The Amazingly Fast Meteor Over New Zealand
Avi Loeb Medium 2/6/26
First things first.
When I first read that headline
My mind just screamed:
WHY ARE YOU TELLING ME
IN YOUR HEADLINE
WHAT SOMETING IS NOT
??????????
He might as well put up
a flashing red neon sign
with big flood lights
all around it
that said:
"IT IS NOT A FRAGMENT
OF 3I/ATLAS!"
Wednesday, January 14, 2026
"REMEMBER:
Monday, September 8, 2025
So ask yourself this, (3I/ATLAS)
And also dont forget:
Avi Loeb Medium Aug 5, 2025
“The more likely scenario
from an engineering
(Supernatural)
perspective
(Since the thing shouldn't exist to begin with)
involves a mothership
(Asteroid)
that releases mini-probes
(fragments)
which perform a
reverse Oberth maneuver
to slow down at perihelion
(100% Absolutely Critical
for understanding what could happen
when 3I/ATLAs reaches the Hill Radius at Jupiter.
More on that coming in a bit.)
and intercept Earth,
taking advantage
of the Sun’s gravitational assist.
The change in angular momentum per unit mass needs to be of order ~(0.36 au)*(68 km/s) where 0.36 au is the change in orbital radius required to get to the Earth’s distance from the Sun from the distance of closest approach of 3I/ATLAS (where 1 au=149.6 million kilometers) and 68 kilometers per second is the speed of 3I/ATLAS at perihelion. The amount of fuel (momentum) required for this maneuver depends on the mass of the mini-probe. (Fragment)
The mini-probe (Fragment(s)
can potentially
reach the Earth
within a few months
after perihelion.”
3I/ATLAS perihelion
with the sun is Oct 29th.
A "few months"
would seem to imply
more than two.
(potentially)
So late January 2026.
Just sayin..."
Just look at the date
of the amazingly fast
meteor over
New Zealand.
A camera image of the bright meteor over Wellington, New Zealand
at 23:25:37 local time on January 30, 2026. (Image credit: RNZ)
"The meteoroid was moving at an amazing speed of
71 kilometers per second relative to Earth.
By itself, this speed is very close
to the maximum value possible
for the impact of an object
bound to the Solar System with Earth."
"The upper limit on the relative speed of a Solar System meteor is therefore: (29.8+42.1)=71.9 kilometers per second."
"Hence, this meteor could have originated
from the Solar System
if it collided with Earth head on,
opposite to its motion around the Sun.
(3I/ATLAS had a retrograde orbit
coming into the solar system
from the opposite direction
than the planets travel around the sun.
It comes into effect later on as well
in regard to Jupiter's Hill Radius.)
"If not,
then its high relative speed
would imply
that it is
interstellar in origin."
And the simple fact of the matter is
they do not know:
Witness:
"Could have'
"If it"
"If not"
and
"would imply"
in the statement above
and then compare that
to the headline:
"The Amazingly Fast Meteor
Over New Zealand
on January 30, 2026
IS NOT
Interstellar in Origin"
That type of
definitive statement
contained in that headline,
is not supported anywhere
throughout the entire text of the article.
(Read it yourself
if you don't think
what I am saying is true,
its why I provide all the links,
make up your own minds)
So why then
would that type of
definitive statement
be in the headline?
Because Satan knows people don't read anymore. People just mindlessly scroll or swipe and cherry pick what they want to believe without any kind of thought or critical analysis given to what the headline says or what the body of evidence presented in the text of the article supports.
"Just put it in the Headline Bob
they will buy it,
it's a Harvard astronomer saying it
for goodness sakes."
"Okay Jim, sounds good."
"Upon entering the solar system, IM1 moved with an interstellar velocity of about 60 kilometers per second relative to the Local Standard of Rest of the Milky-Way galaxy, similar to that of 3I/ATLAS."
So one meteor
that we know was interstellar
was traveling:
"about 60 kilometers per second"
while this one
on JAN 30th which traveled
71 kilometers per second
is not
??????????
"Houston?
We have a problem."
And it gets worse.
"Since the local abundance of Solar System objects is a few orders of magnitude larger than that of interstellar objects, this meteor most likely originated in the Solar System. The 2026 meteor over New-Zealand collided with Earth nearly head-on and probably originated in the outer Solar System."
Translation:
So because there are many more meteors that originate from our solar system than there are of those that are interstellar, this one is
"most likely" or "probably"
"originated in the outer Solar System."
TWO BIG PROBLEMS
WITH THAT LINE OF REASONING:
1) Why was it so much faster
than other meteors that have
originated in the outer Solar System
(more on this in a second.)
2) Why is the headline so definitive
when the body of the article says:
"Could have"
"If not", "would imply"
as well as
"most likely" and "probably"
The logical fallacy
on full display here is:
You presented
two alternative states
as the only possibilities,
when in fact
more possibilities exist.
(It's either
an interstellar meteor
or a
solar system meteor
those are the only two possibilities
being offered for explanations.
The fact that it could be a fragment
of the fastest thing that has ever
been observed
traversing through our solar system
(3I/ATLAS)
that just went by us
is conveniently left out
as well as
directly contradicted
in the headline itself
without any
corroborating evidences
in the body of the article.
PEOPLE PLEASE!
THIS IS NOT
AN ACCIDENT.
"Also known as the false dilemma, this insidious tactic has the appearance of forming a logical argument, but under closer scrutiny it becomes evident that there are more possibilities than the either/or choice that is presented. Binary, black-or-white thinking doesn't allow for the many different variables, conditions, and contexts in which there would exist more than just the two possibilities put forth.
It frames the argument misleadingly
and obscures rational, honest debate.
And that is my biggest problem with Avi
because I have seen it
over and over in his writings:
HE
"frames the argument misleadingly
and obscures rational,
honest debate."
Using this tactic
is just not being
intellectually honest
with yourself.
You are deliberately trying to hide
options that exist
and are known
from people.
And it makes me wonder:
"Who else is paying you
besides Harvard Avi?"
Because if you were intellectually honest with yourself? There would be no need to use a tactic like logical fallacy's to try and deceive people.
So why are you doing so Avi?)
"In contrast from IM1 which exploded at an altitude of 18.7 kilometers over the Pacific Ocean, this new meteor exploded at a much higher altitude of 89.0 kilometers — implying a much lower material strength since the Earth’s atmosphere is highly rarefied at this altitude."
Not necessarily.
Again, this just conveniently ignores the fact that 3I/ATLAS is significantly older than our solar system (2x as old, 8 billion years being on the conservative side of how old it is) and just went by Mars
(more like collided with it
See:
Thursday, December 18, 2025
of a Mars 3I/ATLAS collision:)
and also the sun
and the earth
All which would have exerted
significant gravitational affects on it.
So Im reading that and talking to honey about it and pointing out the main problem with what Avi is saying which is:
"If the meteor over New Zealand
JAN 30th
(The Date just gives it away
in my book.)
was from our own Solar System?
Then why was it so much faster
than others?
And then today we get:
Interstellar-Meteor Candidates
Avi Loeb Medium 2/09/26
Dont get to excited, they were found in
an already existing database.
"In a new paper that I co-authored with my brilliant postdoc Richard Cloete, available here, we report the identification of two previously unrecognized interstellar meteor candidates in NASA’s CNEOS fireball database."
"However, CNEOS publishes no per-event uncertainties, and the accuracy of reported velocities has varied across sensor generations."
(Translation:
As the tracking equipment (sensors) have grown in sensitivity
the velocities of the objects tracked has become more refined.)
"CNEOS-22: 2022–07–28
The heliocentric speed of this bolide is 46.98 kilometers per second, exceeding the solar escape speed of 41.79 kilometers per second."
"CNEOS-25: 2025–02–12
The heliocentric speed is 45.63 kilometers per second, exceeding the escape speed of 42.4 kilometers per second"
"The heliocentric interstellar speeds of the two candidates, 21.5 kilometers per second for CNEOS-22 and 16.9 kilometers per second for CNEOS-22, sample the low end of the velocity distribution expected for objects from the Galactic solar neighborhood. For comparison, 1I/`Oumuamua entered the Solar System with 26 kilometers per second and 2I/Borisov with 32 kilometers per second, whereas 3I/ATLAS entered with 58 kilometers per second."
We are so being watched/monitored
for what we say.
Been saying it for years already.
I say:
"So where are all the others
meteors from our solar system
that were this fast then?"
and a few days later we get
this article pointing
to these two meteors
WHICH THE ONE OVER NEW ZEALAND
WAS FASTER THAN
BUT IT CANT BE
"INTERSTELLAR"
(More like it was from something
that was "interstellar" 3I/ATLAS)
AND WE HAVE TO PUT THAT
IN THE HEADLINE?
But these two meteors
although slower?
ARE CANDIDATES
FOR BEING INTERSTELLAR
METEORS?
WTF AVI?
WE ARE NOT THIS STUPID.
TRY AGAIN.
So now Im going to give you my version of:
"Could have"
"If not",
"would imply"
"most likely"
and
"probably"
"If"
3I/ATLAS
weakened substantially
when it went by
Mars, Sun, Venus, Earth
and if it hit Mars
(See the post referenced above
as there is plenty of coorberating
evidence to support that
postulate.)
And if it
(3I/ATLAS)
were to be leaving fragments
as it most assuredly would be
in that scenario
THEN
late January
would be the time frame
in which we would
be entering
the debris field
it left behind.
A camera image of the bright meteor over Wellington, New Zealand at 23:25:37 local time on January 30, 2026.
"The mini-probe
(Fragment(s)
can potentially
reach the Earth
within a few months
after perihelion.”
3I/ATLAS perihelion
with the sun is Oct 29th.
A "few months"
would seem to imply
more than two.
(potentially)
So late January 2026.
Just sayin..."
Trying to tell you
in the headline
what it can not be:
"is Not Interstellar in Origin"
and then not coming anywhere close
in the article to support that conclusion
flat out gives it away
what is really going on here.
So expect more
superfast meteors
in the coming months,
and I'll be waiting to see
how they are gonna
try and explain
all of them away
when they are all
happening in rapid succession.
To put it as simply as possible?
THERE HAD
TO BE SOME REASON
"is Not Interstellar in Origin"
WAS INCLUDED
IN THAT HEADLINE.
IF YOU DONT LIKE MY REASONING
FOR EXPLAINING IT?
THEN WHATS YOURS?
GIVE ME A BETTER CASE
THAT EXPLAINS IT.
I'LL BE AT OUR KITCHEN TABLE WAITING.
April 24, 2026 — Sliding from the Hill Radius edge
into Jupiter’s Gravitational Basin
M. Popovic Medium 2/1/2026
GOTTA REMIND YOU
OF THE BACK STORY FIRST:
Avi Loeb Medium Aug 5, 2025
“The more likely scenario
from an engineering
(Supernatural)
perspective
(Since the thing shouldn't exist to begin with)
involves a mothership
(Asteroid)
that releases mini-probes
(fragments)
which perform a reverse Oberth maneuver
to slow down
at perihelion."
This is very advanced material.
Way to advanced for the writer to be just an
"IT specialist since 1979 who uses logic..."
It's probably an AI.
But what is said is intreging.
Dont be worried if you dont understand the technical jargon,
Avi in his post mentioned a reverse orbeth manuver
slowing down 3I/ATLAS
that is exactly what would be needed
in order for it to be
temporarily captured
by Juipters gravity,
(and thats kinda the main point here)
lots of this information
is put here for my being able to reference quickly
not solely to inform others.
"This paper analyzes the motion of object C/2025 N1 (ATLAS) exclusively from the perspective of celestial mechanics and the dynamics of the Sun–Jupiter–object system, without making any ontological assumption about its nature (“comet” versus “non-cometary or guided object”). The analysis is based on empirical JPL orbital solutions (#46–#50), with particular emphasis on the stable and long-lasting non-Newtonian parameter A2 (tangential component). It is shown that, if A2 is interpreted as a real and continuous effect in the dynamics, a natural and mathematically permitted outcome is the object’s entry into a temporary Jupiter-centric gravitational regime (temporary capture, TC) around April 24, 2026."
(Translation:
3I/ATLAS is going to slow down enough
to be captured temporarily
by Jupiter, and
I have absolutely no reason
to NOT believe it.)
"First, the standard cometary model becomes dynamically strained
(3I/ATLAS AINT A COMET YO.)
because it requires a rapid weakening or cessation of A2 before the object enters Jupiter’s sphere of influence in order to maintain a fast flyby scenario. Such behavior is not supported by data available up to January 2026. Second, the alternative dynamical model allows for a consistent integration of a stable A2 into the system’s motion, where the cumulative effect of tangential deceleration naturally leads to a reduction of the object’s specific energy relative to Jupiter."
(I don't know anything about the author M. Popovic
other than the small fragment
from his profile shared at the begining
but he is telling you
what the political leaders of the world
and the scientist don't want you to know.
Good enough for me.)
"This is neither a permanent satellite nor a classical flyby."
(It is going to slow down enough
get temporarily captured by Jupiter's gravity
and then eventually slung right at us.
Think about the rock in King David's slingshot
swinging around for a bit
and then turned loose.)
"Flyby is a common user interpretation,
not an explicit claim by JPL."
"By combining:
• empirically stable A₂ (JPL #46–#50),
• cumulative tangential deceleration,
• favorable phase and spatial geometry,
• Jupiter-centric energy analysis,
• closed ZVCs and the dynamical saddle of Ganymede,
a unique conclusion follows:
The object’s entry
into temporary Jupiter capture
around April 24, 2026,
is dynamically permitted,
mathematically consistent,
and fully based
on the available empirical data."
"This is not a claim about the nature of the object,
but about the reality of the trajectory.
If A₂ remains effective,
the outcome follows directly
from the dynamics of the system."
"The reduction of A₂ from 1.745 × 10⁻⁸ au/d² in #49 to 1.735 × 10⁻⁸ au/d² in #50 represents a slight decrease (about 0.6%), but within uncertainties, favoring slower but more prolonged cumulative deceleration. This leads to greater phase delay and improved geometry for tangential entry into the Hill sphere, increasing the likelihood of temporary capture (TC) around April 24, 2026."
(Avi from his blog post
referenced at
the beginning
of this article:
"which perform
a reverse Oberth maneuver
to slow down
at perihelion."
"Integration of the Fuchs Micro-Warp framework (stationary, subluminal warp regime without exotic matter) provides an alternative explanation for the stability of A₂ and associated phenomena."
("Scalability Challenges: While theoretically sound, the standalone Fuchs model requires an immense amount of energy/mass to operate—equivalent to the mass of Jupiter to create the stress-energy tensor needed for the effect."
Included all of that for my own references
not that they were needed to understand what is being said here.)
"Empirical observational data (JWST, VLT, SPHEREx) show unusual chemistry: a high CO₂/H₂O ratio (~8:1 pre-perihelion, ~4:1 post-perihelion), detection of methane (CH₄) after perihelion (13.7–27% relative to H₂O), nickel (Ni) without iron (Fe) in the coma, and an extended CO₂ coma up to ~348,000 km. This does not fit easily into standard cometary sublimation, where activity would rapidly decline beyond >2–3 AU from the Sun."
"Methane and Ni represent secondary products in the micro-warp regime, where energy is redistributed without the need for collisions or thermal processes. This unifies chemistry with dynamics: stable A₂ maintains a regime in which chemical composition supports phase coherence, favoring low-energy entry into TC (temporary capture) on April 24."
"16. Overall Conclusion with Integrated Elements
Empirical data from JPL solutions #46 through #50, with particular emphasis on a stable and positive A₂ ≈ 1.735 × 10⁻⁸ au/d² (with no abrupt drop or sign change from December 2025 to January 2026), combined with cumulative integration of tangential deceleration (Δv = ∫ A₂ dt), lead to one unavoidable conclusion: temporary Jupiter-centric capture (TC) around April 24, 2026, is not merely possible — it is dynamically dominant and the most consistent outcome based on current data."
"The reduction of A₂ from 1.745 × 10⁻⁸ (#49) to 1.735 × 10⁻⁸ (#50) does not weaken the scenario — on the contrary, it strengthens it: slower but more prolonged deceleration enables greater phase delay (~35–40 days relative to the ballistic hyperbola), more favorable tangential approach geometry from “behind” Jupiter, and a critical reduction of relative velocity with respect to Jupiter to ~3–5 km/s or lower. As a result, the Jupiter-centric specific energy ε_J irreversibly becomes negative within the Hill sphere (~0.355 au), zero-velocity curves (ZVCs) close around Jupiter, and the dynamical saddle of Ganymede extends the metastable trajectory to weeks or longer. This is not coincidence — it is a direct consequence of the continuity of A₂ and favorable phase evolution after March 1, 2026, when Jupiter’s influence becomes dominant."
"Probability assessment, based exclusively on empirical data and pure calculation (without reliance on official projections that enforce CO₂ 1/r² weakening):"
• Alternative non-cometary / warp-mediated model (TC April 24, 2026) → 60%
• Standard cometary model (flyby March 16, 2026) → 40%
The Fuchs Micro-Warp framework (stationary subluminal warp regime without exotic matter) provides a unified physical explanation for all key anomalies"
(The only thing
that can alter spacetime
is its creator.
PERIOD.)
"This framework not only eliminates the need for ad hoc adjustments (e.g., variable dust composition, unexpected torque without mass loss, abrupt cessation of activity beyond >3 AU), but also predicts testable sequences: rotational and polarization changes will precede significant phase shifts, A₂ will remain stable or mildly increase through March/April, and potential JUICE/JWST data (February–March 2026) will show NIR and radio signals consistent with warp-jet morphology."
(We'll see.)
"Final position: If the trend of A₂ stability continues (and there is no empirical reason to assume otherwise), temporary entry into Jupiter’s gravitational basin around April 24, 2026, is no longer speculation — it is the most logical, most consistent, and most predictive outcome supported by current data. The standard cometary model with a March 16 flyby requires rapid weakening of A₂ that is not yet evident, while the warp-mediated dynamical model unifies orbit, rotation, polarization, and chemistry into a single coherent system."
By February/March 2026 (especially with new observations and JUICE downlink), the situation will be definitively resolved. But based on what we have now — April 24, 2026, and temporary capture are the reality most strongly supported by the data."
(That wasnt written by an IT guy.
That was written by an AI.
And it just happens to be correct.
Notice it didn't say anything about
needing any
"advanced alien civilizations"
to create the
that explains a large portion of the anomalies
associated with 3I/ATLAS.
Why would it?
Satanically controlled AI
already knows about
"the unseen power
worthy of reverence"
behind 3I/ATLAS.
So I figure you should too.
Seriously
why would an
"IT guy"
write that
and then not ascribe
the
"space time deteroriation"
created by the
to an advanced technological civilization?
Hum?
What's you explanation for that?
I just gave you mine.
Long story short?
Expect 3I/ATLAS to be
temporarily captured
by Jupiter's gravity
and then flung right back at us
just like the rock
in King davids slingshot.
Sun unleashes colossal X4.2 solar flare,
knocking out radio signals across Africa and Europe
Space.com 2/4/26
So lil dated but still very relevant.
Luke 21:25
And there shall be signs
in the sun,
and in the moon,
and in the stars;
and upon the earth
distress of nations,
with perplexity;
(Not understanding
what is happening
or why it it so.)
the sea and the waves roaring;
"An impulsive X4.2 solar flare sparked strong radio blackouts across Africa and Europe as the giant sunspot continues to rage."
(X class flares are the ones you gotta be concerned with.)
"Earlier today (Feb. 4), it (The sun) fired off another powerful solar flare, this time an X4.2, briefly disrupting radio communications across parts of western Africa and southern Europe as intense radiation flooded Earth's upper atmosphere."
"The impulsive flare peaked at 7:13 a.m. EST (1213 GMT). It erupted from volatile sunspot group AR4366, a rapidly growing, magnetically complex region that has been unleashing a near-continuous barrage of potent solar flares since roaring into existence just days ago."
(Early Feb then.)
"X-class solar flares are the most powerful type of solar flare and are capable of triggering widespread radio disturbances. They can also, at times, be accompanied by coronal mass ejections (CMEs) — vast plumes of solar plasma and magnetic field that can spark geomagnetic storms and impressive auroras if Earth-directed. However, no CME signatures have been detected in imagery following this latest X4.2 eruption, according to NOAA's Space Weather Prediction Center."
"Yet for all its fireworks, sunspot region 4366 is beginning to look like it has plenty of bark but very little bite. While the region has fired off multiple powerful solar flares in rapid succession, most have failed to hurl significant amounts of solar material into space. So far, only an earlier X8.4 flare was accompanied by a slow-moving CME, and that just landed at Earth with a glancing blow.'
(When I read those kinds of statements?
It makes my stomach queasy.
It really does.
It's like when the sports broadcaster say something like;
"They haven't won here in 20 years Jim."
And I immediately think along the lines of:
"Ever occur to you
it might be time they did?
Like
"maybe they are due"
isnt a thought
in your head at all?
How?
It just puts a lump in my throat.
How many more times
till one of theses sunspot regions
"has plenty of bark"
cause it aint if
it's when.
IT ONLY TAKES 1 TIME.
And we have set ourselves up
to be orders of magnitude
more vulnerable now
with out overreliance on technology
and our overtaxed/already outdated
electrical grids
than you can ever imagine.
It wont be no blackout
for a lil while.
(Im not talking about
just the flare but also
an accompanying CME.)
Cause one is coming
that's gonna fry electrical grids
for good. Even IF you could repair it?
It would take decades.
Even then?
You wouldn't be able
to afford to build a completely new one
from the ground up
which is what it would take.
And how would you do that
with no electric?
Micha 5:12
NAB
And you shall no longer
adore the works
of your hands.
Thats where it will start.
Take out the electric first.
As lots of the forms of Idolatry
flow from there.
Mindless, brain rotting scrolling
and swiping for stupid entertainment
will go away and
you will have plenty of time
to sit and think about your souls eternity
or destruction)
"With the region still facing us and showing no signs of calming down, space weather forecasters will be keeping a close eye on whether this noisy sunspot will eventually pack a more powerful punch."
(Matter of time.)
And just in case you were wondering
here is todays
2/10/26
"AI Overview"
of sunspot activity.
"As of early February 2026, solar activity is high with eight to nine active, complex sunspot regions (including AR4366 and AR4371) on the Earth-facing solar disk. These regions are producing M-class and potential X-class flares, following a, Space-confirmed peak in October 2024."
This is what they mean lol:
Where is the sun in its current 11-year solar cycle?"
Key 2026 Sunspot and Solar Activity Details:
Active Regions: AR4366 is identified as a large, magnetically complex (beta-gamma-delta) region capable of producing significant flares.
Flare Activity: Recent activity has included M-class flares and an X1.5 flare, causing minor radio blackouts.
Solar Cycle Status: The Sun is in the maximum phase of Solar Cycle 25, which has been stronger than initially predicted, notes Space.com.
(One thing I have learned is,
It's kinda like predicting Hurricanes.
Good luck.)
Impact: Active regions continue to pose a risk for further M-class and X-class solar flares, which can cause radio blackouts and geomagnetic storms.
(It goes quite a bit farther than that.
I wont bore you with it
but I've included it here
if you're interested.)
Data Availability: SDO/HMI images from NASA/SOHO are currently experiencing an image outage.
(Well thats timely.)
For real-time data, this Space Weather Prediction Center dashboard is recommended.
Space Weather Enthusiasts Dashboard
Last but not least.
I am not one
to freak out
over
or whatever
(Yeah its a thing some people think)
And I never have been.
I listen to Black Sabbath
(first album, the one nobody listens to.
War pigs, Paranoid, Vol. 4, Supernaut )
and Ozzy
(Crazy train, No more tears, Moma Im coming home.)
for goodness sakes.
To put it simply?
I know
my faith is stronger
than the music I listen to
or the food I eat
so I dont worry about it.
("Proof is in the pudding" they say.)
All that being said?
To see this:
And dont forget
the IOC sold its self
to Satan for Mammon
a few years back.
Alternating every two years
summer and winter games
instead of every four
allowing professionals to compete etc
all to increase $ revenue.
I just do not understand
how you can see this:
and not
know
that there is
a spiritual war raging
and about to reach its climax
happening right now.
The fact is
people do know
they just dont wanna
admit it to themselves.
FUCKING RED?
FIRE?
It's the
Winter Olympics.
It would have killed them
to have used a blue and white
color scheme and no symbol
??????????
Satan is laughing at you
that you cant even figure out
what he is doing
right in front of your faces.
He don't care to be that open about it
cause he knows how short his time is.
We used to never see
stupid shit like this:
and now we have seen it
at the last several Olympics?
last supper?
This garbage
only started happening on this scale
during my lifetime.
It is not sustainable.
It will be dealt with most harshly.
What I want
is someone to explain to me
and it has to make sense lol
Just what fucking purpose
does any of this serve?
EXCEPT SATANS?
Sucks too.
I hadn't seen much Olympics here lately
I love the odd ball winter stuff,
that we don't see much of
here in the US.
It sucks...
We were looking forward
to Ski jumping.
SATAN...
Not even trying to hide things anymore.
It ought to be telling you
wat is up.
PLAIN AND SIMPLE
The spiritual war is on full tilt.
Keep telling yourselves it aint
and you're going to be
very, very sorry one day.
"Incorrigible Pertinency"
In the 1599 edition of the Geneva Bible, the phrase "incorrigible pertinency" appears in the commentary notes for Revelation 16:21.
Context: The phrase is used in the notes describing the aftermath of the seventh plague, which involves a massive hail storm.
Meaning: The note describes this event as a
sign of the "incorrigible pertinency of the world in their rebellion". In this context, it refers to the world's stubborn, unyielding, and incurable persistence in sinning against God, even in the face of divine judgment.
Significance: It signifies a heart that cannot repent, which is also linked in the notes to the descriptions in Revelation 9:12, 16:9, and 16:10.
Usage in other notes:
The Geneva Bible
notes often use the term "incorrigible" to describe those
who are stubborn in their wickedness or malice, such as in Proverbs 9:8 and Jeremiah 15:15.
Convince me we aint there...
Good luck...
No comments:
Post a Comment