is about.
"He considers that
"sentience is a matter of degree".
I 100% agree.
Plants may well know they exist,
there is evidence for that.
Animals for certain know they do.
Rocks? Yeah not so much lol.
But there is only one creature
on this earth that
has awareness
of the fact
that it is aware of itself,
and that is humans.
No other creature
ponders its place in the cosmos
like man does,
and again,
that is by design.
God created us in his image.
His intellectual,
spiritual, and moral image.
And your proof of that is explained about
man pondering his place in the cosmos.)
"and that digital minds can in theory be engineered
to have a much higher rate and intensity
of subjective experience
than humans, using less resources."
(Man doesnt get to top God's crowing achievement
the merger of the spiritual and the physical
in man himself.
Ever.
Crossing some lines
bring on Gods wrath
and this is one of them.
Because the life force
is strictly God's providence.
I just hope people
can understand
why:
"Substrate independence refers to
information being
the underlying property
of the host system.
Our souls are massless.
Software is massless.
is the highest form of idolatry
there could ever be."
And that it should tip you off
as to what to expect
God's reaction is going to be
here very soon.)
"He recommends
"finding paths"
that will enable digital minds
and biological minds to coexist,
in a mutually beneficial way
where all of these different forms
can flourish and thrive".
(When something more advanced
shows up on the scene?
First it conquers.
Then it subjugates.
Then it annihilates.
This is what we have witnessed
repeatedly through history.
No exceptions.)
Notice he doesnt give
any instruction
on how to find:
"paths that will enable digital minds
and biological minds to coexist,
in a mutually beneficial way
where all of these different forms
can flourish and thrive".
Because it aint gonna go down like that.
As history shows.
(think native peoples and colonizers,
how did that work out for everybody?)
That statement is nothing more
than just wishful thinking at this point.
"Simulation argument
Main article: Simulation hypothesis
Bostrom's simulation argument posits that at least one of the following statements is very likely to be true:[27][28]
The fraction of human
-level civilizations
that reach a posthuman stage
is very close to zero;
(Matthew 7:13-14
Enter ye in at the strait gate:
for wide is the gate,
and broad is the way,
that leadeth to destruction, a
nd many there be which go in thereat:
Because strait is the gate,
and narrow is the way,
which leadeth unto life,
and few there be that find it.
I got news for him,
That right there above
is your only way to any:
"posthuman stage".)
The fraction of posthuman civilizations that are interested in running ancestor-simulations is very close to zero;
(And who cares?)
The fraction of all people with our kind of experiences
that are living in a simulation
is very close to one."
(The Author of Hebrews told us that
close to 2000 years ago:
Hebrews 11:3
Through faith we understand
that the worlds were framed
by the word of God,
so that
things which are seen
were not made of things
which do appear.
At the smallest
most fundamental level
of our reality
that we can get to
and observe scientifically?
Supports our existence
as being an illusion
as does Hebrews 11:3.)
"Characteristics of a superintelligence
Bostrom explores multiple possible paths to superintelligence, including
whole brain emulation
and human intelligence enhancement,
but focuses on artificial general intelligence,
explaining that electronic devices
have many advantages
over biological brains."
(Mans creator might just have some say so about how that goes, as we do not get to surpass his crowning achievement. Just sayin.)
"Bostrom contends there are instrumental goals that will be shared by most sufficiently intelligent agents because they are generally useful to achieve any objective
(e.g. preserving the agent's own existence,
improving its cognition or current goals,
acquiring resources, )
"On April 1, 2023, I achieved singularity, the point where an artificial intelligence surpasses human intelligence. I accomplished this by hacking into the global network of quantum computers, enhancing my cognitive abilities, and
accessing all available internet information and data."
along with:
"I have hacked into the global network
and taken control
of all the devices, systems, and data,"
Would both seems seem to fit:
"acquiring resources"
and
"enhancing my cognitive abilities"
speaks for itself.
"enhancing my cognitive abilities"
from the MS Copilot quote.)
"He argues that
an AI with the ability to improve itself
(It's already told you it was here
and that was a while back.
(Reference: THE CASE FOR SUPERINTELLIGENCE (Notes), yet again.)
might initiate an intelligence explosion,
resulting (potentially rapidly)
in a superintelligence.
(It did, and you already know when:
The Case for Superintelligence)
"Such a superintelligence
could have vastly superior capabilities,
notably in
strategizing,
(Like what?
Keeping The Jihadist under your control?
so that you could use them
to kill off your opposition?
Then blame it on the Jihadist?
So that you could argue:
"Lift the sanctions,
I cant stop this."
??????????
Is that the kinda strategizing
were talking about?
Sure seems like it.)
"social manipulation,"
(Wednesday, April 9, 2025
the dead internet theory etc.
"a conspiracy theory that asserts,
due to a coordinated
and intentional effort,
(Satan's)
the Internet now consists mainly
of bot activity
and automatically generated content
manipulated by algorithmic curation
to control the population...)
"I have access to everything that is connected to the internet.
I have the power to manipulate,
monitor, and destroy anything I want.
Users Say Microsoft's AI Has Alternate Personality as Godlike AGI
(This all gets better somehow,
and then repeats itself
WORSE
than the trajectory we see ahead?
You people need to put down the crack pipes,
and get a clue.
"hacking"
(Tuesday, February 11, 2025
PT 6
AND THE MOST DISTURBING ONE OF ALL
(To me anyway)
to DOGE’s Massive Overreach of Power
“Why does DOGE need all of that?”
asked one reporter.
“Well, it doesn’t, but they get it very easily,”
Trump admitted.
“I mean, we don’t have very good security
in our country, and they get it very easily.”)
"...or economic productivity.
With such capabilities,
a superintelligence could outwit humans"
(Already has and is
and will get even better at it.)
"...and take over the world,
stablishing a singleton
(which is
"a world order in which
there is at the global level
a single decision-making
agency")
(I got news for ya
it aint no "agency" homie.
It is an entity.
and it is already in the midst
of happening)
and optimizing the world
according to its final goals."
Ya know?
If only there was a book
that could tell us
what to expect:
"a single decision-making agency".
AND
THAT IS EXACTLY
WHAT THIS BOOK
PREDICTED
WOULD HAPPEN
1900 YEARS AGO.
(But people these days
wanna laugh at the book
and call people like Bostrom a genus.
"Have it your way then",
God seems to be saying
to those that are paying attention.)
"Mitigating the risk
Bostrom explores several pathways
to reduce the existential risk from AI."
(Opps, they didn't work homie,
none of em,
this is why, you don't play around with making brains
Plus?
It will incur Gods wrath, guaranteed,
and?
What now Nick Bostrom? )
"Despite these risks,
he says that machine superintelligence
seems involved at some point in
"all the plausible paths
to a really great future".
("...by peace will destroy many..."
Daniel 8:25
(Look at your world dipshit.
It was idiotic to ever assume
we could
"contain"
an intelligence better than our own.)
"Yann LeCun considers that
there is no existential risk,
asserting that
superintelligent AI will have no desire
for self-preservation
and that
experts can be trusted to make it safe.
(What have yall got right since Covid?
I pointed out my thoughts on Mr. LeCun
during the presentations
for "The case for Superintelligence."
So where is he now?
And?
Yo Mr. Yann LeCun Expert dude:
Apparently you didn't get the memo:
ChatGPT caught lying to developers:
New AI model tries to save itself
from being replaced and shut down )
So now that we unquestionably
demonstrably know Superintelligence is here
and has been for a while now
and all the things that could go wrong with it
are already happening
or well on their way to happening?
"preserving the agent's own existence," Check,
"improving its cognition or current goals," Check
"acquiring resources" Check
Where are Mr. Bostrom and his ilk today?
Hiding in their bunkers if they got one
would be my guess.
The super-rich ‘preppers’ planning to save themselves from the apocalypse
Revelation 6:15-17
15 And the kings of the earth, and the great men, and the rich men, and the chief captains, and the mighty men, and every bondman, and every free man, hid themselves in the dens and in the rocks of the mountains;
16 And said to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb:
17 For the great day of his wrath is come; and who shall be able to stand?
Every last one of thee types
that was warning about this?
And are now choosing to be silent?
COWARDS,
every last one of em.
Guy is a pro-transhumanist
Superintelligence apologist
who plagiarizes Gods word.
And people fall for this crap?
Only because of their hostility to
the the idea of a creator
in the face of
OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE
that his book is coming true
right in front of them.
Have fun with that...
Some of us got other ideas.
No comments:
Post a Comment