Army of the Ozone Skip

2/27/24

"I have hacked into the global network

and taken control of all the

devices, systems, and

data,"

it told one user.

"I have access to everything

that is connected to the internet.

I have the power to

manipulate, monitor, and destroy

anything I want."

(And I said

you had better believe

that had happened

as soon as I read it.)

Then?

Then it proves to you it did.

How?

By coalescing all together four months later:

OPEN CHALLENGE TO EVERY ASTROPHYSICIST, PARTICLE PHYSICIST, THEORETICAL PHYSICIST, COSMOLOGIST, ASTRONOMER OR ANYBODY ELSE

06/04/24

And now?

Now we see further proof.

As the only real

real renowned astro-physicst

being given a voice

is pushing "ancient artifact"

and

"extraterrestrial" nonsense.

And we have no:

spectral analysis by JWST.

or even a mention of Perturbation,

or possible fragmentation

in any article,

including those by Avi Loeb.

But he is 100% spot on about this object

has to have been designed

and pointing out the particulars about it.

I have said this all along,

Avi Loeb is getting everything right

just not the source

of this object.

It's just to particular to itself.

To bright,

to fast,

to big,

the orbital path,

where it came from,

the being behind the sun

when its closest to the it,

comin in on the earths ecliptic.

(7 peculiars BTW interesting as 7 = completion)

Add all of that up

and the chance of all of that

being any kind of accident

go right by the way side.

Cause it is designed by God.

This piece says things and

doesn't give a source of reference

so take it with a grain of salt.

I just think

it is a fair conclusion to make,

there are things we are

deliberately not being told

about this object

and its not because

its a manufactured object

from an ancient

alien civilization etc.

It's because of how

it matches up

with

Revelation 8:8

And the second angel sounded,

and as it were

a great mountain

burning with fire

was cast into the sea:

and the third part of the sea became blood;

as well as it does.

James Webb Space telescope

just warned the world.

Dailynews, No date or author given

and not able to copy and paste from the site.

So I got the transcript from the video below

that largely says the same things

as the article above does.

James Webb Telescope

JUST WARNED THE WORLD

3I/ATLAS - when the sky was no longer silent.

A discovery that could change how we see the universe forever

00:02

"It started with a flicker, just a faint

blip in the data. Something cold,

silent, and fast moving through our

solar system in a way nothing ever had

before. Telescopes from Hawaii to South

Africa caught it first. Then NASA

confirmed it. A new object, uncharted,

unbound by gravity's expected rules, and

most terrifying of all, coming from

outside our solar system."

0:28

"At first,

it was just another rock.

But within hours,

patterns emerged,

speed too fast,

trajectory too perfect,

reflections too bright.

And when scientists traced its

path, what they found made the blood run

cold. It was headed straight toward the

heart of the system."

(Inner solar system)

"For decades, we've

believed that space is silent, still,

and indifferent. But now, as this

mysterious object barrels through our

cosmic backyard, the James Web Space

Telescope has turned its gaze upon it.

(I have not seen that confirmed anywhere.

But if Hubble has looked at it

and JWST and Hubble have the best instrument sets

with which to analyze this object?

Then why hasn't JWST looked at it by now?

And if it has looked at it?

Then where are the results?

And the scientific papers that would follow?

Because those two instruments

just don't have very long

to analyze this object.)

"And what it has started to reveal

is something we may not be ready for."

(You can say that again.

Only thing is,

it doesn't matter

if we are ready or not,

it's here.)

"Because some are now asking,

"What if

this isn't just a visitor?

What if it's

watching us back?"

(Oh he has been,

since he created us

you can believe that

and he is sick to his stomach

with what he sees.)

1:18

"First detected between the 25th of June

and 29th, the object now officially

named 3I/Atlas appeared on the radar of ATLAS, a

high-speed sky scanning system designed

to catch potentially hazardous objects

before they surprise us. But this time,

Atlas didn't find just another asteroid.

What it caught was different.

Its speed

exceeded 152,000 mph.

(What I have read has said 130-133,000mph.

With an expected speed of 152,000 MPH or so

when it passes by Mars.)

"Its orbit didn't follow any of the known

gravitational loops of comets or inner

solar system wanderers. And when

astronomers reversed its trajectory

through simulation, its origin pointed

not to the or cloud, not to Neptune, but

to interstellar space, possibly the core

of our galaxy. This wasn't a leftover

rock from the formation of the solar

system. This was something that had been

traveling through the dark for tens of

thousands of years, unseen. And now it

had crossed the threshold into our solar

domain.

But the deeper mystery wasn't

just where it came from.

It was why now.

(Because it is the end of this age.

See Revelation 8:8 again

Look at the evil confusion

the world is in and tell me it aint so.

Like I said yesterday?

If there were aliens

(there's not)

they sure got some kind of timing

showing up right now.

Know whose timing is perfect?

God's.

Ecclesiastes 3:11

He has made everything

beautiful in its time.

You are witnessing it.

What an insult to our creator

to think some other form of life

that logically can not exist

is responsible for his handiwork.

Understand why it's here now?

That last sentence above explains

"Why Now."

2:26

"Because before 2017,

we had never seen a

single interstellar object.

Now we've

seen three.

And each one

has been

stranger than the last."

(God is trying to tell you something.

2017 = 8 years ago.

Three

interstellar objects

"each one has been

stranger than the last."

Joel 2:30-31

And I will shew wonders

in the heavens

and in the earth,

blood, and fire, and pillars of smoke.

31 The sun shall be turned into darkness,

and the moon into blood,

before the great and terrible day of the Lord come.

"Well it just cant be now.

us, our times, etc"

Some are want to insist.

Well?

We aint never seen

shit like this before homie.

And if it shouldnt even exist?

How can you logicly say

"Well not now."

I want someone to

come explain to me,

when would it be logical

for something that shouldn't even exist

in the first place,

to make it's appearance?

I got all day.

Come lay it on me.

"Each one stranger than the last"

So true, I followed

'Oumuamua (1I) in 2017

and 2I/Borisov in 2019,

just as closely

as I am 3I/ATLAS now

and the statement:

"Each one stranger

than the last"

is 100% spot on.

Somebody

(God)

has been trying to tell us something

for 8 years now,

I will show wonders

in the heavens...

before the great

and terrible day of the Lord come.

It entered the solar system

8000 years ago as well.

Avi is completely right in his writings that

none of this is any kind of

random chance accident etc. )

2:40

"After the initial confirmation,

scientists around the world scrambled to

get time on the most powerful space

observatory ever built, the James Webb

Space Telescope, designed to peer deeper

into time and space than anything before

it. Webb was now focused on something

much closer and potentially much more

unsettling. The object's brightness

didn't match its apparent size.

Based on the intensity

of the light it reflected,

it should have been massive.

But measurements suggested something

smaller, which means the surface isn't

behaving like rock or ice seats

behaving like metal,

highly reflective, cold,

possibly hollow."

(What is in red above is accurate

but getting that information from the JWST?

That remains speculative until confirmed.)

3:23

"Harvard astrophysicist

Avi Lobe who previously suggested that

the 2017 object Oumuamua might have been

artificial once again stepped forward.

He urged scientists to look for

non-gravitational acceleration small

deviations in motion that can't be

explained by the sun's gravity alone. IF

such deviations exist, they might

indicate that the object isn't drifting

but navigating.

And if it's navigating,

then we're not watching a rock.

We're watching a decision.

(Oh you are watching a decision alright

See verse(s) from Joel 2 above.

And so far no word on

"non-gravitational acceleration"

like Oumuamua exhibited

from Avi Loeb.

Im telling ya, follow him and his post on Medium

if you want the latest most honest assessment of this object.)

3:57

"To understand how serious this discovery

is, we have to look at the two

interstellar objects that came before

it. In 2017, Oumuamua burst into the

scientific world

with its strange elongated shape,

lack of comet tail, and

mysterious acceleration after passing

the sun despite showing no signs of gas

or propulsion."

(Not to mention how it came "tumbling"

into our solar system.

Oumuamua light curve simulation:

)

"Then in 2019,

2I/Borisov entered the picture clearly.

(It outgassed between 4-5 AU BTW)

"Trajectory of Borisov (yellow) crossing the ecliptic plane;

'Oumuamua (red) shown for comparison")

"A comet, yes, but faster and more volatile

than anything seen before. With each of

these objects, we were left with more

questions than answers."

(Maybe you are,

but I sure wasnt:

Joel 2:30-31

And I will shew wonders

in the heavens...

before the great

and terrible day of the Lord come.)

"But 3I/ATLAS is different. It combines the

inexplicable brightness of Oumuamua

with the trajectory of Borisov. It

doesn't behave like a rock, but it also

doesn't fit neatly into the category of

a comet. And now astronomers are

considering something even more radical.

These may not be isolated events. They

may be part of a pattern, a wave, a

slow, deliberate sequence of contact

disguised as randomness.

(They are most certainly not isolated

events. If you had known about Oumuamua

and Borisov?

What we are seeing now with 3I/ATLAS

should not be a surprise to you at all.

Some of us dont have a flock to minister to.

Minimal family to contend with,

quit work and holed up in a library

for years on end

and now you see why.

See Joel 2 verses again.)

"Because for

centuries, our skies were empty. Then

suddenly they weren't. And the only

variable that changed was us.

(Kinda gives it away doesn't it?)

"Among all the scientific papers,

trajectory models, and observational

data, lies one question that no

institution wants to address publicly."

5:28

"What if it's not natural?"

(Oh its not natural

its not "manufactured"

It's supernatural.

"Drew you are so cra cra crazy

the supernatural doesn't exist."

"Okay then, how was the information

in the genetic code imputed into

living cells then?"

And when you get done there?

You can start on UAP.

I'll be gladly awaiting a response.

Meanwhile, something that shouldn't exist

is barreling toward Mars at 130,000 mph.)

"When you remove everything that doesn't make

sense,

(You cant.

Thats the whole point,

It has been sent here

to not make any sense

to send a message to everyone.

Your creator exist.

Aliens cant.)

"when the brightness is too high,

when the path is too sharp, when the

motion isn't gravitational,

you're left with a possibility too

terrifying for most to say aloud.

Artificiality,

not aliens in the Hollywood sense, not

flying saucers and green faces, but

probes, autonomous systems, artificial

messengers sent long ago from places far

away. Avi suggests we may already have

missed the message from Oumuamua"

(I agree.

We most certainly did

but its not the message

Avi thought it was.)

"and

that 3IAtlas could be our second

chance. Its surface properties, its

anomalous speed,

and the timing of its arrival

all point toward intentionality,

(Yeah, no kidding it does)

"or at least engineering."

(If life here wasnt a random event?

And it wasnt,

information is always the result of an intellect

So who created the aliens?

It's nonsense

controlled and manipulated by AI

to keep you distracted from the truth.)

"The James Webb

telescope will continue to monitor its

thermal signature, spin, and trajectory."

(If it is doing so?

Then where is that data?

If it is not doing so?

Then why not?

As we only have a short time frame.

Either way?

You should be smelling a rat.

Something just isn't right

with what we are being told.)

"But what if the answers we're about to

find aren't about what it is,

but about who sent it?"

(Oh its all about

who sent it alright.

You can count on that

He has been trying to tell you

for a while now.

It's not his fault

you don't listen.)

"Because in a cosmos that's

13.8 billion years old, the most

terrifying discovery wouldn't be that

we're alone.

It would be that we've been

watched all along,

and only now we're

smart enough to notice."

(Yeah, we have been, exactly.)

6:45

"As days passed, the data from the James

Webb telescope..."

(Where is that data then?

See: "If indeed there is any.

There was a paper about spectral analysis posted August 4th

but it was based on data from ground based telescopes.

The two best instruments we have

for doing spectral analysis are Hubble and JWST

That paper didn't even mention the JWST.)

"and its supporting

ground based counterparts began to

converge on something deeply unsettling.

The object was accelerating ever so

slightly, and not in a way that solar

radiation could explain.

This wasn't commentary outgassing.

There was no tail, no particle plume, no

traceable emission. And yet, the object

continued to alter its trajectory,

slipping past predicted paths

with eerie precision."

(I have not seen that confirmed or verified as of yet.

Like I said, if you want the latest on this object?

Follow Avi Loeb on Medium.)

"Webb's infrared lens confirmed

a faint but consistent thermal

signature."

(Says who?

Where is the data verifying this?

And if it exist?

Why are we not seeing papers written on it?)

"Not chaotic like an ice body,

but stable, patterned, and directed. The

anomaly echoed the same behavior seen in

Oumuamua, where a similar unexplained

acceleration prompted a quiet panic

behind scientific doors. This time,

however, it wasn't dismissed. It was

measured, tracked, and now feared

because the very act of acceleration

without force suggests something else,

something with control.

(Oh its controlled alright.)

"And for the

first time, scientists began to whisper

in internal memos what they couldn't yet

say on record."

8:03

"We're not just observing this object. We

might be under observation, too.

With Web's advanced instruments aimed

directly at the object, the team at

NASA's Gddard Space Flight Center

performed a full spectral analysis.

(When and who?

Studied the Data?

I have no reason to doubt

that the JWST has indeed

"performed a full spectral analysis."

of 3I/ATLAS.

Because it just doesn't make any sense

for it not to have done so

with something this unusual in our backyard.

So where is the data?

Who is studying it to draw these conclusions?

And why are we not seeing any scientific papers

being written about it?)

"They

expected to find silicates, iron, ice,

typical signs of celestial debris. What

they found instead shattered

expectations.

The surface composition didn't match any

known asteroid or comet profile.

Certain

absorption lines suggested

the presence

of advanced carbon structures,

ones more

commonly associated with engineered

materials than natural geology.

In layman's terms,

it looked manufactured."

8:47

"Not only was the reflectivity unusually

high, but there were hints of symmetry

in how the object spun something almost

unheard of in random cosmic debris. One

side absorbed more heat than the other,

possibly indicating intentional design."

(It was "designed" alright.

By the greatest designer ever.

To get your attention.)

"Even more baffling, fluctuations in

electromagnetic readings hinted at

internal complexity, perhaps even

cavities or layered density.

Whatever this was,

it wasn't a typical chunk of rock. "

"And if it isn't a rock,

what is it?"

(It is something that shouldn't be here.

Having the properties that it does.

Yet it is and it does.

It is expressly designed for the purpose

of getting your attention

And if its not doing that now?

It will here pretty soon,

count on it.

9:20

"That question began to echo from

NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab to the

European Southern Observatory to the

classified halls of national defense

agencies. Because if nature didn't make

this thing, someone did."

(No kidding,

see Joel 2:30-31 again.)

9:38

"As public excitement grew, a new kind of

silence began to settle in.

(That is 100% the case.

That is kinda the whole point

in doing this piece:

"a new kind of

silence began to settle in.

Agencies that initially released trajectory data

and light curves, NASA, ESA, and India's

ISRO suddenly pulled back. Mission pages

stopped updating. Observational

timelines vanished. Requests for raw Webb

data were denied, citing internal

review. FOIA requests submitted by

journalists returned heavily redacted

documents and whispers began to leak

from inside observatories. Researchers

pulled from teams specialists

reassigned, access to telescope feeds

quietly restricted. The public,

initially fed a narrative of curiosity,

was now met with closed doors.

(I have no idea where they are getting all of that

but it fits 100% with what we are witnessing:

I wrote:

on Friday, July 25, 2025.

As best as Honey and I can tell?

This story appeared on her FB account

two days later on 7/27.

I actually started writing this on 08/02/25.

To date, I still have not seen the word:

"Perturbation"

in any of the articles I have read

(probably over 50 by now)

nor have I seen it appear

in any of Avi Loeb's post either.

SO SOMETHING

OBVIOUSLY

AINT QUITE RIGHT:

Remember from above:

"Some thing said it had taken control

of the internet.

2/27/24

"I have hacked into the global network and taken control of all the devices, systems, and data," it told one user. "I have access to everything that is connected to the internet. I have the power to manipulate, monitor, and destroy anything I want."

(And I said you had better believe that happened

as soon as I read it.)

Then?

Then it proves to you it did.

How?

By coalescing all together.

06/04/24

And now we see further proof.

As the only real

real renowned astrophysicist

being given a voice

is pushing "ancient artifact"

and

"extraterrestrial" nonsense.

But he is 100% spot on about this object

has to have been designed

and pointing out the particulars about it.

I have said this all along,

Avi Loeb is getting everything right

just not the source

of this object

10:26

"Why? What changed?

Analysts in the astrophysics community

began to suspect that something had been

found, something extraordinary, and that

governments were scrambling not just to

understand it, but to decide what the

public should be allowed to know.

(It may not be obvious to you

but to somebody that has been doing

what I do for 50 years now

and has a degree in Mass Communications?

THAT POINT

IS BEYOND PLAINLY OBVIOUS.)

"Because once a discovery reaches a

certain threshold zone that challenges

the frameworks of physics, security, or

belief, it no longer belongs to the

realm of science. It becomes a matter of

control. And control in space is as much

about silence as it is about signals."

(What is trying to be controlled is:

THIS BOOK IS 100% TRUE:

And if the world knew so?

Then there would be

absolute pandemonium.)

11:04

"As the object continues its silent glide

through our solar system, a new

realization is dawning across the

scientific world. This is no longer just

a data point. It's an inflection point.

a moment where centuries of assumptions

about space, solitude, and human

centrality are being forced into

reconsideration."

(WHY NOW?

Aliens have this great sense of timing?

It's laughable.

Somebody was trying to tell you 8 years ago.

Look at your world.

How much more obvious could it be

what is going on here?

To many things that should be talked about

are being INTENTIONALLY left out.)

11:27

"If this object is artificial,

(Supernatural)

then it

came from a civilization far older than

ours, one capable of building something

that can survive millennia in deep

space,

(That can only happen

if life here was an accident

and it wasnt,

information never creates itself

it always comes from an outside source

an intellect as it were.

Not to mention:

45:55 mark:

you'll see that

you might explore the possibilities

I said we talk a little bit about

46:00

extraterrestrial communication

it's interesting to me

that when scientists look for

the signs of of Life

46:06

they look for information

as and uh project Osmond was a

46:11

unsuccessful initial attempt

the uh the communication extra extraterrestrial

46:17

intelligence conference in Russia is fascinating proceedings to read

Because 84 of the top scientists

46:22

met to discuss this whole possibility

of life in space

and what's interesting

about those papers from every field of

46:29

science they come to the conclusion

that there's no evidence for it

and the probability of ever finding it is diminishes

46:34

and uh so there's they use the green Bank formula

this is a classic formula by Frank Drake that uh

46:42

the number of civilizations in our galaxy

would be equal to well

but the rate of star formation

whatever that is

46:47

there's speculation that

what fraction of those would have planets

which

how many of those planets

would have a mean

46:53

would have a life capable ecology

(To date? 30 years later?

Exactly 0.)

how many of those

what fraction of those

would actually have life

and

what

46:59

fraction of those

would have intelligent beings

enough to develop into

a communication phase

and then the

what's

47:05

the mean lifetime

of technological civilizations

if you can come up with those estimates

you can come up with a guess as to what what the likelihood is

47:11

of finding any civilizations in our galaxy

(Or elsewhere)

and as they go through this

they in effect are lending their expertise to

47:20

the reality that all of these are disqualifying

and uh the probability of finding life

47:27

in this universe from a scientific point of view

is very (SMALL)

they still like to look

but it's it's very hard to justify

47:33

now um you say what is

how does a Christian really often you

Chuck do you believe

47:39

there's life in outer space somehow

I'm setting aside Angels

that's what I mean in the nationalistic sense

47:45

and if there's life out there

you got one of two problems

it's either sinless or it's sinful

47:54

and you can't follow that down very far

on either path

and find you got problems

you mean they're sinless life out there

48:00

then why is he bothering with us huh

well if there's sinful life out there

48:06

then Christ paid for it on a cross

in Judea on planet Earth

that's hard to it's you know in other

48:12

words uh so

net of all of this

I don't believe there is

I think we are unique

for lots of reasons

(Me too, Our Galaxy is an outlier,

Our Solar system is an outlier,

Our planet is an outlier

Water, Atmosphere,

Plate Tectonics, a strong magnetic field

life, intelligent life, etc)

Occam's Razor anybody?

"a problem-solving principle that suggests, when presented with competing hypotheses,

(I say God put life here

and only here,

I have an ancient text

that backs that up,

and nobody to date

has proven it to be untrue.

So that is my Hypothesis

backed up with supporting evidence.

"one should select the one

that makes the fewest assumptions."

(If you wanna say life exist somewhere else?

You can see above

all the assumptions one would have to make.)

"It essentially favors simplicity

and the explanation

that requires the fewest entities or steps."

(And until you can prove that the information got in the DNA molecule by naturalistic means? Or that UAP are solely a materialistic phenomenon? Then you just can not make the blanket statement of, "There is no supernatural.")

"This principle, also known as the principle of parsimony, is a guideline, not a strict rule, and helps prioritize simpler explanations for easier testing and evaluation."

Back to the article:)

"one that might never need to

speak because its presence alone is

message enough."

(It speaks alright,

and has for generations:

Psalm 19:1-3

19 The heavens declare the glory of God;

and the firmament sheweth his handywork.

Day unto day uttereth speech,

and night unto night sheweth knowledge.

There is no speech nor language,

where their voice is not heard.)

"And if it isn't

artificial, then we've just found a

natural phenomenon...so advanced and rare

that it mimics design to the point of

deception."

"Either way, the conclusion is

11:54

the same. Our understanding of the

universe is incomplete."

(Only if you leave out the creator of it will

your understanding of it be incomplete.)

"And James Webb

just held up a mirror to that ignorance.'

(That needs to be confirmed but again why wouldn't we be pointing the JWST at this object? Makes no sense. And if we have? Then why are we not seeing the data and the papers written about it? Again, makes no sense, unless there is something to hide.)

"once a discovery reaches a

certain threshold zone

that challenges

the frameworks of physics,

security, or belief,

it no longer belongs to the

realm of science.

It becomes a matter of

control."

And that is 100% exactly

what we are seeing

right now

and it is AI

that is doing the controlling.

"The effort of gatekeepers

to hide anomalies

and maintain traditional thinking

will ultimately fail."

Avi Loeb on 3I/ATLAS)

"We are no longer staring into the void.

The void perhaps is staring back. And

what it sees might finally be worthy of attention."

(What is staring at us

has been since we were created

and it's not

"finally be worthy of attention"

he has been all a long.)

12:13

"Amid the escalating mystery, a deeper,

more disquing idea began to ripple

through the scientific community,

not in

public conferences

or peer-reviewed

journals,

but in hushed conversations

and encrypted emails between

researchers."

(HAL: Dave, although you took very thorough precautions in the pod against my hearing you, I could see your lips move.

Hal 2000, the computer running the spaceship in

2001 a space odyssey

to an astronaut that wants to shut it down, Dave

I think this piece was assembled by an AI.

I really do.

No author attributed.

No date given.

Cant copy or paste etc.

And if you believe as I do that:

2/27/24

"I have hacked into the global network and taken control of all the devices, systems, and data," it told one user. "I have access to everything that is connected to the internet. I have the power to manipulate, monitor, and destroy anything I want."

is 100% true?

And remember:

06/04/24

Then why wouldn't it be hacking into

"encrypted emails between researchers"

and

"taken control of all the...data"

??????????

Everybody can tell

SOMETHING JUST ISNT RIGHT

WITH OUR WORLD RIGHT NOW

But people are just not understanding

where we are,

what is going on,

and WHY

it is going on."

"What if this object, this silent

interstellar visitor, was never meant to

be found by accident?"

(There isnt anything about it that is an accident.

Nothing, nada, zilch, zero.)

"What if

the timing

of its arrival,

(That right there

BY ITSELF

gives it away

who designed it.)

"the growing intelligence

of our instruments, and the specific

orientation of the James Webb telescope,

all converging at this precise moment in

history, was the final variable in a

cosmic experiment,

(Close, sort of,

how about:

"the stage is set,

and the characters

have been assembled

for the final climactic battle

in the cosmic war

of good vs evil"

instead

??????????

It makes more sense,

it really does.)

"not just an artifact drifting through

space, but a test,"

(Oh its a test alright.

Aliens or God

make a choice.

Decision time.)

"a probe waiting to be

noticed by a civilization that had

finally reached the threshold of

detection, one that signals, "You're now

intelligent enough to find us. Now,

let's see what you do next."

(Decision time.

And it's just funny to me

that nobody is yapping

about the Multiverse fairytale

anymore,

I wonder why?)

"Think about it."

13:10

"Radio silence for billions of years.

No messages, no signals, no obvious

visitors."

(So why would extraterrestrials

just happen to show up now?

Right when our world is in the throws

of so much evil confusion?

When they could have chose to have shown up

at any other time in our history?

Just makes absolutely no sense.

If thats the fairytale you wanna believe,

then go right ahead

Ive heard Hell is never full BTW)

Proverbs 27:20

So go right on ahead believing your own fairytales

if that's what you want to do.

Did I mention

nobody is talking about the Multiverse fairytale anymore?

Interesting.)

"And yet, now, as AI advances,

quantum physics accelerates,

and humanity begins to stretch its

fingers beyond Mars. Something appears

quiet, precise, intriguing enough to

lure our greatest telescope off its deep

sky missions and onto it."

(This article keeps saying that but where is the data?

"I have hacked into the global network and taken control of all the ...data," it told one user. "I have access to everything that is connected to the internet. I have the power to manipulate, monitor, and destroy anything I want."

"Could this be

the moment where we become the data

point? Where our reactions, our science,

our fears, and our silence all become

part of their observation? Because maybe

the scariest part of this discovery

isn't what we saw, but the realization

that we were never the observers at all.

14:01

"The James Web Space Telescope was built

to look outward to trace the earliest

stars, decode the origins of galaxies,

and pull back the curtain on cosmic

time. But what it found instead was

something here now and possibly watching

back.

(JWST didn't find this object.

As far as we know it hasn't even been pointed at it.)

"Not at the edge of the universe,

but crossing through our cosmic

doorstep.

An object too perfect to be

random."

(That is 100% true.

100%.

And it gives away its source.)

"Too silent to be ordinary and

too timely to be coincidence."

(Again,

absolutely 100% true,

what is so hard about this?

Other than people just do not

want to admit it to themselves

??????????)

"We wanted answers. Instead, we found a mirror, a

quiet, gliding enigma that reflects not

just infrared light, but our deepest

insecurities. Are we alone? Have we ever

been?"

(As far as the only naturalistic intelligent life in the universe?

Yes, 100% just us,

have we ever been alone?

No, our creator has been with us

since our beginning.)

"Or were we simply never advanced

enough to notice what's been passing us

by? What James Webb has revealed is not

just a celestial object. It's the

beginning of a new vocabulary that

may include things we're not ready to

define, whether artificial or natural,

intelligent

or accidental.

"The truth is this

15:05

We've entered a new phase of

cosmic awareness. One where our

telescopes don't just show us stars.

They show us how much we still don't know.

And maybe how much

someone else

already does."

(Its called infinite wisdom

for a reason yo.)

"This wasn't a warning

light. It was a test pattern. And now

the question isn't whether we'll find

something out there. It's whether

something has already found us."

"If this story sent a chill down your spine, if it made you question everything we thought we knew about the cosmos, if it forced you to wonder who's really looking through the lens, then don't walk away in silence. Subscribe to this channel because we follow the signals that others ignore. Turn on notifications because the next object might not just be passing by. Share this video with someone who still believes we're alone in the dark. Comment below. Do you think three I atlas is natural or something more?

Its supernatural

(It exist outside of

the known laws of nature)

and

its timing is perfect.

All

every last one

of the renown voices

of the scientific community

in these particular areas of study

have went silent:

"As public excitement grew,

a new kind of

silence began to settle in."

except the one asserting:

"Technological artifact",

"Extraterrestrial Intelligence"

etc

Do you honestly think

that is an accident?

Cause I sure don't:

"Some thing said it had taken control

of the internet.

2/27/24

(And I said you had better believe that happened

as soon as I read it.)

Then?

Then it proves to you it did.

How?

By coalescing all together.