Showing posts sorted by relevance for query interceptors. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query interceptors. Sort by date Show all posts

Thursday, June 19, 2025

Alrighty, lets talk about

 


"Interceptors."

As in the missiles 

that shoot down the missiles.

(Link above goes to every use of that word on this blog.

Hey? Do your own searching lol) 



Friday, October 13, 2023

Back

"It's pretty simple really, you just overwhelm your adversary with your more technologically advanced weapons that you have plenty of (and they are cheaper than the interceptors) and you make your adversary use up all of their (more expensive and harder to produce) interceptor missiles."


Friday, September 20, 2024

Been

("More like Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran, and it's proxies in Syria and Iraq..."


(Hamas, Hezbollah, and it's (Irans) proxies in Syria and Iraq.

have all largely been neutralized at this point.

What happened to the Houthis BTW?

They've been quiet all the sudden.)


 Im trying to tell you right now this has been common knowledge for years now, it doesn't matter if your missiles are non accurate shit, you fire a shit ton more of them than the other team has interceptors, (and cheap ass drones) and then what?'


Friday, October 18, 2024

Hey?


Missile Defense: 

How Vulnerable Is Israel to Iran’s Attacks?


Council on Foreign Relations


October 16, 2024 

Thanks for the heads up:


"Iran is not the only threat the United States faces. Over time, the U.S. military can’t necessarily afford to have its ships constantly expending interceptors."


(Why do you think Iran has been doing 

what it has been doing?)


"This is why missile defense can be a strategic challenge—one that has to do with questions including defense production, as previously noted, but also alliance relationships, and political questions such as threat prioritization. The United States should also spread its limited missile defense capabilities against other looming threats from China, North Korea, and Russia. The constant expenditure of resources, and the potential that allies’ tolerance for repeated joint defensive efforts may wane with time, will undoubtedly influence how U.S. and Israeli leaders think about what to do next."


Monday, April 24, 2023

Lets

"The Pentagon papers also tell us that Ukraine’s air defenses are very badly depleted, either destroyed by the Russians or lacking ammunition. Even interceptors for the US Patriot air defense system delivered to Ukraine are currently unavailable unless replacement missiles are yanked from US and European operational units."


(Almost like somebody had a plan huh?

Imagine that.)


Seriously, are you not seeing the coordinated plan

from our adversaries at this point?


Friday, October 11, 2024

It's very much worth a read

(The whole strategy is to get them to use up their interceptors, thus making a nuclear payload much more likely to get through. Recent analysis of the last Iranian missile attack has shown Iran can get through Israel's air defenses.)


(That was yours truly BTW.)


Friday, October 4, 2024

I

"It is possible that the Arrow system failed to perform as expected, Lewis says, but he thinks it's more likely that Israel may have decided not to defend Nevatim, in order to save its interceptors to protect population centers like Tel Aviv."


(This is the whole problem.

Iran has way more missiles

than Israel does interceptors.)



Friday, October 18, 2024

Israel Missile Defense

"The problem is compounded by limited magazines (the firing capacity of a ship or land-based interceptor). For instance, during both of Iran’s attacks, U.S. Navy ships helped intercept ballistic missiles. Out of a U.S. destroyer’s 90 vertical launch cells, however, not all are dedicated to interceptors. Some of those cells are reserved for the ship’s self-defense capabilities, such as anti-submarine rockets. The more salvos a ship is forced to engage, the sooner it has to return to port and reload, which takes time. Not all of the navy’s destroyers and cruisers are equipped for ballistic missile defense, either. Land-based missile batteries, too, must rearm. Therefore, missile defense has as much to do with the defender’s in-theater magazine depth and industrial base capacity to produce interceptors, as it does with its general technical capabilities.


(We simply dont have the :

"industrial base capacity"

to produce the interceptors needed.

This is what offshoring

(read GREED.)

all your industrial base gets you.

A defense industry designed 

to maximize profits.

Not protect its populace.


"The challenge is heightened by the fact that sometimes multiple interceptors need to be fired to ensure a single missile is destroyed. Even the most sophisticated defensive systems can’t hit their targets with 100 percent accuracy, partly for reasons described above (e.g., the need to hit inbound missiles directly). Instead, missile defenses hit their targets a portion of the time. Even a 90 percent “probability of kill” may not good enough if the inbound ballistic missile is headed toward a populated area or critical infrastructure, for example. Therefore, to achieve a higher certainty of intercept, the defender would fire two or more interceptors at a single missile, putting the exchange ratio in favor of the attacker."


(As stated above?

China, Russia and Iran all already 

figured this out a long time ago.)


"Interceptors are much more complicated and much more expensive, and therefore take more time to produce, than the missiles fired by the attacker.

Our adversaries figured this out a while back 

and have been preparing for this moment ever since."

(Yours truly again.)


"Faced with a single salvo attack, a defender such as Israel may not be particularly challenged if they have an adequate stockpile of interceptors. But if an aggressor such as Iran makes repeated attacks over time it can become a strategic problem: 

as the tit-for-tat exchange 

plays out over weeks or months,

 the defender spends down its missiles 

faster than the attacker. 

Israel faced one attack in April, another in October, and it could yet face another."


Wednesday, November 1, 2023

Read

(That is another reason this is SO significant.

The JV team

(Iranians)

can and probably will

overwhelm and exhaust

Israeli air defenses.


(Eventually)


And if they can do that?

They can get us to exhaust 

some of our carrier groups

missile defenses as well.

Right as were leading into 

China and Taiwan etc.)



Tuesday, May 6, 2025

Your country


Trump's fight 

against the Houthis, 

by the numbers

Axios 2/6/25


"Why it matters: 


This tenuous deal 

follows a beefed-up U.S. presence 

in the greater Middle East 

and 

months of 

missile-and-drone exchanges 

that 

chewed through 

coveted 

stateside 

stockpiles."



And do not forget this 

Wednesday, April 23, 2025

Warmongering currents


"Iranian FM to visit China

"Baghaei, the Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson, said that the country’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, will visit China on Tuesday, (yesterday) ahead of the third round of nuclear talks between Tehran and Washington, due on Saturday in Oman."


(He did.)


"In a trip to Moscow last week, Araghchi told state TV that Tehran always closely consults with its friends, Russia and Chinaover the nuclear issue."


Given everything listed above?

Do you think thats all they talked about?


OKAY SO, 

UNDERSTAND:

What is really under attack,

is our and Israels weakness:

Our lack of an

"industrial base capacity 

to produce interceptors"


Anybody else says any different?

They are leaving out our adversaries having planed for this for a very long time, as well as, they are not seeing the 3-D chess board in its entirety.




You need the proper lenses 

to be able to see it in its entirety.

Rose-tinted by the blood of Christ.


IRANS STRATEGY

HAS ALWAYS BEEN

TO SURVIVE, 

UNTILL ISRAEL AND THE US SHIPS

AND GROUND BASED 

MISSILE DEFENSES SYSTEMS 

IN THE REGION

RUN OUT OF INTERCEPTORS.

THEN LAUNCH AN OVERWHELMING SALVO

OF MISSILES ALL AT ONCE.


Their main problem with doing that now is

Israel has taken out command and control

making such a coordinated attack

from multiple disperse locations

extremely difficult,

but not impossible.


Now to the recent Headlines 

concerning interceptors:


Israel and US exhausting supplies of 

ballistic missile interceptors, source says

Israel is racing against time to destroy Iran's launch capabilities as interceptor supplies run thin, former officials say

06/16/25

"Israel is using its ballistic missile interceptors at a rapid clip after four days of war with Iran, a senior US official familiar with efforts to resupply Israel told Middle East Eye." 

"In some quarters of the US government, there are concerns that a direct US strike on Iran could lead to bigger Iranian retaliation against Israel that would drain the US’s global stockpile of missile interceptors to a “horrendous” level, the official said."


"Israel relies on a three-tiered air defence system, and Iran’s attacks are challenging its most sophisticated defences."



(Screenshot from a video about missile defenses

 from a few years back.)

"The Iron Dome is used to shoot down short-range rockets and drones fired by groups like Hamas and Hezbollah. The second level is David’s Sling, which can intercept heavier rockets along with some ballistic missiles. The Arrow 2 and 3 systems are used to down ballistic missiles, with the latter able to shoot down exoatmospheric hypersonic missiles."


"Replenishing the Arrow systems has been a perennial problem for Israel."


"MEE reported in September that Israel was struggling to replenish Arrow interceptors after Iran’s first attack on Israel in April last year. The US and Israel jointly produce Arrow interceptors."


The types of interceptors that are required to shoot down ballistic missiles are expensive and difficult to produce in mass quantities,” Dan Caldwell, a former senior Department of Defense official in the Trump administration, who opposed military confrontation with Iran, wrote on X." 


“I will assume Israel has stockpiled a decent number of Arrows and Stunners for its David's Sling but they have to had expend[ed] many of those against the Houthis and during Iran's previous missile attacks last year. It is therefore likely that Israel and US are going to have to start rationing their interceptors soon,” he added. 


"Iran has fired at least 370 ballistic missiles at Israel since 13 June, the Israeli prime minister's press office said on Monday." 


"Thin margins

One advantage Israel enjoys that may help address the shortage of interceptors is its air superiority over Iran, which it appears to have obtained within four days of bombing." 


"Israeli warplanes are operating over Tehran in daylight hours. According to Israel’s military, they have taken out about one-third of Iran’s surface-to-surface missile launch capabilities."


(Not near enough.)


"Josh Paul, a former US State Department official who resigned in protest against US support for Israel’s war on Gaza, told MEE that Israel has selectively targeted Iran’s launch capabilities." 


“We don’t know how much more Iran can launch. I think it is a problem more of launchers than missiles,” he said. However, the two US officials MEE spoke with said that Iran is still holding back in its missile attacks, partly at least to avoid the US directly joining Israel in offensive operations. 


(Horseshit, its sandbagging just like the Russians have done in Ukraine. They are waiting till the US and Israel are out of interceptors, as has been shown, that has been the plan all along.

And that is why the phrase:

"partly at least"

was used.)


"Three Arab officials, including some whose countries are mediating between the US and Iran, told MEE on Monday that they believe the US is more likely than not to directly intervene in Israel’s offensive strikes."


(Since Vietnam?

When have we ever seen 

a serious conflict we didn't join?

Understand why Kennedy was taken out now?



The only reason people don't believe what's being said?

Is because they just don't wanna.

Deep inside, people know its the truth.)



"The US’s carefully constructed line between intervening or not is growing thinner, though. Several current and former US officials who spoke to MEE described the US as “co-belligerent” to the conflict because it is actively participating in Israel’s defence."


"The US is trying to make up for a shortfall in Israel’s own interceptors, the officials say." 


(Good luck

Refer to:

"This tenuous deal 

follows a beefed-up U.S. presence 

in the greater Middle East 

and 

months of 

missile-and-drone exchanges 

that 

chewed through 

coveted 

stateside 

stockpiles."

if needed.)


"The US has shot down Iranian missiles using at least one Terminal High-Altitude Area Defence antimissile battery in Israel. The US also has several Patriot antimissile batteries across the region."


(Couple of facts to consider:

1) A THAAD battery consists of 

at least six launcher vehicles, 

each equipped with eight missiles

with two mobile tactical operations centers (TOCs) and the AN/TPY-2 ground-based radar (GBR).


6x8=48 interceptors pretty simple.

Lets just say they have twice that many:

12x8 = 96 interceptors.


2) Eighth THAAD battery delivered to U.S. military

06/19/25

that was today BTW.


So even if all 8 THADD systems have 96 interceptors?

8x96=768.

And Iran alone has THOUSANDS of ballistic missile that haven't been fired yet, that's not even thinking about, North Korea, China, Russia etc...)


"Notably, a separate US defence official confirmed to MEE on Monday that the US has fired SM-3 air-defence missiles to protect Israel."

"The SM-3 is the ship-mounted version of the Patriot. The official said the USS Arleigh Burke guided missile destroyer participated in Israel's defence from the eastern Mediterranean." 


"Defence analysts noted that during the US’s 2024 campaign against the Houthis in Yemen, 

the US Navy fired 

a year’s worth of SM-3 interceptors 

in a single day." 


(Reference:

Tuesday, May 6, 2025

Your country)


"As the war between Israel and Iran enters its fifth day, the US is sending more military assets into the theatre of operations


("Since Vietnam?

When have we ever seen a serious conflict we didn't join?"


All this:

"What is Trump going to do?"

garbage being peddled to the masses 

might as well be

a General Hospital 

or Days of Our lives episode,

its so staged and managed.


Monday, September 30, 2024

Are you ready?


US boosts air support and hikes troop readiness to deploy for Middle East

"The U.S. military said on Sunday it was increasing its air support capabilities in the Middle East and putting troops on a heightened readiness to deploy to the region as it warned Iran against expanding the ongoing conflict."


"The announcement came two days after President Joe Biden directed the Pentagon to adjust U.S. force posture in the Middle East amid intensifying concern that Israel's killing of the leader of Iran-backed Hezbollah could prompt Tehran to retaliate."

(Everything was pretty much in place before he ever said anything, go figure right?)

See: Thursday, September 26, 2024

That)


"The USS Nimitz aircraft carrier is en route from the South China Sea to the Middle East, according to ship tracking data. The aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson is already in the Middle East."


Israel running low on air defence, 

missiles can last just 10-12 days: Report

06/18/25


"In Short:


Israel's interceptor stockpiles depleting 

amid relentless Iranian missile fire


Arrow missiles cost $3 million each, 

straining defence budget rapidly


Without US resupply

Israel's interception capacity may collapse in 10 days

 

(Now were down to 8-10 days

and how in the world are we gonna 

resupply Israel when:


"This tenuous deal 

follows a beefed-up U.S. presence 

in the greater Middle East 

and 

months of 

missile-and-drone exchanges 

that 

chewed through 

coveted 

stateside 

stockpiles."

??????????)


"Despite claiming major successes against Iran's military infrastructure, Israel is rapidly depleting its supply of long-range missile interceptors, raising alarm over the sustainability of its defence systems, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing a US official familiar with allied intelligence assessments."


The report came amid relentless missile exchanges between Israel and Iran. Since Israel launched Operation Rising Lion last Friday, Iranian forces have fired roughly 400 ballistic missiles — part of an estimated arsenal of 2,000 capable of reaching Israeli territory.


(Ive seen other reports saying its upwards of 3000.)


"Israeli defences, particularly the Arrow system designed to intercept high-altitude ballistic missiles, have managed to neutralise most incoming projectiles, but not without significant strain."


"Officials in Tel Aviv told WSJ that one-third of Iran's missile launchers have been destroyed and claim to have achieved air superiority over Iranian skies. Still, intelligence sources warned that over half of Iran's missile inventory remains intact, with a portion likely concealed in underground facilities."


(Once Israel and the US spend our interceptors?

Israel will be susceptible to missile attacks from Iran

much like Kiev is now to Russian missile attacks.

Think it aint gonna happen?)


"The cost of maintaining Israel's layered missile defence — comprising the Iron Dome, David's Sling, the Arrow system, and US-supplied Patriots and THAAD batteries — is becoming a critical concern. Israeli financial daily The Marker estimated that nightly missile defence operations are costing up to 1 billion shekels ($285 million). The Arrow system alone fires interceptors priced at $3 million each."


(See above about:

OKAY SO, 

UNDERSTAND:

What is really under attack,

is our and Israels weakness:

Our lack of an

"industrial base capacity 

to produce interceptors")


"With Iranian missile barrages continuing almost daily, Israeli air defence stockpiles are now under severe pressure. 

Without rapid resupply from the United States 

(HOW?)

or direct intervention, Israel can maintain its missile defence for 10 or 12 more days if Iran maintains a steady tempo of attacks, a source briefed on US and Israeli intelligence told WSJ. "The system is already overwhelmed. Soon, they may have to choose which missiles to intercept," the source said."


(And you and me and the Irainians 

will be able to see tell when that is happening:

"Soon they may have to choose 

which missiles to intercept"


"That strain is beginning to show. On Friday night, Iranian missiles evaded Israel's defences and struck near the IDF headquarters in Tel Aviv. On Sunday, a direct hit forced the shutdown of a major oil refinery near Haifa. And on Tuesday morning, verified social media videos captured 

multiple Iranian missile impacts 

close to Israel's intelligence compound 

north of Tel Aviv."


"While Israel's offensive strikes have reportedly dealt heavy blows to Iran's capabilities, including military bases, oil infrastructure, and nuclear-linked sites, the broader conflict now hinges on whether Israel can continue defending its skies without exhausting its most-advanced and expensive missile shield."


(That is exactly what I told my friends over dinner last night.

Not only in this conflict but everywhere.

The people with the cheap ballistic missiles

have a built in advantage 

over the people that are trying to shoot them down.


Our adversaries figured this out years ago

and are now beginning to employee that advantage

in Ukraine, in this conflict 

and most assuredly in what is to follow:

Taiwan , China, Pacific etc.

Kinda been our adversaries game plan 

for a long time now.


This is why I don't listen to the likes of Ben Sahpiro et al.

They aint gonna tell you what I do.



Etc.


And on a lil side note?


I have never seen the scriptural justification for 

priest of preachers having to be celibate.


The horrendous results of that policy

speak for themselves.

(And it wasnt always that way BTW).


But if people wanna use the abuses that arose 

(as a direct result of that policy)

 as some kind of justification 

for rejecting their creator?


Or use the sexual predators 

of the Southern Baptist Convention


or the LGBTQ+ in the UMC?

 as some kind of justification 

for rejecting their creator?


Well then go right ahead.

Have it your way.


Still love ya, 

still pulling for the Holy Spirit 

to find its way into your heart, 

still be your friend, 

still hang out, 

have a good time

socialize etc.


And going to a mountain top?

Or anywhere else for that matter

aint gonna save you 

from the ruler of the universe.


Revelation 6:15-17

And the kings of the earth, and the great men, and the rich men, and the chief captains, and the mighty men, and every bondman, and every free man, hid themselves in the dens and in the rocks of the mountains;


16 And said to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb:


17 For the great day of his wrath is come;

 and who shall be able to stand?


Gods wrath?

Still about three

and a half years away.


"There aint no hiding place

from the father of creation

Believe that!"


You already know who.

RNM





Eternity is along time.

I pray you make 

an informed decision about it.


I really do.





Thursday, February 19, 2026

It's not like

 


people don't know this:


The US Navy's overreliance on top missile interceptors

 is 'unsustainable' in more intense fights, top admiral warns


Business Insider 

7/15/25

July of last year.


They knew it a year ago.


Ignoring the reality we face 

and just choosing to believe 

what you want, 

is just flat out stupidity.


  • The US Navy has expended a lot of high-end ballistic missile interceptors in recent air defense operations.

  • A top admiral told BI that this practice is "unsustainable" in high-tempo combat operations.

  • Adm. James Kilby said cheaper alternatives are needed to preserve critical munitions stockpiles.

"US warships fighting around the Middle East have been leaning hard on its best ballistic missile interceptors. That won't be sustainable in high-tempo combat operations that can fast consume key munitions, a top Navy admiral cautioned."

"Kilby said the Navy has fired "significant numbers of advanced munitions" in support of these operations. However, "while the Navy remains fully capable and ready to respond to any contingency today, the pace and volume of these high-end weapon expenditures were neither anticipated by the Navy nor the defense industrial base."

(As I said here:

Thursday, February 19, 2026

"What began as tactical cooperation is crystallising into a strategic partnership, creating the adversarial coalition American policy precisely has historically sought to prevent."


( I 100 % disagree.

This has been the plan all along.


Draw down NATO arms?

Check

(Russia/Ukraine)


Increase Carrier and crew wear and tear

before China vs Taiwan?

Check.



Get the US and Israel to use

difficult and expensive to produce

"Interceptor" missiles

before the main event?

Check.


It didn't just all the sudden turn

"Strategic" over night by chance.



This is how you bring down Goliath.

Coordination, Collusion, Working together.

It wasnt an accident.

It was inevitable.)

It was done on purpose.
Our adversaries knew we couldn't replace them
at the rate we were going to need to be able to.

So they had us use a lot of them 
in the "run up" or the "softening us up"
till we got to the point where we are 
right now today.)


"Navy leadership has pointed to the Red Sea conflict as a clear example of the problem, as US warships have been forced to expend multimillion-dollar missiles to destroy cheap Houthi drones that can cost just thousands of dollars."


(Tuesday, July 8, 2025

 
aint no easy way to put it.

Were Screwed.



First the "fluffier" piece from the AP.





AP 7/02/25

"The Navy also has defended ships in the Red Sea by striking Houthi weapons and launch sites in Yemen with Tomahawk missiles. In one day in January 2024, it fired more Tomahawks than the Navy had purchased the prior year, said Mackenzie Eaglen, a senior defense fellow at the American Enterprise Institute."

And it's not just the naval ones.


CNN 7/31/25


"The United States blew through about a quarter of its supply of high-end THAAD missile interceptors during Israel’s 12-day war with Iran in June, according to two sources familiar with the operation, thwarting attacks at a rate that vastly outpaces production."


"US forces countered Tehran’s barrage of ballistic missiles by firing more than 100 THAADs (short for Terminal High Altitude Area Defense) – and possibly as many as 150 – a significant portion of America’s stockpile of the advanced air defense system, the sources said. The US has seven THAAD systems, and used two of them in Israel in the conflict."


"Former US defense officials and missile experts told CNN that the rapid drawdown has also raised concerns about America’s global security posture and ability to regenerate supplies at speed.


"Last year,  (2024) the US procured only 11 new THAAD interceptors and is expected to receive just 12 more this fiscal year, according to the 2026 budget estimates from the Department of Defense."



"The number of THAADs spent in the 12-day war was first reported by The Wall Street Journal."


(Just in case 

you got something against CNN.

You got something against the WSJ too?)


"Despite the heavy use of THAADs during the 12-day war to help fend off Tehran’s assault last month, dozens of Iranian missiles still struck Israel."


"THAAD is a mobile system that can engage and destroy short-, medium-, and intermediate-range ballistic missiles both inside and outside of the Earth’s atmosphere during their final phase of flight. Each battery is operated by 95 American soldiers, armed with six launchers, and 48 interceptors. The interceptors are manufactured by Lockheed Martin and cost roughly $12.7 million, according to the 2025 Missile Defense Agency budget.


"The US plans to acquire 37 THAAD interceptors next year, according to the 2026 Department of defense budget estimates,..."


(This was written last year, so that is this year now. each system takes 48 interceptors, were not gonna get enough this year to refill one system...)


“The reports about THAAD expenditure are concerning. This is not the sort of thing that the US can afford to continue to do on and on,” he added. “It was a major commitment to our Israeli ally, but missile defense interceptor capacity is definitely a concern, and THAAD is a very scarce resource.”


(Our adversaries knew it.

Thats why they made us use them.)



"US interceptor stockpile concerns preceded the 12-day war, according to four former senior US defense officials who say that the problem is most acute in inventories of high-end interceptors that are a key part of deterrence against China."


"There are nine active THAAD batteries globally, according to manufacturer Lockheed Martin. The US military has seven of those and plans to have an eighth active by 2025

(It has since been delivered.)

according to the Congressional Research Service. Data available in 2019 showed that five of the US’ THAADs were stationed at bases in Texas


(See: Southern Route.

as it explains 

why FIVE of those are in Texas.)


one in Guam and one in South Korea; by last year, the Pentagon had moved two of those batteries to the Middle East to protect Israel."


"Missile shortages and damage in Israel

While most of Iran’s missiles were downed by Israeli and US air defenses, experts, open-source data and video from the ground reviewed by CNN showed that dozens did manage to get through. Tehran’s success rate rose as the war raged on, amounting to some of the worst damage Israel has seen in decades."


(That is only going to get worse now.)


"Analysis conducted by DC-based think tank Jewish Institute for National Security of America (JINSA) estimated that THAADs – alongside Israel’s Arrow-2 and Arrow-3 interceptors – downed 201 of Iran’s 574 missiles, with 57 hitting populated areas. The report estimated that the US’ THAAD system accounted for almost half of all interceptions, indicating that Israel’s Arrow interceptor stockpiles were insufficient. Israel’s Iron Dome system was designed to deflect shorter-range rockets than those being fired by Iran."


After burning through a large portion of their available interceptors, the United States and Israel both face an urgent need to replenish stockpiles and sharply increase production rates,” Ari Cicurel, author of the report, wrote, estimating that it would take three to eight years to replenish at current production rates."


(I keep trying to tell ya,

That is why Israel didn't wanna do this right now.)


"According to data compiled by JINSA, interception rates lagged as the war wore on. Only 8% of Iranian missiles penetrated defenses in the first week of the war. That doubled to 16% in the second half of the conflict and eventually culminated at 25% on the final day of the war before the ceasefire."


(That along with Centcom's forward operating secure communications hub 

at our air base in Qatar being hit were the main reasons forthe reason

 there was a ceasefire, DUH.)


"Analysts say there are several possible reasons for the trend, including an Iranian shift of focus from military targets to populated urban areas, where interception is less robust. Iran also fired more sophisticated missiles as the war progressed."


(Now they have more of them and they have more advanced capabilities than they did before.)


“(Iran) increasingly employed more advanced systems, said Mora Deitch, head of the data analytics center at Israel’s Institute for National Security Studies (INSS). “These included newer missiles with multiple warheads or decoys, which may individually cause less damage but can overwhelm and saturate air defense systems.


(They were saying:

"See what we got?

Keep this up and you will get a lot more of them in the future."

That future is here now.)


"Still missile defense analysts say they saw clear signs of air defense depletion. “The presence of the THAAD battery in the first place suggests that the Israelis don’t have a super deep interceptor magazine,” said Sam Lair, research associate at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies (CNS)."


“Israel was relatively successful in defending (with the US assistance) against unsophisticated Iranian missiles – at the cost of depleting available arsenals of interceptors.


(How many times you gotta say:

"That was the plan!")


"The problem for the US is especially acute in the Indo-Pacific where China has tried to keep the US navy at arm’s length, experts say."


“From a narrowly military standpoint, the Chinese are absolutely the winners in that these last almost two years in the Middle East have seen the US expend pretty substantial amounts of capabilities that the American defense industrial base will find pretty hard to replace,” said Sidharth Kaushal, senior research fellow at Royal United Services Institute."


(Keep trying to tell people it was part of the plan.)


"Ex-defense officials said dwindling defensive capabilities in the Indo-Pacific was a growing concern for the former administration of President Joe Biden as they used the US stockpile to battle Yemen’s Houthi rebels.


“God forbid there should be a conflict in the Pacific, for example, then it really will put a huge strain our missile capacity and the ability for our military to have the munitions necessary to keep up,” said one former senior Biden administration defense official with direct knowledge of the US campaign against the Houthis.


(It the whole reason they had us use them.)

"a conflict in the Pacific"

Thats next, count on it.)