This guy is reading my mind
from a distance
or he is reading what I write.
I know which option
Im going with.
Me yesterday:
Thursday, October 9, 2025
3I/ATLAS, Phobos, Fragmentation etc...
Q&A on the Long-Term Lessons from the Interstellar Visit of 3I/ATLAS
Avi Loeb Medium 10/08/25
"These observations will also inform us
of any non-gravitational maneuvers
or fragmentation of 3I/ATLAS."
(That is the first time
I can remember having seen that word
"fragmentation"
in any article about 3I/ATLAS.)
Today:
Avi Loeb Medium 10/10/25
(As in six hours ago)
"A Hubble Space Telescope image of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9, taken on May 17, 1994. The image shows a train of 21 icy fragments stretched across 1.1 million kilometers, torn apart by the tidal force of Jupiter. (Credit: NASA/ESA/STScI, H. Weaver and E. Smith)"
"On October 29, 2025, the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS will reach perihelion at a distance of 203 million kilometers from the Sun.
So far, no small objects were clearly associated with 3I/ATLAS in astronomical data sets."
(Why did we only get two
during the whole month of September
(one from Hubble
and one from the JWST)
when 3I/ATLAS
was easily visible
from either of
those two instruments again?
And why?
Is the highest resolution photograph
to date of 3I/ATLAS
from the older instrument (Hubble)
and not the newer one?
(JWST)
"There are unrelated images of contemporary comets, background stars and the moons of Mars — Phobos and Deimos. But so far, there are no verified objects that branched off 3I/ATLAS."
"If 3I/ATLAS is a comet of natural origin,
it could disintegrate into fragments
as it comes closer to the Sun."
(Why is this just now being talked about
like it is a possibility?
This thing is older than the solar system.
It is not sublimating (outgassing)
like it should have been.
But we are gonna wait
three months
before this subject (fragmentation) gets brought up?
Me and honey were talking about it back in July
shortly after it was found, but the Harvard astro-physicist
are just now are talking about this possibility?
It's pretty easy to deduce
that something just aint right.)
"Comets disintegrate primarily as a result of heating by the sun, but sometimes also by gravitational tides and rotational stress from outgassing. The catastrophic breakup of a comet into multiple fragments is difficult to forecast without knowing its detailed composition and material strength."
(Still not one mention of:
By Brian Koberlein -
November 22, 2024
Wednesday, July 9, 2025
"Earth and Mars are the only two rocky planets in the solar system to have moons. Based on lunar rock samples and computer simulations, we are fairly certain that our Moon is the result of an early collision between Earth and a Mars-sized protoplanet called Theia. Since we don't have rock samples from either Martian moon, the origins of Deimos and Phobos are less clear. There are two popular models, but new computer simulations point to a compromise solution."
"Observations of Deimos and Phobos show that they resemble small asteroids. This is consistent with the idea that the Martian moons were asteroids captured by Mars in its early history. The problem with this idea is that Mars is a small planet with less gravitational pull than Earth or Venus, which have no captured moons. It would be difficult for Mars to capture even one small asteroid, much less two. And captured moons would tend to have more elliptical orbits, not the circular ones of Deimos and Phobos."
"An alternative model argues that the Martian moons are the result of an early collision similar to that of Earth and Theia. In this model, an asteroid or comet with about 3% of the mass of Mars impacted the planet. It would not be large enough to have fragmented Mars, but it would have created a large debris ring out of which the two moons could have formed. This would explain the more circular orbits, but the difficulty is that debris rings would tend to form close to the planet. While Phobos, the larger Martian moon, orbits close to Mars, Deimos does not. (23,500 km)
"This new model proposes an interesting middle way. Rather than an impact or direct capture, the authors propose a near miss by a large asteroid.
If an asteroid passed close enough to Mars,
the tidal forces of the planet
would rip the asteroid apart
to create a string of fragments."
Not one mention of that
in any article to date
about 3I/ATLAS.
Not one.
No talking about possible
"Fragmentation"
by any scientists
watching this thing
until two days ago.)
"Studies of comets like 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko show that they may have formed from smaller pieces that gently coalesced, leading to a poorly cemented structure with many internal fractures which makes these objects susceptible to break ups."
(Now its like they
(Avi anyway)
are trying to get you ready for something.
And remember
on three separate occasions
Avi Loeb has talked about
the stock market crashing,
money becoming worthless, etc
when 3I/ATLAS comes around
the other side of the sun.
Comes out from hiding basically.)
"Breakup from gravitational tides was demonstrated in 1994, when the fragments of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9, torn apart by Jupiter’s gravity, crashed into the planet (see discussion here)."
"A fleet of smaller objects could also appear as a result of a technological mothership which releases min-probes to study multiple targets simultaneously. Smaller mass probes require less power for maneuvers aimed at exploration or self-replication in many locations at once."
(All of the red above
would violate
the 2nd law of thermodynamics Avi.
And we know you know it.
Pretty simple.
A 7-10 billion year old
"technological mothership"
??????????
Dude?
I dont know how else
to say it:
Put down the crack pipe.
We simply know better.
Who the fuck is paying you
anyway?
The CIA?
Cause it sure seems like it.
Cause this is some flat out
garbage nonsense.
"Shortly after 3I/ATLAS will pass closest to the Sun, it will be observable by ESA’s Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer (Juice) during the month of November."
(Thanks for pointing out the fact
that we wont get that data
till February.
What did I say yesterday?
“Due to the position of JUICE with respect to Earth, the data rate is very low. We expect the data to be downloaded only in February 2026, so we need to be a bit patient,” Witasse told IFLScience."
(So much for getting excited about having a craft to watch 3I/ATLAS during almost the entire month of November.
Watch how many other sites wont ever bring that up about the data taking till February to arrive. All you will hear is "JUICE is going to be observing from Nov 2 till Nov 25.")
"During November and December, terrestrial observatories will also be able to monitor 3I/ATLAS and check whether it disintegrates like a natural comet or releases mini-probes as a technological mothership."
(Aint nothing made
by any type of intelligence
7-10 billion years old
unless it was made by God Almighty
to serve his purposes alone.
PERIOD.)
"The latter act might define 3I/ATLAS as an interstellar gardener, resembling a dandelion flower
which spreads its genetic information
through numerous seeds."
Avi?
Brother?
You and I
and the members
of this community
all know:
information
is always the result
of a conscious,
sentient intellect.
No exception
anywhere ever.
There's not multiple
creators of the life force
and information
is the opposite of random.
There's one owner of the life force
and it happens to be
the creator of the universe.
I'd start wrapping my head
around that fact
"quick like in a hurry"
if I was you.
My honest opinion is this:
Avi knows whats up,
but its like he has to speak in code.
For a variety of reasons
he can not just come out and tell
wats up.
But if you know how to read between the lines?
If you can understand
whats being said by whats not being said?
(Spiritual Gift of Discernment)
Then you can figure it out
Think about it,
you wanna be the guy responsible
for a world wide panic?
This is the reason
we get things like his
blog post today.
THE WHOLE POINT TODAY BEING:
Why are the Harvard scientist
just now considering:
Avi Loeb Medium 10/10/25
When me and Honey
were talking about it
on our front porch
in early July
shortly after
3I/ATLAS was found?
Wednesday,
July 9, 2025
I can tell you this much
theres not a scholarly
Christian apologeticist
anywhere on this earth
that was doing the same.
Not one.
Anywhere.
When somebody says:
"We get
Heaven on earth
for telling you
Hell is coming."
And they did it
years and years ago
when everybody thought
that they were bat shit insane?
And then that comes to fruition?
Right in front of people?
You might wanna listen
to the voice
coming out of those people
cause it aint their voice
and no amount of
"scholarly endeavors"
is going to be able
to match up
with what is being said
through them.
No comments:
Post a Comment