I'm

 

going to try and summarize:

Yeah

even more so.

And the logic goes a lil something like this:

Come explain to me please

why in the world

 I should wait for

"new particles/more complete theories" 

to explain the 

origin and evolution 

of the cosmos

when 

all around us 

everywhere

we see

every time 

ever 

in all of existence

since the beginning of time:

Where there is information?

There is a conscious sentient intellect behind it

trying to convey a message.

But just not in the initial constants of the universe 

and the laws that govern it's existence right?

Or?

In the information digitally encoded into DNA.

That information had to have a material source.

Yeah.

Good luck.

Just because you dont wanna believe something?

Doesn't mean it's not true.

The information contained in those things?

The practitioners of Scientism 

rule out a 

conscious sentient intellect 

being behind them from the start,

even though it flies in the face of what we observe everyday 

and have observed everyday 

since the very first piece of information 

ever came into existence.

(It's idolatry BTW.

Worshiping the gift (science) 

instead of the giver (God Almighty)

And these types wanna talk about special pleading?

Please.

Spare me/us the nonsense.

So pardon me 

(or don't) 

while I dont feel compelled to wait for you 

searching 

for a material answer 

to a metaphysical question 

that you are just never gonna find.

(I have set eternity in the hearts of men...Ecc 3:11).

There has never been a chemical reaction ever take place 

that produces the information necessary for life

of a one cell organism

to exist.

Read that again.

Chemical reactions dont produce the information necessary to create life.

The practitioners of Scientism are looking for a solution that simply doesn't exist.

(Stephen C Meyer correlates it to looking for hot croissants at the car dealership and wondering why you cant find any. But hey, it keeps them in a job I suppose :-).

In addition?

Why would the best and the brightest practitioners of  Scientism

even bother to try convince us of the absurdities of:

The Multiverse

or

That the physical laws of nature bringing into existence universes.

("Because a law like gravity exist the universe had to come into existence"

Stephen Hawking.)

or

Bozeman Brains.

or

Many worlds thesis

If they were so confident of:

"new particles/more complete theories" 

explaining the 

"origin and evolution"

of the cosmos?

They know whats up.

They just dont wanna admit it to themselves.

I would say I rest my case but:

Side note:

I'm a firm believer that God can do anything. 

I believe in a "multiverse" 

(God created the heavens) 

only to the extent that the same conditions 

that applied to bringing this one into existence 

applied to all of them. 

It's all of the available

wait for it...

INFORMATION :-) 

we have.