So this is the third and conclusion
of a three part series that started with:
Friday, July 18, 2025
3I/ATLAS, (obviously a continuing series, Gizmodo, bias in reporting, etc...)
and then continued with:
Friday, July 18, 2025
3I/ATLAS, (obviously a continuing series, Scientific American, etc...)
Don't laugh at the title of the headline.
Just read the informtion that's presented.
I find it very indicative of the age we are living in
that the most detailed, scientific information about 3I/ATLAS
is contained in an article with such a tabloidish headline.
There has been a steady progression
of seriousness and scholarship
through the three pieces contained in this series
and it concludes here.
I encourage you to read
and draw your own conclusions.
Enjoy.
Is the Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Alien Technology?
Avi Loeb
Medium 7/17/25
One of the comments on a different article said of Avi:
"He sees aliens wherever he looks."
Which is pretty good really, and funny,
and pretty fair TBH.
But if you just replace his:
"Aliens, Alien Technology,
Ancient Alien Civilizations"
with: Uncreated Creator, Angels and the Supernatural?
(Existing outside the known laws of nature)
his conclusions are 100% spot on
he just gets the source wrong.
Which is still a lot closer
to the truth
than most others
in his profession are getting.
So somebody please tell Avi:
In order for their to be ANY life
anywhere else in the universe?
Life here has to be an accident.
It was not.
And that is provable.
Three billion character codes
(DNA)
do not:
evolve, self create or self assemble.
Codes take sequence and logic
and are therefore
the opposite of random processes
and evidence(S) of an intellect.
(Everything that has ever processed oxygen to exist (live)
on this earth has had a code, DNA)
Molecular Biologist
(Avi isn't one and neither am I BTW)
have conceded
there are no:
Chemical, Biological, or Physical processes
that generate enough NEW information
to create new life.
Period end of story.
Thanks for coming
drive home safely etc.
Its not even close to debatable.
I don't care who you are.
Truth dont care what you think.
AND HERE IS WHAT
THE SOCIETAL PREIST
OF OUR TIME
WILL COME BACK WITH:
(Call it strawman watever,
its the truth
I've just seen it to many times.)
"Well, life could have developed somewhere else
in the universe differently than it did here."
(They will say that, even knowing, that all the natural laws are the all the same, everywhere in the universe. Same with information it never creates itself.)
So at that point?
At that point right there?
They cease being scientist
and become practitioners of the
FAITH-BASED
belief system
of scientism.
They are violating
scientifically based
Bayesian probablities
to which they supposedly
subscribe to.
They are putting their hope and faith
in something they can not prove,
and there is zero evidence for.
Zero.
(Codes are a sign of an intellect.
We got evidence.
You dont.)
And?
If they wanted?
Funny how none of em dont BTW.
They could start by explaining UAP first
before moving on to:
"life could have developed somewhere else
differently than it did here"
as many individuals have now seen those (UAP)
up close and personal,
right here on earth.
It just seems like it would be
a lot more easier row to hoe so to speak
So anyways(s) :-),
somebody please inform
Avi of that.
Now to the article:
"One of the solutions to Enrico Fermi’s question about extraterrestrials: “where is everybody?” is offered by the dark forest hypothesis, popularized by Cixin Liu’s science fiction novel “The Dark Forest.” This hypothesis proposes that our cosmic neighborhood is dangerous, filled with intelligent civilizations that are hostile and silent to avoid detection by potential predators. In this context, the silence in searches for radio signals by the SETI community is not caused by the lack of extraterrestrial intelligent civilizations, but is instead a consequence of them fearing mutual destruction."
(See comment above about why life here
can not be an accident.
All of that is just complete bunk
and therefore irrelevant.
And?
My Hypothesis would be:
Those "extraterrestrial intelligent civilizations"
invented an intelligence smarter than themselves
and got wiped out by it,
just like we are about to be.
Ask yourself
which scenario seems more likely?)
"Our paper explores the possibility that the recently discovered interstellar object, 3I/ATLAS, may provide evidence in support of the dark forest hypothesis.
This new interstellar interloper
has displayed a number of
anomalous characteristics,
some of which were summarized in an essay
that I wrote shortly after its discovery.
(To many anomalies
=
Not a coincidence.
Reference yesterdays:
Friday, July 18, 2025
3I/ATLAS, (obviously a continuing series,
Scientific American, etc...)
(Thats two
"By Chance(s)" in this article.
As the number of
"By Chance(s)" increases?
The likelihood of those things being
"By Chance"
decreases.
Read it again.
More on this in the next piece.)
Back to Avi's article:)
"In particular:
1. The retrograde orbital plane (defined by the orbital angular momentum vector) of 3I/ATLAS around the Sun lies within 5 degrees of that of Earth — the so-called ecliptic plane.
The likelihood for that coincidence
out of all random orientations is 0.2%.
(Translation:Our interstellar visitor
is coming into the inner solar system
within 5 degrees
of the same plane
as the earth orbits the sun.
Mars ecliptic plane
is within 2 degrees of the earths.
(Inclined, raised)
)
2. As I showed in a recent paper, the brightness of 3I/ATLAS implies an object that is ~20 kilometers in diameter (for a typical albedo of ~5%), too large for an interstellar asteroid. We should have detected a million objects below the ~100-meters scale of the first reported interstellar object 1I/`Oumuamua for each ~20-kilometer object.
3. No spectral features of cometary gas are found in spectroscopic observations of 3I/ATLAS. The detected reddening of reflected sunlight could originate from the surface of the object. Related data can be found here and here. The fuzz observed around 3I/ATLAS (see images here, here and here) is inconclusive given the motion of the object and the inevitable smearing of its image over the exposure time.
4. For its orbital parameters, 3I/ATLAS is synchronized to approach unusually close to Venus (0.65au where 1au is the Earth-Sun separation), Mars (0.19au) and Jupiter (0.36au),
with a cumulative probability
of 0.005%
relative to orbits with the same orbital parameters
but a random arrival time.
(Okay, Avi, I love ya my brother and this is good stuff
but you don't get to quote the statistical probabilities here
and then ignore them where you don't like em.
"Well, life could have developed somewhere else
in the universe differently than it did here."
I just dont like preachers who cherry pick what they want .
All in or all out, same here with this.
You dont get to quote the statistical probabilities here where you like em, and then ignore em where ya dont.
And that is all besides the point lol.
Which is:
The likelihood that 3I/ATLAS has these particular orbital
parameters, coming that close to Venus, Jupiter and Mars
is a cumulative probability of 0.005%.
To put it
just as bluntly as I can
This thing simply
can not be a chance.
Lets take our first miniscule probability about 3I?ATLAS entering the inner solar system within 5 degrees of the earths ecliptic plane of .02 and lets times that by the cumulative probability of passing by Venus Jupitar and Mars as close as it will of .005 and
you end up with a .0001 chance
this object is a random chance.
A 1 in 10,000 chance
3I/ATLAS an accident.
(and that's just based on those two anomalies alone there are others.)
So are you gonna bet the farm on that?
Cause I sure aint.
If its not a comet?
And it isn't acting like one,
and it shouldn't even exist.
Combine all that with:
extraterrestials cant exist
and one is left to ponder:
What is it?
What could have designed it?
And all you have to do
is look at your world
where evil confusion
is running amuck
to be able to figure that out.
Tribulation time is here.
Judgement has been decreed.
God is sick of humanities stupid shit.
He is about to show you who is boss.
It's his creation,
he'll do
whatever he wants with it.
I have heard
He exist outside of the laws of nature.
If he wants to create something
outside of those laws
to serve his purpose?
Then he will.)
5. 3I/ATLAS achieves perihelion on the opposite side of the Sun relative to Earth. This could be intentional to avoid detailed observations from Earth-based telescopes when the object is brightest ...
(I told honey that was exactly the case
days before I ever read this.
That is simply not an accident,
that we wont see this object
at it's brightest.
Combine that fact
with the probabilities listed above
and what do you get?
IT'S NOT AN ACCIDENT.
ALIENS CANT EXIST.
GOD DOES,
AND HE IS PISSED.
Been saying for a while now that trying to surpass his crowning achievement of the merging of the spiritual and the physical in mankind's brains and minds with a different form of intelligence that isn't supposed to be here (AI) was going to result in cataclysmic judgement just like the last time we had a lifeform that wasnt supposed to be here did.
"The retrograde trajectory at a perihelion speed of 68 kilometers per second, opposite to the direction of motion of the Earth around the Sun at 30 kilometers per second, makes the velocity difference between Earth and 3I/ATLAS 98 kilometers per second. It is therefore impractical for earthlings to land on 3I/ATLAS at closest approach by boarding chemical rockets, since our best rockets reach at most a third of that speed."
(To many coincidences
just isnt a coincidence.
Figure it out.)
"Our paper is contingent on a remarkable but testable hypothesis
that 3I/ATLAS is a functioning technological artifact,
to which I and my two co-authors do not necessarily ascribe.
Yet, this hypothesis is worthy of a scientific analysis for two reasons:
(Avi?As explained above
Alien's cant exist,
so you can throw that option right
out the window.)
"1. The consequences,
should the hypothesis turn out to be correct,
could potentially be dire for humanity,
and would possibly require defensive measures to be undertaken
(though these might prove futile)."
(He is getting everything correct
except the source
that is responsible for this object.)
2. The hypothesis is an interesting exercise in its own right,
and is fun to explore, irrespective of its likely validity.
(Yawn, watever dude.)
"Given its interstellar speed of 60 kilometers per second,
3I/ATLAS entered the outer boundary of the Solar System
(at 100,000 times the Earth-Sun separation)
about 8,000 years ago.
(Im sorry
wat does 8 symbolize
in the bible again?
A NEW BEGINING.
How awesome is our God
to have known 8000 years ago
to send this object
for our times now?
OMNIPOTENT
om·nip·o·tent
/ämˈnipədənt/
adjective
(of a deity)
having unlimited power;
able to do anything.
Kinda goes right along with
making pieces of space rock
that just shouldn't exist.
Just sayin.)
"If the hypothesis about
a technological artifact
ends up being correct,
(It cant be, see above about
life here wasnt an accident etc.)
"then there are two possible implications:
first that the intentions of 3I/ATLAS
are entirely benign,
and second that they are malign."
(I got a severe problem
with the logic involved here.
If it is designed
with such precision?
(And it obviously is
given the probabilities
surrounding its anomalies.)
"But was designed to be malign?"
Why would an ancient alien civilization
purposely design it to miss us?
But come so close to Mars?
GOD IS SENDING YOU A WARNING.
I'D HEED IT IF I WAS YOU.
DID I MENTION I KNEW WHERE ME AND HONEY WERE GOING FIVE YEARS AGO AND WHY THAT WAS?
God has a way
of turning humanity
back toward him.
Oh yes he does.
If he has to take drastic measures to get your attention? Then that is what he will do.)
"In the first case, humanity need not do anything but await the arrival of this interstellar messenger with open arms. It is the second option which is of great concern."
(The gravitational forces of the sun and mars at roughly the same time (within 27 days of each other) when 3I/Atlas is hidden behind the sun don't have a chance at all of fragmenting this thing? Or weakening it to the point it does so later?
And it just happens to have come in
on the earths ecliptic plane?
(- 5 degrees)
To fast, to bright, to big?
I just know to much about this particular subject area to ascribe to that view, no matter what any "expert" in the field says. Hell they dont even know simple biology most of em apparently, blaming everything on aliens etc. "Anything but God" seems to be the religion of the day.)
"Given the dramatic implications of the second possibility, we can apply the logic of Pascal’s wager that suggested it is more rational to believe in God’s existence than not. The insight offered by the mathematician Blaise Pascal was that the potential benefits of believing (in our case — alerting humanity to the existential risk from 3I/ATLAS) far outweigh the potential losses (in our case — a theoretical idea that does not describe reality), while the potential losses
of not believing
are far greater
than the potential benefits."
(Interesting to me that he inserted that right there.
I got a feeling I know why that is :-).
"By far, the most likely outcome will be that 3I/ATLAS is a completely natural interstellar object, probably a comet, and we await the astronomical data to support this likely origin."
(That is just not the way
our world is working
post-Covid
condition our world is in proves it.
Was this:
"the most likely outcome" ??????????
Russia wasnt going to invade Ukraine either remember?
Israel and the US weren't gonna bomb Irans nuclear sites either.
Masked men in the USA are snatching innocent people off the streets and hauling them off in unmarked cars.
and has to be disposed of
while the children it was intended for starve...
You could just go on and on for days if you wanted.
So you can just throw
"the most likely outcome"
right out the window.
Not to mention
"The most likely outcome"
is
ALIENS DONT EXIST!)
"Nevertheless, when viewed from
an open-minded and unprejudiced perspective,
our paper includes many compelling insights
that could be applied..."
(Avi?
Honestly?
Given Aliens cant exist?
And therefore 3I/ATLAS
can not be a
"technological artifact"?
I think my perspective on this subject
"when viewed from an open-minded
and unprejudiced perspective"
Has more and better constructed
"compelling insights")
"We might soon realize
that the extension of
natural selection
to interstellar space
involves survival of the fittest."
(So how did the fittest
first get there then?
(These people just kill me)
And I got no problem with:
"Adaptation to ones environment
through natural selection"
None.
Thats a fact, we see it.
The problem is when people try and sell you
that those adaptations through natural selection
eventually over time result in new species.
That requires a new blue print
(DNA Code)
to get a new species.
And even genetic mutation
combined with natural selection
will not give you enough
new information that's needed
to get a new species.
Under critical analysis
all this bull shit
just falls apart.
BELIEF SYSTEMS
ARE BEING DESTROYED
RIGHT NOW
AND FOR A REASON YO.)
"Ignoring the technological option
is not a sign of intelligence."
Sure it is.
Cause aliens cant exist.
That sentence should read:
"Ignoring the theological option
is not a sign of intelligence."
(Theology = The study of God.
We got evidence.)
And it aint like this is some far off thing.
It passes by Mars in October.
Just wanted to point this out as well:
"On July 1, 2025, a new interstellar object, 3I/ATLAS, was spotted at a distance 4.5 times the Earth-Sun separation. At that distance, I immediately calculated that it was anomalously bright, implying an object with a diameter of ~20 kilometers for the typical albedo of asteroids."
"A day later, I posted a note explaining that this size estimate makes little sense for an interstellar asteroid because the interstellar object 1I/`Oumuamua was 200 times smaller, and based on the statistics of asteroids in the Solar system, we should have discovered a million objects of the scale of 1I/`Oumuamua before spotting one interstellar object that is ~20 kilometers in diameter. We know that 20-kilometers asteroids are rare, because non-avian dinosaurs were killed by an asteroid half that size 66 million ago, whereas meter-scale asteroids impact the Earth every year."
"On July 4, I wrote a new paper about the size anomaly of 3I/ATLAS, posted it immediately on my website and the arXiv preprint server, and submitted it for publication in the journal Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society (RNAAS). In my paper, I explained that
detecting a 20-kilometer asteroid
in the inner solar system
over the survey period of 5 years
has a probability of 0.0001
based on the total reservoir
of interstellar asteroids.
This strongly argues in favor of 3I/ATLAS being a comet whose brightness stems from a plume of gas and dust that reflects sunlight from a tens of kilometers region around a compact nucleus with a diameter smaller than a kilometer."
"But facts do not always comply with expectations."
(Please apply that same logic to aliens dude.)
"A week after the discovery of 3I/ATLAS, two preprints (posted here and here) reported that its observed spectrum does not show the spectral fingerprints of atomic or molecular gas. Instead, the spectrum only shows evidence for reddening of reflected sunlight. Such reddening could be indicative of dust, or it might otherwise be related to the surface properties of 3I/ATLAS. For example, Kuiper belt objects in the outer Solar system are reddened when organics on their icy surface are exposed to ultraviolet light or cosmic rays for billions of years."
"In this “red surface” interpretation, there is no plume of dust or gas around 3I/ATLAS and the object has a diameter of order ~20 kilometers. The mild elongation of the fuzz around 3I/ATLAS in current images is along its direction of motion with an extent that is comparable to its speed, ~60 kilometers per second, times the exposure time of the telescopes used to obtain them, a few hundreds seconds."
"If 3I/ATLAS is not an asteroid — based on the interstellar reservoir argument in my paper, nor a comet — based on the lack of the spectral fingerprints of carbon-based molecules around it, then what is it?"
(These people just kill me.
They will tell you:
(and it shouldnt,
ask me why
and Ill explain it to ya.)
Then they turn right around
just like Avi did above
and they say
"Hey, this object
shouldn't exist."
Well why Avi?
Well because we said so.
Okay but
the thing the object is in
shouldn't exist either right?
See the delima here?
So wats the shock?
It's an interstellar asteroid,
it's just not supposed to be.
Matthew 19:26
With God all things are possible.)
"The simplest hypothesis is that 3I/ATLAS is a comet and we are missing the spectral features of its gaseous coma because of its large distance from Earth. However, in case future data will indicate the absence of a cometary tail, we will be faced with the tantalizing possibility that it did not inherit a random velocity in interstellar space
but instead was sent towards
the inner solar system by design,
being a member of a rare population
of massive interstellar objects."
(That you can count on.)
"I mentioned this possibility in the last sentence of my paper,
but it was surgically removed by the editor of RNAAS
(Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society)
before the paper was accepted for publication,
along with data updates, on July 8.
("Anything but God" seems to be
the religion of the day.")
"Interestingly, 3I/ATLAS will pass nearest to the Sun on October 29, 2025, when the Earth will be located on the opposite side of the Sun, making terrestrial observations of it difficult at that time."
(Thats what sold me right there.
That right there combined with all the
other anomalies about this object tells you
it is not by chance.)
"Needless to say, when the details of 3I/ATLAS were summarized on Wikipedia a few days after its discovery, the editors of that entry omitted any reference to anomalies of 3I/ATLAS. They learned about my paper from colleagues on July 4 but responded that this paper must be published in a journal before being referenced on Wikipedia. For context, the Wikipedia site for 3I/ATLAS included at that time only references to unrefereed scientific announcements and news reports. This practice by the Wikipedia gatekeepers provides yet additional evidence for the thesis presented in a new paper that I posted with the psychologists Omer Eldadi and Gershon Tenenbaum on July 9, explaining the psychological reasons
for the suppression of paradigm-breaking evidence
by the scientific community."
(Well shoot, here let me write
my own paper for ya then:
"Anything but God" seems to be
the religion of the day.")
"The effort of gatekeepers to hide anomalies
and maintain traditional thinking
will ultimately fail."
(You can say that again.)
"The effort of gatekeepers to hide anomalies
and maintain traditional thinking
will ultimately fail."
(Ive already been telling honey:
"Wait till it doesn't outgas.
They will just make up
the craziest reasons
for it not doing so.
Still think there wasnt a reason the Gizmodo
article called it a comet 16x?
Better wake up.)
"We deserve to stay ignorant
if we support a closed-minded culture
where gatekeepers deny
the dissemination of information
about anomalies that contradict
prevailing paradigms."
(Its not the size of a comet.
It isn't acting like a comet.
More anomalies
than you can shake a stick at.
Hey I tell ya what
lets call it a comet.)
"Let us instead
maintain our childhood curiosity
and seek evidence
(Like the kind he doesn't have for aliens?
But that we do for intellect
of everything that's ever lived ?)
rather than pretend to be
the adults in the room
that know
the answers in advance."
("Let us instead
maintain our childhood curiosity..."
Agreed
Matthew 18:3
And said, Verily I say unto you,
Except ye be converted,
and become as little children,
ye shall not enter
into the kingdom of heaven.
And?
"Science does not need to feel like a lecture in a classroom, summarizing past knowledge. It could be far more exciting if the teachers would be willing to learn something new!"
Well they are about to learn something
whether they want to or not.
So Now I got:
Friday, July 18, 2025
"Im like 35 article into this subject or so now
and nobody has ever mentioned anything
about any kind of energy transfer
between these two bodies
(Mars and 3I/ATLAS)
being this close together?
Or
"a hypothesis about
a near pass by of Mars"
34:36 mark
Or
Universe today November 22, 2024
"the authors propose
a near miss by a large asteroid.
If an asteroid passed close enough to Mars,
the tidal forces of the planet
would rip the asteroid apart
to create a string of fragments"
All these experts writing all their crap
and not one has mentioned
anything about any of those three things?
IM THE ONLY ONE IN THE WORLD
WHO HAS EVER HEARD OF
OR KNOWS ANYTHING ABOUT
THOSE THREE THINGS?
I havent even said anything about 14 ancient calendars all going from 360 days to 365 days at roughly the same time for some unknowm reason.
I just find that a lil hard to believe.
All these experts talking all their shit
and nobody mentions any part
of any of those three things?
WHY?
The answer is pretty obvious."
And now we can add:
"However, in case future data will indicate the absence of a cometary tail, we will be faced with the tantalizing possibility that it did not inherit a random velocity in interstellar space but instead was sent towards the inner solar system by design, being a member of a rare population of massive interstellar objects."
"I mentioned this possibility in the last sentence of my paper,
but it was surgically removed by the editor of RNAAS
(Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society)
before the paper was accepted for publication, along with data updates, on July 8.
AND:
"when the details of 3I/ATLAS were summarized on Wikipedia a few days after its discovery, the editors of that entry omitted any reference to anomalies of 3I/ATLAS."
"This practice by the Wikipedia gatekeepers provides yet additional evidence for the thesis presented in a new paper that I posted with the psychologists Omer Eldadi and Gershon Tenenbaum on July 9, explaining the psychological reasons for the suppression of paradigm-breaking evidence by the scientific community."
To go along with Gizmodo
calling it a comet 16x
in just a few paragraphs.
To the fact that nobody is mentioning
any of the first three thing.
"The effort of gatekeepers to hide anomalies
and maintain traditional thinking
will ultimately fail."
(They always do
everytime,
no exceptions)
The Dogma
of the faith based belief system of scientism
is currently being destroyed
right in front of your eyes.
And they know it.
As do others.
I figure
you should as well.
And BTW?
Monday, April 17, 2023
Yeah...
lets go there.
Emphasis on miracle.
Why atoms are the Universe’s greatest miracle
APRIL 12, 2023
"If all of human knowledge were someday wiped out in some grand apocalypse, but there were still intelligent survivors who remained, simply passing on the knowledge of atoms to them would go an incredibly long way toward helping them not only make sense the world around them, but to begin down the path of reconstructing the laws of physics and the full suite of the behavior of matter."
(Keep in mind not that long ago I was thinking about Genesis 6 and it's "angel" interpretation when it came over me why I have a briefcase full of notes from every sermon (among other things) I have heard the last 5? 6 Years? I didn't even know why I started taking notes, I just started one day and now I do so without even thinking about it. I sat right there and said, "Now that briefcase full of notes over there makes perfect sense to me." As does "The encyclopedia of knowledge" (along with social commentary etc :-) that I have written over the years. That may not make much sense to you, but it makes perfect sense to me and a few others.)
That was posted April 17th 2023
"If all of human knowledge were someday wiped out in some grand apocalypse, but there were still intelligent survivors who remained..."
("Hit me like a ton of bricks like things do sometimes.")
"The knowledge of atoms would lead, very swiftly, to a reconstruction of the periodic table."
"What took human civilization hundreds of thousands of years to achieve could be re-discovered in a single human lifetime,"
Now?
Two years
and three months later?
Not only do I have all those notes
from those sermons mentioned above?
and all the notes since that time?
Now ? In addition
to all the books and notes?
One the right in the purple binder is a history of the universe,
and the two stacks on the left
yet to be organized in a binder lol
are every word included on the blog about:
The Biblical Demonology Series
and the
Chuck Missler Series
on The Seven Days of Genesis.
I do what I am told.
People laughed.
Till one day they didn't anymore.
Kinda reminds me of Noah
when it started sprinkling?
They quit laughing.
And I want everyone
to know and understand this 100%.
I aint sayin 3I/ATLAS
it's gonna fragment
when its closest to mars,
I aint sayin
it's gonna fragment
when it's closest to the sun.
I aint saying
There's gonna be a huge
asteroid shower of 400 lbs rocks
come crashing on this earth
although thats a distinct possiblity.
I aint saying it could disrupt Mars orbit
(although it seems very likely)
All I am saying is
if this thing fragments
and big enough fragments
or enough of em start
the Kessler syndrome,
then life as you once knew it
will never be the same.
And that?
That is like
the best case scenario.
And people need to get it
through their thick skulls,
this is where we are
and what is going on.
Or do you honestly think the authorities
would just come out and tell you
these are possibilities?
Satan wants to take as many with him as he can on his way to hell. Governments is the easiest way for him to do this.
And This?
Aint an accident
or coincidence:
Matthew 10:28
Do not be afraid
of those who kill the body
but cannot kill the soul.
Rather, be afraid of the One
who can destroy both
soul and body in hell.
Maranatha Lord Jesus.
)
No comments:
Post a Comment