It is just beyond obvious
we are not being told things for a reason.
Where is the JWST spectroscopic data anyway?
12 days from now and we start to loose our best view of it
from out two best instruments, Hubble and JWST.
Seriously, why no spectroscopic data to date from the JWST?
It's only the biggest brightest fastest
most unusual thing humanity has ever seen.
Makes perfect sense.
(Sarcasm, the highest form of humor.)
Seen in Stunning New Hubble Image
sciencealert.com 08/13/25
The Headline is even misleading
as the image they were talking about
wasnt even "new" but one covered
in the media a few days prior.
"Unlike asteroids,
which remain largely unchanged
as they orbit,
3I/ATLAS is behaving more like a comet."
Okay if that was already firmly established?
"behaving more like a comet"
then why feel the need to reiterate it?
Fact is it is anything but:
"behaving more like a comet."
"By analyzing the brightness distribution of the surrounding coma, they estimated the nucleus has an effective radius of less than 2.8 kilometers, assuming it reflects only 4 percent of the light that hits it (similar to charcoal)."
(Well here is another problem then:
"The interstellar object
3I/ATLAS was discovered in a region of the sky
that is crowded with stars, making it difficult to notice.
The discovery image by the ATLAS telescope is shown in the inset image bracketed by the red box, which provides a zoomed-in view of the region where 3I/ATLAS was discovered. (Image credit: ATLAS/University of Hawaii/NASA)
So?
If? As stated here by Avi and tons of others:
"3I/ATLAS was discovered in a region of the sky
that is crowded with stars,
making it difficult to notice."
How is it comprised of material
with the reflectivity of charcoal then?
And remember:
"The origin of the Martian moons is still controversial. Phobos and Deimos both have much in common with carbonaceous C-type asteroids, with spectra, albedo, and density very similar to those of C- or D-type asteroids."
Explains How Mars Got Its Moons
By Brian Koberlein -
November 22, 2024
"This new model proposes an interesting middle way. Rather than an impact or direct capture, the authors propose a near miss by a large asteroid. If an asteroid passed close enough to Mars, the tidal forces of the planet would rip the asteroid apart to create a string of fragments.
Aint it kinda odd nobody bringing that up?
All these Brainiac's
and nobody can figure any of this out?
Still no mention in any article of Perturbation?
We are living in a post-truth age.
The best way to tell whats really going on
it by understanding
WHATS NOT BEING SAID.)
Mysterious interstellar object aiming at Earth 'not natural'
as scientists rule out comet theory
dailymailuk 08/05/25
(You can find more truth in the Tabloids
than in the scientific "rags" (websites) these days
"I cant believe the news today
I cant close my eyes and make it go away."
"When fact is fiction and TV reality."
"While more than 200 researchers have concluded it is likely a comet Harvard physicist Avi Loeb has raised doubts in a newly released pre-print paper, pointing to one glaring omission: 3I/ATLAS has no visible tail."
("The "fuzz" to the right of 3I/ATLAS
is pointing forward.
For something going 130,000 mph?
Yeah...right...makes no sense,
I dont care what they try and make up about why.)
"...the object's unusual lack of gas emissions and its precise, retrograde trajectory, which aligns suspiciously well with the inner solar system."
(I said on July 4th, its not gonna outgas.
And surprise surprise surprise with the lining up
"suspiciously well with the inner solar system")
"That suggests it is more likely than not to be engineered..."
(By the greatest designer ever.)
"According to Loeb, these hypothetical probes (insert: fragments) could arrive between November 21 and December 5, 2025, based on 3I/ATLAS's expected position behind the sun in October, an ideal window for a covert approach.
'It may come to save us or destroy us,' he said. 'We'd better be ready for both options and check whether all interstellar objects are rocks.'
(It's not a rock, it's a mountain.
Revelation 8:8
And the second angel sounded, and as it were a great mountain burning with fire was cast into the sea: and the third part of the sea became blood;)
"He noted that spectroscopic data from this and three previous studies show no signs of atomic or molecular gas in a coma, a feature typically expected in comets."
(Still none and Im gonna double check that
when I get to the end of writing this just to make sure.)
"While the reddening may suggest dust, it could also mean the object simply has a naturally red surface, much like D-type asteroids or other ancient space rocks."
(See above: "Phobos and Deimos both have much in common with carbonaceous C-type asteroids, with spectra, albedo, and density very similar to those of C- or D-type asteroids."
Love warns of impending judgement.)
'Continued monitoring around perihelion is necessary to track changes in activity and color,' the study concluded, 'which will provide insights into the evolution of interstellar materials under solar radiation.'
(Kinda gonna be a lil hard to pull off when its gonna be on the other side of the sun during that time frame. Almost like something "designed" it that away. Design always REQUIRES a designer.)
"If 3I/ATLAS is more than just a rock, he said,
Earth is woefully unprepared."
(It's a mountain.)
'The cost of not warning
could be much worse
than the cost of being wrong.'
(Love warns about impending judgement.)
3I/ATLAS, the Latest Interstellar Visitor
to Make Its Way to Our Solar System,
08/14/25
“That obviously opens the door for it being technological, because who would target the inner solar system?” Loeb mused during the interview."
(Avi?
Get your nose in the New Testament Brother:
Revelation 8:8
And the second angel sounded,
and as it were a great mountain
burning with fire
was cast into the sea:
and the third part of the sea became blood;)
"Since its discovery, 3I/ATLAS has sparked debate among astronomers, with most concluding that all available evidence suggests it is a comet."
(And not even close with regard to:
"All available evidence"
No Tail.
Dust cloud pointing forward.
No gas signatures found etc.)
"The object’s larger size and current estimated trajectory, according to Loeb in a recent podcast interview, suggest the possibility that it may not have been traveling on a random path, but rather that its current movement can be interpreted as having been “aimed” at the inner solar system."
(If only there was a book somebody keeps saying:
)
The fragments are gonna gain momentum
Explains How Mars Got Its Moons
By Brian Koberlein -
November 22, 2024
"This new model proposes an interesting middle way. Rather than an impact or direct capture, the authors propose a near miss by a large asteroid. If an asteroid passed close enough to Mars, the tidal forces of the planet would rip the asteroid apart to create a string of fragments.
Aint it kinda odd nobody bringing that up?
All these Brainiac's
and nobody can figure any of this out?
Still no mention in any article of Perturbation?)
"The fact that it was ATLAS that first discovered this comet got some people concerned. The Asteroid Terrestrial-Impact Last Alert System has a defensive nature. It's designed to spot and warn us about comets, asteroids, or other space objects that might be on a collision course with Earth."
(And the fact that it was thought to be an asteroid before it was confirmed by NASA to be an interstellar visitor, and the fact that something that large going that fast doesnt have to hit earth, it could adjust Mars orbit enough to be troublesome for us, plus it could fragment etc...)
3I/ATLAS Does Not Have A Large Nucleus
https://sites.psu.edu/astrowright 08/13/25 Jason Wright
First he says:
"We still have no good limit
on the size of the nucleus
from reflected light
because it’s hidden
behind the dusty coma."
Then he says:
"Image of the large, dusty coma around ATLAS. Note that much of the light we see comes from a large extended coma, which when this image was taken extended across a region about the size of the Earth. The light is clearly not coming from a small, 20km object at the center. It is true that in this image the point spread function is 1.”3 (see the bar at the top for scale) meaning that a small nucleus would have its light spread out over that radius, and some of the light could plausibly be coming from it. But subsequent observations by HST clearly show that the light is essentially all coming from the coma, with no brightness attributable to a nucleus at all."So if:
"We still have
no good limit
on the size of the nucleus
from reflected light
because it’s hidden
behind the dusty coma."
How then how is it possible:
"The light
is clearly not coming from
a small, 20km object at the center"
??????????
Bad logic never results in good science.
They can make it try and be a comet all they want,
however they wanna try to,
the fact is it aint one
and they knew so at the beginning
before it was confirmed by NASA
to be an interstellar visitor
upending previous assumptions
about it being an asteroid.
How is your soul these days?
Mine feels great BTW.
Romans 10:9
that if you confess with your mouth
the Lord Jesus
and believe in your heart
that God has raised Him from the dead,
you will be saved.
Gotta mean it though.
Otherwise it don't count for nothin,
And he already knows your heart
and your attitude toward him.
Aint no faking nothin here.
And still no spectroscopic data
from the JWST.
I wonder why?
No comments:
Post a Comment