nobody who espouses a
"Holographic universe" position
ever explains
what all
it explains?
Thursday, June 11, 2026
Chuck Missler study of biblical angels
"practical conclusions" part 4, Warning! Yet Again...
"Assuming The Holographic Universe is true?
As Bohm, Missler, Susskind and Hawking purpose?
It eliminates any need for:
(The energy expanding space time)
and Dark Matter
(the force that holds galaxy's together
even though the spacetime they reside in
is expanding.)
Which scientist just do not have a clue
about how start to explain.
It also eliminates the "problems"
set out to solve:
The Monopole problem
The Horizon Problem
and
The Flatness Problem
and none of em
were ever really problems
to start with.
Kinda gives me the impression
people knew The Holographic Principle was correct
and they were just looking for something to do,
so they set out to fix "problems"
that didn't exist in the first place.
A Holographic Universe would explain
why no one has ever witnessed
a star the moment it is being born,
It would negate the:
"Well if we are the only ones in it?
It sure does seem like
an awful waste of space"
contention.
All solved.
Not multiplying any entities,
not violating the scientific principal of
one solution:
And just why wouldn't
"The Father of Lights"
design things that way?
And remember
what our natural laws state:
You are as much physical matter
as one second is to 30 million years
but your information can not be destroyed
(only by its creator)
only transformed.
Time to rethink some things
quick like in a hurry yo.
No comments:
Post a Comment