just one,
that adheres to
the Preterist view
(all in 1st century)
of The Book of Revelation
to explain to me
how humanity doesn't get Cataclysmic Judgement
after trying to surpass Gods crowning achievement
the merging of the physical and the immaterial
in our minds?
(Not brains,
that purely physical)
How do you invent
brains more powerful
than the one God gave us
and not face
Judgement
for having done so?
Cause I dont need
The Book Of Revelation
to make that point.
Genesis 6:1-4
6 And it came to pass,
when men began to multiply on the face of the earth,
and daughters were born unto them,
2 That the sons of God
saw the daughters of men that they were fair;
and they took them wives of all which they chose.
3 And the Lord said,
My spirit shall not always strive with man,
for that he also is flesh:
yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.
4 There were giants in the earth in those days;
and also after that,
when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men,
and they bare children to them,
the same became mighty men which were of old,
men of renown.
Life forms that aren't supposed to be here
will result in Cataclysmic judgement
as creation is the providence of God alone.
CHECKMATE.
Keep on making
The Book of Revelation
all about
the First Century,
see how much
good its going to do you.
Did I mention these
believe systems are antiquated?
Cause Im pretty sure I did.
Monday, March 23, 2026
Friday, December 8, 2017
I'm reading the intro to the Book of Revelation
in my Mendenhall Reference Bible yesterday AM.
I usually use my old NIV version
as it has all my notes, highlights, underlinings
and such but anyway :-)
I'm reading and I read this:
"Some interpreters (1) refer everything in Revelation to the distant future, to the period just preceding the end of the world and the coming of Christ. Others believe that (2) it begins with the writers own time and reflects the continuous story of suffering and calamity up until the end of the present age and the coming of Christ. Still (3) others interpret every reference to some historical event or person in the first century, making it a book of the times."
Then I thought about it for a second and realized,
I certainly don't agree with the last interpretation.
Of the first two mentioned?
It seems more like both of them
combined together somehow.
Somethings are in the future
as well as some things having happened
or started during the writers own time.
Then I kept reading:
"The most influential interpreters of this book
have seen both meanings
in the signs and symbols of John:
historical references to Nero
and the Roman Empire in the first century
and the reading of the future
in the light of this
prophetic understanding of history."
:-).
Made my day Lucy."
The intros to the different books of the bible in the Mendenhall Reference Bible pictured above, from which that quote was taken, were compiled based what 40 different biblical scholars from all different types of denominations had agreed on.
I reiterate:
just one,
that adheres to
the Preterist view
of The Book of Revelation
to explain to me
how humanity doesn't get Cataclysmic Judgement
after trying to surpass Gods crowning achievement
the merging of the physical and the immaterial
in our minds?
How do you invent
brains more powerful
than the one God gave us
and not face
Judgement for having done so?
Cause I dont need
The Book Of Revelation
to make that point...
Life forms that aren't supposed to be here
will result in Cataclysmic judgement
as creation
is the providence of God alone.
Its not as hard to understand
as people are trying to make it
and Judgement is here.
No comments:
Post a Comment