Now that Satan knows the theologians are coming after his henchmen??
Using science to do so no loess?
I told ya:
"That revival of natural theology is taking place
not on the whole among theologians,
who have lost their nerve in that area..."
(Yeah not this one BTW,
I kinda wanna lead the charge so to speak)
Certain cosmologist are gonna look at any little glimmer of hope
they can find to do away with the current cosmological model.
They have been trying for a long time
because they simply do not like the theistic implications
of what they are seeing.
This is why some are so excited about:
"Some scientists speak of a “crisis in cosmology.” They have a good reason."
"The standard model of cosmology has a big new problem:
Some galaxies seem to be too old."
(If they only
"seem"?
to be to old?
And we do not know for certain?
Because we do not have the
results yet?
How exactly is not knowing for certain a crisis exactly?)
"However, new images from the James Webb Space Telescope found galaxies far more distant (and, hence, far older) than what the standard model of cosmology predicts. The new data provide compelling evidence that the model might need to be updated."
(Updated, not thrown away, the current cosmological model has been through this a few time in it's history. Gotta concentrate here on:
"found galaxies far more distant
(and, hence, far older)"
Redshift is good for distance
Spectroscopy is more accurate for age.
One of those is mentioned in this article.
The other isn't.
Take a guess which one is which.
Yeah...Redshift is mentioned,
Spectroscopy isn't.
Now ask yourself why that might be?
"Some galaxies seem to be too old
"the model might need to be updated"
There is absolutely nothing conclusive as of yet
but that is not the way this is being presented.
WHY?
"Now that Satan knows the theologians are coming after his henchmen"
:-).
Keep in mind this was a very small area of space that was observed,
about the size of the moon in the night sky.
And it was a small sample, (six galaxies in total out of billions? Millions?, I cant remember, but it was a lot)
that warranted further investigation.
The JWST wasn't pointed in that direction of the sky for very long,
and the Spectroscopy results are not in yet.
Hence:
"Some galaxies seem to be too old
"the model might need to be updated"
But that is not the manner in which things are portrayed in this piece at all.
"The phrase “crisis in cosmology” is finding its way into a growing number of blogs and podcasts. But what is behind this crisis, and how seriously should we take it?"
(Not at all until the Spectroscopy results come in.)
"...there seems to be a mismatch between how old these first galaxies appear to be and how long ago the age-redshift relation tells us they must have formed. Well-formed galaxies are appearing too early for the story we told above to fully play itself out."
(Catch the subtlety there?
"appear to be"
vs.
"are appearing"?)
"The Big Bang model of cosmology shows us a Universe that is evolving rather than static and eternally unchanging. It is not under question in any serious way."
(Amen, thank you :-)
"What these new JWST results do throw into question
is the story about that evolution
that the standard model of cosmology tells us."
So:
"Some galaxies seem to be too old
"the model might need to be updated"
"a mismatch between
how old
these first galaxies
appear to be
and how long ago the age-redshift relation
tells us they must have formed."
First of all:
Ecclesiastes 3:11
God Set Eternity in the Heart of Mankind
He has made everything appropriate in its time. He has also set eternity
(Ignorance, darkness, unknowable etc)
in their heart,
without the possibility that mankind will find out the work
which God has done from the beginning even to the end.
and:
Psalm 74:16-18
The day is thine, the night also is thine: thou hast prepared the light and the sun.
Thou hast set all the borders of the earth:
thou hast made summer and winter.
Remember this, that the enemy hath reproached, O Lord, and that the foolish people have blasphemed thy name.
Some things
we are just not gonna ever get past
or understand.
And?
If these six galleries are confirmed to be as old as they "appear to be"?
Then I'm gonna come right back with:
"The universe is indeed a hologram."
Thats not me.
Thats cosmology's golden boy
The Universe is a hologram: Stephen Hawking's final theory, explained by his closest collaborator
"Hawking’s final theory of the Big Bang provides a bold and surprising answer. It envisages the Universe as a holographic projection.
In a familiar hologram, a third dimension of space emerges from the lines and scribbles on a screen. In the cosmos-as-hologram idea, which has become the talk of the town among theoretical physicists, it is the dimension of time that can be holographically encoded."
Awesome.
Who exactly did the
"holographic encoding"
then?
Remember:
Information
(encoding in this instance)
is always a sign of conscience, sentient, intelligence, a brain, an intellect.
Everywhere we have ever observed
information?
This has always been the case.
Information simply doesn't "evolve".
So who/what encoded the Hologram then?
Choose carefully,
eternity is at stake.
“For the scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountains of ignorance, he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries.”
God and the Astronomers
Indeed.
This theologian?
Is fine with however old these galaxy's may turn out to be.
It's the portraying them in a light that they currently dont deserve that I got a problem with.
"Astronomers now find they have painted themselves into a corner because they have proven, by their own methods, that the world began abruptly in an act of creation to which you can trace the seeds of every star, every planet, every living thing in this cosmos and on the earth. And they have found that all this happened as a product of forces they cannot hope to discover. That there are what I or anyone would call supernatural forces at work is now, I think, a scientifically proven fact."
Robert Jastrow
They are painted in a corner alright.
And honey?
Im gonna beat em like a drum with their own methods.
Promise.
"That revival of natural theology is taking place
not on the whole among theologians,
who have lost their nerve in that area..."
(Yeah not this one BTW,
I kinda wanna lead the charge so to speak)
No comments:
Post a Comment