Thursday, August 1, 2024

The

 differences in the reporting are chilling.

Gonna try and point some out to you.




Notice in particular:

"threatening escalation"


That was the original story that I screenshot to be able to reference later.
Then when I did a search for the title of that article (exact wording) 
the following was returned at the top of the search:


Same article less than 24 hours later, 
same author, few updates etc,
but notice the headline change:


We went from

"threatening escalation"

to

"risk triggering all-out regional war"
in less than 24 hours.

Think people don't know whats up?
Please...

If you honestly believe 
that its gonna just be a "regional"
war and not global?
And eventually turn nuclear 
as combatants run out of other options?

You might wanna get a clue.
Worry about your souls eternity.

Luke 21:20, 22

20 And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh.

22 For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled.

Now to the article:


"The assassination was potentially explosive amid the region’s volatile, intertwined conflicts because of its target, its timing and the decision to carry it out in Tehran.

(Potentially?
It was
done 
Purposely
to be as
explosive as could be.

The "target" as we will see later would have been the guy who would have signed a cease fire deal for Hamas.

They didnt just take him out
they intentionally took him out
in Tehran, Iran's capitol.

Translation:
Fuck your ceasefire
lets get it on.

Kinda hard to make it any more obvious.
Did I mention Israel has had invasion plans drawn up for Lebanon for a while now?


"The strike came just after Haniyeh had attended the inauguration of Iran’s new president in Tehran — and hours after Israel targeted a top commander in Iran’s ally Hezbollah in the Lebanese capital, Beirut."

"The assassination was potentially explosive amid the region’s volatile, intertwined conflicts because of its target, its timing and the decision to carry it out in Tehran."

("the decision to carry it out in Tehran."
There is your sign right there.)


WARNING WESTERN US LED PROPAGANDA ALERT:

"Bitter regional rivals, Israel and Iran risked plunging into war earlier this year when Israel hit Iran’s embassy in Damascus in April. Iran retaliated, and Israel countered in an unprecedented exchange of strikes on each other’s soil, but international efforts succeeded in containing that cycle before it spun out of control."

(Newsflash:
ITS STILL SPINNING OUT OF CONTROL!

Witness:

 July 19th


July 27th



Were still in the same cycle!


If 

"international efforts succeeded in containing that cycle"

Still led to the two attacks mentioned above?

Id hate to think what unsuccessful international efforts would have led to.

IT"S THIS KINDA SPIN THAT FLIES IN THE FACE OF SUCH OBVIOUS FACTS TO THE CONTRAY, THAT JUST DRIVES ME INSANE.


ITS WHAT OUR LEADERS WANT YOU TO THINK AND ITS COMING RIGHT FROM THE MOUTHPIEC E OF STATE ISSUED PROPAGANDA THESE DAYS THE AP.


THEY MIGHT AS WELL HAVE SCREAMED:
NOTHING TO SEE HERE!
CARRY ON!
KEEP SPENDING!
ITS ALL WE CARE ABOUT.
NOTHING ELSE MATTERS

(queue the tallica song btw)


"But international diplomats trying to defuse tensions were alarmed."


(As well they should be.)


"One Western diplomat, whose country has worked to prevent an Israeli-Hezbollah escalation, said the strikes in Beirut and Tehran have “almost killed” hopes for a Gaza cease-fire"


(That was the intent yawl.)


"and could push the Middle East into a “devastating regional war.” 

(It wont just be regional.)

"The diplomat spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive situation."


(Translation?

They know wats up

They want to keep their job)


"Iran’s powerful Revolutionary Guard warned Israel will face a “harsh and painful response” from Iran and its allies around the region. An influential Iranian parliamentary committee on national security and foreign policy was to hold an emergency meeting on the strike later Wednesday.


Hamas’ military wing said in a statement that Haniyeh’s assassination “takes the battle to new dimensions and will have major repercussions on the entire region.”


NOW LETS COMPARE THAT TO:

Qatar, Egypt question future of Gaza talks after Haniyeh’s killing


Qatar, Egypt and the US have been key mediators in talks between Israel and Hamas to end the war in Gaza.


(Oh you mean the intelligence services of those three countries...right...gotcha...makes perfect sense.)


"Qatar and Egypt, key players in the ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas, have questioned the future of negotiations following the Hamas political chief Ismail Haniyeh’s assassination."


(The entire point of the assassination was:

YOU CAN FORGET ABOUT NEGOTIATIONS.)


“Political assassinations and continued targeting of civilians in Gaza while talks continue leads us to ask, how can mediation succeed when one party assassinates the negotiator on the other side?” Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani wrote on X."


(Well? You know?

How much more obvious 

could they have made it?

Theres not gonna be any negotiations 

for a cease-fire in Gaza.

If there were going to be?

Israel wouldnt have taken out:

"the negotiator on the other side"

The fact that it was done in Tehran 

tells you exactly wats up.

And?

Israel has had the invasion plans drawn up 

for southern Lebanon for a while now.

And?

Not to mention:

June 26th

Israel may soon draft ultra-Orthodox Jews. 


Somebody gotta draw you a map?

Where do you think this is headed?


THERE IS A BOOK BEING PLAYED OUT RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOUR EYES AND IT AINT THE QURAN AND IT AINT THE MASORETIC TEXT.)


"Egypt’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said a “dangerous Israeli escalation policy” over the past two days had undermined efforts to broker an end to the fighting in Gaza..."

(Its was the intent yawl...)


"Nour Odeh, a political analyst told Al Jazeera that it would be very difficult for the ceasefire talks to have any traction at this point.

(Notice the flat out truth has to come from a nonwestern source)

“Maybe there wouldn’t be a dramatic change in the dynamics on the ground in Gaza when it comes to fighting, but certainly the prospects of a ceasefire urgently needed … are more distant than they have ever been,” she said."

(Because everybody knows wats up...except the AP of course, they're special. Are they ever.)


“This man [Haniyeh] could have signed the prisoner exchange deal with the Israelis,” Saleh al-Shannar, who was displaced from his home in northern Gaza, told The Associated Press.

(Thats why they killed him.)

“Why did they kill him? They killed peace, not Ismail Haniyeh.”


("THEY KILLED PEACE"

from a dislocated everyday Palestinian.

The truth you would never hear in the west.)


"Nour Abu Salam, a displaced woman, said the killing showed that Israel does not want to end the war and establish peace in the region. “By assassinating Haniyeh, they are destroying everything,” she said.


(Again

100% correct.)


“We’ve been working from day one not only to try to get to a better place in Gaza, but also to prevent the conflict from spreading, whether it’s the north with Lebanon and Hezbollah, whether it’s the Red Sea with the Houthis, whether it’s Iran, Syria, Iraq, you name it,” Blinken told a forum in Singapore.


What makes these people think they can stop Gods will?


Luke 21: 20, 22

20 And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh.


22 For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled.

???????)


"Israeli government spokesperson David Mencer told reporters in an online briefing that Israel remained committed to the negotiations."


Yeah...thats why they took out the negotiator from the other side...right...gotcah...


Just the difference between the AP:

(US based)

"Bitter regional rivals, Israel and Iran risked plunging into war earlier this year when Israel hit Iran’s embassy in Damascus in April. Iran retaliated, and Israel countered in an unprecedented exchange of strikes on each other’s soil, but international efforts succeeded in containing that cycle before it spun out of control."


intentionally not mentioning that we are still in the same cycle, and not point out wat is so clearly evident:


“Why did they kill him? They killed peace, not Ismail Haniyeh.”

Which came from Al Jazerra.


OUGHT TO BE CONCERNING TO YOU.


KEEP SPENDING,


ITS ALL OKAY,


NO BIBLICAL PROPHECYS 

COMING TRUE,


NOTHING T O SEE HERE ETC...


ITS SICKENING.



No comments: