Friday, November 29, 2024

I

 


just wanna make sure I got this right.


Russian jets intercept B-52s during Baltic training flight


Ill go ahead and give the background

but what matters is at the end of the piece.


"The B-52s were conducting a training flight when the Russian Su-27 fighters intercepted them near Kaliningrad. The defense official said the interception was safe and professional, and the B-52s continued with their planned flight."

"The B-52s are part of a bomber task force mission that deployed to Europe in early November. During Monday’s flight, the B-52s carried out their first simulated weapons drop in Finland and integrated with Finnish F/A-18C Hornets and Swedish JAS 39 Gripens.

"The bombers, which are assigned to the 20th Expeditionary Bomb Squadron, took off from RAF Fairford in England."


All of that is kind of standard operating fare.

You cut the undersea cables to Jutland?

We practice dropping arms to the Fins

etc.


Here is what is not standard operating fare.

No bomb craters from the 

"experimental" 

Russian missile

 they launched in an attack on Ukraine

 Nov 21st remember?

Not one image of one crater.


Now here we are some

six days later?

(This article above was published on 11/27)

and here is what is says:


"On Thursday, (11/21) Russia launched an experimental intermediate-range ballistic missile at the Ukrainian city of Dnipro. 

Reuters later reported, 

citing Ukrainian government sources

that the missile contained 

dummy warheads without explosives."


Yeah...right...

Thats why the Ukraine parliament was shut down 

skipping a session 

and

NATO and Ukraine had an emergency meeting 

NATO and Ukraine to hold emergency talks after Russia’s attack with new hypersonic missile

the next Tuesday? 


And now, with no impact craters of the missile strike, we are being told some six days later that 


"the missile contained 

dummy warheads without explosives"?


Here is the Reuters piece 

the article above was referencing:


"New Russian missile fired at Ukraine carried warheads without explosives, sources say"

11/26/24.

??????


So it takes them five days?

To figure out 

there wasn't any warheads on it?


(UKRAINIAN SOURCES NO LESS

CAUSE THEY ARE SO TRUSTWORTHY.)


And they skipped a session  of Parliament?

And NATO net with Ukraine 

the following Tuesday?


Because of a missile that:

"contained 

dummy warheads 

without explosives"

??????????


This is how stupid

they think you are.


Yeah...right...

sure thing...

unnamed Ukrainian Government Sources.

Gotcha.


And they only bring this up?

After somebody says 

(I wonder who btw:-) 

"Hey, wait a minute

where are the blast craters?"




I just never thought
I would be living in a country
where people would be 
this 
oblivious/ignorant/unconcerned
and 
SIMPLY UNWILLING
to face the facts
about the world we are living in.

WARNING:

What follows is some more 
Mindless Western Propaganda 
to keep you spending your $ 
you dont have any of
to be spending
this Holiday season.


"A new ballistic missile fired by Russia at the Ukrainian city of Dnipro last week carried multiple warheads but no explosives, and caused limited damage, two senior Ukrainian government sources said."

(Why did it take five days to figure that out then huh?

Nice to know were being watched/monitored etc.)


"One of the sources (Ukrainian) said the missile was carrying dummy warheads and described the damage caused as "quite small"."

(I might as well 

be from Missouri

at this point:

So show us then,

the 

"small damage".

Where is it?

What's the harm in showing us?)


"The second source said:..."

(Why are the "Ukrainian" Sources 

unnamed?

Who are they?

What are their positions 

in the Ukrainian government?

How do they know such information?

How did they obtain it?

Just on and on and on...

Truth don't cause questions.

It answers them.)


"In this case, (the missile) was without explosives...There were no types of explosions like we expected. There was something, but it was not huge."


"Putin also said Russia would continue to test the Oreshnik in combat and that it had a stock ready for use. Kyiv has said Ukraine is already working to develop air systems to counter the weapon."

(Mach 11?

8940 MPH?

Ukraine,

while in a war,

is 

"working to develop 

ir systems to counter the weapon."

that the rest of the world 

hasnt accomplished so far?

Get a clue.)


"U.S. officials have said Russia probably possesses only a handful of these missiles..."

(Horse shit we know he has tons, its why we didnt want to "escalate" things with them until we were just given no choice.


What's your explanation?

Why we didnt wanna 

"escalate" 

things with Russia?

I just gave you mine.

Same as I have been saying all along.


What your explanation?

Just gonna go with the 

Company narrative/line of thought?

That Biden is a pussy?

Dont fall for it.

It goes a lot deeper than that.


If Putin doesnt have a lot of them?

And this is only one variety BTW

Then why did they suspend the Ukrainian parliment?

and NATO meet with Ukraine the following Tuesday?


Oh I forgot...

cause of a missile 

with no explosives in its warheads...

right...gotcha...

makes perfect sense...



NO IT MOST CERTIANLY DOES NOT.)


"I would say this is an incredibly expensive way to deliver what is probably not that much destruction," said Jeffrey Lewis, director of the East Asia Nonproliferation Program at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies in California."

(And I would say you're a fucking idiot.

Tow the company line much?

I guess he saw the damage 

that was

"quite small"

and 

HE 

can explain

why it took em

five days?

Five?

To tell you

the missile 

didn't have explosives 

in its warheads?


PEOPLE PLZ
I AM BEGGING YOU

COME TO YOUR SENSES.

QUICK LIKE IN A HURRY!


Here is what 

the 

US NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL

had to say about it:

What we know about the experimental missile Russia fired at a Ukrainian city today

11/21, 

day of the attack:


"...here in the U.S., the National Security Council said in a statement this was an experimental, intermediate-range, ballistic missile that had conventional explosives."


"And Putin went on to say that Russia has the right to use its weapons against countries that allow their weapons to be used against Russia. So he was making a very direct challenge to the U.S. and European nations arming Ukraine. 

(Its what we wanted all along.

(After he bled em all dry  (US NATO) 

of conventional arms BTW.

There are only 40 or so countries in this coalition,

the majority of the world

(either neutral or lined up against US)

couldn't care less 

and simply wants to see us fall at this point.)


"And just to be clear, this Russian missile used today had conventional warheads, but it can carry a nuclear weapon. And military experts say that it's designed primarily to deliver a nuclear warhead."


So take your pick:

US National Security Council 

day of the missile attack?


Or two unnamed 

"Ukrainian" (so they say) 

government sources 

five days later?


I know which one Id go with.

(In this case at least.)


"MYRE: Yeah, absolutely. I spoke with Michael Kofman at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. He recently returned from Ukraine, where he visited front-line areas. He described this as a war of attrition that neither Russia nor Ukraine can sustain."


(The guy is 42 years old.


Go watch a documentary 

on Stalingrad 

dipshit.


This is how Russia fights 

and wins wars.


Its what they do.

They simply outlast you.

And besides:

Friday, April 12, 2024

Somebody has been trying to tell ya...


 "Cavoli said in his written testimony that Russia is expected to produce more ammunition than all 32 NATO allies combined per year and is on track to “command the largest military on the continent and a defense industrial complex capable of generating substantial amounts of ammunition and materiel in support of large scale combat operations.”


I guess:

"Michael Kofman 

at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace."




He either doesnt know 

what the fuck he is talking about?

Or he is spreading 

US government propaganda


Because apparently?

 He didn't get the memo.



"Kofman says we shouldn't assume Putin is willing to negotiate. In fact, he doesn't think Putin will negotiate seriously if he believes he's gaining ground."

(At least he got that right.

If we had a weapon nobody else had?

Would we negotiate?

You already know the answer.

So why will Russia?

Kiev, Brussels, London, Munich and Paris

could all be up in flames in a matter of minutes

with conventional warheads.

DC and Wall Street 

will be right behind them.


Told my preacher and others 

through-out the years,

several times over:


"We are going to live to see things 

we just never thought we would."


In other news lol.

Like anybody wants to keep reading at this point lol.


UK intelligence chief accuses Russia of 'staggeringly reckless' sabotage campaign


"Hybrid attacks on Ukraine's Western allies 

appear to be proliferating

and several high-profile incidents 

have been blamed on the Kremlin."

(Appear to be?

You kidding me?

Aint no:

"Appear"

to it, 

THEY ARE!)


"We have recently uncovered a staggeringly reckless campaign of Russian sabotage in Europe, even as Putin and his acolytes resort to nuclear sabre-rattling, to sow fear about the consequences of aiding Ukraine," Moore told his audience."

(He aint saber rattling. He has demonstrated to you that he has capabilities that the rest of the world doesn't and that he is willing to use them.)


"Such activity and rhetoric is dangerous and beyond irresponsible."

(What was

"dangerous and beyond irresponsible"

Was a bunch of greedy 

war-mongering, 

war profiteering fucks

putting NATO missiles in Poland

when a lot of experts said:


"DONT DO IT!

THERES NO NEED"


that led us here 

to start with.


Ref: 

Wednesday, October 25, 2023

Yup...

 Calling Russia's Attack 'Unprovoked' Lets US Off the Hook)


"Lerner agreed with Moore that 

"the collective security 

of the whole of Europe is at stake" 

in Ukraine."


(Somebody knew that before they ever got started.

Thats why they bled 

all of NATO dry 

of conventional weapons.

Where is the difficulty here 

in understanding all of this?)



‘Would you survive 72 hours?’ 

Germany and the Nordic countries 

prepare citizens for possible war


(Possible?

The people in the know?

Know better.

All of it was avoidable.

Putin made an offer 

to draw up a new security architecture 

for Europe, 

and we laughed at him.


Eventually?

Every Schoolyard Bully 

(US)

that has ever lived 

gets dethroned.


No exceptions.

Every last one.

Same fate.

Now its our turn:

"God is allowing Satan 

to destroy your country 

right in front of you."

I remember somebody saying.


I really don't care if you don't believe it 

or don't like it,

it goes right along with the whole:

"Brutally Honest"

part of the programming we provide here, 

equal opportunity offender and all)


"Apps and booklets are offering advice on how to build a bunker, stockpile food and live without electricity in case the worst happens"




"Experts predict an attack by Russia may be a possibility within the next five years and the search is now on for any structure that could be used if such an event occurred, including metro stations and basements of public offices, schools and town halls."

(Bomb Shelters)


Fuck the experts.

They have all been

increasingly stupid

and irrelevant post-Covid.



Ask yourself this:




If you were Russia?

And you had a weapon?

Nobody else has?

And nobody else has a defense for?




WOULD YOU?

WE?

US?

GIVE THE REST OF THE WORLD

FIVE YEARS TO COME UP WITH ONE?





And?



If its five years out?

Then why would:


"Hybrid attacks on Ukraine's Western allies 
appear to be proliferating..."




Hum?

























No comments: