when I saw the title of the article:
What Were the Chances of Abiogenesis?
universetoday7/31/25
(Still playing catchup since all the focus on 3I/ATLAS :-)
And thanks once again to
Stephen C Meyer and his book:
The Return of the God Hypothesis.)
Let me see if I can figure out
the chances
of Abiogenesis
ever happening
anywhere ever...
Zero.
Zilch.
Nada.
None.
Never.
Ever.
Anywhere.
This is so easily demolished.
No Biological
Chemical
or Physical process
produces the information
we know life needs.
And since the laws of nature are uniform
throughout the universe?
It cant happen anywhere else
ever either.
"A new study published in July 2025 tackles one of science's most profound mysteries - how did life first emerge from non living matter on early Earth? Using cutting edge mathematical approaches, researcher Robert G. Endres from Imperial College London has developed a framework that suggests the spontaneous origin of life faces far greater challenges than previously understood."
(Horseshit.
The elitist cult of scientism
has known what I just stated above
ever since the discovery of DNA.
"known for his work with James Watson which led to the identification of the structure of DNA in 1953, drawing on the work of Maurice Wilkins, Rosalind Franklin and others."
“An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to be almost a miracle, so many are the conditions which would have had to have been satisfied to get it going."
That was 1981.
46 years ago.
Life is still not
"almost a miracle"
IT IS A MIRACLE.
(And if you want how he goes on and qualifies that statement with references to chemical processes etc, then click the link his name goes to above.)
"The study focuses on the difficulty of assembling structured biological information under what could be reasonably expected prebiotic conditions, showing just how hard it would be for the first living cell to form naturally on early Earth. Think of it like trying to write an article about the origins of life for a well renowned space based website by randomly throwing letters at a page. The chances of success become astronomically small as the required complexity increases."
(Information is
always, always, always, a sign
of an conscious, sentient intellect.
Always.
No exceptions ever.
It's a Natural Law.
Which requires a law giver
but that's another story :-).
This is extremely simple stuff
to be able to tell nonbelievers.
As is:
Light on days one and four,
Expanding heavens,
Time space energy and matter
bursting forth in a continuum
just like we know it did etc.)
"Endres applies information theory and algorithmic complexity to understand what it would take for the first living cell,
(The kind they cant even reproduce in the pristine settings of a lab, guided by an outside force, ie the scientist trying to create it. So what do you think is the chance is for such a protocell "self-assembling" on a prebiotic earth that we dont know the conditions of? And even if it were to be able to do so? Where would the information come from? And how would it imbed itself there? The entire concept is just beyond absurd.)
"to spontaneously assemble from chemical building blocks. This mathematical angle reveals just how improbable such an event would be under natural conditions."
(Information is required for life.
Information is the exact opposite of:
"spontaneously assemble"
it never happens.
It is always the result of an intellect.)
"This doesn't mean life's origin is impossible,"
(Well no kidding thx.
Were here aren't we?)
"but rather that
our current understanding may be incomplete."
("May be"?
Horseshit.
HERE IS WHAT
THEY JUST DO NOT
WANT TO ADMIT
TO THEMSELVES:
Information requires a brain.
No brain behind it?
No life, as information is
the single most important ingredient
needed of life.)
"The study emphasizes that uncovering physical principles for life's emergence from non living matter remains a grand challenge for biological physics."
(Cant be done,
here or anywhere.
Cant even do it
in a modern lab
with an outside force
guiding the process.
Case closed.)
"While maintaining scientific rigor, the paper acknowledges that directed panspermia, originally proposed by Francis Crick and Leslie Orgel, remains a speculative but logically open alternative. This hypothesis suggests that life might have been intentionally seeded on Earth by advanced extraterrestrial civilizations, though the author notes this idea challenges Occam's razor, the scientific principle favoring simpler explanations."
(Its not a "logically open alternative" at all. It just moves the same problem somewhere else. Life requires information. PERIOD. It is the single most important ingredient. So where did "advanced extraterrestrial civilizations" get their information from? Hum? The 26 physical constants of the universe were not decided by a committee.
One creator of the universe, one creator and owner of the life force. Infringe on that as we have with unneeded AI? And you just might get a 12 mile wide asteroid going 130000+ mph whizzing by Mars within .2 AU.
Were gonna be teaching this stuff in Sunday School here in a minute, hear that Biology teachers and professors? Your students are about to know what you wont admit to yourselves. With the Holy Spirits guidance
"I'll bury those cockroaches"
once and for all
to quote Tony Montana in Scarface.
The only reason Francis Crick and others purposed
Directed Panspermia
to begin with
was because they knew
the DNA molecule was to complex
and much too rich in information
not to require
an intellect behind it.
To date, despite all their best efforts?
Scientist have solved exactly nothing.)
"Panspermia proposes that organisms such as bacteria,
complete with their DNA,"
(Where did their information in their DNA come from?
How did it get imbedded in the organism?)
"could be transported by means such as comets through space to planets including Earth."
(How did it survive the harsh conditions of space?
Cosmic Radiation?
Solar winds?
How did it survive through the earths atmosphere?
And then also through the impact?
Psalm 139:5-6
5 You hem me in behind and before,
and you lay your hand upon me.
6 Such knowledge
is too wonderful for me,
too lofty for me to attain.
You are not gonna escape your creator.
No matter how hard you try.
He s got ya coming and going.)
"Directed Panspermia even suggests it may have happened at the hands of aliens!"
(Where did they get their information from again?
My assertation is:
A reasonably intelligent fifth grader
can destroy this garbage.
1 Corinthians 3:19-20
For the wisdom of this world is foolishness in God’s sight. As it is written: “He catches the wise in their craftiness”; 20 and again, “The Lord knows that the thoughts of the wise are futile.”)
"This research doesn't disprove the possibility of life emerging naturally on Earth though. Instead, it quantifies the mathematical challenges involved and suggests that we may need to discover new physical principles or mechanisms that could overcome these informational barriers.
(Information requires a sentient,
conscious intellect behind it.
It is a natural law.
No exceptions anywhere ever.
Therefore, you will not
overcome it ever.
Kinda how things are designed :-).
"The work represents an important step toward making the study of life's origins more mathematically rigorous."
"The study also reminds us
that some of the universe's greatest mysteries
still await solutions,
(Good luck:
Ecclesiastes 3:11
"He has made everything beautiful in its time. Also, he has put eternity into man's heart, yet so that he cannot find out what God has done from the beginning to the end."
(Eternity = Emptiness, Ignorance, Darkness,
a void not capable of being filled etc.)
"and that combining mathematical precision with biological questions can reveal new depths to age old puzzles about our existence."
Brains come from brains.
Intellects come from things
that already have them.
It is all anyone
who has ever lived
has ever seen.
Queue Brother Brian:
"It's not complicated!"
No comments:
Post a Comment