Israel Missile Defense

 

Missile Defense: How Vulnerable Is Israel to Iran’s Attacks?

"Israel and its allies have successfully defended against Iran’s missile attacks thus far, but it has required an extraordinary level of cooperation, and the challenge is likely to only get harder if the conflict escalates."

("If"? 

What fantasy world are these folks living in?)

"Missile defense has reemerged as a topic of great international interest following Iran’s historic, direct attacks against Israel in April and October this year. Israel and its close military partners, including the United States, effectively neutralized both strikes, but their success belies the technical complexity of such a multinational missile defense effort, which could get more difficult if hostilities escalate. The United States, meanwhile, will have to weigh potential security trade-offs in other parts of the world if its forces remain committed in the Middle East."

(Its the most pressing threat to the world right now, its why we are there. Europe is gonna have to deal with the Russians and China and Taiwan? Best guess? We will leave Israel to fends for itself and go after China. Why do I say that?

Luke 21:20

And when ye shall see Jerusalem 

compassed with armies,

 then know

 that the desolation thereof is nigh.

Nowhere in the playbook does it mention:

"When you see Jerusalem and its allies surrounded..."

Only:

"And when ye shall see Jerusalem 

compassed with armies,"

When the time comes?

there wont be anybody to help them.

And if you are thinking:

"Well good!" etc?

THEN THINK ABOUT YOUR WORLD 

WITH IRAN WITH A BOMB FOR A SECOND.

"Israel and its partners employed a “layered defense,” which means it used several different systems to engage various kinds of targets at separate points in their flight, such as ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and drones. Layered defenses are essential because each of these fly at different speeds and altitudes and vary in their ability to maneuver in flight and deploy countermeasures."

(Screenshots from a video I watched a few years back.)

"Iran’s salvos included a combination of all these weapons. Cruise missiles are powered by an engine that burns fuel, which limits their range. They’re cheaper to build and easier to launch than ballistic missiles.

Ballistic missiles are fired into orbit by a booster and travel at altitudes up to several hundred kilometers, depending on the missile. They don’t require an engine because they use the earth’s gravitational pull to travel through space, and they reenter the atmosphere above their target. Ballistic missiles can go farther and faster than cruise missiles because most of their travel is unencumbered by atmospheric drag. Their high speeds after reentry—traveling several times the speed of sound—make them very difficult to shoot down in the so-called terminal phase."

"For a defender like Israel, one way to solve this is by shooting down ballistic missiles in their mid-course phase, while they’re still in space, immediately prior to re-entering the atmosphere. This, too, is hard because detonating explosives in space doesn’t produce a shock wave. Defenders can’t simply explode an interceptor in the missile’s proximity to destroy it; they must hit it directly."

"Israel’s layered defense systems include David’s Sling, Iron Dome, Arrow 2, and Arrow 3. Allies and partners have contributed shipboard ballistic missile defense, which are on some U.S. Navy destroyers, as well as Patriot anti-air batteries, and fighter aircraft that can engage cruise missiles and drones, which are slower-moving targets."

"Why is multinational cooperation so important?

The responses to Iran’s two missile attacks were a multinational effort of remarkable sophistication. Only a few militaries in the world possess the necessary technology and can accomplish the degree of organizational integration that the United States, France, the United Kingdom, and Israel demonstrated. Each ally brings unique defensive capabilities designed for the different kinds of targets."

("the United States, France, the United Kingdom, and Israel,"

throw in Australia as well.

Its not hard to see that France and the UK will be tied down with Russia, while the US and the Australians will be going against the Chinese. 

Who does that leave to help Israel again?

(Luke 21:20

And when ye shall see Jerusalem 

compassed with armies,

No mention of allies.

None.

The almighty comes from a Greek word 

that means "all-ruler".

Its not in any pagan or heathen text.

The first time it makes its appearance is in 

ancient Hebrew text.

The "all-ruler" (Almighty God, as in one), 

simply rules over history by bending it to his will.

You are witnessing that right now.

Unless you got your head 

so far in the sand 

or some other place 

such that you just cant tell 

or you simply dont wanna 

and neither one of those options 

is gonna stop anything thats coming.

Might as well just face facts folks.

Queue Honey:

"The time for being nice is over."

Submit or perish eternally I might add.

Just simply put, this level of continous sophistication between these partners: "the United States, France, the United Kingdom, and Israel," throw in Australia as well." Is simply unsustainable and our common foes know it.

China, Russia, Iran North Korea.

Not to mention THAT COMBINED we don't have enough interceptors.)

"During the April attack, for instance: French and British aircraft shot down drones; U.S. Navy destroyers intercepted ballistic missiles; and Israel used its Arrow, David’s Sling, and Iron Dome systems against missiles and drones at varying altitudes. In the days following Iran’s October strikes, the Pentagon announced it would further bolster this regional missile defense network by temporarily deploying a Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) battery, along with dozens of U.S. troops to operate it. The deployment is in part a recognition that nearly any country, including Israel, needs help in effectively defending against such a large barrage of missiles (in April, the success rate was 99 percent, the Israeli military said).

(This aint fuckin Iraq or Afghanistan.

The American public is sleepwalking into disaster.

Youre gonna wake up one morning and be like:

What? 

What's happening?

Why didn't somebody tell us

this was going to happen?

Well?

Somebody(s) was.

Not our fault you 

don't wanna listen.

YOU CANT DRAW THIS UP ANY BETTER

TO MATCH UP WITH WHAT THE BOOK SAYS

WAS GOING TO HAPPEN

IF YOU TRIED TO.

HOW MANY TIMES?

DO YOU HAVE TO SEE THINGS?

MATCHING UP PERFECTLY?

UNTIL YOU WAVE

YOUR WHITE FLAG

OF SPIRITUAL SURRENDER?)

"Since radars, launch platforms, and interceptor missiles are optimized for different threats, allies need to assign responsibilities among themselves ahead of time. Once an attack begins, warnings from advanced infrared satellites and other intelligence sources have to be rapidly gathered and communicated to defenders. Every second counts. The ability to share tipping and cueing among allies to help refine the fire control for the defensive systems is essential. While responsibilities can be designated before time, the shooting of interceptors must be quarterbacked in real time."

"With especially large inbound salvoes of missiles,

(Like what is coming when Iran responds to Israel's coming attack)

 the defenders need to prioritize targets among them, as it could be impossible to intercept them all. 

(Aint no, "could be" to it, it WILL BE impossible to intercept them all, and we dont know who is going to be involved with Iran when they do launch their "especially large inbound salvoes of missiles"

Iran foreign minister to visit Saudi Arabia, regional countries

Oct 8th

Egypt's Sisi meets with Iran's foreign minister

Oct 17th (First time in 11 years btw...interesting.

FOLKS?

This shit is already out of hand and it aint even started yet.)

"This is possibly what happened during the October attack, when several Iranian missiles reached their targets and damaged Israeli air bases. Israel may have de-prioritized intercepting these missiles, judging that missiles headed toward populated areas were more important to destroy."

(Thats exactly what they did because they know they dont have enough interceptors: 

"The deployment (Of a THADD battery) is in part a recognition that nearly any country, including Israel, needs help in effectively defending against such a large barrage of missiles"

"Does Iran have any advantages to exploit?

Faced with a single salvo attack, a defender such as Israel may not be particularly challenged if they have an adequate stockpile of interceptors. But if an aggressor such as Iran makes repeated attacks over time it can become a strategic problem: as the tit-for-tat exchange plays out over weeks or months, the defender spends down its missiles faster than the attacker. Israel faced one attack in April, another in October, and it could yet face another."

(Hezbollah when it was suffering its string of defeats

wanted to go after Israel.

Iran told them to wait, it wasn't time yet.

See why now?

Interceptors are much more complicated and much more expensive, and therefore take more time to produce, than the missiles fired by the attacker.

Our adversaries figured this out a while back and have been preparing for this moment ever since.

So no, its not:

"They just fight over there all the time."

You wanna be a 35 year old ignoramus

 raised on the internet

with your head up your ass? 

You just go right ahead. 

Facts on the ground say something entirely different.

Did I mention the time to be nice is over?

SERIOUSLY

THIS SHIT IS GOING TO GET REAL

REAL QUICK.

PROBABLY AROUND ELECTION TIME 

IN THE US.

(remember that)

"The challenge is heightened by the fact that sometimes multiple interceptors need to be fired to ensure a single missile is destroyed. Even the most sophisticated defensive systems can’t hit their targets with 100 percent accuracy, partly for reasons described above (e.g., the need to hit inbound missiles directly). Instead, missile defenses hit their targets a portion of the time. Even a 90 percent “probability of kill” may not good enough if the inbound ballistic missile is headed toward a populated area or critical infrastructure, for example. Therefore, to achieve a higher certainty of intercept, the defender would fire two or more interceptors at a single missile, putting the exchange ratio in favor of the attacker."

(As stated above?

China, Russia and Iran all already 

figured this out a long time ago.)

"The problem is compounded by limited magazines (the firing capacity of a ship or land-based interceptor). For instance, during both of Iran’s attacks, U.S. Navy ships helped intercept ballistic missiles. Out of a U.S. destroyer’s 90 vertical launch cells, however, not all are dedicated to interceptors. Some of those cells are reserved for the ship’s self-defense capabilities, such as anti-submarine rockets. The more salvos a ship is forced to engage, the sooner it has to return to port and reload, which takes time. Not all of the navy’s destroyers and cruisers are equipped for ballistic missile defense, either. Land-based missile batteries, too, must rearm. Therefore, missile defense has as much to do with the defender’s in-theater magazine depth and industrial base capacity to produce interceptors, as it does with its general technical capabilities.

(We simply dont have the :

"industrial base capacity"

to produce the interceptors needed.

This is what offshoring

(read GREED.)

all your industrial base gets you.

A defense industry designed 

to maximize profits.

Not protect its populace.

Ill tell you what, 

elect me president

and when we go to war

(We already are BTW)

and I'll draft every single

CEO/executive of:

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORP

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP

THE BOEING CO

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP

BLACKROCK et al...

into the US armed forces 

and make em work for the pay of a buck private.

ITS A NATIONAL EMERGENCY YO.

BOUT TO BE.)

"Are there broader security implications for the United States?

"Iran is not the only threat the United States faces. Over time, the U.S. military can’t necessarily afford to have its ships constantly expending interceptors."

(Our foes figured this out a good while ago, 

and now here we are, 

and the fighting in the middle east is anything but 

the kind that always been in the past.

If only there was a book that could tell us whats up.

This is why missile defense can be a strategic challenge

(Can be?

Like I said, what fantasy world are they living in 

over at The council on Foreign relations?

Authors of the piece.)

—one that has to do with questions including defense production, 

(How many times I gotta say it?

Our foes saw this weakness a long time ago

and now here we are.)

as previously noted, but also alliance relationships, and political questions such as threat prioritization. The United States should also spread its limited missile defense capabilities against other looming threats from China, North Korea, and Russia. The constant expenditure of resources, and the potential that allies’ tolerance for repeated joint defensive efforts may wane with time,

(May?

WTF is wrong with these people?)

 will undoubtedly influence how U.S. and Israeli leaders think about what to do next.

I already told ya.

Israel will eventually face its threats by its self.

Luke 21:20

And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh.

AND YOU ARE WORRIED ABOUT AN ELECTION?

WORRY ABOUT YOUR SOULS ETERNITY.

THE ONLY WAY

YOUR WORLD MAKES ANY SENSE 

RIGHT NOW?

IS THROUGH THE LENS

OF BIBLICAL PHROPHESY.

The Two woes have happened.

Financial crisis and Covid.

The two witnesses 

are about to be made official.

Theres a life form

that not supposed to be here.

(Digital intelligence.)

“The general context for Rev 11:3-13 is the period between trumpets six and seven (one-six are treated in 8:1-9:21). Rev 10:5-7 had announced that the divine mystery conveyed through the prophets would be fulfilled when the seventh angel, without delay, blew his trumpet; the seventh one is then sounded in 11:15 (just after the two-witnesses section), and it ushers in ...the kingdom of our Lord and of his Messiah'. The two-witnesses pericope is also set within the second of the three woes. 

(Covid is still going on.)

Rev 7:13-8:12 presents the first, and 11:14 notes that the second woe has passed with the episode of the witnesses and that the third will come soon. In other words, the two witnesses are located very near to the end of the world.”

 

Once again, 

The interprters bible, 

TY Bro Brian.

Keep doubting.

Keep not wanting to believe it.

WHAT IS YOUR BETTER EXPLAINATION

FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS

IN OUR WORLD TODAY?

BRING AN ARMY OF RAISED ON THE INTERNET KNOW IT ALLS WITH YOU.

BETTER WAKE UP.

YOUR ETERNAL SOUL IS AT STAKE.

IM DOING MY PART AS A WATCHMAN.

I WILLNOT HAVE YOUR BLOOD ON MY HANDS.

PROMISE.

AMEN!

I love you babe.