US aircraft carriers should now leave the Middle East
the Hill 07/04/25
aint the point
we are gonna consider.
"Although the seven...bombers...that hit Iranian nuclear facilities received the most media attention, they were accompanied by an additional 120 aircraft. These included F-35 and F-22 stealth fighters, as well as refueling tankers and various intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft. Submarines also launched Tomahawk cruise missiles at Iranian targets as part of what was termed “Operation Midnight Hammer.”
"All the while,
the Navy had
operating in the region,
with SM-3 interceptors
(That we are rapidly running out of
and are gonna need in large quantities
in the Indo-Pacific
here shortly.)
'...that
were critical elements
in Israel’s defense
against incoming Iranian ballistic missiles.
The Navy had two aircraft carriers operating in the region, with a third deploying to Europe that could also be redirected to the Middle East. Carrier-based F-35Cs provided air superiority and also acted as decoys in the strike on Iran."
SO ALL OF THAT
HIGH TECH FIREPOWER
IN THE AREA?
And the Irainain missiles
that hit Mossad planning HQ
and
Israel Army Intelligence HQ
at Herzliya
got past:
5 US Aegis ships,
A US THADD battery
deployed to Israel
And Israels:
as well as
Israels
and
air defense systems.
And you wonder?
WHY
we are being sold
a fairytale
about B2's
flying half way around the world
carrying 20,000lbs more ordinance
than they are capable of?
(Systems are crumbling – but daily life continues.
“the final pantomime product”
of the US government,
indeed:
Where is the blood?
And hey
Rep Clay Higgins
Just wondering...
I repeat:
“the final pantomime product”
of the US government,
indeed:
No comments:
Post a Comment