Tuesday, February 17, 2026

Iranian Missile Capabilities...

 

Iranian Anti-Ship Missiles vs. US Navy Carriers 

in Middle East

19fortyfive.com 2/12/25

(Remember that date 

it is important throughout.)


"Tehran possesses long-range cruise missiles like the Soumar and Hoveizeh, which could target U.S. Navy ships."


"Key Point #1 – These sea-skimming weapons pose a significant threat, but the U.S. Navy’s Aegis Combat System, electronic warfare, and advanced missile defenses like SeaRAM and SEWIP Block III provide robust protection."


(Their missiles got past the

U.S. Navy’s Aegis Combat System

 last time.

Not those specific missiles

and they weren't targeted at ships

but we had guided missile destroyers

in the region

with Aegis Combat Systems

expressly for the purpose of

providing Israel with more protection

from Iranian missiles and Iranian missiles

 got through.


"The success rates of Iranian ballistic missile strikes has already far exceeded the expectations of most Western assessments, and is expected to continue to rise as the Israeli surface-to-air missile arsenal is increasingly depleted. The Israeli Arrow, Barak 8 and David’s Sling systems capable of intercepting medium range missile attacks are estimated to have only a very small number of interceptors available compared to the size of the Iranian arsenals, with support from U.S. Army THAAD anti-missile systems based in Israel and from nearby U.S. Navy AEGIS destroyers only partly alleviating pressure on the Israeli network.


Iran Launches First Strike on Israel 

Using Mach 13+ Fattah Hypersonic Missile: 

Can it Turn the Tide of the War?

militarywatchmagazine.com 6/18/25)


"Key Point #2 – 

If Iran were to strike

the U.S. could respond 

with F-35C stealth fighters"


(Again this was written a year ago.

when tensions were high

2/12/25.


When was the last time Iran

STARTED

a war?

Not in my lifetime.

Now think about 

US.


Those F-35C stealth fighters

 are on the Abraham Lincoln

as well as the USS Gerald Ford

(which isn't in the region as of yet)


"Could the Iranians launch their own carrier-killing missiles 

like the Chinese are able to do in East Asia?"


See:

Wednesday, 

November 1, 2023

Read

past the headline.

“The fact that there’s another front directly to the south raises the risk that Israel (air defenses) can be overwhelmed and then it can be that much more worrying” if Hezbollah, Hamas and others launch massive missile barrages.


(That is another reason this is SO significant.

The JV team

(Iranians)

can and probably will

overwhelm and exhaust

Israeli air defenses.


And if they can do that?

They can get us to exhaust 

some of our carrier groups

missile defenses as well.

Right as were leading into 

China and Taiwan etc.)


"The Reach of Iranian Anti-ship Missiles

The Iranians have long-range cruise missiles that could be aimed at the Truman strike group, 

(This was a year ago remember)

and they could target the American ships in the Eastern Mediterranean plus the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz."


"Iran has the Soumar and the Hoveizeh cruise missiles. The Soumar has a range of more than 1,800 miles. The Hoveizeh is a variant of the Soumar and has a range of 839 miles. The Hoveizeh has an accurate inertial guidance system that could hit a moving ship. It reportedly can strike a target radius of three feet. 


That may be overstated by the Iranians and a form of braggadocio, but it is safe to say that the missile is a threat to U.S. Navy carriers."


(It's not overstated.

Not in the least:


Saturday, June 21, 2025

Now

the truth you didn't wanna hear about.


Iran Launches First Strike on Israel 

Using Mach 13+ Fattah Hypersonic Missile: 

Can it Turn the Tide of the War?

Military watch magazine 06/18/25


So that article was four months 

AFTER

the article we are currently 

working our way through:


Iranian Anti-Ship Missiles

vs. US Navy Carriers 

in Middle East

19fortyfive.com 2/12/25


The whole point of this post

is to give people an awareness

of Iranian missile capabilities 

 they are not aware of.

The fact that I had to use an article this old

to give an accurate picture of those capabilities

tells me people don't want you to know about the

Iranian capabilities.

This used to not be all that hard to find.

Now I had to dig to find it.

It may not mean anything to you

but it says a whole hell of a lot to me.


Now from:

Iran Launches First Strike on Israel 

Using Mach 13+ Fattah Hypersonic Missile: 

Can it Turn the Tide of the War?

Military watch magazine 06/18/25

Unveiled in June 2023, the Fattah has a 1400 kilometre range, and according to Iranian sources uses a hypersonic glide vehicle to achieve a terminal speed of Mach 13 to Mach 15. Its combination of speed and manoeuvrability make it nearly impossible to intercept."

"With Israeli air defences have struggled to intercept attacks launched using much simpler ballistic missile classes, including relatively basic missile designs built in Yemen

their viability against 

more advanced missile classes 

has long been in serious question. 

Hypersonic glide vehicles represent one of the most challenge targets an air defence network can face." 


"The success rates of Iranian 

ballistic missile strikes 

has already far exceeded 

the expectations 

of most Western assessments, 

and is expected to continue to rise 

as the Israeli 

surface-to-air missile arsenal 

is increasingly depleted."


That was written four months after:

"Iran has the Soumar and the Hoveizeh cruise missiles. The Soumar has a range of more than 1,800 miles. The Hoveizeh is a variant of the Soumar and has a range of 839 miles. The Hoveizeh has an accurate inertial guidance system that could hit a moving ship. It reportedly can strike a target radius of three feet. 

That may be overstated by the Iranians 

and a form of braggadocio."


So Im gonna go with

NO.

NO IT IS NOT

"overstated by the Iranians 

and a form of braggadocio"


As they have already shown 

what they can do.)


"Sea-skimming Missiles Are More Difficult to Track

The Hoveizeh also skims low above the sea to avoid radar. This could be dangerous to the strike group. Usually, carriers operate a few hundred miles close to shorelines in order for their aircraft to be able to threaten land targets without refueling

This would give the Iranian cruise missiles a chance to hit a ship."


Exactly what I said earlier today:

Tuesday, February 17, 2026

USS Abraham Lincoln...Lets take a look...


"Our aircraft carriers

 have to get within striking range of Iran's Missiles

in order to get the planes close enough.


600 miles is about the greatest range

(combat radius actualy)

one of our naval fighters has

(Maybe somewhat longer but not much.)


To stay out of their range?

Air refeulers would be needed.


IT'S A PROBLEM.

One you will not hear about.


Its why all the growler 

electronic warfare planes are being put

in the region, we know 

what a tussle this is going to be.)


Back to 

Iranian Anti-Ship Missiles vs. US Navy Carriers 

in Middle East

19fortyfive.com 2/12/25

"The Soumar is a threat, too, and has been for at least 20 years. “The origin of the Soumar appears to be from the nuclear-capable Russian Kh-55. In 2005, Russia acknowledged that 12 Kh-55s [without nuclear warheads] were illegally sold to Iran in 2001 through a black market counterfeit operation,” according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies.


"These two missiles require high levels of maintenance and upkeep, and Iran must have a modern launching system to target carriers and their escort ships. 


(They have underground facilities.

They have been planning for this moment 

since the Iranian revolution in 79.)


"There is also the question of whether they can be produced domestically in numbers with enough to threaten a large contingent of civilian ships and military vessels."


"The U.S. Navy Can Protect Itself Well

It is also unknown whether the Soumar is as accurate as the Hoveizeh. Can it hit moving targets? How precise is the guidance system? The carrier strike group escort ships have a highly effective and battle-tested Aegis Combat System that protects against enemy missiles, so the carrier is not defenseless."


(It hasn't ever seen anything like:


"Unveiled in June 2023, the Fattah has a 1400 kilometre range, and according to Iranian sources uses a hypersonic glide vehicle to achieve a terminal speed of Mach 13 to Mach 15. (9974 mph) Its combination of speed and maneuverability make it nearly impossible to intercept."


Iran Launches First Strike on Israel 

Using Mach 13+ Fattah Hypersonic Missile: 

Can it Turn the Tide of the War?

Military watch magazine 06/18/25)


"Another way to foil Iranian missiles would be to use electronic warfare from EA-18G Growler jamming airplanes. 

This could spoof an incoming missile fired from Iran

There are other defensive options."


(Apparently it is what we are counting on 

or we wouldn't be sending so many of them to the region.)


“US Navy DDG 51 Arleigh Burke class destroyers are now armed with lasers, improved range high-fidelity radar, upgraded interceptors and a new generation of more precise electronic warfare technology called SEWIP Block III.

Closer-in interceptors such as SeaRAM, Rolling AirFrame Missile, and Close-in-Weapons System have also been upgraded as well."


(None of that is going to do shit

against something going 9974 mph.

Hence the growlers.)


"If even one Iranian missile got through the protective umbrella and damaged or sunk an American ship, how would the U.S. Navy respond?"


(All they have to do is get a couple through our defenses.

while we have to be right 100% of the time.

The odds are simply not in our favor.


I read a white paper 


"A white paper is an authoritative, in-depth report that outlines a specific problem and presents a detailed, evidence-based solution or perspective. Primarily used in business-to-business (B2B) marketing and government, these documents aim to educate readers and influence decision-making regarding technology, policy, or complex issues."


years ago

12?13?

I cant remember, but it had 

the US loosing two carriers

in the opening minutes of a conflict

with Iran, and 

the only thing that saved us

and enabled us to come back

and eventually subdue them

was our ability to refuel and rearm our aircraft

at our military bases in the middle east.

Now Iran has drones that can hit those bases

that it didn't have

when that paper was written.

Kinda hard to land aircraft 

when the runway has a 30 foot crater in it.


THIS AINT NO CAKEWALK

LIKE YOU ARE BEING FORCE FED.

NOT AT ALL.)


"The F-35C would need to be within 500 miles of the target before it would need to refuel. A more extended strike range would require in-air refueling and that would limit the level of stealthiness the F-35C enjoys. The Navy could also use the carrier-launched unmanned MQ-25 Stingray refueler drone."


"Iran does have anti-ship missiles that could target carrier strike groups. However, there are many ways that the U.S. Navy has protection. The missiles could be jammed or shot down."


(We are not going to shoot down something going 9000+ MPH.

We dont have anything that can catch up to it.

Hence the growlers, the best shot we got is:

"The missiles could be jammed."

We hope.)


"The Americans should operate with high confidence that they can survive in the Middle East."


(This was written six moths before Iran used the Mach 13+ Fattah Hypersonic Missile, needless to say, things changed since then.)


"There is always a chance of a missile launch, but the Iranian missiles would not be a showstopper and if even one got through the anti-missile screen to damage or destroy an American ship there would be a response from fighter jets to even the score."


(This aint about tit for tat anymore.

Iran feels like its do or die this time

and is willing to wage all out war in the region

and had said as much.) 


"Iran may not wish to push the U.S. Navy 

and create a counter-strike 

that could make a larger war."


(This is now a fight for their very survival.

They couldn't care less 

about a larger regional conflict.


"Hey?

if we are going down?

So are some others in the region."


Would seem to be much more applicable than

caring about any larger regional war breaking out)


 "Look for carrier strike groups 

to continue their patrols in the Middle East 

with the intention that 

they can project power 

without any losses."


Hardly.


Saturday, May 10, 2025

Houthis, Iran etc...


"Okay so roughly seven weeks.

Lost 7 reaper drones 

at a cost of 28 million each.

(196 million)

2 jet fighters lost overboard

(roughly 140 million.)


Spent a billion 

during the first three weeks 

of the operation

sending off alarm bells

to the Indo-pacific command.


So if we spent another

billion?

The second three weeks?

Like we did the first?


Roughly 2.3 billion"


(That was just three months after:

"Look for carrier strike groups to continue their patrols in the Middle East with the intention that they can project power without any losses."

was written.


Also see:

Tuesday, May 6, 2025

Your country


Trump's fight 

against the Houthis, 

by the numbers

Axios 2/6/25


Which was actually written prior to

"they can project power 

without any losses."


Seems like somebody should have known better 

than to write what they did.


Here is the moral of the story:

Ezekiel 16:49


Behold, this was the iniquity 

of thy sister Sodom, 


1) PRIDE

(arrogance)


2) fulness of bread, 

(Fat)


and abundance of idleness 

(Lazy)

was in her and in her daughters, 

neither did she 

strengthen the hand 

of the poor and needy.


("It's their own fault!")


So who does that sound like 

to you today hum?


Cause it sure sound like 

US 

to me.


Proverbs 16:18

Pride goeth before destruction, 

and an haughty spirit 

before a fall.


We should be expecting the same exact result

that Sodom and her sister city's faced.


Love warns about impending judgement.

Yes it does.


Also consider:

Iran’s ballistic missile arsenal: Types, ranges, and regional impact - explainer

The Jerusalem Post 2/4/26


"According to a 2023 report by Behnam Ben Taleblu, a Senior Fellow at the US-based Foundation for Defense of Democracies, Iran continues to develop underground missile depots complete with transport and firing systems, as well as subterranean missile production and storage centers. In 2020, Iran fired a ballistic missile from underground for the first time, it said."

"The Arms Control Association says Iran's missile program is largely based on North Korean and Russian designs and has benefited from Chinese assistance."

"In October, CNN reported that China had been playing a large part in helping Iran rebuild its missile capabilities following the 12-day war's destruction."

"According to that report, CNN, citing European intelligence sources, reported that Iran received shipments containing over 2,000 tons of sodium perchlorate, a key ingredient in the production of the solid-fuel propellant Iran uses in its missiles."


Regional attacks

Iran responded to US participation in Israel's air war against Iran in June by firing missiles at the US Al Udeid air base in Qatar, but Tehran gave advance warning, and no one was hurt. Washington announced a ceasefire hours later.


And what they dont ever tell you is this:


Saturday, July 12, 2025

I love how they do this stuff...


Iran’s attack on Qatar air base 

hit geodesic dome used for US communications, 

satellite photos show


AP

Updated 4:48 07/11/25


DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — An Iranian attack on an air base in Qatar that’s key to the U.S. military hit a geodesic dome housing equipment used by the Americans for secure communications, satellite images analyzed Friday by The Associated Press show."

"The Iranian attack otherwise did little damage — likely because of the fact that the U.S. evacuated its aircraft from the base, which is home to the forward headquarters of the U.S. military’s Central Command, before the attack.'


"Washington announced a ceasefire hours later."


Well I wonder why?



Or in this case?

IT IS.



No comments: