Ethan?

 Dude?

I keep telling ya.

You keep hanging curve balls?

And I'm gonna keep knocking them out of the park.

The surprising origins of wave-particle duality

First of all this is a great article. 

If you haven't ever read about the subject matter 

you might find it a lil weird at first 

but its well done 

and the historical context of the discovery is a nice piece of work.

.

I just got problems with one line:

"While wave-particle duality owes its origin to the quantum nature of the Universe, 

the human story of how we revealed it was full of important steps and missteps, 

driven at all times 

by the only source 

of information that matters: 

experiments 

and direct observations."

One more time:

"...by the only 

source of information 

that matters: 

experiments 

and direct observations."

Tons of us disagree.

And we are right to do so.

Ethan?

Dude?

You just summarily

and without 

ANY reason

dismissed

all of the genetic code

(Information)

that has existed

or does currently exist

as 

"not mattering".

We think it does matter.

And for one important reason.

It violates the laws of physics.

Information degrades 

over time, 

distance and extreme conditions.

It also never assembles itself randomly,

nor does it self create

and it never "evolves."

Information is always a sign of a conscious, sentient intellect.

Everywhere and anywhere we have ever seen it.

Something is trying to say something to you.

The information in the DNA molecules somehow survived the extremely hot conditions of the  Inflation and Big Bang,

traveled to earth for 10 billion years or so

at nearly the speed of light.

And emerged intact.

And is 

and has been 

in every living thing 

that has ever existed.

Yet you say it doesn't matter 

because in your view:

"the only 

source of information 

that matters: 

experiments 

and direct observations"

It's not just the information that matters to us Ethan, It's, how was it created? along with, how did it get into the DNA molecule?

So you see? 

Maybe there was a reason

you dismissed 

that information?

Maybe?

you don't want 

people thinking about 

what I just mentioned above.

Maybe?

Maybe you know it got there 

somehow outside of the laws of physics?

Outside of the natural laws?

Interesting.

Know what the other word for that is?

Supernatural.

Yeah no kidding gee thx.

Would have never guessed.

(Thats sarcasm BTW)

Either there has to be a subatomic particle we haven't discovered yet, 

(It's their answer for everything BTW, 

more on that in a minute.) 

or there is a physical law of nature that we haven't discovered yet 

that allows it to survive such temperature extremes, 

time and distances. 

Supernatural, yeah, outside natural laws, Id go with that one cause that's what we see. As in currently, that's what we observe, etc...

As in:

"the only 

source of information 

that matters: 

experiments 

and direct observations"

As far as the search 

for other subatomic particles goes?

Well?

Those cats aint exactly liking what they are seeing either.

Inside the hunt for new physics at the world’s largest particle collider

The Large Hadron Collider hasn’t seen any new particles since the discovery of the Higgs boson in 2012. Here’s what researchers are trying to do about it.

"The past 50 years of research have given us a spectacularly granular view of nature's laws, each successive particle discovery clarifying how things really work at the bottom. But now, in the post-Higgs era, particle physicists have reached an impasse in their quest to discover, produce, and study new particles at colliders. "We do not have a strong beacon telling us where to look for new physics", Kahn said.

The fish has jumped as far out of the water as it can y'all. Translation? You are only going to see what you are allowed to see. It's another piece of evidence in the, 

"This gig is about up y'all argument."

Believe in your heart.

Confess with your mouth

Jesus Christ 

Lord of lord and King of Kings.

Risen from the dead 

proves ownership of the life force.

PERIOD.

Anyway, that's that :-).

And also Ethan?

You also just 

summarily

dismissed

all of the

theorems 

that say the multiverse is possible.

(Not probable, possible, that's something for another day perhaps lol.)

So anyway,

to a lot of us?

The information in the DNA molecule matters for a variety of reasons and I will forever hold your own words against you in any support of the multiverse you may publish due to the fact that the mathematical theorems that say its "possible" 

are NOT:

"experiments 

and 

direct observations."

and therefore by your own words.

"Not important."

People better wake up.

Quick like in a hurry a

s my friend used to say.