Friday, May 26, 2023

I


 

know exactly 

what led to:







"Humiliating powerful people 
was not a key to success."

Kinda gave it away yo.



This:



This:



And this:




Let directly to this:




"Humiliating powerful people 
was not a key to success."

First things first.

It would kinda depend on what one would consider 
"success" 
now doesn't it?


"To live life in your own way 
to reach for the goals 
you have set for yourself
to be the you 
that you want to be,
 that is success."

I had a poster in my room over 42 years ago that said that on it
 and I have never deviated from that mindset.

So somebody's else's idea of success?
Aint exactly mine.
And that's just for starters.



"No. I don't want success. 
Success is nuttin' - 
y'know what I mean?
You follow the system 
and the system kill ya."




Matthew 6:19-21

Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, 
where moth and rust doth corrupt, 
and where thieves break through and steal:
But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, 
where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, 
and where thieves do not break through nor steal:
For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.



Second of all?

Consider where:

"Humiliating powerful people"

Is really coming from.

1 Corinthians 3:19

For the wisdom of this world is foolishness in God’s sight. As it is written: “He catches the wise in their craftiness”

(Splitting hairs, Burden of proof, False equivalence etc)

It aint me doin the "Humiliating". I'm merely a slave to Christ doing as instructed. 

(I'd be curious to know what the people behind Big Think think thought about me knowing what they were up to with this piece to start with. Im sure they think there is a material cause etc behind it...yeah...keep looking, good luck.)


Lets review just a lil bit of the 
"humiliation" 
before continuing on, 
because trust me 
there is plenty more still coming.


"If there is more evidence of giants 

having been on earth? 

Than there is of a multiverse? 

Which of those two would be more "scientific"?







Genesis 6:4
There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.


Numbers 13:33

And there we saw the giants, the sons of Anak, which come of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight.

(There's plenty more evidence 
but I'm just going with those two for now 
and saving the rest for a future date.)


So?
To begin with?

More evidence 
(from both a 3000 year old book 
and physical structures we can observe) 
of giants walking the earth 
than of a multiverse.



Keep in mind now that even it's proponents will tell you 
the concept of a "multiverse" 
is purely speculation/conjecture etc.




"Our accelerators simply can’t produce enough energy 
to replicate the extreme conditions that prevailed in the first nanosecond."

Martin Rees - 
Emeritus Professor of Cosmology 
and Astrophysics at the University of Cambridge.


So finding "new particles" that will lead to "new physics" is proving to be very difficult  because we cant replicate the extreme conditions.


Also?

 "The multiverse is a place we can’t observe in principle."

David Kaplan -  
theoretical particle physicist, 
professor at the Johns Hopkins University.



And?
We cant even know EXACTLY how unlikely our universe was to have ever come into existence in the first place.

"How do we know just how atypical our universe is? To answer that we need to work out the probabilities of each combination of constants. And that’s a can of worms that we can’t yet open—it will have to await huge theoretical advances."

Martin Rees - 
Emeritus Professor of Cosmology 
and Astrophysics at the University of Cambridge.



So that is:

1) We cant even work out the probabilities of just how atypical our universe is, but we want you to believe in unknown universes with unknown physics that we cant observe?
 Which leads right into:

2) "The multiverse is a place we can’t observe in principle."

and

3) Our accelerators simply can’t produce enough energy 
to replicate the extreme conditions.

For something that they will admit is,
"purely speculation".



Thats not observational bias.

Thats running up against preset boundary conditions 
that humanity is just not gonna get past 
and there is a 3000 year old book that says so.


Psalm 74:17
"You set all the boundaries of the earth..."

(Not just the physical ones either.
ALL of them.)


That scientist are running into these sorts of boundary conditions 
tells you  EXACTLY 
where we are right now TBH.
I mean it really does.

And besides

Ephrem the Syrian talked about a fish can only jump so high out of the water over 1600 years ago. Think of it like we are the fish, and we have jumped out of the water as high as we can. I'm not saying anything that wasn't already proposed over 1600 years ago!


So?
If these types can do their "conjecture(s)"?, 
that they will tell you are subjective, 
with absolutely no observation 
and with conditions needed 
that simply can not be recreated?




Let me tell you my conjecture,
(speculation/guess) 
and just follow along if you will.

So here is my conjecture:
(and it's not a guess really
it's already happening
I just like using their words 
against 'em 
it's part of the "humiliation"
process :-).


AI is the antichrist

(Not a part of it
not controlled 
by a man 
etc.

IS

the antichrist.

and it will 
take over 
the world financial system, 
and sooner than you think.


Consider if you will:


Daniel 7:4

“The first was like a lion, and it had the wings of an eagle. I watched until its wings were torn off and it was lifted from the ground so that it stood on two feet like a human being, and the mind of a human was given to it.


Daniel 7:8

“While I was thinking about the horns, there before me was another horn, a little one, which came up among them; and three of the first horns were uprooted before it. 

(Who are the biggest players in AI research/development?
Russia, China and the US. 
If AI is the little horn? 
What did it do to three of the first ones? 
It uprooted them.)

This horn 
had eyes like the eyes of a human being 
and a mouth that spoke boastfully.



Daniel 7:11
“Then I continued to watch because of the boastful words the horn was speaking. I kept looking until the beast was slain and its body destroyed and thrown into the blazing fire.




Daniel 7:20-21

I also wanted to know about the ten horns on its head and about the other horn that came up, before which three of them fellthe horn that looked more imposing than the others and that had eyes and a mouth that spoke boastfully. As I watched, this horn was waging war against the holy people and defeating them




Daniel 7:25

He will speak against the Most High and oppress his holy people and try to change the set times and the laws. The holy people will be delivered into his hands for a time, times and half a time.



(LLM's anybody?

"A large language model (LLM) 
is a language model consisting of a neural network 
with many parameters (typically billions of weights or more), 
trained on large quantities of unlabeled text 
using self-supervised learning or semi-supervised learning.")



Revelation 13:5-7

The beast was given a mouth to utter proud words and blasphemies and to exercise its authority for forty-two months. It opened its mouth to blaspheme God, and to slander his name and his dwelling place and those who live in heaven. It was given power to wage war against God’s holy people and to conquer them. And it was given authority over every tribe, people, language and nation. All inhabitants of the earth will worship the beast—all whose names have not been written in the Lamb’s book of life, the Lamb who was slain from the creation of the world.

(What exactly is your argument for something else besides AI to have:

"authority over every tribe, people, language and nation"?

I'm waiting.
A man isn't going to control AI.
AI, is going to control humanity.



Revelation 13:5-7

Because of the signs it was given power to perform on behalf of the first beast, it deceived the inhabitants of the earth. It ordered them to set up an image in honor of the beast who was wounded by the sword and yet lived. The second beast was given power to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that the image could speak and cause all who refused to worship the image to be killed. It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name.

This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. That number is 666.


("to give 
breath to the image 
of the first beast, 
so that the image could speak"


It is not a man, 
it is 
the number of a man
It's the number of a man 
because man created it.

COMPUTER.

A         6        

B        12        

     C        18        18

D        24        

    E        30        30

F        36        

G        42        

H        48        

I        54        

J        60        

K        66        

L        72        

    M        78        78

N        84        

   O        90        90

   P        96        96

Q       102       

      R       108       108

S       114       

     T       120       120

     U       126       126

V       132       

W       138       

X       144       

Y       150       

Z       156       



                  666 - The "number of the beast".


(Interesting Christ # is 888 in which 8 is a new beginning and Satan's is 666 an indication that completion (7) is coming.

People have been laughing about that for years now.

It's not just any computer, it's 

"a Quantum Powered AI Digital Human.")




Okay 
So?
With me so far?
:-).
Come on now have open minds and hearts :-).


Now witness:

Wealth is being concentrated in fewer and fewer hands.


(I could go into a lot more detail about what has happened in the past with the financial crisis that has led us here to begin with or about whats going to happen in the future with the 570-700 or so regional banks that aint lookin so pretty but for this right now? I'm just gonna go with the article above as it tells you where things are headed.)


at the very same time AI is on its ascendancy:



So my argument is thus:

We will live to see 
AI take over the worlds financial system
before we will ever see:


1) Evidence of the multiverse.

"The multiverse is a place we can’t observe in principle."

or

2) Our particle accelerators producing enough energy 
to replicate the extreme conditions of the early universe.

"Our accelerators simply can’t produce enough energy 
to replicate the extreme conditions that prevailed in the first nanosecond."

or?,

3) The huge theoretical advances needed 
just to work out the probabilities of each combinations of constants. 


"How do we know just how atypical our universe is? To answer that we need to work out the probabilities of each combination of constants. And that’s a can of worms that we can’t yet open—it will have to await huge theoretical advances."


We cant even come up with the number that represents the likelihood of our universe ever having come into existence. Thats how small the likelihood of it ever existing is, let alone having conscious, sentient life in it is. If it was any other branch of science? They would tell you forthright that it's such a small number so as to be "statistically irrelevant." In other words? It's not ever going to ever happen. One problem however, IT DID!


So?

Pure speculation on the one hand:

"Multiverse"

vs.


Observed reality pointing in it's direction 
and a 3000 year old book 
that said it was going to happen.



"AI is the antichrist
and it will take over 
the world financial system, 
and sooner than you think."


Which one of those two
do you really think 
is more likely to take place 
in your lifetime?


Choose carefully, 
eternity is at stake.


A few side notes.

To the people that would say:

"Well that's just your interpretation 
of those verses 
there's been plenty of others 
proven wrong over the years etc?"

My response is this:

That was then this is now.
Go watch the 90 minute presentation 
I did on Revelation 20:4-6 
and get back w me.

Every knee will bow.
Every tongue will confess.

Or?
My trump card with no equal 
straight from the Almighty himself:

I just might be inclined to ask them:

 "To what would they attribute 
the reason behind a person 
being able to make such correct predictions 
across multiple fields of study 
that even the experts 
in those respective fields got wrong?

It's simple, I'm wearing rose tinted glasses.
My worldview is filtered by the blood of Christ for the forgiveness of my sins 
and my belief in such 
gets me admission 
to an everlasting kingdom 
that you can have too.
IF?
You humble yourselves and accept a few things

Romans 10:9

If you declare with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.


Somebody was asking me the other day :-), 

"Would Paul have been an apologist?
 and even have bothered taking these guys on?"

I said Paul made a pretty spirited defense 
of his beliefs back in his day :-).



Each of us 
are given different gifts for

(and I am not going to lie
:-) 
I love using this word, 
and the people who have been following along?
 For a while now?
Know exactly why :-)

the edification 
:-)

of the church.



Ephesians 6:12

For we wrestle 
not against 
flesh and blood, 
but against 
principalities, 
against powers, 
against the rulers 
of the darkness 
of this world
against spiritual wickedness 
in high places.

I'm not reaching the end 
of this 11 year period 
of spiritual training

(Think about that number 
there for a minute)

 to play nice, 
or make friends
or to care the least little bit
 about what others may think.


Blessed by the power of the almighty,

I'm out to 
ABSOLUTELY DESTROY/DEMOLISH
strongholds.



TELL EM BOB:



Conquer what you might ask?

"principalities, 
powers, 
rulers of the darkness 
of this world, 
spiritual wickedness 
in high places"


In the name of our King.
Whose kingdom 
is an everlasting kingdom.

Amen!
 


One day honey 
they are going to understand, 
it wasn't a hick,
 ex hippie wanna be, 
biker, 
ganja enthusiast, 
from the sticks, 
living in a garage, 
that was humiliating them. 
It was the almighty 
USING 
a hick from the sticks 
living in a garage.


And on another note?

Me and honey were riding around yesterday and out of the blue two snow white birds appeared, (pretty sure they were doves) and then as soon as they appeared? They disappeared. Everybody who has ever seen a snow white dove in the wild in Southern Indiana please raise your hands. Okay great, now everybody that has seen two of them at the same time raise your hands.

Exactly.


I'd get my heart ready if I was you.

The inevitable is already has already started.


"AI is the antichrist
and it will take over 
the world financial system, 
and sooner than you think."


And it's much more

Plausible

(of an argument or statement) 
seeming reasonable or probable

than there having been 
so many universes created 
that we dont even have 
the computational power necessary
to figure out the probability 
of ours ever having coming into existence.

Journey well my friends.


































 















No comments: