or Spectral Fingerprints of Gas Around It
Avi Loeb Medium
8/04/25
"According to new data reported in a paper that was posted today on the arXiv, 3I/ATLAS exhibits “reddening colors … with no visible tail detected.” The authors explain these features as being “likely due to viewing geometry and low dust production.”
(They have done nothing but make excuses for this objects anomalies
since it's discovery/conformation b y NASA as an interstellar object.
So the question becomes:
WHY IS THAT?)
"When I argued in an essay on July 20, 2025 that the prematurely claimed elongation in the images of 3I/ATLAS might be an artifact resulting from the motion of the object, I was attacked by bloggers who insisted that it represents evidence for a cometary tail. Now that the dust has settled, literally speaking, we can ask again: could 3I/ATLAS be something other than a comet?"
(It's an asteroid just like it was previously thought to be until NASA conformed it as an interstellar visitor and said it "might be" a comet. Opps.)
"The concluding sentence of the paper’s abstract states: “Continued monitoring around perihelion is necessary to track changes in activity, color, which will provide insights into the evolution of interstellar materials under solar radiation.” I wholeheartedly agree with this imperative for a simple reason. The more data we collect, the more difficult it would be for scientists to shove anomalies of 3I/ATLAS under the carpet of traditional thinking. We are used to finding icy rocks which exhibit familiar cometary tails in the solar system, but an encounter with objects from interstellar space is a blind date on astronomical scales."
(The question is
why are scientist shoving the
"anomalies of 3I/ATLAS
under the carpet of traditional thinking."
And why are the "Heavy Hitters" in the fields of :
Astro-physics, Cosmology, Particle physics, Astronomy etc
so silent about this object?
All of the interviews in all of the articles Ive read are always with
"no-names" people in the field, not one of any renown with the exception of Avi is saying anything about this object.
WHY?
Thats another blog post coming up here shortly,
I was working on it
before this article came through last night.)
"Recent days led to a rise in the number of commentators who, despite not being practicing scientists, are ready to unequivocally denounce non-cometary interpretations of the data on 3I/ATLAS."
(See my comments above.
I mean it is obvious
if you have been following this story
that has happened, so again,
WHY?
WHY are non-scientist:
"ready to unequivocally denounce
non-cometary interpretations
of the data on 3I/ATLAS"
I said to honey on July 4th when I read my first article on the subject, this thing isn't a comet, it's not going to outgas and the voracity with which unqualified people who are making unequivocal judgments about "non-cometary interpretations" (And it doesn't have to be an ancient "artifact", or be of "extraterrestrial origin" etc to be a "non-cometary interpretation" of the data) of this object in "recent days"
ought to be telling you something just aint right.
"Yeah don't worry, nothing to see here,
go get caught up on your Epstein files,
or Hunter Biden's laptop
or a jeans commercial
or whatever the distraction of today is.)
"The truth will be revealed in the coming couple of months as 3I/ATLAS gets closer to the Sun and its anomalies become easier to measure."
(I said that to Honey as well:
"wait till you see the BS
they will make up
about why it isn't outgassing.")
"If it continues to be deficient of carbon-based molecules or a visible cometary tail, will comet experts argue that it is a dark comet as they suggested recently for 1I/`Oumuamua?"
'Let me reiterate a point which is avoided by these commentators. In my first published paper on 3I/ATLAS, I showed that a rock as wide as 20 kilometers — as inferred from the brightness of 3I/ATLAS, can only be delivered from interstellar space into the inner solar system once per 10,000 years.
(My friend is all about some 10,000 year repeating cycles.
Sorry bud, this thing aint comin back.)
"Yet, we discovered 3I/ATLAS over the past decade. Moreover, ...the retrograde trajectory of 3I/ATLAS is fined tuned to be in the ecliptic plane (with a probability of 0.2%), and its arrival time is fine tuned to get unusually close to Jupiter, Mars and Venus (with a probability of 0.005%)."
(To many coincidences is never a coincidence.
It shouldn't exist.
Extra terrestrials cant exist
(Where did the information needed
for their creation come from?)
So why is it here?
And why right now?
(If there were alien's?
they sure got some sense of timing)
Why so many anomalies?
You might wanna figure out
what is going on in our world
and why
even though nobody seems
to want to be talking about
the book of Revelation.
What kinda Christian
doesn't warn about
impending Judgement?
Opps.)
"Asking the question: `Is 3I/ATLAS alien technology?’ should not be censored for the simple reason that we must avoid being misguided by prejudice."
(Aliens cant exist
Life (as far as we know)
ALWAYS requires information.
Information is never the result
of any random process
but always the result of an intellect,
therefore,
life here could not
have been a random event
and since the laws of nature are uniform
throughout the universe
life anywhere else
would require information from an intellect
and therefore could not be
the result of ANY random process either,
so yes, 100% down with:
"we must avoid
being misguided by prejudice."
as in:
The prejudice of the cult of scientism
basic dogma:
"There can not be a God."
Should likewise be summarily dismissed.
This object (3I?ATLAS)
just has to many anomalies
to be a chance.
So what's responsible for it?
If the choice is either
extraterrestrials that cant exist?
Or God?
I know which I would go with.)
"In science, any question is legitimate...
("This object just has to many anomalies
to be a chance.
So what's responsible for it?")
"The scientific method allows for all possible questions, which are later answered by collecting data and ruling out possibilities.
(Hillbilly Translation?
The Multiverse is unscientific.)
"It is anti-scientific to suppress curiosity-driven questions about anomalies before conclusive data is gathered to explain them."
(Avi?
The practitioners of the extremists cult of scientism
just dont care if they are being anti-scientific,
its why they are extremists.)
And, as I have stated before:
That this is actually happening?
Is evidence
of a disinformation campaign
about 3I/ATLAS
Pretty simple.)
"The spectroscopic data reported in the new paper on 3I/ATLAS, as well as in three previous papers (here, here and here), does not show the features expected for atomic or molecular gas in a coma. The observed reddening in the spectrum of reflected sunlight from 3I/ATLAS is commonly interpreted as dust, but it could also be associated with a red surface for the object."
"All in all, the verdict will be up to data
and not opinions voiced on social media."
(Amen to that!
Just wanna point out that
100% of the data we have about life,
the only place we KNOW it exist,
says that information is needed.
So what's the intellect behind
Avis extraterrestrial's?
Hum
??????????)
No comments:
Post a Comment