I go again on my own
Going down the only road I've ever known
Like a drifter, I was born to walk alone..."
Hated that song actually lol.
Truth.
Point is?
Here WE go again.
New study unveils its role in early life
"The beginning of life on Earth
and its evolution over billions of years
continue to intrigue researchers worldwide.
The central
(a principle or set of principles laid down
by an authority as incontrovertibly true.)
or
the directional flow of genetic information
from
a deoxyribose nucleic acid
(DNA) template
to
a ribose nucleic acid
(RNA) transcript,
and finally into a functional protein,
is fundamental
to cellular structure and functions.
"DNA functions as the blueprint of the cell
(Blueprints dont write themselves!)
and carries genetic information
(Always the result on an intellect.)
required for the synthesis of functional proteins.
Conversely, proteins are required
for the synthesis of DNA.
Therefore, whether DNA emerged first
or protein, continues to remain a matter of debate."
(Hogwash!
You'll see why here in a minute.)
"This molecular version of the
"chicken and egg" question
led to the proposition of an "RNA World."
(Complete falsehood.
They are purposely framing the problem wrong.
Its not which came first the DNA or the protein that led to the RNA world hypothesis.
It's that they BOTH (DNA and Protein(s) had to come into existence at roughly the same time as one is dependent upon the other. If they hadn't came into existence at roughly the same time? Each would have soon mutated or "evolved" into something different, or simply ceased to exist.
Two macromolecules randomly evolving and coming into existence at the roughly same time?
What are the odds?
Well...so small
that some might call it what it is,
a miracle.
Now do you see the problem they dont want you to know about?
Its not the chicken and the egg.
It's that they are two sides of the same coin.
That is what scientist know and dont like.
Just like certain cosmologist dont like how fine tuned this universe is for life and seek ways around it (Multiverse).
Its the same exact thing going on here.
"RNAs in the form of "ribozymes," or RNA enzymes,
carry genetic information similar to DNA
(Yup)
and also possess
like proteins.
(Here is what they are not telling you.
1) Just how rare the catalytic functions are in RNA.
2) And the belief that they only happen at the end of very long complex RNA sequences.)
"The discovery of ribozymes further fueled the RNA World hypothesis where RNA served dual functions of "genetic information storage" and "catalysis," facilitating primitive life activities solely by RNA.'
(Holler at me when you figure out how RNA transitioned into DNA and the process reversed itself.
Remember the central dogma now:
"the directional flow of genetic information
from
a deoxyribose nucleic acid
(DNA) template
to
a ribose nucleic acid
(RNA) transcript,
and finally into a functional protein.
(Chicken/egg?
More like cart before the horse
if you ask me.)
"While modern ribosomes are a complex of RNAs and proteins, ribozymes during early evolutionary stages may have been pieced together through the assembly of individual functional RNA units."
"To test this hypothesis, Professor Koji Tamura, along with his team of researchers at the Department of Biological Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, conducted a series of experiments to decode the assembly of functional ribozymes. For this, they designed an artificial ribozyme,
(Play God much?
Every last one of these origin of life experiments suffers from the same problem. There is an outside entity directing the process. Interesting.)
"R3C ligase, to investigate how individual RNA units come together to form a functional structure."
"We modified the structure by adding specific domains that can interact with various effectors."
(Again, play God much?)
"To explore whether the elongation of RNA, achieved by linking individual RNA units together, is regulated allosterically, the researchers altered the structure of the R3C ligase."
(How many times you gotta say it?
Play God much?)
"Given the important roles of ATP and histidine in RNA interactions and molecular functions, these results provide novel insights into the role of RNA in early evolution, including the origin of the genetic code."
(Translation
You know that thing we told it what to do?
Yeah.
Well it did what we told it.
And?
"including the origin of the genetic code."
And no example given as to how.
Just a blanket statement.
Here is the problem.
You can prove RNA originated
ALL OF THE GENETIC CODE IN THE WORLD, THAT HAS EVER EXISTED, EVERY LAST BIT OF IT, FOR EVERY SINGLE THING THAT HAS EVER LIVED ON THE FACE OF THE EARTH.
But if you can not show how RNA
transitioned into DNA?
Then you aint proved shit.
Remember the dogma:
(What we know to be true)
"the directional flow of genetic information
from
a deoxyribose nucleic acid (DNA) template
to
a ribose nucleic acid (RNA) transcript,
and finally into a functional protein"
"Furthermore, engineered ribozymes such as the one developed in this study..."
(Hey the thing did what we told it to!)
"Overall, this study can offer insights into how the transition from the RNA World to the modern "DNA/Protein World" occurred.
(How?
Did somebody have to engineer that as well?
It violates essential Dogma!)
Other problems with the RNA World hypothesis include:
RNA is inherently unstable.
It Doesn't like water or moisture.
It hasn't been able to self replicate
in the pristine settings of a lab.
And "modeling" the conditions of a primordial earth (in a lab) are at best simply a guess.
This is what happens when science tries to work around what it doesn't like seeing,
namely:
"They are purposely framing the problem wrong.
Its not which came first the DNA or the protein that led to the RNA world hypothesis.
It's that they BOTH (DNA and Protein(s) had to come into existence at roughly the same time as one is dependent upon the other. If they hadn't came into existence at roughly the same time? Each would have soon mutated or "evolved" into something different, or simply ceased to exist.
Two macromolecules randomly evolving and coming into existence at the roughly same time?
What are the odds?
Well...so small that some might call it what it is, a miracle.
Combine all the physical constants we know we have to have to exact tolerances (13? 20? 26?30? of them? It doesn't really matter) with the fact that two macromolecules (DNA and proteins) came together in roughly the same time? And you will start to understand just how unlikely it is that our universe ever came into existence, let alone have the life in it it does.
The more you know and understand
about your world?
On the microscopic?
and large scale structures
(LSS) level?
The more you will become convinced,
that not only can there be a God?
But that there has to be.
No comments:
Post a Comment