just wanna make sure
I got this right.
Trump said we had
"obliterated"
Iran's nuclear program
after our attacks on it.
Iran’s Nuclear Facilities Have Been Obliterated
whitehouse.gov June 25th 2025
So why are we currently
"having talks"
with them about it?
And want them to
"make a deal"
about something that was
"obliterated?
It's like I woke up one morning
and my entire country
had just went
collectively brain dead.
after Iran assessment that angered Trump
Guardian 8/22/25
"The US defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, has fired a general whose agency’s initial intelligence assessment of damage to Iranian nuclear sites from US strikes angered Donald Trump, according to two people familiar with the decision and a White House official."
"Lt Gen Jeffrey Kruse will no longer serve as head of the US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), according to the people, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it publicly"
"The firing is the latest upheaval in the US military and intelligence agencies, and comes a few months after details of the preliminary assessment leaked to the media. It found that Iran’s nuclear program has been set back only a few months by the US strikes, contradicting assertions from Trump and the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu."
"In a news conference following the June strikes,
Hegseth lambasted the press for focusing on the preliminary assessment
but did not offer
any direct evidence
of the destruction of Iranian
nuclear production facilities."
Since we are already
building up forces and assets
in the region
(again)
what seems like
the most logical choice?
"obliterated"
or
"Iran’s nuclear program
has been set back only a few months"
??????????
No comments:
Post a Comment