are gonna blow this
way out of proportion.
Who likes to "muddy the waters"
so you cant see the truth clearly?
SATAN.
Avi Loeb Medium 10/06/25
Even the title is misleading:
"The above analysis is based on the assumption
that the Navcam images are of 3I/ATLAS.
This was not specified explicitly
on the NASA website."
"Two versions of the image of the interstellar object, 3I/ATLAS, obtained by the Navcam camera onboard NASA’s Mars Perseverance rover on October 4, 2025.
(On the NASA site,
on neither picture does
it ever says or even suggest
for that matter
that "smudge"
was 3I/ATLAS.)
"This photo was selected by public vote and featured as "Image of the Week" for Week 242 (Sept. 28 - Oct. 4, 2025) of the Perseverance rover mission on Mars.
NASA's Mars Perseverance rover acquired this image using its onboard Right Navigation Camera (Navcam). The camera is located high on the rover's mast and aids in driving.
This image was acquired on Oct. 4, 2025 (Sol 1643) at the local mean solar time of 21:33:39.
Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech
AND:
"NASA's Mars Perseverance rover acquired this image using its onboard Right Navigation Camera (Navcam). The camera is located high on the rover's mast and aids in driving.
This image was acquired on Oct. 4, 2025 (Sol 1643) at the local mean solar time of 21:33:39.
Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech"
respectively.
(SO WHY EVEN POST THEM?
IF NASA ISNT GOING TO SAY:
"THIS IS 3I/ATLAS")
"This scale sets the width of the elongated stripe in the Navcam image of 3I/ATLAS. Thus, the projected length of the stripe is about 50,000 kilometers."
"The upper bound on the diameter of 3I/ATLAS was derived by the SPHEREx space observatory (reported here) as 46 kilometers for an albedo of 4%. The Navcam stripe is a thousand times longer than this upper limit and therefore must be an artifact of a long integration time given that the source moves across the Martian sky. If 3I/ATLAS was a cylinder as long as 50,000 kilometers, then it would have occupied an angular size of 23 arcseconds in the Hubble Space Telescope image taken on July 21, 2025, when 3I/ATLAS was at a distance of 3 times the Earth-Sun separation from the Hubble camera. Instead, 3I/ATLAS appears smaller by at least an order of magnitude in the actual Hubble image (available here and here). This suggests that the elongation of the stripe was generated by the integration time used to make the composite Navcam image, during which 3I/ATLAS moved across the Martian sky."
"In conclusion, the stripe in the Navcam image must have resulted from stacking hundreds of Navcam images over a total time interval of about 10 minutes. 3I/ATLAS would have looked like a circular spot for an individual snapshot, which has a maximum exposure time of 3.28 seconds for Navcam. In a single frame, the motion of 3I/ATLAS on the Martian sky would have smeared its image by merely 300 kilometers, only ~3% of the much larger smearing by 12,500 kilometers associated with the limited angular resolution of Navcam. The stacking of hundreds of images enhanced the apparent brightness of 3I/ATLAS in the final image."
"The above analysis is based on the assumption that the Navcam images are of 3I/ATLAS. This was not specified explicitly on the NASA website. If the Navcam images represent single snapshots with an exposure time below 3.28 seconds, then the brightness and angular length of the observed source imply that it is not 3I/ATLAS. In that case, the source might be much closer to the camera — capable of being smeared into an elongated image with a smaller spatial size and a smaller speed."
"3I/ATLAS shared the experience of a movie star with lots of cameras from 7 Mars orbiters and a ground-based rover taking snapshots of it as it passed across the Martian sky."
By my count?
Thats 7 different anomalies
and 8 different man made tools.
Somebody is talking to you.
Are you listening?
Do you even have the ears needed?
To be able to hear?
"The highest resolution image was taken by the HiRISE camera onboard the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. HiRISE has an angular resolution that translated to 30 kilometers per pixel on October 3, 2025. The brightest pixel in the HiRISE image will provide the best constraint yet on the area of 3I/ATLAS. We are all hoping that the HiRISE team will release their images as soon as possible."
So why in the world
release two different photographs
and neither one of them
is stated to be 3I/ATLAS?
And why?
Release these photographs
(watever they are of)
from:
"OCT 4TH, 2025"
THE DAY
AFTER
3I/ATLAS
closest encounter
with the Red planet
??????????
Why not give us pictures
from
THE DAY OF
3I/ATLAS
closest encounter
with the red planet
??????????
When something doesnt make any sense?
You really have two choice:
IT'S EITHER A LIE,
OR SOMEBODY IS
SIMPLY BAT-SHIT INSANE.
Take your pic.
Pun intended lol.
And it hasn't ever
from the very get go.
No comments:
Post a Comment