More things that a "Holographic Universe " would explain.

 

futuregenquantum@IG

NOBEL PRIZE PHYSICIST JAMES PEEBLES

 SAYS WE MUST ADMIT A HARD TRUTH: 

DARK MATTER AND DARK ENERGY 

ARE JUST PLACEHOLDERS 

FOR OUR IGNORANCE

"It's very unfortunate 

that one thinks of the beginning

whereas in fact, we have no good theory 

of such a thing as the beginning."

Ecclesiastes 3:11

God Set Eternity in the Heart of Mankind

He has made everything appropriate in its time. 

He has also set eternity in their heart, 

without the possibility 

that mankind will find out 

the work which God has done 

from the beginning 

even to the end.

Now to the post.

Bot generated I am sure.

"We have explored distant galaxies, detected gravitational waves and built mathematical models of the universe-but we still do not know what approximately 95% of it is made of."

"According to the standard cosmological model, ordinary matter-the atoms forming stars, planets and every living thing-accounts for only around 5% of the universe."

"The remaining cosmic inventory is attributed 

to dark matter and dark energy."

"Scientists have strong observational evidence for their effects. Dark matter appears to provide the invisible gravitational framework that helps galaxies form and remain together, while dark energy is the name given to the unknown phenomenon associated with the universe's accelerating expansion."

"But these names are not complete explanations.

As Nobel Prize-winning cosmologist 

James Peebles has emphasized, 

we still postulate these components 

without knowing 

their fundamental physical nature."

(How about going with what:

Bohm, Missler, Susskind and Hawking suggested ?

If its a holographic Universe?

Then Dark Matter and Dark Energy

wouldn't have a need for a

"fundamental physical nature".)

"Modern cosmology can describe the universe with astonishing precision-while remaining deeply uncertain about what most of it actually is.'

(Because its an illusion from

"The father of lights"

James 1:17)

"Perhaps the most honest statement in science is this:

We have discovered how much we still do not understand.

What do you think will solve the mystery first:"

(I already told you,

see above.)

 

"a new particle, 

a new theory of gravity 

or completely new physics?"

And that is why there is no:

"New Particles".

"New theory's of gravity".

or any

"New physics"

Bringing the list 

of what a Holographic Universe 

would explain

to ten items now:

1) Dark Energy

and

2) Dark Matter,

3) The Monopole problem,

4) The Horizon Problem

and 

5)The Flatness Problems 

of 

6) Inflationary Cosmology

(Of which there would be no need for.)

7) It would negate the:

"Well if we are the only ones in it?

It sure does seem like 

an awful waste of space" 

contention.

and it would also explain why

there are no 

8) "New Particles".

9) "New theory's of gravity".

(That would explain anything anyway)

or any

10) "New physics"

See: Saturday, June 13, 2026

Why is it

And? 

Maybe they are just doing so?

To keep themselves in a job?

"we still postulate these components 

without knowing 

their fundamental physical nature"

"Everything we can directly see-stars, planets, galaxies and ourselves-belongs to ordinary matter.

Yet ordinary matter makes up only about:

5% of the universe

The rest is believed to be:

27% Dark Matter

68% Dark Energy"

"Dark matter does not emit, absorb or reflect light.

Scientists infer its existence

from its gravitational effects on:

Rotating galaxies

Galaxy clusters

Gravitational lensing

The structure of the universe

We can observe what it does.

But we still do not know what it is.

(Because, as some of the greatest 

scientific and theological minds of our time(s) 

have suggested

 its all an illusion.

The galaxies that the JWST found that were to large to have been where they were in the early universe just flat out give this away.)

"The universe is expanding-

and that expansion appears to be accelerating.

(It would explain that as well 

so make it 11 things a holographic explains.

Things don't expand

then contract

and then "reexpand")

Scientists use the term dark energy to describe 

whatever is driving this cosmic acceleration.

But its true origin remains 

one of the greatest unanswered questions in physics.

(Good luck to ya!:

Ecclesiastes 3:11

God Set Eternity in the Heart of Mankind

He has made everything appropriate in its time. 

He has also set eternity in their heart, 

without the possibility 

that mankind will find out 

the work which God has done 

from the beginning 

even to the end.)

"Nobel laureate James Peebles has emphasized that cosmologists postulate dark matter and dark energy to explain observations.

The labels successfully describe 

what the universe appears to be doing.

They do not yet reveal the underlying physics."

Humanity has mapped galaxies billions of light-years away, detected gravitational waves and photographed black holes.

Yet approximately 95% of the universe 

remains physically unexplained.

(Because its really not physical at all?)

"The greatest discovery in cosmology 

may still be waiting for us."

Or maybe:

Bohm, Missler, Susskind and Hawking

all had it right 

and everybody today is either 

just missing the obvious

or just wants to keep getting a check?

This is just a no-brainer.

 I'm sitting here 

and everything I am looking at

and experiencing?

(matter, made of atoms

including myself)

Their actual 

solid physical components 

are equal to 

one second in 30 billion years

(Honest to Goodness ratio)

but what these yo-yos are looking at

kazillions of light years away

has to be physically "real"

??????????

Did I mention 

there were six

galaxy's initially found 

by the JWST 

that were to big

to have existed 

in early stages

of the universe 

which they were found?

Interesting number,

to me anyway.

Six.

Right before completion

Love ya everybody.

Peace.